World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Natalie O. Rosen

Natalie O. Rosen

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 43 7358 6862 494 465 164 5490

Natalie O. Rosen publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Natalie O. Rosen between 2005 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Natalie O. Rosen published across 21 years, from 2005 to 2025, averaging 10.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 27 publications in 2025. 45 of the 222 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2005 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 27. Peak 27 publications in 2025. 2005: 1 publication 2006: 0 publications 2007: 1 publication 2008: 0 publications 2009: 2 publications 2010: 2 publications 2011: 1 publication 2012: 1 publication 2013: 3 publications 2014: 10 publications 2015: 7 publications 2016: 10 publications 2017: 22 publications 2018: 12 publications 2019: 15 publications 2020: 22 publications 2021: 25 publications 2022: 23 publications 2023: 20 publications 2024: 18 publications 2025: 27 publications
2005 2025

222 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Natalie O. Rosen: publications per year, 2005 to 2025
Year Publications
2005 1
2006 0
2007 1
2008 0
2009 2
2010 2
2011 1
2012 1
2013 3
2014 10
2015 7
2016 10
2017 22
2018 12
2019 15
2020 22
2021 25
2022 23
2023 20
2024 18
2025 27
Total 222
Download as CSV

Natalie O. Rosen publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Natalie O. Rosen sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 161–170 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 164 publications — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477 164
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Natalie O. Rosen D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Natalie O. Rosen sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 42–43 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617 43
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Natalie O. Rosen is a researcher affiliated with Dalhousie University in Canada, specializing broadly in the fields of Medicine and Psychology. Their work spans several subfields including Psychiatry and Mental Health, Social Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, and General Health Professions.

Their research primarily focuses on topics related to sexual function and dysfunction studies, attachment and relationship dynamics, adolescent sexual and reproductive health, maternal mental health during pregnancy and postpartum, sexuality, behavior and technology, marriage and sexual relationships, and reproductive health and technologies.

Frequent coauthors include Sophie Bergeron, Samantha J. Dawson, Marie-Pier Vaillancourt-Morel, Emily A. Impett, and Serena Corsini-Munt, reflecting collaborative work within their areas of study.

Natalie O. Rosen has contributed to various research venues, with notable frequent publication outlets being:

  • The Journal of Sexual Medicine
  • The Journal of Sex Research
  • Archives of Sexual Behavior
  • Journal of Family Psychology
  • Journal of Social and Personal Relationships

Recent publications from Rosen include the following papers:

  • "Trajectories of sexual well-being among couples in the transition to parenthood," 2020, Journal of Family Psychology

Other notable recent papers in related research areas (from Rosen's network of authorship) include:

  • "Machine learning uncovers the most robust self-report predictors of relationship quality across 43 longitudinal couples studies," 2020, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • "Preliminary validation of the Sexual Distress Scale-Short Form: Applications to Women, Men, and Prostate Cancer Survivors," 2020, Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy
  • "Biopsychosocial predictors of trajectories of postpartum sexual function in first-time mothers," 2020, Health Psychology
  • "Are Couples More Satisfied When They Match in Sexual Desire? New Insights From Response Surface Analyses," 2020, Social Psychological and Personality Science

Best Publications

  • Machine learning uncovers the most robust self-report predictors of relationship quality across 43 longitudinal couples studies

    Samantha Joel;Paul W. Eastwick;Colleen J. Allison;Ximena B. Arriaga

  • A little uncertainty goes a long way: state and trait differences in uncertainty interact to increase information seeking but also increase worry.

    Natalie O. Rosen;Bärbel Knäuper

  • Sexual and relationship intimacy among women with provoked vestibulodynia and their partners: associations with sexual satisfaction, sexual function, and pain self-efficacy.

    Katy Bois;Sophie Bergeron;Natalie O. Rosen;Pierre McDuff

  • Differentiating intolerance of uncertainty from three related but distinct constructs.

    Natalie O Rosen;Elena Ivanova;Bärbel Knäuper

  • Woman and Partner-Perceived Partner Responses Predict Pain and Sexual Satisfaction in Provoked Vestibulodynia (PVD) Couples

    Natalie O. Rosen;Sophie Bergeron;Bianca Leclerc;Bernard Lambert

  • Harmful or helpful: Perceived solicitous and facilitative partner responses are differentially associated with pain and sexual satisfaction in women with provoked vestibulodynia

    Natalie O. Rosen;Natalie O. Rosen;Sophie Bergeron;Maria Glowacka;Isabelle Delisle

  • How aging affects self-reports

    Bärbel Knäuper;Kimberly Carrière;Melodie Chamandy;Zhen Xu

  • Impact of male partner responses on sexual function in women with vulvodynia and their partners: a dyadic daily experience study.

    Natalie O. Rosen;Sophie Bergeron;Gentiana Sadikaj;Maria Glowacka

  • Genital pain in women : beyond interference with intercourse

    Sophie Bergeron;Natalie O. Rosen;Mélanie Morin

  • Genito-Pelvic Pain Through a Dyadic Lens: Moving Toward an Interpersonal Emotion Regulation Model of Women's Sexual Dysfunction.

    Natalie O Rosen;Sophie Bergeron

  • Feasibility and Preliminary Effectiveness of a Novel Cognitive-Behavioral Couple Therapy for Provoked Vestibulodynia: A Pilot Study

    Serena Corsini‐Munt;Sophie Bergeron;Natalie O. Rosen;Marie‐Hélène Mayrand

  • Intimacy, sexual satisfaction, and sexual distress in vulvodynia couples: An observational study.

    Katy Bois;Sophie Bergeron;Natalie O. Rosen;Marie-Hélène Mayrand

  • How implicit theories of sexuality shape sexual and relationship well-being.

    Jessica A. Maxwell;Amy Muise;Geoff MacDonald;Lisa C. Day

  • Sexual Distress and Sexual Problems During Pregnancy: Associations With Sexual and Relationship Satisfaction.

    Sarah A. Vannier;Natalie O. Rosen;Natalie O. Rosen

  • Female Sexual Pain Disorders: a Review of the Literature on Etiology and Treatment

    Sophie Bergeron;Serena Corsini-Munt;Leen Aerts;Kate Rancourt

  • Provoked vestibulodynia : mediators of the associations between partner responses, pain, and sexual satisfaction

    Natalie O. Rosen;Natalie O. Rosen;Sophie Bergeron;Bernard Lambert;Marc Steben

  • A New Baby in the Bedroom: Frequency and Severity of Postpartum Sexual Concerns and Their Associations With Relationship Satisfaction in New Parent Couples

    Hera E. Schlagintweit;Kristen Bailey;Natalie O. Rosen;Natalie O. Rosen

  • Acceptance of Vulvovaginal Pain in Women with Provoked Vestibulodynia and Their Partners: Associations with Pain, Psychological, and Sexual Adjustment

    Katelynn E. Boerner;Natalie O. Rosen;Natalie O. Rosen

  • Talking About Sex When Sex Is Painful: Dyadic Sexual Communication Is Associated With Women's Pain, and Couples' Sexual and Psychological Outcomes in Provoked Vestibulodynia.

    Kate M Rancourt;Natalie O Rosen;Natalie O Rosen;Sophie Bergeron;Logan J Nealis

  • Daily Associations Between Partner Responses and Sexual and Relationship Satisfaction in Couples Coping with Provoked Vestibulodynia

    Natalie O. Rosen;Natalie O. Rosen;Amy Muise;Sophie Bergeron;Isabelle Delisle

Frequent Co-Authors

Sophie Bergeron
Sophie Bergeron University of Montreal
Amy Muise
Amy Muise York University
Emily A. Impett
Emily A. Impett University of Toronto
Christine T. Chambers
Christine T. Chambers Dalhousie University
Bärbel Knäuper
Bärbel Knäuper McGill University
Caroline F. Pukall
Caroline F. Pukall Queen's University
Lori A. Brotto
Lori A. Brotto University of British Columbia
Pedro Nobre
Pedro Nobre University of Porto
Pierre McDuff
Pierre McDuff University of Montreal
Julia R. Heiman
Julia R. Heiman Indiana University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you're interested in a career in psychology, online degrees can provide flexible and accessible pathways to a range of roles. The most common starting point is a bachelor’s degree in psychology or a related field, but many positions—such as licensed therapists or counselors—require a master’s degree and additional credentials.

Licensure requirements vary widely by state, so it’s essential to understand the specific qualifications needed in your area. For example, those looking into how to become a licensed therapist in New York City must complete a graduate program and accrue supervised experience. The Newark licensed therapist requirements and Norfolk licensed therapist education requirements also detail distinct coursework and examination steps.

Those pursuing how to become a licensed therapist in North Las Vegas will need to meet state-specific guidelines for training and licensure. Online programs can be a great way to meet these prerequisites and advance your career, but always verify that your chosen program is accredited and aligns with your professional goals.

Best Scientists Citing Natalie O. Rosen

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles