World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 40 8249 7702 817 779 147 6655

Jon C. Cole publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Jon C. Cole between 1999 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Jon C. Cole published across 27 years, from 1999 to 2025, averaging 6 papers a year. Output peaked at 15 publications in 2017. 11 of the 161 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1999 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 15. Peak 15 publications in 2017. 1999: 1 publication 2000: 2 publications 2001: 0 publications 2002: 8 publications 2003: 6 publications 2004: 7 publications 2005: 5 publications 2006: 7 publications 2007: 11 publications 2008: 9 publications 2009: 0 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 6 publications 2012: 11 publications 2013: 7 publications 2014: 3 publications 2015: 3 publications 2016: 7 publications 2017: 15 publications 2018: 11 publications 2019: 8 publications 2020: 8 publications 2021: 7 publications 2022: 3 publications 2023: 1 publication 2024: 8 publications 2025: 3 publications
1999 2025

161 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Jon C. Cole: publications per year, 1999 to 2025
Year Publications
1999 1
2000 2
2001 0
2002 8
2003 6
2004 7
2005 5
2006 7
2007 11
2008 9
2009 0
2010 4
2011 6
2012 11
2013 7
2014 3
2015 3
2016 7
2017 15
2018 11
2019 8
2020 8
2021 7
2022 3
2023 1
2024 8
2025 3
Total 161
Download as CSV

Jon C. Cole publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jon C. Cole sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 141–150 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 147 publications — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597 147
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Jon C. Cole D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jon C. Cole sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 40–41 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671 40
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Jon C. Cole is affiliated with the University of Liverpool in the United Kingdom. Their research focuses primarily on psychology, with a body of work that spans 43 publications in this main field of study. Within psychology, their subfields include social psychology, experimental and cognitive psychology, clinical psychology, general health professions, and applied psychology.

Their work addresses various key topics, notably psychological and temporal perspectives research, psychological well-being and life satisfaction, behavioral health and interventions, substance abuse treatment and outcomes, posttraumatic stress disorder research, health, psychology, and well-being, as well as homelessness and social issues.

Jon C. Cole has contributed to multiple academic papers recently. Among these are:

  • Perceived harm, motivations for use and subjective experiences of recreational psychedelic 'magic' mushroom use, 2020, Journal of Psychopharmacology
  • The relationship between balanced and negative time perspectives, and symptoms of anxiety and depression, 2020, Psychiatry Research
  • Regulatory decoupling and the effectiveness of the ISO 9001 quality management system in the construction sector in the UK - a case study analysis, 2021, Construction Management and Economics
  • Ligand-based G Protein Coupled Receptor pharmacophore modeling: Assessing the role of ligand function in model development, 2021, Journal of Molecular Graphics and Modelling
  • Different Version, Similar Result? A Critical Analysis of the Multiplicity of Shortened Versions of the Zimbardo Time Perspective Inventory, 2020, SAGE Open

The frequent coauthors collaborating with Jon C. Cole are:

  • Michael T. McKay
  • Chloe J. Brennan
  • John L. Perry
  • Frank C. Worrell
  • Andrew Percy

Jon C. Cole often publishes in venues including Drug and Alcohol Dependence, BMJ Open, Personality and Individual Differences, Journal of Psychopharmacology, and Psychiatry Research. The distribution of publications shows multiple contributions to Drug and Alcohol Dependence, making it the most frequent venue among those listed.

Best Publications

  • Delay discounting and the alcohol Stroop in heavy drinking adolescents.

    Matt Field;Paul Christiansen;Jon Cole;Andrew Goudie

  • Analyses of second-generation 'legal highs' in the UK: initial findings.

    Simon D. Brandt;Harry R. Sumnall;Fiona Measham;Jon Cole

  • Multiple behavioural impulsivity tasks predict prospective alcohol involvement in adolescents.

    Gordon Fernie;Margot Peeters;Matthew J. Gullo;Paul Christiansen

  • Altered states: the clinical effects of Ecstasy.

    J.C. Cole;H.R. Sumnall

  • Delay discounting and the behavioural economics of cigarette purchases in smokers: the effects of nicotine deprivation.

    Matt Field;Mary Santarcangelo;Harry Sumnall;Andrew Goudie

  • Chronic Jet Lag Produces Cognitive Deficits

    Unknown

  • Risk-taking but not response inhibition or delay discounting predict alcohol consumption in social drinkers

    Gordon Fernie;Jon C. Cole;Andrew J. Goudie;Matt Field

  • The content of ecstasy tablets: implications for the study of their long-term effects.

    Jon C. Cole;Mike Bailey;Harry R. Sumnall;Graham F. Wagstaff

  • The pre-clinical behavioural pharmacology of 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA).

    Jon C Cole;Harry R Sumnall

  • Analysis of NRG ‘legal highs’ in the UK: identification and formation of novel cathinones

    Simon D. Brandt;Sally Freeman;Harry Robin Sumnall;Fiona Measham

  • The varieties of ecstatic experience: an exploration of the subjective experiences of ecstasy.

    Harry R. Sumnall;Jon C. Cole;Lisa Jerome

  • Use, function, and subjective experiences of gamma-hydroxybutyrate (GHB).

    Harry Robin Sumnall;Kerry Woolfall;Sara Edwards;Jon C. Cole

  • Components of behavioural impulsivity and automatic cue approach predict unique variance in hazardous drinking.

    Paul Christiansen;Jon C. Cole;Andrew J. Goudie;Matt Field

  • Ego depletion increases ad-lib alcohol consumption: investigating cognitive mediators and moderators.

    Paul Christiansen;Jon C. Cole;Matt Field

  • Social defeat increases alcohol preference of C57BL/10 strain mice; effect prevented by a CCKB antagonist

    A. P. Croft;S. P. Brooks;J. Cole;H. J. Little

  • Self-reported depressive symptomatology in community samples of polysubstance misusers who report Ecstasy use: a meta-analysis

    Harry R. Sumnall;Jon C. Cole

  • The effects of priming restrained versus disinhibited behaviour on alcohol-seeking in social drinkers.

    Andrew Jones;Ramona Guerrieri;Gordon Fernie;Jon Cole

  • Adaptive Flexibility Examining the Role of Expertise in the Decision Making of Authorized Firearms Officers During Armed Confrontation

    Laura Boulton;Jon Cole

  • Facilitating memory with hypnosis, focused meditation, and eye closure.

    Graham F. Wagstaff;Jo Brunas-Wagstaff;Jon Cole;Luke Knapton

  • A behavioural economic analysis of alcohol, amphetamine, cocaine and ecstasy purchases by polysubstance misusers.

    Harry R. Sumnall;Elizabeth Tyler;Graham F. Wagstaff;Jon C. Cole

  • Acamprosate, but not naltrexone, inhibits conditioned abstinence behaviour associated with repeated ethanol administration and exposure to a plus-maze.

    Cole Jc;Littleton Jm;Little Hj

Frequent Co-Authors

Harry Sumnall
Harry Sumnall Liverpool John Moores University
Matt Field
Matt Field University of Sheffield
Frank C. Worrell
Frank C. Worrell University of California, Berkeley
Paul Christiansen
Paul Christiansen University of Liverpool
David R. Foxcroft
David R. Foxcroft Oxford Brookes University
Mark A Bellis
Mark A Bellis Liverpool John Moores University
Charles A. Marsden
Charles A. Marsden University of Nottingham
Martin Dempster
Martin Dempster Queen's University Belfast
Matthew J. Gullo
Matthew J. Gullo Griffith University
Laurence Alison
Laurence Alison University of Liverpool

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying psychology in the USA opens the door to numerous online degrees and specialized career paths. Many students choose to advance by becoming Board Certified Behavior Analysts (BCBAs), a highly sought-after credential in educational, clinical, and community settings.

Requirements to qualify for this profession vary depending on location. For instance, you can learn more about bcba certification requirements in Detroit and see how local fieldwork, education, and supervised experience come together. Similarly, if you are interested in becoming a bcba in Durham, you should be aware of the specific coursework and exam preparation steps required in that region.

Aspiring professionals in other cities can review regional standards, such as those for becoming a bcba in El Paso or examine Fort Wayne bcba education requirements. No matter where you are located, online psychology degrees can help prepare you for rewarding roles in therapy, counseling, applied behavior analysis, and beyond.

Best Scientists Citing Jon C. Cole

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles