World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Molecular Biology 67 1547 1387 120 108 199 24731

Elaine Dzierzak publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Elaine Dzierzak between 1978 and 2024, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Elaine Dzierzak published across 47 years, from 1978 to 2024, averaging 5 papers a year. Output peaked at 14 publications in 2002. 9 of the 236 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1978 to 2024. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 14. Peak 14 publications in 2002. 1978: 1 publication 1979: 0 publications 1980: 2 publications 1981: 2 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 1 publication 1985: 1 publication 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 2 publications 1989: 1 publication 1990: 0 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 9 publications 1994: 4 publications 1995: 4 publications 1996: 3 publications 1997: 4 publications 1998: 3 publications 1999: 2 publications 2000: 3 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 14 publications 2003: 5 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 11 publications 2006: 9 publications 2007: 8 publications 2008: 12 publications 2009: 11 publications 2010: 8 publications 2011: 11 publications 2012: 4 publications 2013: 14 publications 2014: 8 publications 2015: 10 publications 2016: 7 publications 2017: 9 publications 2018: 7 publications 2019: 14 publications 2020: 5 publications 2021: 6 publications 2022: 6 publications 2023: 4 publications 2024: 5 publications
1978 2024

236 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Elaine Dzierzak: publications per year, 1978 to 2024
Year Publications
1978 1
1979 0
1980 2
1981 2
1982 0
1983 0
1984 1
1985 1
1986 0
1987 0
1988 2
1989 1
1990 0
1991 0
1992 0
1993 9
1994 4
1995 4
1996 3
1997 4
1998 3
1999 2
2000 3
2001 2
2002 14
2003 5
2004 4
2005 11
2006 9
2007 8
2008 12
2009 11
2010 8
2011 11
2012 4
2013 14
2014 8
2015 10
2016 7
2017 9
2018 7
2019 14
2020 5
2021 6
2022 6
2023 4
2024 5
Total 236
Download as CSV

Elaine Dzierzak publication distribution in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Molecular Biology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Elaine Dzierzak sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 53 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 47–56 to 564+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 177. Most scientists, 177, have 117–126 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 197–206 publications, is where this scientist sits. 47–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–66 publications: 17 scientists 67–76 publications: 65 scientists 77–86 publications: 90 scientists 87–96 publications: 125 scientists 97–106 publications: 131 scientists 107–116 publications: 162 scientists 117–126 publications: 177 scientists 127–136 publications: 158 scientists 137–146 publications: 158 scientists 147–156 publications: 146 scientists 157–166 publications: 159 scientists 167–176 publications: 131 scientists 177–186 publications: 110 scientists 187–196 publications: 112 scientists 197–206 publications: 100 scientists 207–216 publications: 89 scientists 217–226 publications: 98 scientists 227–236 publications: 74 scientists 237–246 publications: 72 scientists 247–256 publications: 63 scientists 257–266 publications: 53 scientists 267–276 publications: 54 scientists 277–286 publications: 49 scientists 287–296 publications: 52 scientists 297–306 publications: 43 scientists 307–316 publications: 46 scientists 317–326 publications: 41 scientists 327–336 publications: 42 scientists 337–346 publications: 31 scientists 347–356 publications: 28 scientists 357–366 publications: 29 scientists 367–376 publications: 26 scientists 377–386 publications: 24 scientists 387–396 publications: 24 scientists 397–406 publications: 14 scientists 407–416 publications: 13 scientists 417–426 publications: 20 scientists 427–436 publications: 12 scientists 437–446 publications: 20 scientists 447–456 publications: 11 scientists 457–466 publications: 10 scientists 467–476 publications: 14 scientists 477–486 publications: 14 scientists 487–496 publications: 10 scientists 497–506 publications: 13 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 2 scientists 527–536 publications: 4 scientists 537–546 publications: 6 scientists 547–556 publications: 8 scientists 557–563 publications: 6 scientists 564+ publications: 100 scientists
47–56 publications 564+

This scientist: 199 publications — 58th percentile

58% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Molecular Biology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,076 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
47–56 7
57–66 17
67–76 65
77–86 90
87–96 125
97–106 131
107–116 162
117–126 177
127–136 158
137–146 158
147–156 146
157–166 159
167–176 131
177–186 110
187–196 112
197–206 100 199
207–216 89
217–226 98
227–236 74
237–246 72
247–256 63
257–266 53
267–276 54
277–286 49
287–296 52
297–306 43
307–316 46
317–326 41
327–336 42
337–346 31
347–356 28
357–366 29
367–376 26
377–386 24
387–396 24
397–406 14
407–416 13
417–426 20
427–436 12
437–446 20
447–456 11
457–466 10
467–476 14
477–486 14
487–496 10
497–506 13
507–516 13
517–526 2
527–536 4
537–546 6
547–556 8
557–563 6
564+ 100
Download as CSV

Elaine Dzierzak D-index placement in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Molecular Biology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Elaine Dzierzak sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100 125
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 145+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 131. Most scientists, 131, have 64–65 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 66–67 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 36 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 115 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 121 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 130 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 106 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 116 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 113 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 129 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 120 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 105 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 131 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 97 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 106 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 83 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 89 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 77 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 70 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 73 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 60 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 48 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 45 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 50 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 31 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 51 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 43 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 39 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 41 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 29 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 33 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 35 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 20 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 38 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 19 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 28 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 13 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 23 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 15 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 11 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 21 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 14 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 9 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 16 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 7 scientists 144 D-Index: 7 scientists 145+ D-Index: 100 scientists
40–41 D-Index 145+

This scientist: 67 D-Index — 50th percentile

50% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Molecular Biology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,076 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 36
42–43 101
44–45 115
46–47 121
48–49 118
50–51 130
52–53 106
54–55 116
56–57 113
58–59 129
60–61 120
62–63 105
64–65 131
66–67 95 67
68–69 97
70–71 106
72–73 83
74–75 89
76–77 77
78–79 70
80–81 73
82–83 60
84–85 48
86–87 45
88–89 50
90–91 31
92–93 51
94–95 43
96–97 38
98–99 39
100–101 41
102–103 29
104–105 33
106–107 35
108–109 20
110–111 38
112–113 19
114–115 28
116–117 13
118–119 23
120–121 16
122–123 15
124–125 11
126–127 21
128–129 7
130–131 13
132–133 14
134–135 17
136–137 9
138–139 8
140–141 16
142–143 7
144 7
145+ 100
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2018 - Fellow of the Royal Society of Edinburgh
  • 2014 - Member of Academia Europaea
  • Fellow of The Academy of Medical Sciences, United Kingdom
  • Member of the European Molecular Biology Organization (EMBO)
  • Fellow of The Academy of Medical Sciences, United Kingdom
  • Member of the European Molecular Biology Organization (EMBO)
  • Fellow of The Academy of Medical Sciences, United Kingdom
  • Member of the European Molecular Biology Organization (EMBO)

Overview

Elaine Dzierzak is affiliated with the University of Edinburgh in the United Kingdom. Their research is primarily situated within the domains of Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, Medicine, and Immunology and Microbiology, reflecting a multidisciplinary approach to biomedical science.

Their work spans specific subfields including Immunology, Cell Biology, Molecular Biology, Hematology, and Epidemiology. The scientist's main topics of research cover Zebrafish Biomedical Research Applications, Immune Cells in Cancer, Single-cell and Spatial Transcriptomics, Acute Myeloid Leukemia Research, T-cell and B-cell Immunology, Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, and Pluripotent Stem Cells Research.

Elaine Dzierzak has contributed to a number of recent papers, with notable publications including:

  • "Iterative Single-Cell Analyses Define the Transcriptome of the First Functional Hematopoietic Stem Cells" (2020, Cell Reports)
  • "Notch ligand Dll4 impairs cell recruitment to aortic clusters and limits blood stem cell generation" (2020, The EMBO Journal)
  • "E-cadherin is regulated by GATA-2 and marks the early commitment of mouse hematopoietic progenitors to the basophil and mast cell fates" (2021, Science Immunology)
  • "Bioengineering Self-Organizing Signaling Centers to Control Embryoid Body Pattern Elaboration" (2021, ACS Synthetic Biology)
  • "Embryonic Origins of the Hematopoietic System: Hierarchies and Heterogeneity" (2022, HemaSphere)

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Elaine Dzierzak include:

  • Chris S. Vink
  • Samanta A. Mariani
  • Antonio Maglitto
  • Anna Popravko
  • Emma de Pater

Their publications mainly appear in venues such as:

  • Experimental Hematology
  • HemaSphere
  • Blood Advances
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • The EMBO Journal

Elaine Dzierzak's academic recognition includes several distinctions:

  • Fellow of the Royal Society of Edinburgh (2018)
  • Member of Academia Europaea (2014)
  • Member of the European Molecular Biology Organization (EMBO)
  • Fellow of The Academy of Medical Sciences, United Kingdom

Best Publications

  • Definitive Hematopoiesis Is Autonomously Initiated by the AGM Region

    Alexander Medvinsky;Elaine Dzierzak

  • Development of hematopoietic stem cell activity in the mouse embryo

    Albrecht Müller;A. Medvinsky;John Strouboulis;Frank Grosveld

  • Runx1 is required for the endothelial to haematopoietic cell transition but not thereafter

    Michael J. Chen;Tomomasa Yokomizo;Brandon M. Zeigler;Elaine Dzierzak

  • In vivo imaging of haematopoietic cells emerging from the mouse aortic endothelium

    Jean-Charles Boisset;Wiggert van Cappellen;Charlotte Andrieu-Soler;Niels Galjart

  • Of lineage and legacy: the development of mammalian hematopoietic stem cells

    Elaine Dzierzak;Nancy A Speck

  • Definitive hematopoietic stem cells first develop within the major arterial regions of the mouse embryo

    Marella F.T.R. de Bruijn;Nancy A. Speck;Marian C.E. Peeters;Elaine Dzierzak

  • Combinatorial transcriptional control in blood stem/progenitor cells: Genome-wide analysis of ten major transcriptional regulators

    Nicola K. Wilson;Samuel D. Foster;Xiaonan Wang;Kathy Knezevic

  • Targeted disruption of the GATA3 gene causes severe abnormalities in the nervous system and in fetal liver haematopoiesis.

    Pier Paolo Pandolfi;Pier Paolo Pandolfi;Matthew E. Roth;Alar Karis;Alar Karis;Mark W. Leonard

  • An early pre-liver intraembryonic source of CFU-S in the developing mouse

    Alexander L. Medvinsky;Nina L. Samoylina;Albrecht M. Müller;Elaine A. Dzierzak

  • Runx1 expression marks long-term repopulating hematopoietic stem cells in the midgestation mouse embryo

    Trista E North;Marella F.T.R de Bruijn;Terryl Stacy;Laleh Talebian

  • The Murine Placenta Contains Hematopoietic Stem Cells within the Vascular Labyrinth Region

    Katrin Ottersbach;Elaine Dzierzak

  • Hematopoietic Stem Cells Localize to the Endothelial Cell Layer in the Midgestation Mouse Aorta

    Marella F.T.R de Bruijn;Xiaoqian Ma;Catherine Robin;Katrin Ottersbach

  • Hematopoietic Stem Cell Development Is Dependent on Blood Flow

    Trista E. North;Wolfram Goessling;Marian Peeters;Pulin Li

  • Lineage-specific expression of a human β -globin gene in murine bone marrow transplant recipients reconstituted with retrovirus-transduced stem cells

    Elaine A. Dzierzak;Thalia Papayannopoulou;Richard C. Mulligan

  • Characterization of the First Definitive Hematopoietic Stem Cells in the AGM and Liver of the Mouse Embryo

    María José Sánchez;Alan Holmes;Colin Miles;Elaine Dzierzak

  • Maternal retinoids control type 3 innate lymphoid cells and set the offspring immunity

    Serge A. van de Pavert;Manuela Ferreira;Rita G. Domingues;Hélder Ribeiro

  • Erythropoiesis: Development and Differentiation

    Elaine Dzierzak;Sjaak Philipsen

  • GATA-2 plays two functionally distinct roles during the ontogeny of hematopoietic stem cells.

    Kam-Wing Ling;Katrin Ottersbach;Jan Piet van Hamburg;Aneta Oziemlak

  • Efficient Hematopoietic Differentiation of Human Embryonic Stem Cells on Stromal Cells Derived from Hematopoietic Niches

    Maria H. Ledran;Anna Krassowska;Lyle Armstrong;Ian Dimmick

  • Mouse embryonic hematopoiesis

    Elaine Dzierzak;Alexander Medvinsky

Frequent Co-Authors

Nancy A. Speck
Nancy A. Speck University of Pennsylvania
Christine L. Mummery
Christine L. Mummery Leiden University Medical Center
Trista E. North
Trista E. North Boston Children's Hospital
María José Sánchez
María José Sánchez University of Granada
Berthold Göttgens
Berthold Göttgens University of Cambridge
Pierre Charbord
Pierre Charbord Université Paris Cité
Leonard I. Zon
Leonard I. Zon Harvard University
Pier Paolo Pandolfi
Pier Paolo Pandolfi Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Dies Meijer
Dies Meijer University of Edinburgh

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in molecular biology, many students look for specialized online degrees and accelerated pathways into healthcare careers. Programs like how many years to become a nurse practitioner offer streamlined timelines for advancing into nursing practice. This is especially appealing to individuals who wish to combine their molecular biology background with direct patient care.

Many professionals consider the fastest rn to bsn program online as a way to quickly upskill and broaden career opportunities within healthcare. Bridge programs, such as rn to np programs online, make it possible to progress from an associate degree in nursing to advanced practice roles without lengthy delays.

For those with a molecular biology degree but no prior nursing experience, direct entry msn programs for non-nurses online allow a fast track into nursing leadership roles. These flexible, online pathways make it easier for science graduates to apply their laboratory expertise in clinical, research, or educational healthcare environments.

Best Scientists Citing Elaine Dzierzak

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles