World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
36
Citations
6154
World Ranking
9469
National Ranking
5017

Michael Amlung publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael Amlung sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 120 publications — 32nd percentile

32% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Michael Amlung D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael Amlung sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Michael Amlung is affiliated with the University of Kansas in the United States and has contributed extensively to research in psychology and medicine. Their scholarly work focuses on various subfields such as epidemiology, clinical psychology, applied psychology, experimental and cognitive psychology, and cognitive neuroscience.

The scientist's research topics cover a range of areas including substance abuse treatment and outcomes, behavioral health and interventions, mental health research topics, decision-making and behavioral economics, cannabis and cannabinoid research, smoking behavior and cessation, and functional brain connectivity studies.

Michael Amlung has published numerous articles in several recurring venues. Frequent publication platforms include:

  • Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology
  • Psychology of Addictive Behaviors
  • Drug and Alcohol Dependence
  • Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
  • Psychiatry Research Neuroimaging

Their recent papers illustrate the scope of their research interests and collaborative efforts. These papers include:

  • Patterns of substance use among adolescents: A systematic review, 2020, Drug and Alcohol Dependence
  • Delay Discounting in Established and Proposed Behavioral Addictions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis, 2021, Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
  • Acute and extended exposure to episodic future thinking in a treatment seeking addiction sample: A pilot study, 2020, Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment
  • Evaluation of delay discounting as a transdiagnostic research domain criteria indicator in 1388 general community adults, 2022, Psychological Medicine
  • Applied behavioral economics and public health policies: Historical precedence and translational promise, 2022, Behavioural Processes

Michael Amlung frequently collaborates with several co-authors in the field, including:

  • James MacKillop
  • Derek D. Reed
  • Lawrence H. Sweet
  • Sarah C. Weinsztok
  • Sabrina K. Syan

Best Publications

  • Delayed reward discounting and addictive behavior: a meta-analysis

    James MacKillop;James MacKillop;Michael T. Amlung;Lauren R. Few;Lara A. Ray

  • Steep delay discounting and addictive behavior: a meta‐analysis of continuous associations

    Michael Amlung;Lana Vedelago;John Acker;Iris Balodis

  • Delay Discounting as a Transdiagnostic Process in Psychiatric Disorders: A Meta-analysis.

    Michael Amlung;Michael Amlung;Emma Marsden;Katherine Holshausen;Katherine Holshausen;Vanessa Morris

  • Steep discounting of delayed monetary and food rewards in obesity: a meta-analysis.

    M. Amlung;T. Petker;J. Jackson;I. Balodis

  • Is Talk 'Cheap'? An Initial Investigation of the Equivalence of Alcohol Purchase Task Performance for Hypothetical and Actual Rewards

    Michael T. Amlung;John Acker;Monika K. Stojek;James G. Murphy

  • Automating Scoring of Delay Discounting for the 21- and 27-Item Monetary Choice Questionnaires

    Brent A. Kaplan;Michael Amlung;Derek D. Reed;David P. Jarmolowicz

  • Patterns of substance use among adolescents: A systematic review.

    Jillian Halladay;R. Woock;H. El-Khechen;C. Munn

  • Understanding the effects of stress and alcohol cues on motivation for alcohol via behavioral economics.

    Michael Amlung;Michael Amlung;James MacKillop;James MacKillop

  • Understanding alcohol motivation using the alcohol purchase task: A methodological systematic review

    Brent A. Kaplan;Brent A. Kaplan;Rachel N.S. Foster;Derek D. Reed;Michael Amlung

  • Further evidence of close correspondence for alcohol demand decision making for hypothetical and incentivized rewards.

    Michael Amlung;James MacKillop

  • Price elasticity of illegal versus legal cannabis: a behavioral economic substitutability analysis.

    Michael Amlung;Michael Amlung;Derek D. Reed;Vanessa Morris;Elizabeth R. Aston

  • The neuroeconomics of nicotine dependence: a preliminary functional magnetic resonance imaging study of delay discounting of monetary and cigarette rewards in smokers.

    James MacKillop;James MacKillop;Michael T. Amlung;Lauren M. Wier;Sean P. David;Sean P. David

  • Syntax for calculation of discounting indices from the monetary choice questionnaire and probability discounting questionnaire

    Joshua C. Gray;Michael T. Amlung;Abraham A. Palmer;James MacKillop

  • Dissociable brain signatures of choice conflict and immediate reward preferences in alcohol use disorders.

    Michael Amlung;Lawrence H. Sweet;Lawrence H. Sweet;John Acker;Courtney L. Brown

  • Experimental Manipulations of Behavioral Economic Demand for Addictive Commodities: A Meta‐Analysis

    Samuel F. Acuff;Michael Amlung;Ashley A. Dennhardt;James MacKillop

  • Interrelationships between marijuana demand and discounting of delayed rewards: Convergence in behavioral economic methods

    Elizabeth R. Aston;Jane Metrik;Jane Metrik;Michael Amlung;Christopher W. Kahler

  • Clarifying the relationship between impulsive delay discounting and nicotine dependence.

    Michael Amlung;James MacKillop

  • Neuroanatomical foundations of delayed reward discounting decision making

    Max M. Owens;Joshua C. Gray;Michael T. Amlung;Assaf Oshri

  • Delay Discounting in Established and Proposed Behavioral Addictions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

    Sarah Weinsztok;Sarah Brassard;Iris Balodis;Laura E. Martin

  • The Neuroeconomics of Alcohol Demand: An Initial Investigation of the Neural Correlates of Alcohol Cost–Benefit Decision Making in Heavy Drinking Men

    James MacKillop;Michael T Amlung;John Acker;Joshua C Gray

  • Increased behavioral economic demand and craving for alcohol following a laboratory alcohol challenge

    Michael Amlung;Kayleigh N McCarty;David H Morris;Chia-Lin Tsai

Frequent Co-Authors

James MacKillop
James MacKillop McMaster University
Lawrence H. Sweet
Lawrence H. Sweet University of Georgia
Derek D. Reed
Derek D. Reed University of Kansas
James G. Murphy
James G. Murphy University of Memphis
Jane Metrik
Jane Metrik Brown University
Iris M. Balodis
Iris M. Balodis McMaster University
John E. McGeary
John E. McGeary Brown University
Denis M. McCarthy
Denis M. McCarthy University of Missouri
Margaret C. McKinnon
Margaret C. McKinnon McMaster University
Lara A. Ray
Lara A. Ray University of California, Los Angeles

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a degree in psychology opens doors to a variety of rewarding online pathways, including counseling, mental health, and social services. With growing demand for qualified counselors and therapists, online programs in related fields are becoming increasingly accessible and affordable.

One important consideration is tuition cost, as it can greatly impact your long-term career goals. Prospective students should compare program options—such as the most affordable counseling degree programs in Michigan and the cheapest counseling programs in Minnesota—to find high-quality education within their budget.

For those interested in studying in the South, the affordable counseling programs in Nashville and the most affordable counseling degree programs in New Orleans are noteworthy. These programs can help you start or advance a career in mental health counseling, school psychology, or substance abuse counseling while keeping student debt manageable.

Ultimately, choosing the right online degree sets the foundation for a diverse and impactful career in psychology, counseling, or related fields. Take time to research institutions, costs, and course content that align with your career goals.

Best Scientists Citing Michael Amlung

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles