World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Lucia F. O'Sullivan

Lucia F. O'Sullivan

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 42 7626 7115 513 484 147 6345

Lucia F. O'Sullivan publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Lucia F. O'Sullivan between 1992 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Lucia F. O'Sullivan published across 34 years, from 1992 to 2025, averaging 5.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 14 publications in 2019. 20 of the 182 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1992 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 14. Peak 14 publications in 2019. 1992: 1 publication 1993: 1 publication 1994: 1 publication 1995: 1 publication 1996: 1 publication 1997: 0 publications 1998: 4 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 1 publication 2001: 4 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 4 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 8 publications 2006: 9 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 2 publications 2010: 9 publications 2011: 6 publications 2012: 7 publications 2013: 7 publications 2014: 7 publications 2015: 5 publications 2016: 9 publications 2017: 11 publications 2018: 7 publications 2019: 14 publications 2020: 5 publications 2021: 10 publications 2022: 5 publications 2023: 9 publications 2024: 9 publications 2025: 11 publications
1992 2025

182 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Lucia F. O'Sullivan: publications per year, 1992 to 2025
Year Publications
1992 1
1993 1
1994 1
1995 1
1996 1
1997 0
1998 4
1999 1
2000 1
2001 4
2002 2
2003 4
2004 2
2005 8
2006 9
2007 4
2008 5
2009 2
2010 9
2011 6
2012 7
2013 7
2014 7
2015 5
2016 9
2017 11
2018 7
2019 14
2020 5
2021 10
2022 5
2023 9
2024 9
2025 11
Total 182
Download as CSV

Lucia F. O'Sullivan publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lucia F. O'Sullivan sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 141–150 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 147 publications — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597 147
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Lucia F. O'Sullivan D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lucia F. O'Sullivan sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 42–43 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617 42
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Lucia F. O'Sullivan is affiliated with the University of New Brunswick in Canada. Their scholarly work spans fields including psychology, social sciences, and medicine, with a strong emphasis on subfields such as clinical psychology, general health professions, sociology and political science, gender studies, and social psychology.

Their research covers several interconnected topics, notably:

  • Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
  • Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health
  • Sexual function and dysfunction studies
  • Marriage and Sexual Relationships
  • Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
  • Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
  • Gender, Feminism, and Media

Some of their recent publications include:

  • What is sexual wellbeing and why does it matter for public health?, 2021, The Lancet Public Health
  • Parent-Adolescent Sexual Communication in India: Responses of Middle Class Parents, 2020, Journal of Family Issues
  • Bullying Victimization and Sexual Wellbeing in Sexually Active Heterosexual, Cisgender and Sexual/Gender Minority Adolescents: The Mediating Role of Emotion Regulation, 2021, Journal of Youth and Adolescence
  • Satisfying curiosities through "sextech": Who is accessing non-traditional sexual education?, 2021, Computers in Human Behavior
  • How Prepared Are Teachers to Provide Comprehensive Sexual Health Education?, 2024, American Journal of Sexuality Education

Their work has been published most frequently in the following venues:

  • The Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality
  • The Journal of Sex Research
  • Archives of Sexual Behavior
  • Personal Relationships
  • The Lancet Public Health

Throughout their career, they have collaborated with several frequent co-authors, including:

  • Charlene F. Belu
  • E. Sandra Byers
  • Jacinthe Dion
  • Beáta Bőthe
  • Sophie Bergeron

Best Publications

  • Feigning sexual desire: Consenting to unwanted sexual activity in heterosexual dating relationships

    Unknown

  • Mother-Daughter Communication about Sex among Urban African American and Latino Families

    Lucia F. O’Sullivan;Heino F. L. Meyer-Bahlburg;Beverly X. Watkins

  • College students’ incorporation of initiator and restrictor roles in sexual dating interactions

    Lucia F. O'Sullivan;E. Sandra Byers

  • What is sexual wellbeing and why does it matter for public health

    Kirstin R Mitchell;Ruth Lewis;Lucia F O'Sullivan;J Dennis Fortenberry

  • Actual versus desired initiation patterns among a sample of college men: tapping disjunctures within traditional male sexual scripts.

    Shari L Dworkin;Lucia O'Sullivan

  • I Wanna Hold Your Hand: The Progression of Social, Romantic and Sexual Events in Adolescent Relationships

    Lucia F. O’Sullivan;Mariah Mantsun Cheng;Kathleen Mullan Harris;Jeanne Brooks‐Gunn

  • Gender Role and Relationship Norms among Young Adults in South Africa: Measuring the Context of Masculinity and HIV Risk

    Abigail Harrison;Lucia F. O'Sullivan;Susie Hoffman;Curtis Dolezal

  • Schoolgirls and Soccer Moms: A Content Analysis of Free “Teen” and “MILF” Online Pornography

    Unknown

  • The developmental association of sexual self-concept with sexual behavior among adolescent women

    Devon J. Hensel;J. Dennis Fortenberry;Lucia F. O’Sullivan;Donald P. Orr

  • THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE SEXUAL SELF-CONCEPT INVENTORY FOR EARLY ADOLESCENT GIRLS

    Lucia F. O'Sullivan;Heino F. L. Meyer-Bahlburg;Ian W. McKeague

  • Sex without Desire: Characteristics of Occasions of Sexual Compliance in Young Adults' Committed Relationships

    Unknown

  • Communicating Interest in Sex: Verbal and Nonverbal Initiation of Sexual Activity in Young Adults’ Romantic Dating Relationships

    Unknown

  • HIV risk behaviors and the context of sexual coercion in young adults' sexual interactions: results from a diary study in rural South Africa.

    Hoffman S;O'Sullivan Lf;Harrison A;Dolezal C

  • The timing of changes in girls' sexual cognitions and behaviors in early adolescence: a prospective, cohort study.

    Lucia F. O’Sullivan;Jeanne Brooks-Gunn

  • African-American and Latina Inner-City Girls’ Reports of Romantic and Sexual Development

    Lucia F. O’Sullivan;Heino F. L. Meyer-Bahlburg

  • Challenges of providing confidential care to adolescents in urban primary care: clinician perspectives.

    M. Diane McKee;Susan E. Rubin;Giselle Campos;Lucia F. O’Sullivan

  • Prevalence and Characteristics of Sexual Functioning among Sexually Experienced Middle to Late Adolescents

    Lucia F. O'Sullivan;Lori A. Brotto;E. Sandra Byers;Jo Ann Majerovich

  • Mother-Daughter Communication about Sexuality in a Clinical Sample of Hispanic Adolescent Girls:

    Lucia F. O’Sullivan;Beatriz M. S. Jaramillo;Donna Moreau;Heino F. L. Meyer-Bahlburg

  • A cognitive analysis of college students' explanations for engaging in unprotected sexual intercourse.

    Lucia F. O’Sullivan;Wadiya Udell;Vernique A. Montrose;Patricia Antoniello

  • Who gives and who gets: why, when, and with whom young people engage in oral sex.

    Sarah A. Vannier;Lucia F. O’Sullivan

  • In the absence of marriage: long-term concurrent partnerships, pregnancy, and HIV risk dynamics among South African young adults.

    Abigail Harrison;Lucia F. O’Sullivan

  • Drawing the Line: The Development of a Comprehensive Assessment of Infidelity Judgments

    Ashley E. Thompson;Lucia F. O’Sullivan

  • Similar but different: Men's and women's experiences of sexual coercion.

    E. Sandra Byers;Lucia F. O'Sullivan

  • Sexual and reproductive health education attitudes and experience in India: how much support is there for comprehensive sex education? Findings from an Internet survey

    Lucia F. O’Sullivan;E. Sandra Byers;Koumari Mitra

  • A Longitudinal Study of Problems in Sexual Functioning and Related Sexual Distress Among Middle to Late Adolescents.

    Lucia F. O'Sullivan;E. Sandra Byers;Lori A. Brotto;Jo Ann Majerovich

  • Linking online sexual activities to health outcomes among teens

    Lucia F. O'Sullivan

Frequent Co-Authors

E. Sandra Byers
E. Sandra Byers University of New Brunswick
Susie Hoffman
Susie Hoffman Columbia University
Joanne E. Mantell
Joanne E. Mantell Columbia University
Heino F. L. Meyer-Bahlburg
Heino F. L. Meyer-Bahlburg Columbia University
Lori A. Brotto
Lori A. Brotto University of British Columbia
Judith Wuest
Judith Wuest University of New Brunswick
Abigail Harrison
Abigail Harrison Brown University
Melanie J. Zimmer-Gembeck
Melanie J. Zimmer-Gembeck Griffith University
Susan Sprecher
Susan Sprecher Illinois State University
David A. Clark
David A. Clark University of New Brunswick

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying psychology in the USA opens doors to a range of exciting online degrees and career paths. Many students choose counseling as a specialization, given its growing demand in education, healthcare, and community settings. Prospective students can explore programs that fit their career ambitions and location preferences.

Online psychology and counseling degrees provide flexible options for working professionals and career changers. They often cover foundational topics like human development, therapeutic techniques, and mental health assessment, leading to roles such as school counselor, clinical counselor, or mental health advocate.

For those interested in specific regions, it’s helpful to compare best counseling program rankings in Baltimore, best counseling program rankings in Boston, and best counseling degree programs in California. Additionally, if you plan to study or work in the Midwest, you can refer to the top counseling degree programs in Chicago.

With a psychology background, you can build a rewarding career and positively impact the mental wellness of your community. Exploring these online degrees and top counseling programs is a great first step.

Best Scientists Citing Lucia F. O'Sullivan

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles