World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Chemistry 44 16710 15086 4143 3403 145 8692

Marcus T. Cicerone publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Marcus T. Cicerone between 1989 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Marcus T. Cicerone published across 37 years, from 1989 to 2025, averaging 5 papers a year. Output peaked at 15 publications in 2009. 13 of the 186 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1989 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 15. Peak 15 publications in 2009. 1989: 1 publication 1990: 0 publications 1991: 1 publication 1992: 1 publication 1993: 1 publication 1994: 2 publications 1995: 4 publications 1996: 3 publications 1997: 2 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 0 publications 2001: 0 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 8 publications 2004: 10 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 5 publications 2007: 9 publications 2008: 8 publications 2009: 15 publications 2010: 12 publications 2011: 12 publications 2012: 11 publications 2013: 7 publications 2014: 7 publications 2015: 9 publications 2016: 7 publications 2017: 8 publications 2018: 6 publications 2019: 3 publications 2020: 5 publications 2021: 3 publications 2022: 3 publications 2023: 5 publications 2024: 2 publications 2025: 11 publications
1989 2025

186 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Marcus T. Cicerone: publications per year, 1989 to 2025
Year Publications
1989 1
1990 0
1991 1
1992 1
1993 1
1994 2
1995 4
1996 3
1997 2
1998 0
1999 0
2000 0
2001 0
2002 2
2003 8
2004 10
2005 3
2006 5
2007 9
2008 8
2009 15
2010 12
2011 12
2012 11
2013 7
2014 7
2015 9
2016 7
2017 8
2018 6
2019 3
2020 5
2021 3
2022 3
2023 5
2024 2
2025 11
Total 186
Download as CSV

Marcus T. Cicerone publication distribution in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Chemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marcus T. Cicerone sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000 1,250
Bar chart with 63 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 61–80 to 1,295+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,350. Most scientists, 1,350, have 161–180 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 141–160 publications, is where this scientist sits. 61–80 publications: 66 scientists 81–100 publications: 302 scientists 101–120 publications: 623 scientists 121–140 publications: 918 scientists 141–160 publications: 1,218 scientists 161–180 publications: 1,350 scientists 181–200 publications: 1,344 scientists 201–220 publications: 1,281 scientists 221–240 publications: 1,216 scientists 241–260 publications: 1,100 scientists 261–280 publications: 979 scientists 281–300 publications: 939 scientists 301–320 publications: 764 scientists 321–340 publications: 643 scientists 341–360 publications: 628 scientists 361–380 publications: 522 scientists 381–400 publications: 459 scientists 401–420 publications: 397 scientists 421–440 publications: 327 scientists 441–460 publications: 270 scientists 461–480 publications: 265 scientists 481–500 publications: 252 scientists 501–520 publications: 201 scientists 521–540 publications: 185 scientists 541–560 publications: 148 scientists 561–580 publications: 148 scientists 581–600 publications: 132 scientists 601–620 publications: 114 scientists 621–640 publications: 104 scientists 641–660 publications: 91 scientists 661–680 publications: 92 scientists 681–700 publications: 73 scientists 701–720 publications: 57 scientists 721–740 publications: 54 scientists 741–760 publications: 67 scientists 761–780 publications: 45 scientists 781–800 publications: 46 scientists 801–820 publications: 39 scientists 821–840 publications: 32 scientists 841–860 publications: 36 scientists 861–880 publications: 29 scientists 881–900 publications: 26 scientists 901–920 publications: 24 scientists 921–940 publications: 14 scientists 941–960 publications: 23 scientists 961–980 publications: 28 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 15 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 29 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 12 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 19 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 12 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 6 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 8 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 12 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 5 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 6 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 14 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 7 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 2 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 6 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 4 scientists 1,281–1,294 publications: 6 scientists 1,295+ publications: 100 scientists
61–80 publications 1,295+

This scientist: 145 publications — 12th percentile

12% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Chemistry scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 17,934 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
61–80 66
81–100 302
101–120 623
121–140 918
141–160 1,218 145
161–180 1,350
181–200 1,344
201–220 1,281
221–240 1,216
241–260 1,100
261–280 979
281–300 939
301–320 764
321–340 643
341–360 628
361–380 522
381–400 459
401–420 397
421–440 327
441–460 270
461–480 265
481–500 252
501–520 201
521–540 185
541–560 148
561–580 148
581–600 132
601–620 114
621–640 104
641–660 91
661–680 92
681–700 73
701–720 57
721–740 54
741–760 67
761–780 45
781–800 46
801–820 39
821–840 32
841–860 36
861–880 29
881–900 26
901–920 24
921–940 14
941–960 23
961–980 28
981–1,000 15
1,001–1,020 29
1,021–1,040 12
1,041–1,060 19
1,061–1,080 12
1,081–1,100 6
1,101–1,120 8
1,121–1,140 12
1,141–1,160 5
1,161–1,180 6
1,181–1,200 14
1,201–1,220 7
1,221–1,240 2
1,241–1,260 6
1,261–1,280 4
1,281–1,294 6
1,295+ 100
Download as CSV

Marcus T. Cicerone D-index placement in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Chemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marcus T. Cicerone sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 61 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 159+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,051. Most scientists, 1,051, have 56–57 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 44–45 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 289 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 612 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 808 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 776 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 835 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 861 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 872 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 933 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,051 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 930 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 882 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 834 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 731 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 775 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 683 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 646 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 561 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 501 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 437 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 388 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 354 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 292 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 275 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 254 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 235 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 185 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 192 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 155 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 163 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 125 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 105 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 105 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 112 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 88 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 68 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 69 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 65 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 79 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 61 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 44 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 37 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 40 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 33 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 26 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 34 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 35 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 25 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 27 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 17 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 16 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 20 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 20 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 15 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 9 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 16 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 11 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 9 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 3 scientists 158 D-Index: 3 scientists 159+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40–41 D-Index 159+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 7th percentile

7% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Chemistry scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 17,934 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 289
42–43 612
44–45 808 44
46–47 776
48–49 835
50–51 861
52–53 872
54–55 933
56–57 1,051
58–59 930
60–61 882
62–63 834
64–65 731
66–67 775
68–69 683
70–71 646
72–73 561
74–75 501
76–77 437
78–79 388
80–81 354
82–83 292
84–85 275
86–87 254
88–89 235
90–91 185
92–93 192
94–95 155
96–97 163
98–99 125
100–101 105
102–103 105
104–105 112
106–107 88
108–109 68
110–111 69
112–113 65
114–115 79
116–117 61
118–119 44
120–121 37
122–123 40
124–125 33
126–127 26
128–129 34
130–131 35
132–133 25
134–135 27
136–137 17
138–139 16
140–141 20
142–143 20
144–145 15
146–147 9
148–149 9
150–151 16
152–153 11
154–155 9
156–157 3
158 3
159+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2016 - Fellow of American Physical Society (APS) Citation For outstanding contributions to the understanding of the dynamics in glassy materials, demonstrating its importance in the stabilization of protein therapeutics, and the development of broadband CARS microscopy for bioimaging

Overview

Marcus T. Cicerone is affiliated with the National Institute of Standards and Technology in the United States. Their primary field of study is Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, with a focused body of work spanning 21 publications.

Their research encompasses multiple subfields including Biophysics, Atomic and Molecular Physics and Optics, Biomedical Engineering, Molecular Biology, and Analytical Chemistry. Within these areas, Cicerone's work addresses several main topics such as Spectroscopy Techniques in Biomedical and Chemical Research, Spectroscopy and Chemometric Analyses, Material Dynamics and Properties, Bee Products Chemical Analysis, Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies, Quantum Information and Cryptography, and Advanced Fluorescence Microscopy Techniques.

Frequent collaborators in their research include Wei-Wen Chen, Jessica Z. Dixon, Charles H. Camp, Daniel J. Lum, and Michael D. Mazurek. The venues where Cicerone has published most frequently reflect their interdisciplinary scope, including The Journal of Physical Chemistry B, arXiv (Cornell University), Optics Letters, Nature Chemical Biology, and Soft Matter.

Selected recent papers by Marcus T. Cicerone include:

  • Spectroscopic coherent Raman imaging of Caenorhabditis elegans reveals lipid particle diversity (2020, Nature Chemical Biology)
  • The polarizability response of a glass-forming liquid reveals intrabasin motion and interbasin transitions on a potential energy landscape (2020, Soft Matter)
  • Witnessing the survival of time-energy entanglement through biological tissue and scattering media (2021, arXiv (Cornell University))
  • Hybrid Lipid Nanocapsules: A Robust Platform for mRNA Delivery (2024, ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces)
  • Toward Gene-Correlated Spatially Resolved Metabolomics with Fingerprint Coherent Raman Imaging (2023, The Journal of Physical Chemistry B)

In 2016, Marcus T. Cicerone was awarded the distinction of Fellow of the American Physical Society (APS) for contributions to understanding dynamics in glassy materials, the stabilization of protein therapeutics, and the development of broadband CARS microscopy for bioimaging.

Best Publications

  • Enhanced translation of probe molecules in supercooled o‐terphenyl: Signature of spatially heterogeneous dynamics?

    Marcus T. Cicerone;M. D. Ediger

  • How do molecules move near Tg? Molecular rotation of six probes in o‐terphenyl across 14 decades in time

    Marcus T. Cicerone;F. R. Blackburn;M. D. Ediger

  • High-Speed Coherent Raman Fingerprint Imaging of Biological Tissues.

    Charles H. Camp;Young Jong Lee;John M. Heddleston;Christopher M. Hartshorn

  • Chemically sensitive bioimaging with coherent Raman scattering

    Charles H. Camp;Marcus T. Cicerone

  • Relaxation of spatially heterogeneous dynamic domains in supercooled ortho‐terphenyl

    Marcus T. Cicerone;M. D. Ediger

  • LTB4 Is a Signal-Relay Molecule during Neutrophil Chemotaxis

    Philippe V. Afonso;Mirkka Janka-Junttila;Young Jong Lee;Colin P. McCann;Colin P. McCann

  • Simple approach to one-laser, broadband coherent anti-Stokes Raman scattering microscopy.

    Tak W. Kee;Marcus T. Cicerone

  • The effect of 3D hydrogel scaffold modulus on osteoblast differentiation and mineralization revealed by combinatorial screening.

    Kaushik Chatterjee;Sheng Lin-Gibson;William E. Wallace;Sapun H. Parekh

  • Anomalous Diffusion of Probe Molecules in Polystyrene: Evidence for Spatially Heterogeneous Segmental Dynamics

    Marcus T. Cicerone;F. R. Blackburn;M. D. Ediger

  • Fast dynamics and stabilization of proteins: binary glasses of trehalose and glycerol.

    Marcus T. Cicerone;Christopher L. Soles

  • Broadband CARS spectral phase retrieval using a time-domain Kramers-Kronig transform.

    Yuexin Liu;Young Jong Lee;Marcus T. Cicerone

  • β-Relaxation governs protein stability in sugar-glass matrices

    Marcus T. Cicerone;Jack F. Douglas

  • Stabilization of proteins in solid form.

    Marcus T. Cicerone;Marcus T. Cicerone;Michael J. Pikal;Ken K. Qian

  • Protein and solvent dynamics: how strongly are they coupled?

    G. Caliskan;D. Mechtani;J. H. Roh;A. Kisliuk

  • Modulus-Driven Differentiation of Marrow Stromal Cells in 3D Scaffolds That Is Independent of Myosin-based Cytoskeletal Tension

    Sapun H. Parekh;Kaushik Chatterjee;Kaushik Chatterjee;Sheng Lin-Gibson;Nicole M. Moore

  • Drying-induced variations in physico-chemical properties of amorphous pharmaceuticals and their impact on stability (I): stability of a monoclonal antibody.

    Ahmad M. Abdul‐Fattah;Vu Truong‐Le;Luisa Yee;Lauren Nguyen

  • Photobleaching technique for measuring ultraslow reorientation near and below the glass transition : tetracene in o-terphenyl

    Marcus T. Cicerone;M. D. Ediger

  • Label-Free Cellular Imaging by Broadband Coherent Anti-Stokes Raman Scattering Microscopy

    Sapun H. Parekh;Young Jong Lee;Khaled A. Aamer;Marcus T. Cicerone

  • Translational Diffusion on Heterogeneous Lattices: A Model for Dynamics in Glass Forming Materials

    Marcus T. Cicerone;Paul A. Wagner;M. D. Ediger

  • Impact of sucrose level on storage stability of proteins in freeze‐dried solids: II. Correlation of aggregation rate with protein structure and molecular mobility

    Bingquan Wang;Serguei Tchessalov;Marcus T. Cicerone;Nicholas W. Warne

  • Molecular motions and viscoelasticity of amorphous polymers near Tg

    Tadashi Inoue;Marcus T. Cicerone;M. D. Ediger

Frequent Co-Authors

Mark Ediger
Mark Ediger University of Wisconsin–Madison
Christopher L. Soles
Christopher L. Soles National Institute of Standards and Technology
Michael J. Pikal
Michael J. Pikal University of Connecticut
Jack F. Douglas
Jack F. Douglas National Institute of Standards and Technology
Alexei P. Sokolov
Alexei P. Sokolov University of Tennessee at Knoxville
Newell R. Washburn
Newell R. Washburn Carnegie Mellon University
Juan J. de Pablo
Juan J. de Pablo New York University
Esmaiel Jabbari
Esmaiel Jabbari University of South Carolina
Rocky S. Tuan
Rocky S. Tuan Chinese University of Hong Kong
Steven D. Hudson
Steven D. Hudson National Institute of Standards and Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Chemistry in the USA opens doors to various career paths that often align with healthcare, legal, and pharmaceutical industries. For those interested in legal support roles, exploring the best online associates in criminal justice can be a practical starting point. These programs provide foundational knowledge that complements a chemistry background, especially in forensic chemistry.

Within the legal field, understanding the types of paralegals and salaries is crucial for evaluating career prospects. Some chemistry graduates leverage their scientific expertise to specialize as paralegals in intellectual property or environmental law.

Pharmaceutical careers are a natural fit for chemistry graduates. To learn about one prominent role on the sales side, check out information on how much do pharmaceutical reps make. These positions combine product knowledge with business skills and often require experience in chemistry or related sciences.

For those aiming higher, becoming a pharmacist requires specific education and licensing. Detailed insights on pharmacist education requirements can guide chemistry students in planning their advanced studies and professional paths in pharmacy.

Best Scientists Citing Marcus T. Cicerone

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles