World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Anne Louise Oaklander

Anne Louise Oaklander

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
48
Citations
10071
World Ranking
6157
National Ranking
2690

Anne Louise Oaklander publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Anne Louise Oaklander sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 176 publications — 54th percentile

54% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Anne Louise Oaklander D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Anne Louise Oaklander sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 37th percentile

37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Recommendations for the management of herpes zoster.

    Robert H. Dworkin;Robert W. Johnson;Judith Breuer;John W. Gnann;John W. Gnann

  • Neuropathic pain following breast cancer surgery: proposed classification and research update.

    Beth F. Jung;Gretchen M. Ahrendt;Anne Louise Oaklander;Robert H. Dworkin

  • Congenital Insensitivity to Pain: An Update

    Elna M Nagasako;Anne Louise Oaklander;Robert H Dworkin

  • Evidence of focal small-fiber axonal degeneration in complex regional pain syndrome-I (reflex sympathetic dystrophy)

    Anne Louise Oaklander;Julia G. Rissmiller;Lisa B. Gelman;Li Zheng

  • Objective evidence that small-fiber polyneuropathy underlies some illnesses currently labeled as fibromyalgia

    Anne Louise Oaklander;Zeva Daniela Herzog;Heather M. Downs;Max M. Klein

  • Single-Agent Bortezomib in Previously Untreated Multiple Myeloma: Efficacy, Characterization of Peripheral Neuropathy, and Molecular Correlations With Response and Neuropathy

    Paul G. Richardson;Wanling Xie;Constantine Mitsiades;Asher A. Chanan-Khan

  • Diagnosis and assessment of pain associated with herpes zoster and postherpetic neuralgia.

    Robert H. Dworkin;John W. Gnann;Anne Louise Oaklander;Srinivasa N. Raja

  • The density of remaining nerve endings in human skin with and without postherpetic neuralgia after shingles.

    Anne Louise Oaklander

  • Unilateral postherpetic neuralgia is associated with bilateral sensory neuron damage

    Anne Louise Oaklander;Katharine Romans;Sylvia Horasek;Adelaine Stocks

  • Is reflex sympathetic dystrophy/complex regional pain syndrome type I a small-fiber neuropathy?

    Anne Louise Oaklander;Howard L. Fields

  • Treatments for chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP): an overview of systematic reviews.

    Anne Louise Oaklander;Michael Pt Lunn;Richard Ac Hughes;Ivo N van Schaik

  • Transcranial magnetic stimulation of the brain: guidelines for pain treatment research

    Max M. Klein;Roi Treister;Tommi Raij;Alvaro Pascual-Leone

  • Research design considerations for chronic pain prevention clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations.

    Jennifer S. Gewandter;Robert H. Dworkin;Dennis C. Turk;John T. Farrar

  • Herpes zoster itch: preliminary epidemiologic data.

    Anne Louise Oaklander;David Bowsher;Bradley Galer;Maija Haanpää

  • Heterogenous Patterns of Sensory Dysfunction in Postherpetic Neuralgia Suggest Multiple Pathophysiologic Mechanisms

    Marco Pappagallo;Anne Louise Oaklander;Amy L. Quatranopiacentini;Michael R. Clark

  • Scientific Advances in and Clinical Approaches to Small-Fiber Polyneuropathy: A Review.

    Anne Louise Oaklander;Maria Nolano

  • Mechanisms of Pain and Itch Caused by Herpes Zoster (Shingles)

    Anne Louise Oaklander

  • Intractable postherpetic itch and cutaneous deafferentation after facial shingles.

    Anne Louise Oaklander;Steven P. Cohen;Shubha V.Y. Raju

  • Unilateral nerve injury produces bilateral loss of distal innervation

    Anne Louise Oaklander;Jennifer M. Brown

  • Management of herpes zoster and post-herpetic neuralgia now and in the future.

    Richard J. Whitley;Antonio Volpi;Mike McKendrick;Albert van Wijck

  • Neuropathic pain associated with non-surgical treatment of breast cancer.

    Beth F. Jung;David Herrmann;Jennifer Griggs;Anne Louise Oaklander

Frequent Co-Authors

Robert H. Dworkin
Robert H. Dworkin University of Rochester Medical Center
Srinivasa N. Raja
Srinivasa N. Raja Johns Hopkins University
Anthony A. Amato
Anthony A. Amato Claude Bernard University Lyon 1
Paul G. Richardson
Paul G. Richardson Harvard University
Robert H. Brown
Robert H. Brown University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School
Patrick Y. Wen
Patrick Y. Wen Harvard University
John T. Farrar
John T. Farrar University of Pennsylvania
Richard J. Whitley
Richard J. Whitley University of Alabama at Birmingham
Robert L. Schlossman
Robert L. Schlossman Harvard University
Julien Cohen-Adad
Julien Cohen-Adad Polytechnique Montréal

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Neuroscience opens doors to various fields that blend biology, psychology, and healthcare. For those interested in supporting individuals and communities, exploring an accelerated masters in social work can be a fast-track route to advanced roles in clinical and community settings. These online programs offer flexibility and can be completed in less time than traditional options.

If your interest is more aligned with understanding human behavior, an accelerated psychology degree may be valuable. These online degrees focus on psychological theories, research, and counseling skills, preparing graduates for direct mental health careers or further study in neuroscience or related fields.

For those aiming for careers in counseling, choosing a program with the right accreditation is key. Investigate cacrep accredited counseling programs to ensure your degree meets industry standards, which is often required for professional licensure. Affordability is also important, and there are numerous most affordable online counseling degrees that offer quality education without financial strain.

Whether your path is neuroscience, psychology, social work, or counseling, online learning options provide the flexibility and specialization needed to achieve your career goals in a rapidly evolving field.

Best Scientists Citing Anne Louise Oaklander

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles