World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Jean-Philippe Laurenceau

Jean-Philippe Laurenceau

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 51 5108 4738 2810 2543 135 18973

Jean-Philippe Laurenceau publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Jean-Philippe Laurenceau between 1997 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Jean-Philippe Laurenceau published across 29 years, from 1997 to 2025, averaging 5 papers a year. Output peaked at 16 publications in 2021. 12 of the 145 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1997 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 16. Peak 16 publications in 2021. 1997: 1 publication 1998: 1 publication 1999: 0 publications 2000: 0 publications 2001: 0 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 6 publications 2005: 8 publications 2006: 6 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 6 publications 2011: 9 publications 2012: 9 publications 2013: 5 publications 2014: 3 publications 2015: 11 publications 2016: 5 publications 2017: 4 publications 2018: 5 publications 2019: 9 publications 2020: 1 publication 2021: 16 publications 2022: 7 publications 2023: 4 publications 2024: 6 publications 2025: 6 publications
1997 2025

145 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Jean-Philippe Laurenceau: publications per year, 1997 to 2025
Year Publications
1997 1
1998 1
1999 0
2000 0
2001 0
2002 2
2003 3
2004 6
2005 8
2006 6
2007 4
2008 4
2009 4
2010 6
2011 9
2012 9
2013 5
2014 3
2015 11
2016 5
2017 4
2018 5
2019 9
2020 1
2021 16
2022 7
2023 4
2024 6
2025 6
Total 145
Download as CSV

Jean-Philippe Laurenceau publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jean-Philippe Laurenceau sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 131–140 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 135 publications — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644 135
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Jean-Philippe Laurenceau D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jean-Philippe Laurenceau sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 50–51 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 51 D-Index — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445 51
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Jean-Philippe Laurenceau is affiliated with the University of Delaware in the United States and specializes in research spanning medicine and psychology.

Their research covers multiple subfields, including social psychology, endocrinology, diabetes and metabolism, sociology and political science, oncology, and epidemiology. The scientist's work addresses core topics such as family support in illness, attachment and relationship dynamics, cancer survivorship and care, childhood cancer survivors' quality of life, cancer-related cognitive impairment studies, substance abuse treatment and outcomes, and diabetes management and research.

Frequently publishing in venues related to behavioral medicine and health psychology, the scientist has contributed multiple papers to the following journals and series:

  • Annals of Behavioral Medicine
  • Health Psychology
  • PsycTESTS Dataset
  • Journal of Family Psychology
  • JMIR Research Protocols

Some recent publications include:

  • "Integrating time into stigma and health research," 2022, Nature Reviews Psychology
  • "Fear of Cancer Recurrence and Inhibited Disclosure: Testing the Social-Cognitive Processing Model in Couples Coping With Breast Cancer," 2020, Annals of Behavioral Medicine
  • "Psychosocial Impact of Cancer Care Disruptions in Women With Breast Cancer During the COVID-19 Pandemic," 2021, Frontiers in Psychology
  • "Fear of Cancer Recurrence and Sleep in Couples Coping With Early-Stage Breast Cancer," 2022, Annals of Behavioral Medicine
  • "Assessing barriers to providing tobacco use disorder treatment in community mental health settings with a revised version of the Smoking Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices (S-KAP) instrument," 2020, Addictive Behaviors

Collaboration is a notable aspect of their work, with frequent coauthors including:

  • Scott D. Siegel
  • Emily C. Soriano (11 collaborations)
  • Christine Perndorfer (8 collaborations)
  • Valerie A. Earnshaw (7 collaborations)
  • Natalie M. Brousseau (7 collaborations)

Best Publications

  • Intensive Longitudinal Methods: An Introduction to Diary and Experience Sampling Research

    Niall Bolger;Jean-Philippe Laurenceau

  • Mindfulness and Emotion Regulation: The Development and Initial Validation of the Cognitive and Affective Mindfulness Scale-Revised (CAMS-R)

    Greg Feldman;Greg Feldman;Adele Hayes;Sameet Kumar;Jeff Greeson;Jeff Greeson

  • Intimacy as an Interpersonal Process" The Importance of Self-Disclosure, Partner Disclosure, and Perceived Partner Responsiveness in Interpersonal Exchanges

    Jean-Philippe Laurenceau;Lisa Feldman Barrett;Paula R. Pietromonaco

  • The interpersonal process model of intimacy in marriage: a daily-diary and multilevel modeling approach.

    Jean-Philippe Laurenceau;Lisa Feldman Barrett;Michael J Rovine

  • Change is not always linear: the study of nonlinear and discontinuous patterns of change in psychotherapy.

    Adele M. Hayes;Jean-Philippe Laurenceau;Greg Feldman;Jennifer L. Strauss

  • Modeling general and specific variance in multifaceted constructs: a comparison of the bifactor model to other approaches.

    Fangfang Chen;Adele M. Hayes;Charles S. Carver;Jean Philippe Laurenceau

  • Using diary methods to study marital and family processes.

    Jean-Philippe Laurenceau;Niall Bolger

  • Effects of an attachment-based intervention on the cortisol production of infants and toddlers in foster care.

    Mary Dozier;Elizabeth Peloso;Erin Lewis;Jean-Philippe Laurenceau

  • Psychosocial factors predict CD4 and viral load change in men and women with human immunodeficiency virus in the era of highly active antiretroviral treatment.

    Gail Ironson;Conall O'Cleirigh;Mary Ann Fletcher;Jean Philippe Laurenceau

  • Accelerating the development of emotion competence in Head Start children: Effects on adaptive and maladaptive behavior

    Carroll E. Izard;Kristen A. King;Christopher J. Trentacosta;Judith K. Morgan

  • Using diary methods in psychological research.

    Masumi Iida;Patrick E. Shrout;Jean-Philippe Laurenceau;Niall Bolger

  • Early alliance, alliance ruptures, and symptom change in a nonrandomized trial of cognitive therapy for avoidant and obsessive-compulsive personality disorders.

    Jennifer L. Strauss;Adele M. Hayes;Sheri L. Johnson;Cory F. Newman

  • Gender minority stress, mental health, and relationship quality: a dyadic investigation of transgender women and their cisgender male partners.

    Kristi E. Gamarel;Sari L. Reisner;Jean-Philippe Laurenceau;Tooru Nemoto

  • Marital conflict, maternal and paternal parenting, and child adjustment: a test of mediation and moderation.

    Karen J. Kaczynski;Kristin M. Lindahl;Neena M. Malik;Jean Philippe Laurenceau

  • Some methodological and statistical issues in the study of change processes in psychotherapy.

    Jean-Philippe Laurenceau;Adele M. Hayes;Greg C. Feldman

  • Discontinuities and cognitive changes in an exposure-based cognitive therapy for depression.

    Adele M. Hayes;Greg C. Feldman;Christopher G. Beevers;Jean-Philippe Laurenceau

  • Perceived partner reactions to diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer: impact on psychosocial and psychosexual adjustment.

    Sarah R. Wimberly;Charles S. Carver;Jean Philippe Laurenceau;Suzanne D. Harris

  • Avoidance and processing as predictors of symptom change and positive growth in an integrative therapy for depression

    Adele M Hayes;Christopher G Beevers;Gregory C Feldman;Jean-Philippe Laurenceau

  • Anxiety characteristics independently and prospectively predict myocardial infarction in men the unique contribution of anxiety among psychologic factors.

    Biing Jiun Shen;Yael E. Avivi;John F. Todaro;Avron Spiro

  • Dispositional optimism and the mechanisms by which it predicts slower disease progression in HIV: proactive behavior, avoidant coping, and depression.

    Gail Ironson;Elizabeth Balbin;Rick Stuetzle;Mary Ann Fletcher

Frequent Co-Authors

Adele M. Hayes
Adele M. Hayes University of Delaware
Charles S. Carver
Charles S. Carver University of Miami
Lawrence H. Cohen
Lawrence H. Cohen University of Delaware
Niall Bolger
Niall Bolger Columbia University
Jeffrey M. Greeson
Jeffrey M. Greeson Rowan University
Lisa Feldman Barrett
Lisa Feldman Barrett Northeastern University
Sari L. Reisner
Sari L. Reisner University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Michael H. Antoni
Michael H. Antoni University of Miami
Crystal L. Park
Crystal L. Park University of Connecticut
Blaine J. Fowers
Blaine J. Fowers University of Miami

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology in the USA opens doors to diverse career opportunities and flexible study options. Many students are drawn to online degrees, which offer convenience and can be more cost-effective. However, it's critical to consider tuition costs, accreditation, and state-specific licensing requirements when selecting a psychology or counseling program.

For those interested in affordable counseling degrees, there are several resources to guide your search. Prospective students in Illinois can find affordable counseling programs in Illinois. Similarly, those based in Indiana can explore most affordable counseling degree programs in Indiana to find suitable options.

If you are considering studying in a major city, there are also affordable counseling programs in Los Angeles worth exploring. Students in Michigan, meanwhile, can look into affordable counseling programs in Michigan.

Choosing an accredited and budget-friendly program can make a significant impact on your education and future career in psychology, counseling, or related fields.

Best Scientists Citing Jean-Philippe Laurenceau

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles