World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 37 9249 8645 4897 4460 105 5041

Jane Metrik publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Jane Metrik between 2001 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Jane Metrik published across 25 years, from 2001 to 2025, averaging 4.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 11 publications in 2017. 14 of the 123 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2001 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 11. Peak 11 publications in 2017. 2001: 1 publication 2002: 1 publication 2003: 1 publication 2004: 3 publications 2005: 0 publications 2006: 2 publications 2007: 0 publications 2008: 1 publication 2009: 3 publications 2010: 1 publication 2011: 4 publications 2012: 4 publications 2013: 5 publications 2014: 4 publications 2015: 8 publications 2016: 10 publications 2017: 11 publications 2018: 9 publications 2019: 9 publications 2020: 4 publications 2021: 10 publications 2022: 8 publications 2023: 10 publications 2024: 5 publications 2025: 9 publications
2001 2025

123 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Jane Metrik: publications per year, 2001 to 2025
Year Publications
2001 1
2002 1
2003 1
2004 3
2005 0
2006 2
2007 0
2008 1
2009 3
2010 1
2011 4
2012 4
2013 5
2014 4
2015 8
2016 10
2017 11
2018 9
2019 9
2020 4
2021 10
2022 8
2023 10
2024 5
2025 9
Total 123
Download as CSV

Jane Metrik publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jane Metrik sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 101–110 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 105 publications — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736 105
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Jane Metrik D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jane Metrik sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 36–37 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659 37
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Jane Metrik is affiliated with Brown University in the United States and has an extensive research portfolio in the fields of Medicine and Psychology. Their work frequently intersects Pharmacology, Epidemiology, Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, and General Health Professions. The focus of their scholarship centers on topics such as Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research, Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes, Homelessness and Social Issues, Sleep and related disorders, Suicide and Self-Harm Studies, Behavioral Health and Interventions, and Bipolar Disorder and Treatment.

Recent publications by Jane Metrik include:

  • Patterns of Cannabis and Alcohol Co-Use: Substitution Versus Complementary Effects (2022, Alcohol Research)
  • Ordering in Alcohol and Cannabis Co-Use: Impact on Daily Consumption and Consequences (2020, Drug and Alcohol Dependence)
  • Refining the Marijuana Purchase Task: Using Qualitative Methods to Inform Measure Development (2020, Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology)
  • Drinking Less on Cannabis Use Days: The Moderating Role of UPPS-P Impulsive Personality Traits (2021, Psychology of Addictive Behaviors)
  • Longitudinal Associations Between Negative Urgency, Symptoms of Depression, Cannabis and Alcohol Use in Veterans (2020, Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology)

Jane Metrik collaborates frequently with several coauthors, including Rachel L. Gunn, Elizabeth R. Aston, Brian Borsari, William R. Corbin, and Angela K. Stevens. This network reflects a diverse set of expertise linking substance use behaviors and clinical psychology.

The scientist's work is published mainly in the following venues:

  • Drug and Alcohol Dependence
  • Psychology of Addictive Behaviors
  • PsycTESTS Dataset
  • Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology
  • Addictive Behaviors

The integration of clinical and experimental approaches in their research provides insight into substance use patterns, measurement refinement, and behavioral health interventions. The broad scope of topics indicates a multidisciplinary approach aimed at understanding and addressing substance use and its psychological correlates.

Best Publications

  • Self-efficacy and smoking cessation: a meta-analysis.

    Chad J. Gwaltney;Jane Metrik;Christopher W. Kahler;Saul Shiffman

  • Test-retest reliability of alcohol measures: is there a difference between internet-based assessment and traditional methods?

    Elizabeth T. Miller;Derrick J. Neal;Lisa J. Roberts;John S. Baer

  • Co-use of Alcohol and Cannabis: A Review.

    Ali M. Yurasek;Elizabeth R. Aston;Jane Metrik;Jane Metrik

  • Balanced placebo design with marijuana: Pharmacological and expectancy effects on impulsivity and risk taking

    Jane Metrik;Christopher W. Kahler;Brady Reynolds;John E. McGeary;John E. McGeary

  • Further validation of a marijuana purchase task

    Elizabeth R. Aston;Jane Metrik;James MacKillop

  • Alcohol use and initial smoking lapses among heavy drinkers in smoking cessation treatment.

    Christopher W. Kahler;Nichea S. Spillane;Jane Metrik

  • Progression into and out of binge drinking among high school students.

    Elizabeth J. D'Amico;Jane Metrik;Denis M. McCarthy;Kevin C. Frissell

  • Price elasticity of illegal versus legal cannabis: a behavioral economic substitutability analysis.

    Michael Amlung;Michael Amlung;Derek D. Reed;Vanessa Morris;Elizabeth R. Aston

  • Effectiveness of a marijuana expectancy manipulation: Piloting the balanced-placebo design for marijuana.

    Jane Metrik;Damaris J. Rohsenow;Peter M. Monti;John McGeary

  • Daily Patterns of Marijuana and Alcohol Co-Use Among Individuals with Alcohol and Cannabis Use Disorders.

    Jane Metrik;Jane Metrik;Rachel L. Gunn;Kristina M. Jackson;Alexander W. Sokolovsky

  • Anxiety Sensitivity and Distress Intolerance as Predictors of Cannabis Dependence Symptoms, Problems, and Craving: The Mediating Role of Coping Motives.

    Samantha G Farris;Jane Metrik;Marcel O Bonn-Miller;Christopher W Kahler

  • Addressing Heavy Drinking in Smoking Cessation Treatment: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

    Christopher W. Kahler;Jane Metrik;Heather R. LaChance;Susan E. Ramsey;Susan E. Ramsey

  • Cue-Elicited Increases in Incentive Salience for Marijuana: Craving, Demand, and Attentional Bias

    Jane Metrik;Jane Metrik;Elizabeth R. Aston;Christopher W. Kahler;Damaris J. Rohsenow;Damaris J. Rohsenow

  • Affect and cannabis use in daily life: a review and recommendations for future research.

    Andrea M. Wycoff;Jane Metrik;Timothy J. Trull

  • The Mediating Roles of Coping, Sleep, and Anxiety Motives in Cannabis Use and Problems Among Returning Veterans With PTSD and MDD

    Jane Metrik;Kristina Jackson;Shayna S. Bassett;Michael J. Zvolensky

  • Interrelationships between marijuana demand and discounting of delayed rewards: Convergence in behavioral economic methods

    Elizabeth R. Aston;Jane Metrik;Jane Metrik;Michael Amlung;Christopher W. Kahler

  • Enhanced motivational interviewing versus brief advice for adolescent smoking cessation: results from a randomized clinical trial.

    Suzanne M. Colby;Jessica Nargiso;Tracy O'Leary Tevyaw;Tracy O'Leary Tevyaw;Nancy P. Barnett

  • Latent factor structure of a behavioral economic marijuana demand curve.

    Elizabeth R. Aston;Samantha G. Farris;Samantha G. Farris;Samantha G. Farris;James MacKillop;James MacKillop;Jane Metrik;Jane Metrik

  • Working memory and impulsivity predict marijuana-related problems among frequent users

    Anne M. Day;Jane Metrik;Nichea S. Spillane;Christopher W. Kahler

  • Acute Effects of Marijuana Smoking on Negative and Positive Affect

    Jane Metrik;Christopher W. Kahler;John E. McGeary;Peter M. Monti

Frequent Co-Authors

James MacKillop
James MacKillop McMaster University
Christopher W. Kahler
Christopher W. Kahler Brown University
Damaris J. Rohsenow
Damaris J. Rohsenow Brown University
John E. McGeary
John E. McGeary Brown University
Brian Borsari
Brian Borsari University of California, San Francisco
Samantha G. Farris
Samantha G. Farris Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Kristina M. Jackson
Kristina M. Jackson Brown University
Valerie S. Knopik
Valerie S. Knopik Purdue University West Lafayette
Peter M. Monti
Peter M. Monti Brown University
Sandra A. Brown
Sandra A. Brown University of California, San Diego

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online psychology degrees opens up a range of flexible career pathways in counseling, mental health services, and related fields. Online programs are especially popular for those seeking to balance work, life, and education, allowing students to gain essential qualifications from anywhere in the world.

If you’re interested in becoming a mental health counselor, it’s important to be aware that certification requirements vary by location. For example, Portland mental health counselor certification requirements outline state-specific educational and supervised experience criteria. Similarly, the Raleigh mental health counselor certification requirements focus on accredited graduate coursework and licensure exam mandates.

Other areas, such as Reno and Richmond, also have unique pathways. Those seeking to become a mental health counselor in Reno face distinctive steps around practicum hours and Nevada-specific licensing. Likewise, understanding how to meet the how to become a mental health counselor in Richmond criteria is key for those planning to practice in Virginia.

No matter where you plan to practice, researching regional requirements—and considering accredited online programs—can help ensure a smooth journey from student to professional.

Best Scientists Citing Jane Metrik

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles