World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 47 6160 5725 3352 3039 137 9266

Denis M. McCarthy publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Denis M. McCarthy between 1972 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Denis M. McCarthy published across 54 years, from 1972 to 2025, averaging 5.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 16 publications in 2020. 16 of the 281 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1972 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 16. Peak 16 publications in 2020. 1972: 1 publication 1973: 2 publications 1974: 1 publication 1975: 0 publications 1976: 2 publications 1977: 1 publication 1978: 5 publications 1979: 4 publications 1980: 3 publications 1981: 2 publications 1982: 3 publications 1983: 2 publications 1984: 5 publications 1985: 2 publications 1986: 1 publication 1987: 1 publication 1988: 2 publications 1989: 5 publications 1990: 2 publications 1991: 4 publications 1992: 1 publication 1993: 2 publications 1994: 1 publication 1995: 4 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 3 publications 1999: 2 publications 2000: 3 publications 2001: 11 publications 2002: 7 publications 2003: 9 publications 2004: 8 publications 2005: 7 publications 2006: 7 publications 2007: 7 publications 2008: 1 publication 2009: 11 publications 2010: 7 publications 2011: 7 publications 2012: 10 publications 2013: 10 publications 2014: 7 publications 2015: 9 publications 2016: 13 publications 2017: 15 publications 2018: 12 publications 2019: 10 publications 2020: 16 publications 2021: 9 publications 2022: 4 publications 2023: 4 publications 2024: 8 publications 2025: 8 publications
1972 2025

281 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Denis M. McCarthy: publications per year, 1972 to 2025
Year Publications
1972 1
1973 2
1974 1
1975 0
1976 2
1977 1
1978 5
1979 4
1980 3
1981 2
1982 3
1983 2
1984 5
1985 2
1986 1
1987 1
1988 2
1989 5
1990 2
1991 4
1992 1
1993 2
1994 1
1995 4
1996 0
1997 0
1998 3
1999 2
2000 3
2001 11
2002 7
2003 9
2004 8
2005 7
2006 7
2007 7
2008 1
2009 11
2010 7
2011 7
2012 10
2013 10
2014 7
2015 9
2016 13
2017 15
2018 12
2019 10
2020 16
2021 9
2022 4
2023 4
2024 8
2025 8
Total 281
Download as CSV

Denis M. McCarthy publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Denis M. McCarthy sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 131–140 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 137 publications — 42nd percentile

42% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644 137
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Denis M. McCarthy D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Denis M. McCarthy sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 46–47 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495 47
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Denis M. McCarthy is affiliated with the University of Missouri in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of medicine and psychology, with an emphasis on subfields such as epidemiology, surgery, applied psychology, clinical psychology, and pathology and forensic medicine. The scientist's publication record reflects a multidisciplinary approach integrating clinical and behavioral sciences.

The research topics covered by McCarthy include:

  • Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects
  • Traffic and Road Safety
  • Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
  • Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior

Frequent publication venues for McCarthy's work include:

  • Digestive Diseases and Sciences
  • Psychology of Addictive Behaviors
  • Addiction
  • Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs
  • Assessment

Among recent papers authored or coauthored by McCarthy are:

  • "Proton Pump Inhibitor Use, Hypergastrinemia, and Gastric Carcinoids-What Is the Relationship?" (2020) published in International Journal of Molecular Sciences
  • "To Infuse or Ingest in Human Laboratory Alcohol Research" (2020) published in Alcoholism Clinical and Experimental Research
  • "Non-alcoholic beverage consumption among US adults who consume alcohol" (2024) published in Addiction
  • "Alcohol demand as a predictor of drinking behavior in the natural environment" (2022) published in Addiction
  • "Giant Gastric Ulcers: An Unusual Culprit" (2020) published in Digestive Diseases and Sciences

Frequent collaborators with McCarthy include:

  • Courtney A. Motschman
  • Timothy J. Trull
  • Olivia M. Warner
  • Vaishnavi Boppana
  • Kayleigh N. McCarty

Best Publications

  • On the sins of short-form development.

    Gregory T. Smith;Denis M. McCarthy;Kristen G. Anderson

  • On the validity and utility of discriminating among impulsivity-like traits.

    Gregory T. Smith;Sarah Fischer;Melissa A. Cyders;Agnes M. Annus

  • Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and peptic ulcer disease

    Andrew H. Soll;Wilfred M. Weinstein;John Kurata;Denis McCarthy

  • Methodological considerations in the refinement of clinical assessment instruments.

    Gregory T. Smith;Denis M. McCarthy

  • Less drinking, yet more problems: Understanding African American drinking and related problems.

    Tamika C. B. Zapolski;Sarah L. Pedersen;Denis M. McCarthy;Gregory T. Smith

  • Escalation and Initiation of Younger Adolescents' Substance Use: The Impact of Perceived Peer Use

    Elizabeth J. D’Amico;Denis M. McCarthy

  • Self-reported drinking and alcohol-related problems among early adolescents: dimensionality and validity over 24 months

    Gregory T. Smith;Denis M. McCarthy;Mark S. Goldman

  • On the value of homogeneous constructs for construct validation, theory testing, and the description of psychopathology.

    Gregory T. Smith;Denis M. McCarthy;Tamika C. B. Zapolski

  • Four-year outcomes from adolescent alcohol and drug treatment.

    Sandra A. Brown;Elizabeth J. D'amico;Denis M. Mccarthy;Susan F. Tapert

  • Nonsteroidal Antiinflammatory Drug-Induced Ulcers: Management by Traditional Therapies

    Denis M. McCarthy

  • The Aberrant Salience Inventory: A new measure of psychosis proneness.

    David C. Cicero;John G. Kerns;Denis M. McCarthy

  • Constructing a Short Form of the Smoking Consequences Questionnaire With Adolescents and Young Adults

    Mark G. Myers;Denis M. McCarthy;Laura MacPherson;Sandra A. Brown

  • The Protective Behavioral Strategies Scale-20: improved content validity of the Serious Harm Reduction Subscale

    Hayley Treloar;Matthew P. Martens;Denis M. McCarthy

  • A prospective test of the influence of negative urgency and expectancies on binge eating and purging.

    Sarah Fischer;Claire M Peterson;Denis McCarthy

  • Colonoscopy After Golytely Preparation in Acute Rectal Bleeding

    Antonio Caos;Kent G. Benner;James Manier;Denis M. McCarthy

  • Driving after use of alcohol and marijuana in college students.

    Denis M. McCarthy;Ann-Maree Lynch;Sarah L. Pederson

  • Integrating disinhibition and learning risk for alcohol use.

    Denis M. McCarthy;Larry S. Kroll;Gregory T. Smith

  • Components of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Related to Outcome in Childhood Anxiety Disorders

    Chelsea M. Ale;Denis M. McCarthy;Lilianne M. Rothschild;Stephen Perry Whiteside

  • Implicit and explicit measures of alcohol and smoking cognitions.

    Denis M. McCarthy;Dana M. Thompsen

  • Negative affect combines with smoking outcome expectancies to predict smoking behavior over time.

    Lee M. Cohen;Denis M. McCarthy;Sandra A. Brown;Mark G. Myers

  • Escalation and Initiation of Younger Adolescents' Substance Use

    Elizabeth J. D'Amico;Denis M. McCarthy

Frequent Co-Authors

Sandra A. Brown
Sandra A. Brown University of California, San Diego
Gregory T. Smith
Gregory T. Smith University of Kentucky
Joshua A. Hicks
Joshua A. Hicks Texas A&M University
Bruce D. Bartholow
Bruce D. Bartholow University of Missouri
Jane Metrik
Jane Metrik Brown University
Michael Amlung
Michael Amlung University of Kansas
Kenneth J. Sher
Kenneth J. Sher University of Missouri
Elizabeth J. D'Amico
Elizabeth J. D'Amico RAND Corporation
Matthew P. Martens
Matthew P. Martens University of Missouri

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in psychology opens diverse career pathways in counseling, therapy, and mental health services. These programs offer flexibility for students balancing work or family commitments. Key considerations include program accreditation, state licensing requirements, and the type of counseling specialization you wish to pursue.

The requirements to become a counselor vary significantly depending on your state. For those looking for the fastest way to become a counselor in New Hampshire or the fastest way to become a counselor in New Jersey, it’s important to understand state-specific educational criteria and licensure processes.

If you’re considering New Mexico, review the fastest way to become a counselor in New Mexico to streamline your path. Alternatively, for those wanting efficient routes in the Empire State, check out New York fastest counseling programs to find accelerated and reputable options.

By researching related online degrees and reviewing state-specific pathways, you can make informed decisions to jumpstart a rewarding psychology career.

Best Scientists Citing Denis M. McCarthy

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles