World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Neuroscience 96 850 760 98 89 614 42575
Medicine 96 9533 8947 927 883 617 42588

Olga Ciccarelli publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Olga Ciccarelli between 1987 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Olga Ciccarelli published across 39 years, from 1987 to 2025, averaging 15.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 61 publications in 2016. 17 of the 602 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
20 40 60
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1987 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 61. Peak 61 publications in 2016. 1987: 1 publication 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 1 publication 1994: 1 publication 1995: 0 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 3 publications 1998: 3 publications 1999: 11 publications 2000: 6 publications 2001: 8 publications 2002: 10 publications 2003: 14 publications 2004: 8 publications 2005: 11 publications 2006: 12 publications 2007: 12 publications 2008: 15 publications 2009: 22 publications 2010: 16 publications 2011: 31 publications 2012: 41 publications 2013: 28 publications 2014: 49 publications 2015: 36 publications 2016: 61 publications 2017: 31 publications 2018: 37 publications 2019: 35 publications 2020: 34 publications 2021: 36 publications 2022: 7 publications 2023: 5 publications 2024: 6 publications 2025: 11 publications
1987 2025

602 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Olga Ciccarelli: publications per year, 1987 to 2025
Year Publications
1987 1
1988 0
1989 0
1990 0
1991 0
1992 0
1993 1
1994 1
1995 0
1996 0
1997 3
1998 3
1999 11
2000 6
2001 8
2002 10
2003 14
2004 8
2005 11
2006 12
2007 12
2008 15
2009 22
2010 16
2011 31
2012 41
2013 28
2014 49
2015 36
2016 61
2017 31
2018 37
2019 35
2020 34
2021 36
2022 7
2023 5
2024 6
2025 11
Total 602
Download as CSV

Olga Ciccarelli publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Olga Ciccarelli sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 887+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 539. Most scientists, 539, have 98–107 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 608–617 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientist 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 887+

This scientist: 614 publications — 97th percentile

97% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 18
48–57 79
58–67 193
68–77 323
78–87 406
88–97 452
98–107 539
108–117 505
118–127 522
128–137 469
138–147 456
148–157 459
158–167 397
168–177 383
178–187 350
188–197 302
198–207 306
208–217 262
218–227 242
228–237 220
238–247 203
248–257 174
258–267 176
268–277 175
278–287 125
288–297 116
298–307 127
308–317 128
318–327 99
328–337 89
338–347 78
348–357 96
358–367 66
368–377 59
378–387 65
388–397 54
398–407 48
408–417 49
418–427 34
428–437 31
438–447 30
448–457 31
458–467 36
468–477 40
478–487 35
488–497 30
498–507 23
508–517 26
518–527 20
528–537 23
538–547 20
548–557 20
558–567 17
568–577 14
578–587 20
588–597 20
598–607 19
608–617 18 614
618–627 17
628–637 11
638–647 11
648–657 11
658–667 8
668–677 7
678–687 11
688–697 10
698–707 4
708–717 6
718–727 5
728–737 5
738–747 9
748–757 9
758–767 3
768–777 7
778–787 7
788–797 6
798–807 2
808–817 2
818–827 7
828–837 0
838–847 9
848–857 3
858–867 1
868–877 3
878–886 6
887+ 100
Download as CSV

Olga Ciccarelli D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Olga Ciccarelli sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 68 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 163+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 512. Most scientists, 512, have 46–47 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 96–97 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30–31 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 96 D-Index — 91st percentile

91% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 42
32–33 172
34–35 296
36–37 435
38–39 459
40–41 456
42–43 467
44–45 478
46–47 512
48–49 435
50–51 425
52–53 418
54–55 392
56–57 357
58–59 334
60–61 328
62–63 260
64–65 278
66–67 239
68–69 250
70–71 210
72–73 200
74–75 189
76–77 170
78–79 146
80–81 113
82–83 126
84–85 100
86–87 84
88–89 99
90–91 84
92–93 85
94–95 72
96–97 76 96
98–99 45
100–101 49
102–103 43
104–105 32
106–107 45
108–109 50
110–111 32
112–113 39
114–115 32
116–117 29
118–119 27
120–121 19
122–123 23
124–125 27
126–127 16
128–129 24
130–131 13
132–133 21
134–135 17
136–137 14
138–139 15
140–141 10
142–143 10
144–145 13
146–147 9
148–149 8
150–151 6
152–153 6
154–155 7
156–157 7
158–159 10
160–161 4
162 8
163+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Olga Ciccarelli is affiliated with University College London in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily focuses on the field of Medicine, with notable contributions in Surgery, Hepatology, Epidemiology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, and Infectious Diseases.

The scientist has a considerable number of publications related to topics on Organ Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes, Liver Disease and Transplantation, and Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment. Additional research interests include Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies, Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis, Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments, and COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies.

Olga Ciccarelli has authored several recent papers, including:

  • COVID-19 in an international European liver transplant recipient cohort, 2020, published in Gut
  • COVID-19 in liver transplant recipients: preliminary data from the ELITA/ELTR registry, 2020, published in The Lancet. Gastroenterology & hepatology
  • Development and validation of a REcurrent Liver cAncer Prediction ScorE (RELAPSE) following liver transplantation in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: Analysis of the US Multicenter HCC Transplant Consortium, 2023, published in Liver Transplantation
  • Novel Benchmark Values for Redo Liver Transplantation, 2022, published in Annals of Surgery
  • The role of the comprehensive complication index for the prediction of survival after liver transplantation, 2020, published in Updates in Surgery

The frequent co-authors working with Olga Ciccarelli include Laurent Coubeau, Géraldine Dahlqvist, Samuele Iesari, Eliano Bonaccorsi-Riani, and Bénédicte Delire.

Their work has appeared repeatedly in a set of publication venues notably including Endoscopy, HPB, Journal of Hepatology, Gut, and Liver Transplantation. These journals reflect the wide focus across surgery, hepatology, and transplantation research areas.

Best Publications

  • Tract-based spatial statistics: voxelwise analysis of multi-subject diffusion data.

    S M Smith;M Jenkinson;H Johansen-Berg;D Rueckert

  • Non-invasive mapping of connections between human thalamus and cortex using diffusion imaging

    T E J Behrens;H Johansen-Berg;M W Woolrich;M W Woolrich;S M Smith

  • Multiple sclerosis

    Unknown

  • A Longitudinal Study of Abnormalities on MRI and Disability from Multiple Sclerosis

    Peter A Brex;Olga Ciccarelli;Jonathon I O'Riordan;Michael Sailer

  • MRI criteria for the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: MAGNIMS consensus guidelines.

    Massimo Filippi;Maria Assunta Rocca;Olga Ciccarelli;Olga Ciccarelli;Nicola De Stefano

  • Clinically isolated syndromes

    David H Miller;Declan T Chard;Olga Ciccarelli

  • Functional–Anatomical Validation and Individual Variation of Diffusion Tractography-based Segmentation of the Human Thalamus

    Heidi Johansen-Berg;Timothy E.J. Behrens;Emma Sillery;Olga Ciccarelli

  • Lateralization of ventral and dorsal auditory-language pathways in the human brain

    Geoffrey J.M. Parker;Simona Luzzi;Daniel C. Alexander;Claudia A.M. Wheeler-Kingshott

  • 2021 MAGNIMS–CMSC–NAIMS consensus recommendations on the use of MRI in patients with multiple sclerosis

    Mike P Wattjes;Olga Ciccarelli;Olga Ciccarelli;Daniel S Reich;Brenda Banwell;Brenda Banwell

  • Assessment of lesions on magnetic resonance imaging in multiple sclerosis: practical guidelines

    Massimo Filippi;Paolo Preziosa;Brenda L Banwell;Frederik Barkhof;Frederik Barkhof

  • Diffusion-based tractography in neurological disorders: concepts, applications, and future developments

    Olga Ciccarelli;Marco Catani;Heidi Johansen-Berg;Christopher Clark

  • Myelin-oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody-associated disease.

    Romain Marignier;Romain Marignier;Yael Hacohen;Alvaro Cobo-Calvo;Anne Katrin Pröbstel

  • Deep gray matter volume loss drives disability worsening in multiple sclerosis.

    Arman Eshaghi;Arman Eshaghi;Ferran Prados;Wallace J Brownlee;Daniel R Altmann;Daniel R Altmann

  • Exploring the origins of grey matter damage in multiple sclerosis

    Massimiliano Calabrese;Roberta Magliozzi;Olga Ciccarelli;Jeroen J. G. Geurts

  • Investigation of MS normal-appearing brain using diffusion tensor MRI with clinical correlations

    O. Ciccarelli;D. J. Werring;C. A M Wheeler-Kingshott;G. J. Barker

  • Disease Course and Treatment Responses in Children With Relapsing Myelin Oligodendrocyte Glycoprotein Antibody–Associated Disease

    Yael Hacohen;Yael Hacohen;Yu Yi Wong;Christian Lechner;Maciej Jurynczyk

  • The current state-of-the-art of spinal cord imaging: Methods

    Patrick W. Stroman;Claudia A. M. Wheeler-Kingshott;M. Bacon;J. M. Schwab

  • Brain atrophy and lesion load predict long term disability in multiple sclerosis

    Veronica Popescu;Federica Agosta;Hanneke E Hulst;Ingrid C Sluimer

  • Progression of regional grey matter atrophy in multiple sclerosis.

    Arman Eshaghi;Arman Eshaghi;Razvan V Marinescu;Alexandra L Young;Nicholas C Firth

  • Longitudinal multiple sclerosis lesion segmentation: Resource and challenge.

    Aaron Carass;Snehashis Roy;Amod Jog;Jennifer L. Cuzzocreo

  • Diffusion MRI in multiple sclerosis

    M. Rovaris;A. Gass;R. Bammer;S. J. Hickman

  • Investigating cervical spinal cord structure using axial diffusion tensor imaging

    Claudia A.M. Wheeler-Kingshott;Simon J. Hickman;Geoffrey J.M. Parker;Olga Ciccarelli

  • Consensus recommendations for MS cortical lesion scoring using double inversion recovery MRI

    J.J.G. Geurts;S.D. Roosendaal;M. Calabrese;O. Ciccarelli

Frequent Co-Authors

Alan J. Thompson
Alan J. Thompson University College London
Frederik Barkhof
Frederik Barkhof University College London
Claudia A. M. Wheeler-Kingshott
Claudia A. M. Wheeler-Kingshott University College London
Massimo Filippi
Massimo Filippi Vita-Salute San Raffaele University
Daniel R. Altmann
Daniel R. Altmann Imperial College London
Maria A. Rocca
Maria A. Rocca Vita-Salute San Raffaele University
Paul M. Matthews
Paul M. Matthews Imperial College London
Christian Enzinger
Christian Enzinger Medical University of Graz
Sebastien Ourselin
Sebastien Ourselin King's College London
Daniel C. Alexander
Daniel C. Alexander University College London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Olga Ciccarelli

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles