World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Rising Stars
2025

D-Index & Metrics

Rising Stars

D-Index
40
Citations
6389
World Ranking
654
National Ranking
35

Neuroscience

D-Index
43
Citations
7134
World Ranking
7407
National Ranking
206

Prejaas Tewarie publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Prejaas Tewarie sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 101 publications — 17th percentile

17% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Prejaas Tewarie D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Prejaas Tewarie sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2025 - Research.com Rising Stars Award

Overview

Prejaas Tewarie is affiliated with the University of Nottingham in the United Kingdom. Their research predominantly spans the fields of Neuroscience and Medicine, with notable contributions to various subfields such as Cognitive Neuroscience, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Epidemiology, Neurology, and Emergency Medicine.

The scientist's work investigates multiple topics related to brain function and neuroimaging. Key topics include:

  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Neural dynamics and brain function
  • EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Traumatic Brain Injury Research
  • Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
  • Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation

Prejaas Tewarie has published extensively in respected scientific venues. Frequent publication outlets include:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • NeuroImage
  • NeuroImage Clinical
  • Network Neuroscience
  • Scientific Reports

Several recent papers exemplify their research focus and output. These include:

  • "Disruption in structural-functional network repertoire and time-resolved subcortical fronto-temporoparietal connectivity in disorders of consciousness," 2022, eLife
  • "Abnormal meta-state activation of dynamic brain networks across the Alzheimer spectrum," 2021, NeuroImage
  • "Mapping functional brain networks from the structural connectome: Relating the series expansion and eigenmode approaches," 2020, NeuroImage
  • "Minimum spanning tree analysis of brain networks: A systematic review of network size effects, sensitivity for neuropsychiatric pathology, and disorder specificity," 2022, Network Neuroscience
  • "Clinical and neurophysiological effects of central thalamic deep brain stimulation in the minimally conscious state after severe brain injury," 2022, Scientific Reports

The scientist has collaborated frequently with other researchers. Notable coauthors include:

  • Arjan Hillebrand
  • Cornelis J. Stam
  • Steven Laureys
  • Menno M. Schoonheim
  • Gustavo Deco

Best Publications

  • The OSCAR-IB consensus criteria for retinal OCT quality assessment.

    Prejaas Tewarie;Lisanne Balk;Fiona Costello;Ari Green

  • How reliable are MEG resting-state connectivity metrics?

    Giles L. Colclough;Mark W. Woolrich;Prejaas Tewarie;Matthew J. Brookes

  • Direction of information flow in large-scale resting-state networks is frequency-dependent

    Arjan Hillebrand;Prejaas Tewarie;Edwin van Dellen;Meichen Yu

  • The trees and the forest: Characterization of complex brain networks with minimum spanning trees.

    C.J. Stam;P. Tewarie;E. Van Dellen;E.C.W. van Straaten

  • The minimum spanning tree: An unbiased method for brain network analysis

    P. Tewarie;E. van Dellen;E. van Dellen;A. Hillebrand;C.J. Stam

  • Cortical atrophy patterns in multiple sclerosis are non-random and clinically relevant

    Martijn D. Steenwijk;Jeroen J. G. Geurts;Marita Daams;Betty M. Tijms

  • Dynamics of large-scale electrophysiological networks: a technical review

    George C. O'Neill;Prejaas K. Tewarie;Diego Vidaurre;Lucrezia Liuzzi

  • A multi-layer network approach to MEG connectivity analysis.

    Matthew J. Brookes;Prejaas K. Tewarie;Benjamin A.E. Hunt;Sian E. Robson

  • The relation between structural and functional connectivity patterns in complex brain networks

    C J Stam;E C W van Straaten;E Van Dellen;P Tewarie

  • A mapping between structural and functional brain networks.

    Meier J;Tewarie P;Hillebrand A;Douw L

  • Bidirectional trans-synaptic axonal degeneration in the visual pathway in multiple sclerosis

    L.J. Balk;M.D. Steenwijk;P. Tewarie;M. Daams

  • Functional brain network analysis using minimum spanning trees in Multiple Sclerosis: An MEG source-space study

    P. Tewarie;A. Hillebrand;M.M. Schoonheim;B.W. van Dijk

  • Measuring electrophysiological connectivity by power envelope correlation: a technical review on MEG methods.

    George C. O'Neill;Eleanor L. Barratt;Benjamin A. E. Hunt;Prejaas K. Tewarie

  • Timing of retinal neuronal and axonal loss in MS: a longitudinal OCT study

    Lisanne J. Balk;Andrés Cruz-Herranz;Philipp Albrecht;Sam Arnow

  • Structural degree predicts functional network connectivity: a multimodal resting-state fMRI and MEG study.

    P. Tewarie;A. Hillebrand;E. van Dellen;M.M. Schoonheim

  • A dam for retrograde axonal degeneration in multiple sclerosis

    L.J. Balk;J.W.R. Twisk;M.D. Steenwijk;M. Daams

  • Integrating cross-frequency and within band functional networks in resting-state MEG: A multi-layer network approach

    Prejaas Tewarie;Arjan Hillebrand;Bob W van Dijk;Cornelis J Stam

  • Measurement of dynamic task related functional networks using MEG

    George C. O’Neill;Prejaas K. Tewarie;Giles L. Colclough;Lauren E. Gascoyne

  • Relationships between cortical myeloarchitecture and electrophysiological networks

    Benjamin A. E. Hunt;Prejaas K. Tewarie;Olivier E. Mougin;Nicolas Geades

  • Functional brain networks: linking thalamic atrophy to clinical disability in multiple sclerosis, a multimodal fMRI and MEG study.

    Prejaas Tewarie;Menno M. Schoonheim;Daphne I. Schouten;Chris H. Polman

Frequent Co-Authors

Arjan Hillebrand
Arjan Hillebrand Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Cornelis J. Stam
Cornelis J. Stam Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Matthew J. Brookes
Matthew J. Brookes University of Nottingham
Frederik Barkhof
Frederik Barkhof University College London
Chris H. Polman
Chris H. Polman VU University Medical Center
Linda Douw
Linda Douw Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Menno M. Schoonheim
Menno M. Schoonheim University of Amsterdam
Abigail Sellen
Abigail Sellen Microsoft (United States)
Jeroen J. G. Geurts
Jeroen J. G. Geurts Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in neuroscience opens up exciting academic and professional possibilities. For those seeking flexibility and a quicker path to graduation, there are a number of online accelerated programs available in fields related to neuroscience and health sciences. These programs allow motivated students to earn their degree in less time than traditional options.

When considering your future career, it’s worth exploring the highest paying degrees and the highest paying majors. Many neuroscience graduates transition into careers in medicine, biotechnology, or research, all of which have the potential for competitive salaries and growth opportunities.

Affordability is also a key concern for many students. To help offset tuition costs, you can find online colleges that offer financial aid, making advanced education more accessible. Exploring these options can help you chart a rewarding career path in neuroscience or a related discipline, even if you need flexibility and financial support.

Best Scientists Citing Prejaas Tewarie

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles