World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
86
Citations
29515
World Ranking
581
National Ranking
88

Michael F. Fay publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael F. Fay sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 306 publications — 92nd percentile

92% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Michael F. Fay D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael F. Fay sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 86 D-Index — 93rd percentile

93% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Michael F. Fay is affiliated with the Royal Botanic Gardens in the United Kingdom. Their research portfolio encompasses a range of topics within agricultural and biological sciences, biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology, with significant contributions to plant science and ecology.

Their work extends deeply into several subfields, including plant science, ecology, evolution, behavioral studies, molecular biology, genetics, and nature and landscape conservation. These areas reflect a focus on the biological and ecological facets of plant life and molecular mechanisms influencing biodiversity.

Key research topics addressed by Michael F. Fay include:

  • Plant and animal studies
  • Plant and fungal species descriptions
  • Genomics and phylogenetic studies
  • Plant diversity and evolution
  • Botanical studies and applications
  • Genetic diversity and population structure
  • Horticultural and viticultural research

Their publication record includes numerous papers featured in several well-known scientific venues. Frequent publication venues include:

  • Curtis s Botanical Magazine
  • Wellcome Open Research
  • Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society
  • Biodiversity and Conservation
  • Plants People Planet

Michael F. Fay has collaborated frequently with other researchers. Notable coauthors include:

  • Maarten J. M. Christenhusz
  • Jacopo Calevo
  • Ilia J. Leitch
  • Tim C. G. Rich
  • Roberta Gargiulo

Recent representative papers authored or coauthored by Michael F. Fay are:

  • "State of the World's Plants and Fungi 2020" (2020), Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University)
  • "The origin and speciation of orchids" (2024), New Phytologist
  • "A multi-taxon analysis of European Red Lists reveals major threats to biodiversity" (2023), PLoS ONE
  • "Rapid Parallel Adaptation to Anthropogenic Heavy Metal Pollution" (2021), Molecular Biology and Evolution
  • "Lost and Found: Coffea stenophylla and C. affinis, the Forgotten Coffee Crop Species of West Africa" (2020), Frontiers in Plant Science

Best Publications

  • Angiosperm phylogeny inferred from 18S rDNA, rbcL, and atpB sequences

    Douglas E. Soltis;Pamela S. Soltis;Mark W. Chase;Mark E. Mort

  • Phylogenetics of Flowering Plants Based on Combined Analysis of Plastid atpB and rbcL Gene Sequences

    Vincent Savolainen;Mark W. Chase;Sara B. Hoot;Cynthia M. Morton

  • Cross-species transfer of nuclear microsatellite markers: potential and limitations.

    Thelma Barbará;Clarisse Palma-Silva;Gecele M. Paggi;Fernanda Bered

  • Phylogeny of the eudicots : a nearly complete familial analysis based on rbcL gene sequences

    Vincent Savolainen;Michael F. Fay;Dirk C. Albach;Anders Backlund

  • Conservation of rare and endangered plants using in vitro methods

    Michael F. Fay

  • The largest eukaryotic genome of them all

    Jaume Pellicer;Michael F. Fay;Ilia J. Leitch

  • When in doubt, put it in Flacourtiaceae: a molecular phylogenetic analysis based on plastid rbcL DNA sequences

    Mark W. Chase;Sue Zmarzty;M. Dolores Lledo;Kenneth J. Wurdack

  • Taxonomic affinities of Medusagyne oppositifolia (Medusagynaceae)

    Michael F. Fay;Susan M. Swensen;Mark W. Chase

  • A review of the trade in orchids and its implications for conservation

    Amy Hinsley;Amy Hinsley;Hugo J. de Boer;Hugo J. de Boer;Hugo J. de Boer;Michael F. Fay;Michael F. Fay;Stephan W. Gale

  • A phylogenetic analysis of Rhamnaceae using rbcL and trnL-F plastid DNA sequences.

    James E. Richardson;Michael F. Fay;Quentin C. B. Cronk;Quentin C. B. Cronk;Diane Bowman;Diane Bowman

  • Barrier to gene flow between two ecologically divergent Populus species, P. alba (white poplar) and P. tremula (European aspen): the role of ecology and life history in gene introgression.

    C. Lexer;M. F. Fay;J. A. Joseph;M.-S. Nica

  • Rapid and recent origin of species richness in the Cape flora of South Africa

    James E. Richardson;James E. Richardson;Frans M. Weitz;Frans M. Weitz;Michael F. Fay;Quentin C. B. Cronk;Quentin C. B. Cronk

  • Barcoding of Plants and Fungi

    Mark W. Chase;Michael F. Fay

  • Multigene Analyses of Monocot Relationships

    Mark W. Chase;Michael F. Fay;Dion S. Devey;Oliver Maurin

  • Growing coffee: Psilanthus (Rubiaceae) subsumed on the basis of molecular and morphological data; implications for the size, morphology, distribution and evolutionary history of Coffea

    Aaron P. Davis;James Tosh;Nicolas Ruch;Michael F. Fay

  • Orchid conservation: how can we meet the challenges in the twenty-first century?

    Michael F. Fay;Michael F. Fay

  • Simultaneous parsimony jackknife analysis of 2538 rbcL DNA sequences reveals support for major clades of green plants, land plants, seed plants and flowering plants

    Mari Källersjö;James S. Farris;Mark W. Chase;Birgitta Bremer

  • Molecular systematics of Iridaceae: evidence from four plastid DNA regions

    Gail Reeves;Mark W. Chase;Peter Goldblatt;Paula Rudall

  • Stable Epigenetic Effects Impact Adaptation in Allopolyploid Orchids (Dactylorhiza: Orchidaceae)

    Ovidiu Paun;Richard M. Bateman;Michael F. Fay;Mikael Hedrén

  • Systematics of Amaryllidaceae based on cladistic analysis of plastid sequence data.

    Alan W. Meerow;Michael F. Fay;Charles L Guy;Qin-Bao Li

  • Amplified fragment length polymorphisms (AFLP) reveal details of polyploid evolution in Dactylorhiza (Orchidaceae)

    Mikael Hedrén;Michael F. Fay;Mark W. Chase

  • Diversity, phylogeny, and evolution in the monocotyledons

    Michael F. Fay

Frequent Co-Authors

Mark W. Chase
Mark W. Chase Royal Botanic Gardens
Christian Lexer
Christian Lexer University of Vienna
Ilia J. Leitch
Ilia J. Leitch Royal Botanic Gardens
James E. Richardson
James E. Richardson University College Cork
Richard M. Bateman
Richard M. Bateman Royal Botanic Gardens
Paula J. Rudall
Paula J. Rudall Royal Botanic Gardens
Salvatore Cozzolino
Salvatore Cozzolino University of Naples Federico II
Quentin C. B. Cronk
Quentin C. B. Cronk University of British Columbia
Michelle van der Bank
Michelle van der Bank University of Johannesburg
J. Chris Pires
J. Chris Pires Colorado State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering a career in Ecology and Evolution can open doors to a wide range of fields, including healthcare, research, and education. Many students discover related interests as they progress, such as biological research or nursing—especially through flexible online programs.

If you’re thinking about a career change, accelerated nursing programs for non nurses online provide a fast track to the medical field. For registered nurses seeking to advance, rn to bsn 6 months programs offer an efficient path to a bachelor’s degree.

Those interested in advanced roles may wonder how long to become nurse practitioner and what the career outlook looks like. For specialization, understanding the dnp pmhnp salary can help you plan your educational journey and future opportunities.

Whether you pursue ecology, nursing, or a blend of both, exploring online degree options can accelerate your path to a rewarding career while offering flexibility and affordability.

Best Scientists Citing Michael F. Fay

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles