World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Materials Science 47 11146 10767 2621 2433 142 7995

Newell R. Washburn publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Newell R. Washburn between 1987 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Newell R. Washburn published across 39 years, from 1987 to 2025, averaging 4.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 23 publications in 2004. 19 of the 177 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1987 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 23. Peak 23 publications in 2004. 1987: 1 publication 1988: 1 publication 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 1 publication 1994: 0 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 2 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 3 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 8 publications 2004: 23 publications 2005: 16 publications 2006: 7 publications 2007: 7 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 7 publications 2010: 7 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 2 publications 2013: 6 publications 2014: 6 publications 2015: 9 publications 2016: 7 publications 2017: 5 publications 2018: 4 publications 2019: 7 publications 2020: 4 publications 2021: 2 publications 2022: 4 publications 2023: 4 publications 2024: 8 publications 2025: 11 publications
1987 2025

177 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Newell R. Washburn: publications per year, 1987 to 2025
Year Publications
1987 1
1988 1
1989 0
1990 0
1991 0
1992 0
1993 1
1994 0
1995 0
1996 0
1997 2
1998 0
1999 0
2000 3
2001 2
2002 2
2003 8
2004 23
2005 16
2006 7
2007 7
2008 6
2009 7
2010 7
2011 5
2012 2
2013 6
2014 6
2015 9
2016 7
2017 5
2018 4
2019 7
2020 4
2021 2
2022 4
2023 4
2024 8
2025 11
Total 177
Download as CSV

Newell R. Washburn publication distribution in Materials Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Materials Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Newell R. Washburn sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 57 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 50–69 to 1,163+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 891. Most scientists, 891, have 190–209 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,163 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 130–149 publications, is where this scientist sits. 50–69 publications: 28 scientists 70–89 publications: 152 scientists 90–109 publications: 356 scientists 110–129 publications: 487 scientists 130–149 publications: 723 scientists 150–169 publications: 835 scientists 170–189 publications: 850 scientists 190–209 publications: 891 scientists 210–229 publications: 862 scientists 230–249 publications: 766 scientists 250–269 publications: 726 scientists 270–289 publications: 665 scientists 290–309 publications: 593 scientists 310–329 publications: 537 scientists 330–349 publications: 477 scientists 350–369 publications: 440 scientists 370–389 publications: 356 scientists 390–409 publications: 321 scientists 410–429 publications: 256 scientists 430–449 publications: 246 scientists 450–469 publications: 216 scientists 470–489 publications: 212 scientists 490–509 publications: 174 scientists 510–529 publications: 194 scientists 530–549 publications: 162 scientists 550–569 publications: 131 scientists 570–589 publications: 111 scientists 590–609 publications: 103 scientists 610–629 publications: 99 scientists 630–649 publications: 77 scientists 650–669 publications: 92 scientists 670–689 publications: 56 scientists 690–709 publications: 53 scientists 710–729 publications: 53 scientists 730–749 publications: 38 scientists 750–769 publications: 52 scientists 770–789 publications: 43 scientists 790–809 publications: 38 scientists 810–829 publications: 34 scientists 830–849 publications: 25 scientists 850–869 publications: 18 scientists 870–889 publications: 20 scientists 890–909 publications: 24 scientists 910–929 publications: 27 scientists 930–949 publications: 20 scientists 950–969 publications: 17 scientists 970–989 publications: 10 scientists 990–1,009 publications: 16 scientists 1,010–1,029 publications: 13 scientists 1,030–1,049 publications: 12 scientists 1,050–1,069 publications: 9 scientists 1,070–1,089 publications: 8 scientists 1,090–1,109 publications: 7 scientists 1,110–1,129 publications: 9 scientists 1,130–1,149 publications: 2 scientists 1,150–1,162 publications: 5 scientists 1,163+ publications: 100 scientists
50–69 publications 1,163+

This scientist: 142 publications — 12th percentile

12% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,163 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Materials Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 12,847 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
50–69 28
70–89 152
90–109 356
110–129 487
130–149 723 142
150–169 835
170–189 850
190–209 891
210–229 862
230–249 766
250–269 726
270–289 665
290–309 593
310–329 537
330–349 477
350–369 440
370–389 356
390–409 321
410–429 256
430–449 246
450–469 216
470–489 212
490–509 174
510–529 194
530–549 162
550–569 131
570–589 111
590–609 103
610–629 99
630–649 77
650–669 92
670–689 56
690–709 53
710–729 53
730–749 38
750–769 52
770–789 43
790–809 38
810–829 34
830–849 25
850–869 18
870–889 20
890–909 24
910–929 27
930–949 20
950–969 17
970–989 10
990–1,009 16
1,010–1,029 13
1,030–1,049 12
1,050–1,069 9
1,070–1,089 8
1,090–1,109 7
1,110–1,129 9
1,130–1,149 2
1,150–1,162 5
1,163+ 100
Download as CSV

Newell R. Washburn D-index placement in Materials Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Materials Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Newell R. Washburn sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 64 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 165+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 667. Most scientists, 667, have 52–53 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 165 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 46–47 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 211 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 450 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 612 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 612 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 598 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 657 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 667 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 621 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 597 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 610 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 587 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 606 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 533 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 490 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 469 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 378 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 421 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 359 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 323 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 299 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 230 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 210 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 195 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 203 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 175 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 175 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 142 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 121 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 117 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 107 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 88 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 85 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 68 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 62 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 57 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 45 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 49 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 50 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 34 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 38 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 37 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 29 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 28 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 24 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 33 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 28 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 20 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 23 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 17 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 12 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 17 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 21 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 13 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 11 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 13 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 9 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 4 scientists 164 D-Index: 3 scientists 165+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40–41 D-Index 165+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 15th percentile

15% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 165 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Materials Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 12,847 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 211
42–43 450
44–45 612
46–47 612 47
48–49 598
50–51 657
52–53 667
54–55 621
56–57 597
58–59 610
60–61 587
62–63 606
64–65 533
66–67 490
68–69 469
70–71 378
72–73 421
74–75 359
76–77 323
78–79 299
80–81 230
82–83 210
84–85 195
86–87 203
88–89 175
90–91 175
92–93 142
94–95 121
96–97 117
98–99 107
100–101 88
102–103 85
104–105 68
106–107 62
108–109 57
110–111 45
112–113 49
114–115 50
116–117 34
118–119 38
120–121 37
122–123 29
124–125 28
126–127 24
128–129 33
130–131 28
132–133 21
134–135 20
136–137 23
138–139 17
140–141 12
142–143 17
144–145 21
146–147 13
148–149 11
150–151 14
152–153 13
154–155 9
156–157 10
158–159 7
160–161 4
162–163 4
164 3
165+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Newell R. Washburn is a researcher affiliated with Carnegie Mellon University in the United States, specializing in the field of engineering with a focus on civil and structural engineering. Their work encompasses a range of subfields and topics related to materials science, construction, and computational methods.

Washburn's research spans multiple subfields including civil and structural engineering, computational theory and mathematics, pulmonary and respiratory medicine, building and construction, and materials chemistry.

The scientist's main topics of work can be outlined as follows:

  • Concrete and Cement Materials Research
  • Computational Drug Discovery Methods
  • Innovative concrete reinforcement materials
  • Machine Learning in Materials Science
  • Innovations in Concrete and Construction Materials
  • Aortic aneurysm repair treatments
  • Surfactants and Colloidal Systems

Frequent publication venues for Washburn include:

  • Cement and Concrete Research
  • Drug Delivery and Translational Research
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering
  • Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling

The scientist has contributed to various research articles demonstrating the application of machine learning and computational methods in materials and chemical sciences. Selected recent publications are:

  • "Hierarchical Machine Learning for High-Fidelity 3D Printed Biopolymers" (2020), ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering
  • "Predicting the rheology of limestone calcined clay cements (LC3): Linking composition and hydration kinetics to yield stress through Machine Learning" (2022), Cement and Concrete Research
  • "Elucidating the Physicochemical Basis of the Glass Transition Temperature in Linear Polyurethane Elastomers with Machine Learning" (2020), The Journal of Physical Chemistry B
  • "Diffusion Models in De Novo Drug Design" (2024), Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
  • "Predicting Young's Modulus of Linear Polyurethane and Polyurethane-Polyurea Elastomers: Bridging Length Scales with Physicochemical Modeling and Machine Learning" (2022), ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces

Washburn frequently collaborates with other scientists, with key coauthors including:

  • Kimberly E. Kurtis
  • Barnabás Póczos
  • Joseph Pugar
  • Christopher M. Childs
  • Oğulcan Canbek

Best Publications

  • The grateful dead: damage-associated molecular pattern molecules and reduction/oxidation regulate immunity.

    Michael T. Lotze;Herbert J. Zeh;Anna Rubartelli;Louis J. Sparvero

  • Structure and Mechanical Properties of Poly(D,L-lactic acid)/Poly(ε-caprolactone) Blends

    M E. Broz;David L. VanderHart;N. R. Washburn

  • High-throughput investigation of osteoblast response to polymer crystallinity: influence of nanometer-scale roughness on proliferation.

    Newell R. Washburn;Kenneth M. Yamada;Carl G. Simon;Scott B. Kennedy

  • Influence of the degree of methacrylation on hyaluronic acid hydrogels properties

    Sidi A. Bencherif;Abiraman Srinivasan;Ferenc Horkay;Jeffrey O. Hollinger

  • Synthesis and Characterization of PEG Dimethacrylates and Their Hydrogels

    Sheng Lin-Gibson;Sidi Bencherif;James A. Cooper;Stephanie J. Wetzel

  • Combinatorial screen of the effect of surface energy on fibronectin-mediated osteoblast adhesion, spreading and proliferation.

    Scott B. Kennedy;Newell R. Washburn;Newell R. Washburn;Carl George Simon;Eric J. Amis

  • Improved Lignin Polyurethane Properties with Lewis Acid Treatment

    Hoyong Chung;Newell R. Washburn

  • Enhanced reversible adhesion of dopamine methacrylamide-coated elastomer microfibrillar structures under wet conditions.

    Paul Glass;Hoyong Chung;Newell R Washburn;Metin Sitti

  • Chemistry of lignin-based materials

    Hoyong Chung;Newell R. Washburn

  • Structure-Property Relationships of Photopolymerizable Poly(Ethylene Glycol) Dimethacrylate Hydrogels

    Sheng Lin-Gibson;Ronald L. Jones;Newell R. Washburn;Ferenc Horkay

  • Solid-phase ATRP synthesis of peptide-polymer hybrids.

    Ying Mei;Kathryn L. Beers;H. C. Byrd;David L. Vanderhart

  • A universal route towards thermoplastic lignin composites with improved mechanical properties

    Shayna L. Hilburg;Allison N. Elder;Hoyong Chung;Rachel L. Ferebee

  • Nanostructured hybrid hydrogels prepared by a combination of atom transfer radical polymerization and free radical polymerization

    Sidi A. Bencherif;Daniel J. Siegwart;Abiraman Srinivasan;Ferenc Horkay

  • Tuning Cell Adhesion on Gradient Poly(2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate)-Grafted Surfaces

    Ying Mei;Tao Wu;Chang Xu;Kurt J. Langenbach

  • Co-extrusion of biocompatible polymers for scaffolds with co-continuous morphology†‡§

    Newell R. Washburn;Carl G. Simon;Alessandro Tona;Hoda M. Elgendy

  • Combinatorial screening of cell proliferation on poly(L-lactic acid)/poly(D,L-lactic acid) blends.

    Carl G. Simon;Naomi Eidelman;Scott B. Kennedy;Amit Sehgal

  • Synthesis by AGET ATRP of degradable nanogel precursors for in situ formation of nanostructured hyaluronic acid hydrogel.

    Sidi A. Bencherif;Newell R. Washburn;Krzysztof Matyjaszewski

  • Polymer-grafted lignin surfactants prepared via reversible addition-fragmentation chain-transfer polymerization.

    Chetali Gupta;Newell R Washburn

  • Ternary Polymer Blends as Model Surfactant Systems

    Newell R. Washburn;Timothy P. Lodge;Frank S. Bates

  • Selective adsorption of rare earth elements onto functionalized silica particles

    Jonathan C. Callura;Kedar M. Perkins;Clinton W. Noack;Newell R. Washburn

  • In situ atomic force microscope study of lead underpotential deposition on gold (111): structural properties of the catalytically active phase

    Chun Hsien Chen;Newell Washburn;Andrew A. Gewirth

  • Enhanced Adhesion of Dopamine Methacrylamide Elastomers via Viscoelasticity Tuning

    Hoyong Chung;Paul Glass;Jewel M. Pothen;Metin Sitti

Frequent Co-Authors

Eric J. Amis
Eric J. Amis University of Akron
Krzysztof Matyjaszewski
Krzysztof Matyjaszewski Carnegie Mellon University
Joseph M. Antonucci
Joseph M. Antonucci National Institute of Standards and Technology
Barnabás Póczos
Barnabás Póczos Carnegie Mellon University
Metin Sitti
Metin Sitti Max Planck Institute for Intelligent Systems
Alamgir Karim
Alamgir Karim University of Houston
David A. Dzombak
David A. Dzombak Carnegie Mellon University
Marcus T. Cicerone
Marcus T. Cicerone National Institute of Standards and Technology
Kimberly E. Kurtis
Kimberly E. Kurtis Georgia Institute of Technology
Matthew L. Becker
Matthew L. Becker Duke University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Newell R. Washburn

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles