World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Engineering and Technology

D-Index
46
Citations
6870
World Ranking
5258
National Ranking
1479

Kimberly E. Kurtis publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kimberly E. Kurtis sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 804+

This scientist: 241 publications — 62nd percentile

62% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

Kimberly E. Kurtis D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kimberly E. Kurtis sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 46 D-Index — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

Overview

Kimberly E. Kurtis is a researcher affiliated with the Georgia Institute of Technology in the United States. Their work spans the field of Engineering, with a primary focus on Civil and Structural Engineering. Additional subfields include Building and Construction, Materials Chemistry, Ocean Engineering, and Biomaterials.

The main topics covered in Kimberly E. Kurtis's research include:

  • Concrete and Cement Materials Research
  • Innovative concrete reinforcement materials
  • Concrete Corrosion and Durability
  • Concrete Properties and Behavior
  • Innovations in Concrete and Construction Materials
  • Building materials and conservation
  • Smart Materials for Construction

Kimberly E. Kurtis has contributed to numerous publications, many of which are found in notable venues such as:

  • Cement and Concrete Research
  • Construction and Building Materials
  • ACI Materials Journal
  • Cement
  • Materials and Structures

Some recent papers authored or co-authored by Kimberly E. Kurtis include:

  • "Predicting the rheology of limestone calcined clay cements (LC3): Linking composition and hydration kinetics to yield stress through Machine Learning" (2022), Cement and Concrete Research
  • "Optimization of matrix viscosity improves polypropylene fiber dispersion and properties of engineered cementitious composites" (2022), Construction and Building Materials
  • "Advances in imaging, scattering, spectroscopy, and machine learning-aided approaches for multiscale characterization of cementitious systems" (2023), Cement and Concrete Research
  • "Water-to-cement ratio of calcium sulfoaluminate belite cements: Hydration, setting time, and strength development" (2022), Cement
  • "In-situ microtomography image segmentation for characterizing strain-hardening cementitious composites under tension using machine learning" (2023), Cement and Concrete Research

Frequent co-authors of Kimberly E. Kurtis include:

  • Newell R. Washburn
  • Francesca Lolli
  • Qingxu Jin
  • Connor Szeto
  • Laurence J. Jacobs

Best Publications

  • Time to failure for concrete exposed to severe sulfate attack

    Paulo J.M. Monteiro;Kimberly E. Kurtis

  • Influence of TiO2 Nanoparticles on Early C3S Hydration

    Bo Yeon Lee;Kimberly E. Kurtis

  • Chloride-induced corrosion resistance of high-strength stainless steels in simulated alkaline and carbonated concrete pore solutions

    Robert D. Moser;Preet M. Singh;Lawrence F. Kahn;Kimberly E. Kurtis

  • Influence of Portland Cement Composition on Early Age Reactions with Metakaolin

    Fabien Lagier;Kimberly E. Kurtis

  • Effect of mechanical processing on sugar cane bagasse ash pozzolanicity

    Guilherme C. Cordeiro;Kimberly E. Kurtis

  • Effects of concrete properties and nutrients on fungal colonization and fouling

    David J. Giannantonio;Jonah C. Kurth;Kimberly E. Kurtis;Patricia A. Sobecky

  • Advances in characterizing and understanding the microstructure of cementitious materials

    Paulo J.M. Monteiro;Guoqing Geng;Delphine Marchon;Jiaqi Li

  • Rapid Evaluation of Alkali-silica Reactivity of Aggregates Using a Nonlinear Resonance Spectroscopy Technique

    Jun Chen;Amal R. Jayapalan;Jin-Yeon Kim;Kimberly E. Kurtis

  • Influence of TiO2 Nanoparticles on Early C3S Hydration

    B.Y. Lee;J.J. Thomas;M. Treager;K.E. Kurtis

  • Utilization of Savannah Harbor river sediment as the primary raw material in production of fired brick.

    Andrea Mezencevova;Nortey N. Yeboah;Susan E. Burns;Lawrence F. Kahn

  • X-ray microtomography (microCT) of the progression of sulfate attack of cement paste

    S.R Stock;N.K Naik;A.P Wilkinson;K.E Kurtis

  • Characterization of ASR damage in concrete using nonlinear impact resonance acoustic spectroscopy technique

    Krzysztof J. Leśnicki;Jin-Yeon Kim;Kimberly E. Kurtis;Laurence J. Jacobs

  • Sulfate Attack Monitored by MicroCT and EDXRD: Influence of Cement Type, Water-To-Cement Ratio, and Aggregate

    N. N. Naik;A. C. Jupe;Stuart R Stock;A. P. Wilkinson

  • Assessing the efficiency of entrained air voids for freeze-thaw durability through modeling

    Nathan P. Mayercsik;Matthieu Vandamme;Kimberly E. Kurtis

  • Can nanotechnology be ‘green’? Comparing efficacy of nano and microparticles in cementitious materials

    Amal R. Jayapalan;Bo Yeon Lee;Kimberly E. Kurtis

  • Proposed mechanism of C-S-H growth tested by soft X-ray microscopy

    Unknown

  • Characterization of progressive microcracking in Portland cement mortar using nonlinear ultrasonics

    X.J. Chen;X.J. Chen;J.-Y. Kim;K.E. Kurtis;J. Qu

  • Air-coupled detection of nonlinear Rayleigh surface waves in concrete—Application to microcracking detection

    Gun Kim;Chi-Won In;Jin-Yeon Kim;Kimberly E. Kurtis

  • Service-life of concrete in freeze-thaw environments: Critical degree of saturation and calcium oxychloride formation

    Scott H. Smith;Chunyu Qiao;Prannoy Suraneni;Kimberly E. Kurtis

  • Characterization of entrained air voids in cement paste with scattered ultrasound

    Wonsiri Punurai;Jacek Jarzynski;Jianmin Qu;Kimberly E. Kurtis

  • Influence of Additions of Anatase TiO2 Nanoparticles on Early-Age Properties of Cement-Based Materials

    Amal R Jayapalan;Bo Yeon Lee;Sarah M Fredrich;Kimberly E Kurtis

  • Characterization of biomass and high carbon content coal ash for productive reuse applications

    N.N. Nortey Yeboah;Christopher R. Shearer;Susan E. Burns;Kimberly E. Kurtis

  • Characterization of Multi-scale Porosity in Cement Paste by Advanced Ultrasonic Techniques

    Wonsiri Punurai;Wonsiri Punurai;Jacek Jarzynski;Jianmin Qu;Jin-Yeon Kim

  • GUIDELINES FOR THE USE OF LITHIUM TO MITIGATE OR PREVENT ASR

    K J Folliard;Mda Thomas;K E Kurtis

  • Empirical Models to Predict Concrete Expansion Caused by Sulfate Attack

    Kimberly E. Kurtis;Paulo J. M. Monteiro;Samer M. Madanat

  • Sustainable Development and Energy Geotechnology Potential Roles for Geotechnical Engineering

    R. J. Fragaszy;J. C. Santamarina;A. Amekudzi;D. Assimaki

Frequent Co-Authors

Jin-Yeon Kim
Jin-Yeon Kim Georgia Institute of Technology
Reza Zoughi
Reza Zoughi Iowa State University
Paulo J.M. Monteiro
Paulo J.M. Monteiro University of California, Berkeley
Angus P. Wilkinson
Angus P. Wilkinson Georgia Institute of Technology
Jianmin Qu
Jianmin Qu Tufts University
Newell R. Washburn
Newell R. Washburn Carnegie Mellon University
Barnabás Póczos
Barnabás Póczos Carnegie Mellon University
John L. Provis
John L. Provis Paul Scherrer Institute
Michael H. Bergin
Michael H. Bergin Duke University
Jeffery R. Roesler
Jeffery R. Roesler University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring engineering and technology in the USA opens up a wide range of related online degrees and diverse career options. Many students interested in technical fields also look to complement their skill set with studies in management, business, communication, legal, or human resources sectors.

Business-minded students who want an affordable graduate degree should consider the cheapest aacsb online mba no gmat options, which allow for flexible schedules and important leadership training. For those leaning towards legal aspects of technology or compliance roles, there are specialized aba approved paralegal programs available online to enhance your credentials.

Professionals looking to move quickly into people management can pursue a 1 year online master's in human resources, streamlining your route to HR management roles. If communication is your focus – perhaps for technical writing or public relations in tech firms – an online masters in communications provides practical skills for engaging diverse audiences.

Each of these online degrees can support a thriving career alongside your foundation in engineering or technology, helping you stand out in an evolving job market.

Best Scientists Citing Kimberly E. Kurtis

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles