What is he best known for?
The fields of study he is best known for:
- Ecology
- Climate change
- Ecosystem
His primary areas of investigation include Permafrost, Yedoma, Arctic, Thermokarst and Permafrost carbon cycle.
His Permafrost research integrates issues from Soil carbon, Climatology, Earth science, Climate change and Greenhouse gas.
His research in Soil carbon focuses on subjects like Global warming, which are connected to Snow and Subarctic climate.
Guido Grosse interconnects Hydrology and Paleontology, Pleistocene in the investigation of issues within Arctic.
His Thermokarst research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Landform, Geomorphology, Deglaciation and Physical geography.
His Permafrost carbon cycle research focuses on subjects like Total organic carbon, which are linked to Organic matter, Geochemistry, Coastal geography and Transect.
His most cited work include:
- Climate change and the permafrost carbon feedback (1300 citations)
- Estimated stocks of circumpolar permafrost carbon with quantified uncertainty ranges and identified data gaps (669 citations)
- Vulnerability of high‐latitude soil organic carbon in North America to disturbance (335 citations)
What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?
Guido Grosse focuses on Permafrost, Thermokarst, Physical geography, Arctic and Yedoma.
Within one scientific family, Guido Grosse focuses on topics pertaining to Hydrology under Permafrost, and may sometimes address concerns connected to Soil water.
His Thermokarst study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Global warming, Peninsula, Methane and Holocene.
His study in Physical geography is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Glacial period, Last Glacial Maximum, Climatology, Peat and Landform.
His biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Cryosphere, Climate change and Remote sensing.
His Yedoma study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Organic matter, Total organic carbon, Permafrost carbon cycle, Sediment and Geochemistry.
He most often published in these fields:
- Permafrost (77.37%)
- Thermokarst (44.53%)
- Physical geography (39.20%)
What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2018-2021)?
- Permafrost (77.37%)
- Physical geography (39.20%)
- Thermokarst (44.53%)
In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:
His primary areas of study are Permafrost, Physical geography, Thermokarst, Arctic and Yedoma.
The Permafrost study combines topics in areas such as Soil carbon, Total organic carbon, Global warming, Climate change and Sediment.
The various areas that he examines in his Physical geography study include Aggradation, Tundra, Holocene, Peat and Drainage.
He has included themes like Chronosequence, Carbon dioxide, Sink and Methane in his Thermokarst study.
His studies deal with areas such as Coastal erosion, Remote sensing, Precipitation and Sea ice as well as Arctic.
His work is dedicated to discovering how Yedoma, Fluvial are connected with Cryoturbation and other disciplines.
Between 2018 and 2021, his most popular works were:
- Permafrost is warming at a global scale (274 citations)
- Permafrost is warming at a global scale (274 citations)
- Carbon release through abrupt permafrost thaw (87 citations)
In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:
- Ecology
- Climate change
- Ecosystem
His main research concerns Permafrost, Thermokarst, Arctic, Physical geography and Methane.
Guido Grosse is interested in Yedoma, which is a branch of Permafrost.
His Thermokarst research incorporates elements of Tundra and Chronosequence.
His Arctic research focuses on Remote sensing and how it relates to Atmospheric methane.
His Physical geography research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Aggradation, Satellite imagery, Drainage, Ice core and Last Glacial Maximum.
In his study, which falls under the umbrella issue of Methane, Subsidence, Atmosphere and Talik is strongly linked to Carbon dioxide.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s
body of work. If you have any feedback, you can
contact us
here.
