World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Sharyn Rundle-Thiele

Sharyn Rundle-Thiele

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Business and Management 51 940 876 54 54 334 10890

Sharyn Rundle-Thiele publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Sharyn Rundle-Thiele between 2000 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Sharyn Rundle-Thiele published across 26 years, from 2000 to 2025, averaging 15.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 35 publications in 2021. 27 of the 413 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2000 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 35. Peak 35 publications in 2021. 2000: 1 publication 2001: 4 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 9 publications 2006: 10 publications 2007: 9 publications 2008: 15 publications 2009: 12 publications 2010: 12 publications 2011: 13 publications 2012: 7 publications 2013: 11 publications 2014: 14 publications 2015: 31 publications 2016: 30 publications 2017: 31 publications 2018: 23 publications 2019: 34 publications 2020: 23 publications 2021: 35 publications 2022: 33 publications 2023: 21 publications 2024: 15 publications 2025: 12 publications
2000 2025

413 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Sharyn Rundle-Thiele: publications per year, 2000 to 2025
Year Publications
2000 1
2001 4
2002 2
2003 3
2004 3
2005 9
2006 10
2007 9
2008 15
2009 12
2010 12
2011 13
2012 7
2013 11
2014 14
2015 31
2016 30
2017 31
2018 23
2019 34
2020 23
2021 35
2022 33
2023 21
2024 15
2025 12
Total 413
Download as CSV

Sharyn Rundle-Thiele publication distribution in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Business and Management in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sharyn Rundle-Thiele sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100
Bar chart with 82 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 35–39 to 436+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 122. Most scientists, 122, have 95–99 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 330–334 publications, is where this scientist sits. 35–39 publications: 2 scientists 40–44 publications: 2 scientists 45–49 publications: 5 scientists 50–54 publications: 20 scientists 55–59 publications: 39 scientists 60–64 publications: 66 scientists 65–69 publications: 52 scientists 70–74 publications: 80 scientists 75–79 publications: 83 scientists 80–84 publications: 116 scientists 85–89 publications: 94 scientists 90–94 publications: 111 scientists 95–99 publications: 122 scientists 100–104 publications: 104 scientists 105–109 publications: 113 scientists 110–114 publications: 96 scientists 115–119 publications: 97 scientists 120–124 publications: 112 scientists 125–129 publications: 93 scientists 130–134 publications: 79 scientists 135–139 publications: 69 scientists 140–144 publications: 80 scientists 145–149 publications: 81 scientists 150–154 publications: 85 scientists 155–159 publications: 50 scientists 160–164 publications: 74 scientists 165–169 publications: 61 scientists 170–174 publications: 40 scientists 175–179 publications: 44 scientists 180–184 publications: 47 scientists 185–189 publications: 59 scientists 190–194 publications: 35 scientists 195–199 publications: 37 scientists 200–204 publications: 49 scientists 205–209 publications: 48 scientists 210–214 publications: 34 scientists 215–219 publications: 31 scientists 220–224 publications: 37 scientists 225–229 publications: 34 scientists 230–234 publications: 25 scientists 235–239 publications: 28 scientists 240–244 publications: 34 scientists 245–249 publications: 28 scientists 250–254 publications: 23 scientists 255–259 publications: 22 scientists 260–264 publications: 11 scientists 265–269 publications: 16 scientists 270–274 publications: 23 scientists 275–279 publications: 12 scientists 280–284 publications: 16 scientists 285–289 publications: 10 scientists 290–294 publications: 12 scientists 295–299 publications: 12 scientists 300–304 publications: 8 scientists 305–309 publications: 13 scientists 310–314 publications: 13 scientists 315–319 publications: 6 scientists 320–324 publications: 10 scientists 325–329 publications: 9 scientists 330–334 publications: 7 scientists 335–339 publications: 10 scientists 340–344 publications: 10 scientists 345–349 publications: 7 scientists 350–354 publications: 4 scientists 355–359 publications: 10 scientists 360–364 publications: 3 scientists 365–369 publications: 7 scientists 370–374 publications: 2 scientists 375–379 publications: 8 scientists 380–384 publications: 4 scientists 385–389 publications: 5 scientists 390–394 publications: 5 scientists 395–399 publications: 2 scientists 400–404 publications: 2 scientists 405–409 publications: 4 scientists 410–414 publications: 3 scientists 415–419 publications: 2 scientists 420–424 publications: 5 scientists 425–429 publications: 3 scientists 430–434 publications: 1 scientist 435 publications: 1 scientist 436+ publications: 100 scientists
35–39 publications 436+

This scientist: 334 publications — 93rd percentile

93% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Business and Management scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,017 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
35–39 2
40–44 2
45–49 5
50–54 20
55–59 39
60–64 66
65–69 52
70–74 80
75–79 83
80–84 116
85–89 94
90–94 111
95–99 122
100–104 104
105–109 113
110–114 96
115–119 97
120–124 112
125–129 93
130–134 79
135–139 69
140–144 80
145–149 81
150–154 85
155–159 50
160–164 74
165–169 61
170–174 40
175–179 44
180–184 47
185–189 59
190–194 35
195–199 37
200–204 49
205–209 48
210–214 34
215–219 31
220–224 37
225–229 34
230–234 25
235–239 28
240–244 34
245–249 28
250–254 23
255–259 22
260–264 11
265–269 16
270–274 23
275–279 12
280–284 16
285–289 10
290–294 12
295–299 12
300–304 8
305–309 13
310–314 13
315–319 6
320–324 10
325–329 9
330–334 7 334
335–339 10
340–344 10
345–349 7
350–354 4
355–359 10
360–364 3
365–369 7
370–374 2
375–379 8
380–384 4
385–389 5
390–394 5
395–399 2
400–404 2
405–409 4
410–414 3
415–419 2
420–424 5
425–429 3
430–434 1
435 1
436+ 100
Download as CSV

Sharyn Rundle-Thiele D-index placement in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Business and Management scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sharyn Rundle-Thiele sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 60 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 89+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 171. Most scientists, 171, have 32 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 51 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 156 scientists 31 D-Index: 159 scientists 32 D-Index: 171 scientists 33 D-Index: 161 scientists 34 D-Index: 135 scientists 35 D-Index: 124 scientists 36 D-Index: 114 scientists 37 D-Index: 111 scientists 38 D-Index: 103 scientists 39 D-Index: 89 scientists 40 D-Index: 81 scientists 41 D-Index: 97 scientists 42 D-Index: 80 scientists 43 D-Index: 69 scientists 44 D-Index: 68 scientists 45 D-Index: 63 scientists 46 D-Index: 54 scientists 47 D-Index: 69 scientists 48 D-Index: 50 scientists 49 D-Index: 58 scientists 50 D-Index: 54 scientists 51 D-Index: 62 scientists 52 D-Index: 54 scientists 53 D-Index: 43 scientists 54 D-Index: 49 scientists 55 D-Index: 35 scientists 56 D-Index: 40 scientists 57 D-Index: 44 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 29 scientists 60 D-Index: 48 scientists 61 D-Index: 32 scientists 62 D-Index: 30 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 22 scientists 65 D-Index: 19 scientists 66 D-Index: 20 scientists 67 D-Index: 18 scientists 68 D-Index: 17 scientists 69 D-Index: 21 scientists 70 D-Index: 20 scientists 71 D-Index: 19 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 10 scientists 74 D-Index: 16 scientists 75 D-Index: 24 scientists 76 D-Index: 13 scientists 77 D-Index: 19 scientists 78 D-Index: 8 scientists 79 D-Index: 6 scientists 80 D-Index: 4 scientists 81 D-Index: 12 scientists 82 D-Index: 7 scientists 83 D-Index: 7 scientists 84 D-Index: 6 scientists 85 D-Index: 10 scientists 86 D-Index: 4 scientists 87 D-Index: 11 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89+ D-Index: 96 scientists
30 D-Index 89+

This scientist: 51 D-Index — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Business and Management scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,017 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 156
31 159
32 171
33 161
34 135
35 124
36 114
37 111
38 103
39 89
40 81
41 97
42 80
43 69
44 68
45 63
46 54
47 69
48 50
49 58
50 54
51 62 51
52 54
53 43
54 49
55 35
56 40
57 44
58 34
59 29
60 48
61 32
62 30
63 22
64 22
65 19
66 20
67 18
68 17
69 21
70 20
71 19
72 14
73 10
74 16
75 24
76 13
77 19
78 8
79 6
80 4
81 12
82 7
83 7
84 6
85 10
86 4
87 11
88 6
89+ 96
Download as CSV

Overview

Sharyn Rundle-Thiele is affiliated with Griffith University in Australia and has produced extensive research primarily focused on business, management, and accounting. Their scholarly work spans a variety of interconnected subfields, including marketing, sociology and political science, applied psychology, public health, environmental and occupational health, and general health professions.

The scientist's research emphasizes topics such as behavioral health and interventions, service and product innovation, environmental sustainability in business, obesity, physical activity, diet, consumer behavior in brand consumption and identification, environmental education and sustainability, and eating disorders and behaviors.

Notable recent publications include:

  • Capability, opportunity, and motivation: an across contexts empirical examination of the COM-B model, 2021, BMC Public Health
  • Long live the marketing mix. Testing the effectiveness of the commercial marketing mix in a social marketing context, 2020, Journal of Social Marketing
  • Community perspectives and engagement in sustainable solid waste management (SWM) in Fiji: A socioecological thematic analysis, 2021, Journal of Environmental Management
  • Influencing household-level waste-sorting and composting behaviour: What works? A systematic review (1995-2020) of waste management interventions, 2021, Waste Management & Research The Journal for a Sustainable Circular Economy
  • CBE: A Framework to Guide the Application of Marketing to Behavior Change, 2021, Social Marketing Quarterly

Frequently publishing in recognized venues, this researcher has contributed to journals including:

  • Journal of Social Marketing
  • International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
  • Social Marketing Quarterly
  • European Journal of Marketing
  • Journal of Environmental Management

Collaborative efforts have involved co-authors such as Julia Carins, Timo Dietrich, Patricia David, Bo Pang, and Taylor Jade Willmott, with multiple joint publications ranging from 8 to 21 works each.

Best Publications

  • Customer satisfaction should not be the only goal

    Rebekah Bennett;Sharyn Rundle-Thiele

  • A comparison of attitudinal loyalty measurement approaches

    Rebekah Bennett;Sharyn Rundle-Thiele

  • Marketing capabilities: Antecedents and implications for B2B SME performance

    Bill Merrilees;Sharyn Rundle-Thiele;Ashley Roland Lye

  • A brand for all seasons? A discussion of brand loyalty approaches and their applicability for different markets

    Sharyn Rundle‐Thiele;Rebekah Bennett

  • Corporate social responsibility and bank customer satisfaction: A research agenda

    Lynette Maree McDonald;Sharyn Rundle-Thiele

  • Assessing the performance of brand loyalty measures

    Sharyn Rundle‐Thiele;Marisa Maio Mackay

  • Eating for the better: a social marketing review (2000-2012)

    Julia E Carins;Sharyn R Rundle-Thiele

  • Exploring loyal qualities: assessing survey‐based loyalty measures

    Sharyn Rundle‐Thiele

  • Segmentation: A tourism stakeholder view

    Aaron Tkaczynski;Sharyn R. Rundle-Thiele;Narelle Beaumont

  • Co-design: from expert- to user-driven ideas in public service design

    Jakob Trischler;Timo Dietrich;Sharyn Rundle-Thiele

  • Capability, opportunity, and motivation: an across contexts empirical examination of the COM-B model

    Taylor Jade Willmott;Bo Pang;Sharyn Rundle-Thiele

  • Event segmentation: a review and research agenda.

    Aaron Tkaczynski;Sharyn R. Rundle-Thiele

  • Elaborating customer loyalty: exploring loyalty to wine retailers

    Sharyn Rundle-Thiele

  • Minimizing alcohol harm: A systematic social marketing review (2000–2014) ☆

    Krzysztof Kubacki;Sharyn Rundle-Thiele;Bo Pang;Nuray Buyucek

  • Co-designing services with vulnerable consumers

    Timo Dietrich;Jakob Trischler;Lisa Schuster;Sharyn Rundle-Thiele

  • Destination Segmentation: A Recommended Two-Step Approach

    Aaron Tkaczynski;Sharyn Rundle-Thiele;Narelle Beaumont

  • Using two-step cluster analysis to identify homogeneous physical activity groups

    Sharyn Rundle-Thiele;Krzysztof Kubacki;Aaron Tkaczynski;Joy Parkinson

  • The brand loyalty life cycle: Implications for marketers

    Unknown

  • The moderating effect of cultural congruence on the internal marketing practice and employee satisfaction relationship: An empirical examination of Australian and Taiwanese born tourism employees

    Yu-Ting Huang;Sharyn Rundle-Thiele

  • Social marketing theory development goals: an agenda to drive change

    Sharyn Rundle-Thiele;Patricia Tavares De Lima David;Taylor Willmott;Bo Pang

  • A systematic review assessing the extent of social marketing principle use in interventions targeting children (2000-2014)

    Krzysztof Kubacki;Sharyn Rundle-Thiele;Ville Lahtinen;Joy Parkinson

  • Systematic literature review of best practice in food waste reduction programs

    Jeawon Kim;Sharyn Rundle-Thiele;Kathy Knox

Frequent Co-Authors

Denni Arli
Denni Arli University of Tasmania
Jason P. Connor
Jason P. Connor University of Queensland
Judy Drennan
Judy Drennan Queensland University of Technology
Matthew J. Gullo
Matthew J. Gullo Griffith University
Walter Wymer
Walter Wymer University of Lethbridge
Ross McD. Young
Ross McD. Young University of the Sunshine Coast
O. C. Ferrell
O. C. Ferrell Auburn University
Simone Pettigrew
Simone Pettigrew George Institute for Global Health
Janet R. McColl-Kennedy
Janet R. McColl-Kennedy University of Queensland
Michael Jay Polonsky
Michael Jay Polonsky Deakin University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in Business and Management opens diverse career opportunities. Today, students can easily advance their education through flexible learning options. For those looking to lead, affordable doctoral programs in leadership provide advanced training for executive and managerial roles at a reduced cost.

It's important to choose accredited schools to ensure quality. Many nationally accredited online universities offer recognized degrees that employers value. Fast-track degree options are also gaining popularity, allowing students to enter the workforce sooner.

For example, students can opt for an accelerated construction management degree to quickly build expertise for leadership roles in construction and engineering sectors. Alternatively, those interested in healthcare can look into online programs for healthcare administration to prepare for in-demand roles in hospitals and clinics.

Choosing the right online pathway can fast-track your business career and open doors to new industries, all while offering flexibility and affordability.

Best Scientists Citing Sharyn Rundle-Thiele

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles