World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
105
Citations
38413
World Ranking
6805
National Ranking
3593

O.J. Ginther publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where O.J. Ginther sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 556 publications — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

O.J. Ginther D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where O.J. Ginther sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 105 D-Index — 67th percentile

67% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

O.J. Ginther is affiliated with the University of Wisconsin-Madison in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on reproductive physiology in livestock, genetics, and veterinary equine medical research, with a specialization in agricultural and biological sciences.

The scientist's recent publications showcase a concentration on follicle dynamics, ovulation, and reproductive biology in livestock species. Notable papers include:

  • Switching of follicle destiny so that the second largest follicle becomes dominant in monovulatory species, 2021, Theriogenology
  • Intraovarianism and differences in ovulation frequency between left and right ovaries in Bos taurus heifers, 2020, Reproductive Biology

Their research interests are reflected in various scientific venues, with frequent contributions to journals such as:

  • Journal of Equine Veterinary Science
  • Theriogenology
  • Biology of Reproduction
  • Reproduction
  • Reproductive Biology

They collaborate frequently with other researchers in related fields. Key coauthors include:

  • Victor Gomez-León
  • Rafael R. Domingues
  • Milo C. Wiltbank
  • T. Castro
  • J. Jacob

Their research spans several subfields of study, such as agronomy and crop science, genetics, public health and environmental health, equine studies, and immunology. The main topics addressed in their work cover:

  • Reproductive Physiology in Livestock
  • Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
  • Reproductive Biology and Fertility
  • Veterinary Equine Medical Research
  • Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
  • Reproductive System and Pregnancy
  • Animal health and immunology

O.J. Ginther's contributions emphasize understanding biological mechanisms behind reproductive patterns and follicle development in livestock. Their body of work bridges genetics, physiology, and veterinary science, highlighting the interconnectedness of these disciplines in animal reproductive research.

Best Publications

  • Temporal associations among ovarian events in cattle during oestrous cycles with two and three follicular waves.

    O. J. Ginther;L. Knopf;J. P. Kastelic

  • Selection of the dominant follicle in cattle

    O J Ginther;M C Wiltbank;P M Fricke;J R Gibbons

  • Association between surges of follicle-stimulating hormone and the emergence of follicular waves in heifers.

    G. P. Adams;R. L. Matteri;J. P. Kastelic;J. C. H. Ko

  • Follicular deviation and acquisition of ovulatory capacity in bovine follicles

    Roberto Sartori;Paul M. Fricke;João C.P. Ferreira;O.J. Ginther

  • Composition and characteristics of follicular waves during the bovine estrous cycle

    O.J. Ginther;J.P. Kastelic;L. Knopf

  • Follicle Selection in Monovular Species

    O.J. Ginther;M.A. Beg;D.R. Bergfelt;F.X. Donadeu

  • Ultrasonography of the bovine ovary.

    R.A. Pierson;O.J. Ginther

  • Ultrasonic imaging of the ovaries and uterus in cattle

    R.A. Pierson;O.J. Ginther

  • Ovarian follicular dynamics in heifers: test of two-wave hypothesis by ultrasonically monitoring individual follicles.

    L. Knopf;J.P. Kastelic;E. Schallenberger;O.J. Ginther

  • Effect of progesterone on ovarian follicles, emergence of follicular waves and circulating follicle-stimulating hormone in heifers.

    G. P. Adams;R. L. Matteri;O. J. Ginther

  • Mechanism of follicle deviation in monovular farm species

    O.J. Ginther;M.A. Beg;F.X. Donadeu;D.R. Bergfelt

  • Reproductive biology of the mare - basic and applied aspects.

    O. J. Ginther

  • Follicular dynamics during the ovulatory season in goats

    O.J. Ginther;K. Kot

  • Emergence and deviation of follicles during the development of follicular waves in cattle

    O.J. Ginther;K. Kot;L.J. Kulick;M.C. Wiltbank

  • Ultrasonographic appearance of the bovine conceptus from days 20 through 60.

    S Curran;R A Pierson;O J Ginther

  • Selection of a dominant follicle and suppression of follicular growth in heifers

    G.P. Adams;K. Kot;C.A. Smith;O.J. Ginther

  • Relationship between ultrasonic assessment of the corpus luteum and plasma progesterone concentration in heifers.

    J.P. Kastelic;D.R. Bergfelt;O.J. Ginther

  • Associations between emergence of follicular waves and fluctuations in FSH concentrations during the estrous cycle in ewes.

    O.J. Ginther;K. Kot;M.C. Wiltbank

  • Mobility of the early equine conceptus

    O.J. Ginther

  • Ultrasonic morphology of corpora lutea and central luteal cavities during the estrous cycle and early pregnancy in heifers.

    J.P. Kastelic;R.A. Pierson;O.J. Ginther

Frequent Co-Authors

Milo C. Wiltbank
Milo C. Wiltbank University of Wisconsin–Madison
Gregg P. Adams
Gregg P. Adams Western University of Health Sciences
A. L. Pope
A. L. Pope University of Wisconsin–Madison
Paul M. Fricke
Paul M. Fricke University of Wisconsin–Madison
Edward L. Squires
Edward L. Squires University of Kentucky
John P. Kastelic
John P. Kastelic University of Calgary
George E. Seidel
George E. Seidel Colorado State University
E. K. Inskeep
E. K. Inskeep West Virginia University
Brian W. Kirkpatrick
Brian W. Kirkpatrick University of Wisconsin–Madison

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a medical career in the USA often begins with nursing and related healthcare pathways. Many students choose to start with accessible programs, such as finding the easiest bsn program to get into to quickly gain foundational knowledge and experience.

For those seeking flexibility and affordability, online options are highly attractive. Prospective nurses often look for the cheapest rn to bsn program to complete their degree with minimal financial burden. This route is ideal for those balancing work, family, and education.

Non-nursing graduates interested in advancing quickly can consider direct entry msn programs online. These fast-track programs provide a streamlined path into advanced nursing roles, even for those without a previous nursing background.

Ambitious professionals aiming for leadership or academic positions may pursue phd in nursing online programs. These affordable online doctorates allow experienced nurses to deepen expertise, contribute to research, or educate future practitioners while continuing their careers.

Best Scientists Citing O.J. Ginther

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles