World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
46
Citations
9042
World Ranking
6023
National Ranking
468

Diogo Veríssimo publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Diogo Veríssimo sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 151 publications — 42nd percentile

42% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Diogo Veríssimo D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Diogo Veríssimo sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 46 D-Index — 39th percentile

39% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Diogo Veríssimo is affiliated with the University of Oxford in the United Kingdom and conducts research primarily within the field of Environmental Science. Their work spans several subfields, including Social Psychology, Ecology, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Sociology and Political Science, and Ecological Modeling.

The scientist's research topics cover a diverse range of subjects such as Animal and Plant Science Education, Species Distribution and Climate Change, Wildlife Ecology and Conservation, Environmental Education and Sustainability, Digital Marketing and Social Media, Economic and Environmental Valuation, and Insect Utilization and Effects.

Veríssimo's recent scholarly contributions include several notable papers:

  • The manifold costs of being a non-native English speaker in science (2023, PLoS Biology)
  • Digital data sources and methods for conservation culturomics (2021, Conservation Biology)
  • Biodiversity conservation as a promising frontier for behavioural science (2021, Nature Human Behaviour)
  • The role of species charisma in biological invasions (2020, Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment)
  • Ethical considerations when conservation research involves people (2020, Conservation Biology)

The venues where Veríssimo frequently publishes include Conservation Science and Practice, Conservation Biology, People and Nature, Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, and Conservation Letters.

Among frequent collaborators of Diogo Veríssimo are:

  • E.J. Milner-Gulland (with 13 joint publications)
  • Ivan Jarić (12 joint publications)
  • Ricardo A. Correia (11 joint publications)
  • Uri Roll (11 joint publications)
  • Laura Thomas-Walters (11 joint publications)

Best Publications

  • Conservation social science: understanding and integrating human dimensions to improve conservation

    Nathan J. Bennett;Nathan J. Bennett;Nathan J. Bennett;Robin Roth;Sarah C. Klain;Kai Chan

  • Mainstreaming the social sciences in conservation.

    Nathan J. Bennett;Nathan J. Bennett;Nathan J. Bennett;Robin Roth;Sarah C. Klain;Kai M. A. Chan

  • Scientific evidence supports a ban on microbeads

    Chelsea M. Rochman;Chelsea M. Rochman;Sara M. Kross;Sara M. Kross;Jonathan B. Armstrong;Jonathan B. Armstrong;Michael T. Bogan;Michael T. Bogan

  • Toward a systematic approach for identifying conservation flagships

    Diogo Verissimo;Douglas C. MacMillan;Robert J. Smith

  • Illegal wildlife trade: Scale, processes, and governance

    Michael ‘t Sas-Rolfes;Daniel W.S. Challender;Amy Hinsley;Diogo Veríssimo

  • Identifying Cinderella species: uncovering mammals with conservation flagship appeal

    Robert J. Smith;Diogo Veríssimo;Nicholas J.B. Isaac;Kate E. Jones

  • Let the locals lead

    Robert J. Smith;Diogo Veríssimo;Nigel Leader-Williams;Richard M. Cowling

  • Competitive outreach in the 21st century: Why we need conservation marketing

    Andrew J. Wright;Andrew J. Wright;Diogo Veríssimo;Kathleen Pilfold;E.C.M. Parsons

  • Characterizing efforts to reduce consumer demand for wildlife products

    Diogo Veríssimo;Anita K. Y. Wan

  • Birds as tourism flagship species: a case study of tropical islands

    Diogo Veríssimo;Iain M Fraser;Jim J. Groombridge;Rachel M. Bristol

  • Increased conservation marketing effort has major fundraising benefits for even the least popular species

    Diogo Veríssimo;Diogo Veríssimo;Greg Vaughan;Martin S. Ridout;Carly Waterman

  • Digital data sources and methods for conservation culturomics

    Ricardo A. Correia;Richard Ladle;Richard Ladle;Ivan Jarić;Ivan Jarić;Ana C. M. Malhado

  • Understanding Urban Demand for Wild Meat in Vietnam: Implications for Conservation Actions

    Rachel Shairp;Diogo Verissimo;Iain Fraser;Daniel Challender

  • Anthropomorphized species as tools for conservation: utility beyond prosocial, intelligent and suffering species

    M. Root-Bernstein;M. Root-Bernstein;L. Douglas;A. Smith;D. Veríssimo

  • Biodiversity conservation as a promising frontier for behavioural science.

    Kristian Steensen Nielsen;Theresa M. Marteau;Jan M. Bauer;Richard B. Bradbury;Richard B. Bradbury

  • The role of species charisma in biological invasions

    Ivan Jarić;Franck Courchamp;Ricardo A Correia;Sarah L Crowley

  • Heterogeneity in consumer preferences for orchids in international trade and the potential for the use of market research methods to study demand for wildlife

    Amy Hinsley;Diogo Verissimo;Diogo Verissimo;David L. Roberts

  • Influencing human behaviour: an underutilised tool for biodiversity management

    Diogo Veríssimo

  • Ethical considerations when conservation research involves people.

    Stephanie Brittain;Stephanie Brittain;Harriet Ibbett;Harriet Ibbett;Emiel de Lange;Leejiah Dorward;Leejiah Dorward

  • Making more Effective Use of Human Behavioural Science in Conservation Interventions

    Andrew Balmford;Richard B. Bradbury;Richard B. Bradbury;Jan M. Bauer;Steven Broad

  • Emerging illegal wildlife trade issues: A global horizon scan

    Nafeesa Esmail;Bonnie C. Wintle;Michael t Sas-Rolfes;Andrea Athanas

  • Using a systematic approach to select flagship species for bird conservation.

    Diogo Veríssimo;Tatiana Pongiluppi;Maria Cintia M. Santos;Pedro F. Develey

  • Flagships or Battleships: Deconstructing the Relationship between Social Conflict and Conservation Flagship Species

    Leo R. Douglas;Diogo Veríssimo

Frequent Co-Authors

Robert J. Smith
Robert J. Smith University of Kent
Douglas C. MacMillan
Douglas C. MacMillan University of Kent
E. J. Milner-Gulland
E. J. Milner-Gulland University of Oxford
Iain Fraser
Iain Fraser University of Kent
Nathan J. Bennett
Nathan J. Bennett University of British Columbia
Chelsea M. Rochman
Chelsea M. Rochman University of Toronto
Emily S. Darling
Emily S. Darling Wildlife Conservation Society
Petr Pyšek
Petr Pyšek Czech Academy of Sciences
Enrico Di Minin
Enrico Di Minin University of Helsinki
David L. Roberts
David L. Roberts University of Kent

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in Environmental Sciences, exploring related online degrees can open diverse career paths. Many students seek the what's the easiest bachelor's degree to get to balance academic rigor while expanding their knowledge in environmental topics. Geology, for example, is a natural complement, with several reputed programs available. Looking into a geology online degree provides strong scientific foundations applicable to careers in resource management and environmental consulting.

Another growing field closely linked to environmental studies is Geographic Information Systems (GIS). GIS technology is vital for data analysis and environmental planning. Many students pursue the best GIS programs in the US to gain skills that are highly sought after in government agencies and private firms focused on sustainability.

For those leaning towards leadership or policy roles, an advanced degree like a Master of Public Administration (MPA) can be valuable. Easy access to flexible programs is important, and some choose from easiest online MPA programs that offer a one-year timeline, helping professionals quickly advance their expertise in environmental governance and management.

Best Scientists Citing Diogo Veríssimo

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles