World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Nachum Soroker

Nachum Soroker

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
39
Citations
6175
World Ranking
8326
National Ranking
64

Nachum Soroker publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nachum Soroker sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 139 publications — 37th percentile

37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Nachum Soroker D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nachum Soroker sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 15th percentile

15% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Nachum Soroker is affiliated with Tel Aviv University in Israel and has an extensive research portfolio primarily within the fields of Medicine and Neuroscience. Their work spans multiple subfields including Cognitive Neuroscience, Neurology, Rehabilitation, Psychiatry and Mental Health, and Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation.

The scientist's research focuses on several core topics, notably:

  • Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
  • Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders
  • Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders
  • Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
  • Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Spatial Neglect and Hemispheric Dysfunction

Key recent papers authored or coauthored by Nachum Soroker include:

  • Tonic stretch reflex threshold as a measure of spasticity after stroke: Reliability, minimal detectable change and responsiveness (2021, Clinical Neurophysiology)
  • Exercise intensity of the upper limb can be enhanced using a virtual rehabilitation system (2020, Disability and Rehabilitation Assistive Technology)
  • Stroke Lesion Impact on Lower Limb Function (2021, Frontiers in Human Neuroscience)
  • Effect of post-stroke spasticity on voluntary movement of the upper limb (2021, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation)
  • Resting-state EEG topographies: Reliable and sensitive signatures of unilateral spatial neglect (2020, NeuroImage Clinical)

Nachum Soroker has frequently published in several venues, including:

  • Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
  • Scientific Reports
  • Disability and Rehabilitation Assistive Technology
  • Neuropsychologia
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

Frequent collaborators in their research include:

  • Silvi Frenkel-Toledo
  • Dario G. Liebermann
  • Shay Ofir
  • Melanie C. Baniña
  • Sigal Berman

Best Publications

  • Functional disability and rehabilitation outcome in right hemisphere damaged patients with and without unilateral spatial neglect.

    Noomi Katz;Adina Hartman-Maeir;Haim Ring;Nachum Soroker

  • Activities, participation and satisfaction one-year post stroke

    Adina Hartman-Maeir;Nachum Soroker;Haim Ring;Noga Avni

  • Inhibition of return in spatial attention: direct evidence for collicular generation.

    Ayelet Sapir;Nachum Soroker;Andrea Berger;Avishai Henik

  • Selective visual streaming in face recognition: evidence from developmental prosopagnosia.

    Shlomo Bentin;Leon Y. Deouell;Nachum Soroker

  • Differential Effects of Right- and Left-Hemisphere Damage on Understanding Sarcasm and Metaphor

    Rachel Giora;Eran Zaidel;Nachum Soroker;Gila Batori

  • Gesture and the processing of speech: neuropsychological evidence.

    U. Hadar;D. Wenkert-Olenik;R. Krauss;N. Soroker

  • Effects of right and left hemisphere damage on performance of the "Right Hemisphere Communication Battery".

    E. Zaidel;A. Kasher;N. Soroker;G. Batori

  • Electrophysiological evidence for an early(pre-attentive) information processing deficit in patients with right hemisphere damage and unilateral neglect.

    Leon Y. Deouell;Shlomo Bentin;Nachum Soroker

  • Awareness of disabilities in stroke rehabilitation--a clinical trial.

    A Hartman-Maeir;N Soroker;S D Oman;N Katz

  • Assessment of spatial attention after brain damage with a dynamic reaction time test.

    Leon Y. Deouell;Yaron Sacher;Nachum Soroker

  • AWARENESS OF DEFICITS IN STROKE REHABILITATION

    Adina Hartman-Maeir;Nachum Soroker;Haim Ring;Noomi Katz

  • The posterior parietal cortex in recognition memory: A neuropsychological study

    Sharon Haramati;Nachum Soroker;Yadin Dudai;Daniel A. Levy;Daniel A. Levy

  • Measuring and Characterizing the Human Nasal Cycle

    Roni Kahana-Zweig;Maya Geva-Sagiv;Aharon Weissbrod;Lavi Secundo

  • Ideational gestures and speech in brain-damaged subjects

    U. Hadar;A. Burstein;R. Krauss;N. Soroker

  • Anosognosia for hemiplegia in stroke rehabilitation.

    Adina Hartman-Maeir;Nachum Soroker;Noomi Katz

  • Spared and Impaired Olfactory Abilities after Thalamic Lesions

    Lee Sela;Yaron Sacher;Corinne Serfaty;Yaara Yeshurun

  • Dynamics of the EEG power in the frequency and spatial domains during observation and execution of manual movements.

    Silvi Frenkel-Toledo;Shlomo Bentin;Shlomo Bentin;Anat Perry;Dario G. Liebermann

  • Auditory inattention in right-hemisphere-damaged patients with and without visual neglect

    N Soroker;N Calamaro;J Glicksohn;M.S Myslobodsky

  • Effects of right- and left-hemisphere damage on understanding conversational implicatures.

    Asa Kasher;Gila Batori;Nachum Soroker;David Graves

  • Automated measurement of proprioception following stroke.

    N. Leibowitz;N. Levy;S. Weingarten;Y. Grinberg

Frequent Co-Authors

Leon Y. Deouell
Leon Y. Deouell Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Shlomo Bentin
Shlomo Bentin Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Mindy F. Levin
Mindy F. Levin McGill University
Shaul Hochstein
Shaul Hochstein Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Eran Zaidel
Eran Zaidel University of California, Los Angeles
Dov Sagi
Dov Sagi Weizmann Institute of Science
Joseph Glicksohn
Joseph Glicksohn Bar-Ilan University
Noam Sobel
Noam Sobel Weizmann Institute of Science
Eli Vakil
Eli Vakil Bar-Ilan University
Avishai Henik
Avishai Henik Ben-Gurion University of the Negev

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying neuroscience in the USA can open doors beyond traditional research roles. Many students interested in brain science also pursue careers in mental health, counseling, and therapy. These fields require specialized education and credentials, which are now more accessible through flexible and affordable online programs.

One valuable pathway is earning a cacrep online masters in counseling, which is recognized for meeting education standards essential for licensure. For those on a budget, exploring the cheapest online lpc programs can make entering the field even more achievable.

If you are interested in relationship and family dynamics, an online mft masters programs can prepare you for licensed marriage and family therapist roles. Alternatively, those passionate about clinical practice might benefit from affordable online masters in clinical psychology to build advanced diagnostic and therapeutic skills.

These degree options complement neuroscience studies, offering diverse career paths in healthcare, education, and counseling.

Best Scientists Citing Nachum Soroker

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles