World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Eshkol Rafaeli

Eshkol Rafaeli

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 33 10323 9662 126 115 125 13750

Eshkol Rafaeli publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Eshkol Rafaeli between 2002 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Eshkol Rafaeli published across 24 years, from 2002 to 2025, averaging 6.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 28 publications in 2010. 17 of the 147 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2002 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 28. Peak 28 publications in 2010. 2002: 1 publication 2003: 3 publications 2004: 0 publications 2005: 1 publication 2006: 4 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 1 publication 2009: 2 publications 2010: 28 publications 2011: 3 publications 2012: 3 publications 2013: 3 publications 2014: 2 publications 2015: 9 publications 2016: 11 publications 2017: 8 publications 2018: 8 publications 2019: 6 publications 2020: 15 publications 2021: 8 publications 2022: 6 publications 2023: 4 publications 2024: 5 publications 2025: 12 publications
2002 2025

147 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Eshkol Rafaeli: publications per year, 2002 to 2025
Year Publications
2002 1
2003 3
2004 0
2005 1
2006 4
2007 4
2008 1
2009 2
2010 28
2011 3
2012 3
2013 3
2014 2
2015 9
2016 11
2017 8
2018 8
2019 6
2020 15
2021 8
2022 6
2023 4
2024 5
2025 12
Total 147
Download as CSV

Eshkol Rafaeli publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Eshkol Rafaeli sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 121–130 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 125 publications — 35th percentile

35% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670 125
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Eshkol Rafaeli D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Eshkol Rafaeli sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 32–33 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 33 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702 33
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Eshkol Rafaeli is affiliated with Bar-Ilan University in Israel and conducts research primarily in the field of psychology. Their work spans a range of specialized areas within psychology, including clinical psychology, social psychology, experimental and cognitive psychology, cognitive neuroscience, and applied psychology.

Their research topics cover diverse psychological themes such as attachment and relationship dynamics, anxiety, depression, psychometrics, treatment, cognitive processes, personality disorders and psychopathology, child and adolescent psychosocial and emotional development, mental health research topics, psychotherapy techniques and applications, and action observation and synchronization.

They have published recent papers focusing on various aspects of psychological science. Some of these are:

  • "Machine learning uncovers the most robust self-report predictors of relationship quality across 43 longitudinal couples studies," 2020, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • "Patterns of early change in interpersonal problems and their relationship to nonverbal synchrony and multidimensional outcome," 2020, Journal of Counseling Psychology
  • "Intrapersonal and interpersonal vocal affect dynamics during psychotherapy," 2021, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
  • "Therapeutic technique diversity is linked to quality of working alliance and client functioning following alliance ruptures," 2020, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
  • "Modes: Cohesive personality states and their interrelationships as organizing concepts in psychopathology," 2023, Journal of Psychopathology and Clinical Science

Frequent coauthors in Rafaeli's research include Eran Bar-Kalifa, Wolfgang Lutz, Gal Lazarus, Rony Pshedetzky-Shochat, and Haran Sened. These collaborations have contributed to a body of work encompassing multiple studies in various specialized fields.

Rafaeli commonly publishes in several academic venues, with repeated contributions to:

  • Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
  • Psychotherapy Research
  • Journal of Social and Personal Relationships
  • Psychophysiology
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Their scholarly output reflects sustained engagement in advancing knowledge across multiple subfields of psychology, with particular emphasis on clinical and social aspects related to mental health and therapeutic processes.

Best Publications

  • Diary Methods: Capturing Life as it is Lived

    Niall Bolger;Angelina Davis;Eshkol Rafaeli

  • Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology

    Unknown

  • A Procedure for Evaluating Sensitivity to Within-Person Change: Can Mood Measures in Diary Studies Detect Change Reliably?

    James A. Cranford;Patrick E. Shrout;Masumi Iida;Eshkol Rafaeli

  • Paper or plastic? Data equivalence in paper and electronic diaries.

    Amie S. Green;Eshkol Rafaeli;Niall Bolger;Patrick E. Shrout

  • Schema Therapy: Distinctive Features

    Eshkol Rafaeli;David P Bernstein;Jeffrey E. Young

  • The rejection-rage contingency in borderline personality disorder.

    Kathy R. Berenson;Geraldine Downey;Eshkol Rafaeli;Karin G. Coifman

  • Skilled Support Within Intimate Relationships

    Eshkol Rafaeli;Marci E. J. Gleason

  • Machine learning uncovers the most robust self-report predictors of relationship quality across 43 longitudinal couples studies

    Samantha Joel;Paul W. Eastwick;Colleen J. Allison;Ximena B. Arriaga

  • Emotion Differentiation as a Protective Factor Against Nonsuicidal Self-Injury in Borderline Personality Disorder

    Landon F. Zaki;Karin G. Coifman;Eshkol Rafaeli;Kathy R. Berenson

  • Affective Synchrony: Individual Differences in Mixed Emotions

    Eshkol Rafaeli;Gregory M. Rogers;William Revelle

  • Perceived Partner Responsiveness Mediates the Association Between Sexual and Marital Satisfaction: A Daily Diary Study in Newlywed Couples

    Reuma Gadassi;Lior Eadan Bar-Nahum;Sarah Newhouse;Ragnar Anderson

  • Empathic accuracy and relationship satisfaction: A meta-analytic review

    Haran Sened;Michal Lavidor;Gal Lazarus;Eran Bar-Kalifa

  • From Negative to Positive and Back Again: Polarized Affective and Relational Experience in Borderline Personality Disorder

    Karin G. Coifman;Kathy R. Berenson;Eshkol Rafaeli;Geraldine Downey

  • Within-Person Changes in the Structure of Emotion The Role of Cultural Identification and Language

    Wei Qi Elaine Perunovic;Daniel Heller;Eshkol Rafaeli

  • AFFECT DYNAMICS, BEREAVEMENT AND RESILIENCE TO LOSS

    Karin G. Coifman;George A. Bonanno;Eshkol Rafaeli

  • Cognitive biases in emotional disorders: Information processing and social-cognitive perspectives.

    Susan Mineka;Eshkol Rafaeli;Iftah Yovel

  • Marital Satisfaction and Communication Behaviors During Sexual and Nonsexual Conflict Discussions in Newlywed Couples: A Pilot Study

    Uzma S Rehman;Erick Janssen;Sarah Newhouse;Julia Heiman

  • A premature consensus: are happiness and sadness truly opposite affects?

    Eshkol Rafaeli;William Revelle

  • Emotional experience and alliance contribute to therapeutic change in psychodynamic therapy.

    Hadar Fisher;Dana Atzil-Slonim;Eran Bar-Kalifa;Eshkol Rafaeli

  • Therapeutic bond judgments: Congruence and incongruence.

    Dana Atzil-Slonim;Eran Bar-Kalifa;Eshkol Rafaeli;Wolfgang Lutz

  • Depression and Empathic Accuracy in Couples An Interpersonal Model of Gender Differences in Depression

    Reuma Gadassi;Nilly Mor;Eshkol Rafaeli;Eshkol Rafaeli

Frequent Co-Authors

David P. Bernstein
David P. Bernstein Maastricht University
Wolfgang Lutz
Wolfgang Lutz University of Trier
Geraldine Downey
Geraldine Downey Columbia University
Julian A. Rubel
Julian A. Rubel Osnabrück University
Niall Bolger
Niall Bolger Columbia University
Erick Janssen
Erick Janssen KU Leuven
Patrick E. Shrout
Patrick E. Shrout New York University
Julia R. Heiman
Julia R. Heiman Indiana University
Harry T. Reis
Harry T. Reis University of Rochester
Jacques P. Barber
Jacques P. Barber Adelphi University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology online degrees opens diverse pathways for prospective students across the United States. Top universities now offer flexible programs that accommodate busy schedules and a wide range of academic interests. Options vary by state, with some regions standing out for their program quality and unique specializations.

For those focused on the West Coast, the best online psychology degree rankings in California showcase strong options, including programs with a focus on multicultural counseling and community psychology. If you are based in the Midwest, the best online psychology degree programs ranking in Illinois highlights well-ranked institutions offering general and applied psychology tracks.

At the graduate level, advanced students can pursue research and clinical careers thanks to the best online doctorate in psychology degree programs ranking in America. For those in New England, the best online psychology program rankings in Massachusetts provide detailed insights into programs with strengths in social psychology and developmental studies.

With increasing demand for mental health professionals and behavioral experts, earning a psychology degree online can lead to rewarding roles in counseling, education, research, and human services nationwide.

Best Scientists Citing Eshkol Rafaeli

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles