World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
55
Citations
11195
World Ranking
2982
National Ranking
334

David L. Roberts publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David L. Roberts sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 196 publications — 73rd percentile

73% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

David L. Roberts D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David L. Roberts sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 55 D-Index — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

David L. Roberts is affiliated with the University of Kent in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily focuses on Environmental Science, with notable depth in related subfields such as Ecology, Social Psychology, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Ecological Modeling, and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics.

The scientist's work spans multiple topics, including:

  • Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
  • Animal and Plant Science Education
  • Species Distribution and Climate Change
  • Wildlife Conservation and Criminology Analyses
  • Identification and Quantification in Food
  • Animal Disease Management and Epidemiology
  • Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology

David L. Roberts has been published in a range of journals, with frequent appearances in:

  • Oryx
  • Conservation Biology
  • Tropical Conservation Science
  • UNC Libraries
  • Conservation Science and Practice

Among recent papers authored or co-authored by Roberts are:

  • Dating first cases of COVID-19, 2021, PLoS Pathogens

Other recent publications within the dataset feature co-authors affiliated with related research, though not authored by Roberts, including works published in venues like Trends in Ecology & Evolution and Conservation Science and Practice.

Roberts often collaborates with several researchers in their field. Frequent co-authors include:

  • Ivan Jarić
  • Alastair Key
  • Diogo Veríssimo
  • Iain Fraser
  • Helen Pheasey

The researcher's interdisciplinary approach combines ecological modeling and social psychology elements to address conservation challenges, species distribution affected by climate change, and epidemiological factors in animal disease. Their work also intersects with archaeological and paleontological perspectives concerning Pleistocene-era hominins.

Best Publications

  • Oxidative stress in malaria parasite-infected erythrocytes: Host-parasite interactions

    Katja Becker;Leann Tilley;Jonathan L. Vennerstrom;David Roberts

  • Anthropogenic climate change for 1860 to 2100 simulated with the HadCM3 model under updated emissions scenarios

    T.C. Johns;J.M. Gregory;W.J. Ingram;C.E. Johnson

  • Estimation of natural and anthropogenic contributions to twentieth century temperature change

    Simon F. B. Tett;Gareth S. Jones;Peter A. Stott;David C. Hill;David C. Hill

  • A review of the trade in orchids and its implications for conservation

    Amy Hinsley;Amy Hinsley;Hugo J. de Boer;Hugo J. de Boer;Hugo J. de Boer;Michael F. Fay;Michael F. Fay;Stephan W. Gale

  • How many species of flowering plants are there

    Lucas N. Joppa;David L. Roberts;David L. Roberts;Stuart L. Pimm

  • Biodiversity hotspots house most undiscovered plant species

    Lucas N. Joppa;Lucas N. Joppa;Lucas N. Joppa;David L. Roberts;David L. Roberts;Norman Myers;Stuart L. Pimm

  • Validation of biological collections as a source of phenological data for use in climate change studies: a case study with the orchid Ophrys sphegodes

    Karen M. Robbirt;Karen M. Robbirt;Anthony J. Davy;Michael J. Hutchings;David L. Roberts;David L. Roberts

  • Strong carbon cycle feedbacks in a climate model with interactive CO2 and sulphate aerosols

    Chris D. Jones;Peter M. Cox;Richard L. H. Essery;David L. Roberts

  • The impact of natural and anthropogenic forcings on climate and hydrology since 1550

    Simon F. B. Tett;Richard Betts;Thomas J. Crowley;Jonathan Gregory

  • Flightless birds: when did the dodo become extinct?

    David L. Roberts;Andrew R. Solow

  • How many herbarium specimens are needed to detect threatened species

    Malin C. Rivers;Malin C. Rivers;Lin Taylor;Neil A. Brummitt;Thomas R. Meagher

  • Elevational gradients of species diversity, breeding system and floral traits of orchid species on Réunion Island

    Hans Jacquemyn;Claire Micheneau;David L. Roberts;Thierry Pailler

  • Extinction of one of the world's largest freshwater fishes: Lessons for conserving the endangered Yangtze fauna

    Hui Zhang;Ivan Jarić;David L. Roberts;Yongfeng He

  • Species identification by experts and non-experts: comparing images from field guides

    Gail E. Austen;Markus Bindemann;Richard A. Griffiths;David L. Roberts

  • The response of the climate system to the indirect effects of anthropogenic sulfate aerosol

    K. D. Williams;A. Jones;D. L. Roberts;C. A. Senior

  • Estimating the extent and structure of trade in horticultural orchids via social media

    Amy Hinsley;Tamsin E. Lee;Joseph R. Harrison;David L. Roberts

  • The population ecology and social behaviour of taxonomists

    Lucas N. Joppa;David L. Roberts;Stuart L. Pimm

  • Dynamics of the global trade in live reptiles: Shifting trends in production and consequences for sustainability

    Janine E. Robinson;Richard A. Griffiths;Freya A.V. St. John;David L. Roberts

  • Regional and global context of the Late Cenozoic Langebaanweg (LBW) palaeontological site: West Coast of South Africa

    David L. Roberts;Thalassa Matthews;Andrew I.R. Herries;Claire Boulter

  • Potential Disruption of Pollination in a Sexually Deceptive Orchid by Climatic Change

    Karen M. Robbirt;David L. Roberts;Michael J. Hutchings;Anthony J. Davy

  • Heterogeneity in consumer preferences for orchids in international trade and the potential for the use of market research methods to study demand for wildlife

    Amy Hinsley;Diogo Verissimo;Diogo Verissimo;David L. Roberts

  • Significance of Sighting Rate in Inferring Extinction and Threat

    Greg J. McINERNY;David L. Roberts;Anthony J. Davy;Phillip J. Cribb

  • A NONPARAMETRIC TEST FOR EXTINCTION BASED ON A SIGHTING RECORD

    Andrew R. Solow;David L. Roberts

  • Convalescent plasma in patients admitted to hospital with COVID-19 (RECOVERY): a randomised, controlled, open-label, platform trial

    Peter W Horby;Lise Estcourt;Leon Peto

Frequent Co-Authors

Richard A. Griffiths
Richard A. Griffiths University of Kent
Andrew R. Solow
Andrew R. Solow Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution
Franck Courchamp
Franck Courchamp University of Paris-Saclay
Lucas Joppa
Lucas Joppa Microsoft (United States)
Markus Bindemann
Markus Bindemann University of Kent
Chris S. Elphick
Chris S. Elphick University of Connecticut
J. Michael Reed
J. Michael Reed Tufts University
Pavel Kindlmann
Pavel Kindlmann Charles University
Robert J. Smith
Robert J. Smith University of Kent
Diogo Veríssimo
Diogo Veríssimo University of Oxford

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring careers in Ecology and Evolution often leads students toward fields that intersect with healthcare, environmental policy, and research. For those interested in bridging life sciences with nursing and health, online opportunities abound. Many professionals enhance their expertise through asn to np programs, which allow registered nurses with an associate degree to advance into nurse practitioner roles through flexible online studies.

Even individuals without a nursing background can transition into this in-demand field thanks to online msn programs for non nurses. These programs are designed for career changers who may have a foundation in biological or environmental sciences.

Selecting the right online institution is essential. Those seeking high-quality, reputable programs should research top rated online nursing schools wgu and compare them to other leaders in remote healthcare education.

Cost is a key consideration, especially for students looking to continue their education seamlessly from a bachelor’s to a master’s degree. There are online bsn to msn programs that focus on affordability while maintaining strong academic standards. These pathways support diverse career options in both ecological and medical environments.

Best Scientists Citing David L. Roberts

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles