World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Business and Management 34 2283 2152 136 136 100 8702

Ian Lings publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Ian Lings between 1998 and 2024, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Ian Lings published across 27 years, from 1998 to 2024, averaging 3.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 10 publications in 2010. 4 of the 104 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1998 to 2024. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 10. Peak 10 publications in 2010. 1998: 1 publication 1999: 3 publications 2000: 1 publication 2001: 0 publications 2002: 0 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 5 publications 2005: 6 publications 2006: 2 publications 2007: 5 publications 2008: 8 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 10 publications 2011: 6 publications 2012: 7 publications 2013: 3 publications 2014: 8 publications 2015: 8 publications 2016: 5 publications 2017: 5 publications 2018: 3 publications 2019: 3 publications 2020: 3 publications 2021: 1 publication 2022: 0 publications 2023: 3 publications 2024: 1 publication
1998 2024

104 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Ian Lings: publications per year, 1998 to 2024
Year Publications
1998 1
1999 3
2000 1
2001 0
2002 0
2003 2
2004 5
2005 6
2006 2
2007 5
2008 8
2009 5
2010 10
2011 6
2012 7
2013 3
2014 8
2015 8
2016 5
2017 5
2018 3
2019 3
2020 3
2021 1
2022 0
2023 3
2024 1
Total 104
Download as CSV

Ian Lings publication distribution in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Business and Management in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ian Lings sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100
Bar chart with 82 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 35–39 to 436+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 122. Most scientists, 122, have 95–99 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 100–104 publications, is where this scientist sits. 35–39 publications: 2 scientists 40–44 publications: 2 scientists 45–49 publications: 5 scientists 50–54 publications: 20 scientists 55–59 publications: 39 scientists 60–64 publications: 66 scientists 65–69 publications: 52 scientists 70–74 publications: 80 scientists 75–79 publications: 83 scientists 80–84 publications: 116 scientists 85–89 publications: 94 scientists 90–94 publications: 111 scientists 95–99 publications: 122 scientists 100–104 publications: 104 scientists 105–109 publications: 113 scientists 110–114 publications: 96 scientists 115–119 publications: 97 scientists 120–124 publications: 112 scientists 125–129 publications: 93 scientists 130–134 publications: 79 scientists 135–139 publications: 69 scientists 140–144 publications: 80 scientists 145–149 publications: 81 scientists 150–154 publications: 85 scientists 155–159 publications: 50 scientists 160–164 publications: 74 scientists 165–169 publications: 61 scientists 170–174 publications: 40 scientists 175–179 publications: 44 scientists 180–184 publications: 47 scientists 185–189 publications: 59 scientists 190–194 publications: 35 scientists 195–199 publications: 37 scientists 200–204 publications: 49 scientists 205–209 publications: 48 scientists 210–214 publications: 34 scientists 215–219 publications: 31 scientists 220–224 publications: 37 scientists 225–229 publications: 34 scientists 230–234 publications: 25 scientists 235–239 publications: 28 scientists 240–244 publications: 34 scientists 245–249 publications: 28 scientists 250–254 publications: 23 scientists 255–259 publications: 22 scientists 260–264 publications: 11 scientists 265–269 publications: 16 scientists 270–274 publications: 23 scientists 275–279 publications: 12 scientists 280–284 publications: 16 scientists 285–289 publications: 10 scientists 290–294 publications: 12 scientists 295–299 publications: 12 scientists 300–304 publications: 8 scientists 305–309 publications: 13 scientists 310–314 publications: 13 scientists 315–319 publications: 6 scientists 320–324 publications: 10 scientists 325–329 publications: 9 scientists 330–334 publications: 7 scientists 335–339 publications: 10 scientists 340–344 publications: 10 scientists 345–349 publications: 7 scientists 350–354 publications: 4 scientists 355–359 publications: 10 scientists 360–364 publications: 3 scientists 365–369 publications: 7 scientists 370–374 publications: 2 scientists 375–379 publications: 8 scientists 380–384 publications: 4 scientists 385–389 publications: 5 scientists 390–394 publications: 5 scientists 395–399 publications: 2 scientists 400–404 publications: 2 scientists 405–409 publications: 4 scientists 410–414 publications: 3 scientists 415–419 publications: 2 scientists 420–424 publications: 5 scientists 425–429 publications: 3 scientists 430–434 publications: 1 scientist 435 publications: 1 scientist 436+ publications: 100 scientists
35–39 publications 436+

This scientist: 100 publications — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Business and Management scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,017 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
35–39 2
40–44 2
45–49 5
50–54 20
55–59 39
60–64 66
65–69 52
70–74 80
75–79 83
80–84 116
85–89 94
90–94 111
95–99 122
100–104 104 100
105–109 113
110–114 96
115–119 97
120–124 112
125–129 93
130–134 79
135–139 69
140–144 80
145–149 81
150–154 85
155–159 50
160–164 74
165–169 61
170–174 40
175–179 44
180–184 47
185–189 59
190–194 35
195–199 37
200–204 49
205–209 48
210–214 34
215–219 31
220–224 37
225–229 34
230–234 25
235–239 28
240–244 34
245–249 28
250–254 23
255–259 22
260–264 11
265–269 16
270–274 23
275–279 12
280–284 16
285–289 10
290–294 12
295–299 12
300–304 8
305–309 13
310–314 13
315–319 6
320–324 10
325–329 9
330–334 7
335–339 10
340–344 10
345–349 7
350–354 4
355–359 10
360–364 3
365–369 7
370–374 2
375–379 8
380–384 4
385–389 5
390–394 5
395–399 2
400–404 2
405–409 4
410–414 3
415–419 2
420–424 5
425–429 3
430–434 1
435 1
436+ 100
Download as CSV

Ian Lings D-index placement in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Business and Management scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ian Lings sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 60 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 89+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 171. Most scientists, 171, have 32 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 34 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 156 scientists 31 D-Index: 159 scientists 32 D-Index: 171 scientists 33 D-Index: 161 scientists 34 D-Index: 135 scientists 35 D-Index: 124 scientists 36 D-Index: 114 scientists 37 D-Index: 111 scientists 38 D-Index: 103 scientists 39 D-Index: 89 scientists 40 D-Index: 81 scientists 41 D-Index: 97 scientists 42 D-Index: 80 scientists 43 D-Index: 69 scientists 44 D-Index: 68 scientists 45 D-Index: 63 scientists 46 D-Index: 54 scientists 47 D-Index: 69 scientists 48 D-Index: 50 scientists 49 D-Index: 58 scientists 50 D-Index: 54 scientists 51 D-Index: 62 scientists 52 D-Index: 54 scientists 53 D-Index: 43 scientists 54 D-Index: 49 scientists 55 D-Index: 35 scientists 56 D-Index: 40 scientists 57 D-Index: 44 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 29 scientists 60 D-Index: 48 scientists 61 D-Index: 32 scientists 62 D-Index: 30 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 22 scientists 65 D-Index: 19 scientists 66 D-Index: 20 scientists 67 D-Index: 18 scientists 68 D-Index: 17 scientists 69 D-Index: 21 scientists 70 D-Index: 20 scientists 71 D-Index: 19 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 10 scientists 74 D-Index: 16 scientists 75 D-Index: 24 scientists 76 D-Index: 13 scientists 77 D-Index: 19 scientists 78 D-Index: 8 scientists 79 D-Index: 6 scientists 80 D-Index: 4 scientists 81 D-Index: 12 scientists 82 D-Index: 7 scientists 83 D-Index: 7 scientists 84 D-Index: 6 scientists 85 D-Index: 10 scientists 86 D-Index: 4 scientists 87 D-Index: 11 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89+ D-Index: 96 scientists
30 D-Index 89+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 26th percentile

26% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Business and Management scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,017 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 156
31 159
32 171
33 161
34 135 34
35 124
36 114
37 111
38 103
39 89
40 81
41 97
42 80
43 69
44 68
45 63
46 54
47 69
48 50
49 58
50 54
51 62
52 54
53 43
54 49
55 35
56 40
57 44
58 34
59 29
60 48
61 32
62 30
63 22
64 22
65 19
66 20
67 18
68 17
69 21
70 20
71 19
72 14
73 10
74 16
75 24
76 13
77 19
78 8
79 6
80 4
81 12
82 7
83 7
84 6
85 10
86 4
87 11
88 6
89+ 96
Download as CSV

Overview

Ian Lings is affiliated with the Queensland University of Technology in Australia. Their work mainly centers around the field of Business, Management and Accounting, with a focus on several subfields such as Marketing, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Management of Technology and Innovation, Communication, and Strategy and Management.

The research conducted by Ian Lings covers key topics including Marketing and Advertising Strategies, Customer Service Quality and Loyalty, Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification, Management and Marketing Education, Advertising and Communication Studies, Corporate Identity and Reputation, and Digital Marketing and Social Media.

Ian Lings has contributed publications primarily in the following venues:

  • Journal of Marketing Communications
  • Journal of Consumer Marketing
  • PsycTESTS Dataset

Recent papers authored or coauthored by Ian Lings include:

  • "How gratitude improves relationship marketing outcomes for young consumers" (2020), published in Journal of Consumer Marketing
  • "A step change in marketing communication education - the next urgent steps for research" (2023), published in Journal of Marketing Communications
  • "Competitive advantage for life: an industry view of marketing communication education" (2023), published in Journal of Marketing Communications
  • "Information Disclosure, Consumer Hope, and Online Repurchasing--Model" (2020), published in PsycTESTS Dataset
  • "The power of synergy to reinvent IMC education" (2023), published in Journal of Marketing Communications

Frequent collaborative partners in Ian Lings's research include:

  • Gayle Kerr
  • Philip J. Kitchen
  • Syed Muhammad Fazal-e-Hasan
  • Gary Mortimer
  • Gurjeet Kaur

The publications by Ian Lings reflect a strong emphasis on marketing communication education and strategic marketing approaches. Their work engages both theoretical and practical dimensions within marketing and management disciplines.

Best Publications

  • Dynamic Capabilities and Performance: Strategy, Structure and Environment

    Ralf Wilden;Siegfried P. Gudergan;Bo Bernhard Nielsen;Ian Lings

  • Internal market orientation: Construct and consequences

    Ian N Lings

  • Doing Business Research: A Guide to Theory and Practice

    Nick J. Lee;Ian N. Lings

  • Employer branding: strategic implications for staff recruitment

    Ralf Wilden;Siegfried Gudergan;Ian Lings

  • Measuring internal market orientation

    Ian N. Lings;Gordon E. Greenley

  • Strategic planning and performance: extending the debate

    John M. Rudd;Gordon E. Greenley;Amanda T. Beatson;Ian N. Lings

  • The influence of internal communication on employee engagement: A pilot study

    Emma Karanges;Kim Johnston;Amanda Beatson;Ian Lings

  • An introduction to the application of (case 1) best–worst scaling in marketing research

    Jordan Louviere;Ian Lings;Towhidul Islam;Siegfried Gudergan

  • The impact of internal and external market orientations on firm performance

    Ian N. Lings;Gordon E. Greenley

  • Balancing internal and external market orientations

    Ian Lings

  • Internal Marketing and Customer Driven Wavefronts

    Roger F. Brooks;Ian N Lings;Martina A Botschen

  • Implementing and Measuring the Effectiveness of Internal Marketing.

    Ian N. Lings;Roger F. Brooks

  • Investigating attitudes towards three South American destinations in an emerging long haul market using a model of consumer-based brand equity (CBBE)

    Constanza Bianchi;Constanza Bianchi;Steven Pike;Ian Lings

  • Internal market orientation and market‐oriented behaviours

    Ian N. Lings;Gordon E. Greenley

  • Internal marketing and supply chain management

    Ian N. Lings

  • Employee behaviour and relationship quality: impact on customers

    Amanda Beatson;Ian Lings;Siegfried Gudergan

  • Attracting and retaining staff: the role of branding and industry image

    Michelle Wallace;Ian Lings;Roslyn A Cameron;Neroli Sheldon

  • Managing Service Quality with Internal Marketing Schematics

    Ian N Lings

  • Buying a sponsor's brand: the role of affective commitment to the sponsored team

    Ian N. Lings;Kate M. Owen

  • The role of customer gratitude in making relationship marketing investments successful

    Syed Fazal e Hasan;Ian Lings;Larry Neale;Gary Mortimer

  • Employer branding : strategic implications for staffrecruitment

    Ralph Wilden;Siegfried Gudergan;Ian Lings

Frequent Co-Authors

Siegfried P. Gudergan
Siegfried P. Gudergan University of Waikato
Steven Pike
Steven Pike Queensland University of Technology
Nick Lee
Nick Lee University of Warwick
John W. Cadogan
John W. Cadogan University of Leicester
Judy Drennan
Judy Drennan Queensland University of Technology
Constanza Bianchi
Constanza Bianchi Queensland University of Technology
Gordon E. Greenley
Gordon E. Greenley Aston University
Jordan J. Louviere
Jordan J. Louviere University of South Australia
Bo Bernhard Nielsen
Bo Bernhard Nielsen University of Sydney
Terry N. Flynn
Terry N. Flynn University of Nottingham

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online education in business and management opens up numerous flexible and affordable pathways. Fast track programs are growing in popularity, letting students complete degrees quicker than traditional formats. These programs are a great option for those eager to advance their careers or pivot quickly into the business world.

Many students consider online business management degree programs as they offer cost-effective and flexible learning opportunities. These programs are widely recognized by employers and can be tailored to specific interests, such as entrepreneurship or finance.

Another growing field is healthcare business leadership. Obtaining healthcare administration degrees online enables working professionals to upskill while juggling job and family responsibilities. For those seeking advanced qualifications, some of the most affordable MHA programs offer graduate-level education in healthcare management at a fraction of the typical cost.

These online pathways can help you launch or advance a rewarding career in business or healthcare administration — while balancing education, work, and family.

Best Scientists Citing Ian Lings

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles