World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
77
Citations
31435
World Ranking
939
National Ranking
351

Michelle C. Mack publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michelle C. Mack sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 271 publications — 88th percentile

88% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Michelle C. Mack D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michelle C. Mack sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 77 D-Index — 89th percentile

89% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Michelle C. Mack is affiliated with Northern Arizona University in the United States. Their research spans across environmental science and earth and planetary sciences, with a significant focus on atmospheric science, global and planetary change, ecology, soil science, and nature and landscape conservation. The main topics in their work include fire effects on ecosystems, climate change and permafrost, cryospheric studies and observations, peatlands and wetlands ecology, tree-ring climate responses, geology and paleoclimatology research, and atmospheric and environmental gas dynamics.

The scientist has published extensively in various academic venues. Frequent publication venues include Ecosphere, Environmental Research Letters, Global Change Biology, Ecosystems, and Earth System Science Data. Their work often addresses ecosystem carbon balance, wildfire impacts, and soil microbial dynamics.

Selected recent publications include:

  • "Arctic tundra shrubification: a review of mechanisms and impacts on ecosystem carbon balance" (2021) published in Environmental Research Letters
  • "Carbon loss from boreal forest wildfires offset by increased dominance of deciduous trees" (2021) published in Science
  • "Increasing fire and the decline of fire adapted black spruce in the boreal forest" (2021) published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • "The temperature sensitivity of soil: microbial biodiversity, growth, and carbon mineralization" (2021) published in The ISME Journal
  • "Fuel availability not fire weather controls boreal wildfire severity and carbon emissions" (2020) published in Nature Climate Change

Frequently collaborating co-authors include Xanthe J. Walker, Jill F. Johnstone, Brendan M. Rogers, S. J. Goetz, and Merritt R. Turetsky.

Best Publications

  • Consequences of changing biodiversity

    F. Stuart Chapin Iii;Erika S. Zavaleta;Valerie T. Eviner;Rosamond L. Naylor

  • TRY plant trait database : Enhanced coverage and open access

    Jens Kattge;Gerhard Bönisch;Sandra Díaz;Sandra Lavorel

  • Changing disturbance regimes, ecological memory, and forest resilience

    Jill F. Johnstone;Craig D. Allen;Jerry F. Franklin;Lee E. Frelich

  • The human dimension of fire regimes on Earth

    David M. J. S. Bowman;Jennifer Balch;Paulo Artaxo;William J. Bond

  • Ecosystem carbon storage in arctic tundra reduced by long-term nutrient fertilization

    Michelle C. Mack;Edward A. G. Schuur;M. Syndonia Bret-Harte;Gaius R. Shaver

  • The impact of boreal forest fire on climate warming.

    J. T. Randerson;H. Liu;M. G. Flanner;S. D. Chambers

  • Global patterns of foliar nitrogen isotopes and their relationships with climate, mycorrhizal fungi, foliar nutrient concentrations, and nitrogen availability

    Joseph M. Craine;Andrew J. Elmore;Marcos P. M. Aidar;Mercedes Bustamante

  • Impacts of biological invasions on disturbance regimes

    Michelle C. Mack;Caria M. D'Antonio

  • Changes in fire regime break the legacy lock on successional trajectories in Alaskan boreal forest

    Jill F. Johnstone;Jill F. Johnstone;Teresa N. Hollingsworth;F. Stuart Chapin;Michelle C. Mack

  • Carbon loss from an unprecedented Arctic tundra wildfire

    Michelle C. Mack;M. Syndonia Bret-Harte;Teresa N. Hollingsworth;Randi R. Jandt

  • Increasing wildfires threaten historic carbon sink of boreal forest soils

    Xanthe J. Walker;Jennifer L. Baltzer;Steven G. Cumming;Nicola J. Day

  • Fire, climate change, and forest resilience in interior Alaska

    Jill F. JohnstoneJ.F. Johnstone;F. Stuart ChapinF.S. Chapin;Teresa N. HollingsworthT.N. Hollingsworth;Michelle C. MackM.C. Mack

  • The effect of nutrient deposition on bacterial communities in Arctic tundra soil

    Barbara J. Campbell;Shawn W. Polson;Thomas E. Hanson;Thomas E. Hanson;Michelle C. Mack

  • Plant Species Composition and Productivity following Permafrost Thaw and Thermokarst in Alaskan Tundra

    Edward A. G. Schuur;Kathryn G. Crummer;Jason G. Vogel;Michelle C. Mack

  • A shift of thermokarst lakes from carbon sources to sinks during the Holocene epoch

    K. M. Walter Anthony;S. A. Zimov;Guido Grosse;Guido Grosse;Miriam C. Jones;Miriam C. Jones

  • Arctic tundra shrubification: a review of mechanisms and impacts on ecosystem carbon balance

    Zelalem A Mekonnen;William J Riley;Logan T Berner;Nicholas J Bouskill

  • Biomass offsets little or none of permafrost carbon release from soils, streams, and wildfire: an expert assessment

    Benjamin W. Abbott;Jeremy B. Jones;Edward A. G. Schuur;F. Stuart Chapin

  • The representation of arctic soils in the land surface model: The importance of mosses

    Jason Beringer;Amanda H. Lynch;F. Stuart Chapin;Michelle Mack

  • Sinks for nitrogen inputs in terrestrial ecosystems: a meta‐analysis of 15N tracer field studies

    P. H. Templer;M. C. Mack;F. S. Chapin;L. M. Christenson

  • Carbon loss from boreal forest wildfires offset by increased dominance of deciduous trees.

    Michelle C. Mack;Michelle C. Mack;Xanthe J. Walker;Xanthe J. Walker;Jill F. Johnstone;Jill F. Johnstone;Jill F. Johnstone;Heather D. Alexander;Heather D. Alexander

  • Postfire Soil N Cycling in Northern Conifer Forests Affected by Severe, Stand-Replacing Wildfires

    Erica A. H. Smithwick;Monica G. Turner;Michelle C. Mack;F. Stuart Chapin

  • Relationships among fires, fungi, and soil dynamics in Alaskan Boreal Forests

    Kathleen K. Treseder;Michelle C. Mack;Alison Cross

Frequent Co-Authors

Jill F. Johnstone
Jill F. Johnstone University of Saskatchewan
Edward A. G. Schuur
Edward A. G. Schuur Northern Arizona University
Scott J. Goetz
Scott J. Goetz Northern Arizona University
Merritt R. Turetsky
Merritt R. Turetsky University of Colorado Boulder
F. Stuart Chapin
F. Stuart Chapin University of Alaska Fairbanks
Jennifer L. Baltzer
Jennifer L. Baltzer Wilfrid Laurier University
Teresa N. Hollingsworth
Teresa N. Hollingsworth German National Academy of Sciences Leopoldina
Carla M. D'Antonio
Carla M. D'Antonio University of California, Santa Barbara
Jennifer W. Harden
Jennifer W. Harden United States Geological Survey
M. Syndonia Bret-Harte
M. Syndonia Bret-Harte University of Alaska Fairbanks

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Students interested in Ecology and Evolution may benefit from exploring a wide range of related online degrees and career pathways. Many interdisciplinary fields, such as Speech-Language Pathology and Nursing, now offer flexible online degree options for learners from diverse academic backgrounds.

For example, individuals with a non-SLP (Speech-Language Pathology) background can explore SLP bridge pathway for communication sciences graduates. Those seeking a faster route may consider asha online slp programs, which combine accelerated learning with full accreditation.

Similarly, students holding a non-nursing degree but interested in healthcare can find non nursing degree to bsn online programs, helping them transition toward a Bachelor of Science in Nursing efficiently.

Career prospects also expand as you specialize. For instance, looking at potential salaries, the psych np salary data provides insight into earning expectations for psychiatric nurse practitioners by state—useful information when considering your professional pathway.

Best Scientists Citing Michelle C. Mack

Trending Scientists