World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
50
Citations
8641
World Ranking
3878
National Ranking
68

Salvatore Cozzolino publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Salvatore Cozzolino sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 183 publications — 67th percentile

67% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Salvatore Cozzolino D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Salvatore Cozzolino sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 50 D-Index — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Salvatore Cozzolino is affiliated with the University of Naples Federico II in Italy. The main research fields focus on Agricultural and Biological Sciences, Environmental Science, and Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, reflecting a broad expertise in life sciences and environmental studies. Within these domains, subfields of special interest include Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Plant Science, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Molecular Biology, and Genetics.

The scientist's work covers several key topics, highlighting a diverse research portfolio. These topics include:

  • Plant and animal studies
  • Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
  • Plant Parasitism and Resistance
  • Species Distribution and Climate Change
  • Genetic diversity and population structure
  • Plant Reproductive Biology
  • Insect and Pesticide Research

Publication activity is documented across a range of journals and venues, with frequent contributions to the following:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society
  • New Phytologist
  • Ecology and Evolution
  • Plant Species Biology

Recent papers showcase research across genetics, adaptation, and ecological interactions. Notable publications include:

  • "Hidden genetic variation in plasticity provides the potential for rapid adaptation to novel environments," 2023, published in New Phytologist
  • "Structural Variants and Speciation: Multiple Processes at Play," 2023, Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology
  • "Adaptive divergence generates distinct plastic responses in two closely related Senecio species," 2022, Evolution
  • "DNA barcoding of native Caucasus herbal plants: potentials and limitations in complex groups and implications for phylogeographic patterns," 2021, Biodiversity Data Journal
  • "Ecological factors driving pollination success in an orchid that mimics a range of Fabaceae," 2020, Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society

Collaboration is a consistent aspect of this research profile, with frequent co-authors including:

  • Donata Cafasso
  • James Clark
  • Antonia Cristaudo
  • Daniela Scaccabarozzi
  • Greg M. Walter

This comprehensive research engagement reflects a career that integrates genetic, ecological, and botanical studies within both experimental and theoretical frameworks. The focus on plant and animal interactions, adaptation mechanisms, and molecular ecology situates the scientist within interdisciplinary conversations in life sciences research.

Best Publications

  • Orchid diversity: an evolutionary consequence of deception?

    Salvatore Cozzolino;Alex Widmer

  • Phytotoxicity to and uptake of enrofloxacin in crop plants

    Luciana Migliore;Salvatore Cozzolino;Maurizio Fiori

  • Evolution of reproductive isolation in plants.

    A Widmer;C Lexer;S Cozzolino

  • PATTERNS OF REPRODUCTIVE ISOLATION IN MEDITERRANEAN DECEPTIVE ORCHIDS

    Giovanni Scopece;Aldo Musacchio;Alex Widmer;Salvatore Cozzolino

  • Inefficient photosynthesis in the Mediterranean orchid Limodorum abortivum is mirrored by specific association to ectomycorrhizal Russulaceae.

    M. Girlanda;M. A. Selosse;D. Cafasso;F. Brilli

  • Phylogeny and evolution of Orchis and allied genera based on ITS DNA variation: morphological gaps and molecular continuity.

    Serena Aceto;Paolo Caputo;Salvatore Cozzolino;Luciano Gaudio

  • Sympatric bromeliad species (Pitcairnia spp.) facilitate tests of mechanisms involved in species cohesion and reproductive isolation in Neotropical inselbergs.

    Clarisse Palma-Silva;T. Wendt;Fábio Pinheiro;Thelma Barbará;Thelma Barbará

  • Effect on plants of sulphadimethoxine used in intensive farming (Panicum miliaceum, Pisum sativum and Zea mays)

    Luciana Migliore;Gianfranco Brambilla;Salvatore Cozzolino;Luciano Gaudio

  • Herbivory and floral signaling: phenotypic plasticity and tradeoffs between reproduction and indirect defense

    Florian P. Schiestl;Heather Kirk;Laurent Bigler;Salvatore Cozzolino

  • Photosynthetic Mediterranean meadow orchids feature partial mycoheterotrophy and specific mycorrhizal associations.

    Mariangela Girlanda;Rossana Segreto;Donata Cafasso;Heiko Tobias Liebel

  • Multiple shifts to different pollinators fuelled rapid diversification in sexually deceptive Ophrys orchids

    Hendrik Breitkopf;Hendrik Breitkopf;Renske E. Onstein;Donata Cafasso;Philipp M. Schlüter

  • FLORAL ISOLATION IS THE MAIN REPRODUCTIVE BARRIER AMONG CLOSELY RELATED SEXUALLY DECEPTIVE ORCHIDS

    Shuqing Xu;Philipp M. Schlüter;Giovanni Scopece;Hendrik Breitkopf

  • Evolution of postzygotic reproductive isolation in a guild of deceptive orchids.

    Giovanni Scopece;Alex Widmer;Salvatore Cozzolino

  • Hybridization and introgression across different ploidy levels in the Neotropical orchids Epidendrum fulgens and E. puniceoluteum (Orchidaceae).

    Fábio Pinheiro;Fábio De Barros;Clarisse Palma-Silva;Diogo Meyer

  • Hybrid floral scent novelty drives pollinator shift in sexually deceptive orchids.

    Nicolas J Vereecken;Nicolas J Vereecken;Salvatore Cozzolino;Florian P Schiestl

  • Variability in floral scent in rewarding and deceptive orchids: the signature of pollinator-imposed selection?

    Charlotte C. Salzmann;Antonio M. Nardella;Salvatore Cozzolino;Florian P. Schiestl

  • Phytotoxicity to and uptake of flumequine used in intensive aquaculture on the aquatic weed, Lythrum salicaria L.

    Luciana Migliore;Salvatore Cozzolino;Maurizio Fiori

  • Evidence for pollinator sharing in Mediterranean nectar-mimic orchids: absence of premating barriers?

    Salvatore Cozzolino;Florian P Schiestl;Andreas Müller;Olga De Castro

  • Laboratory models to evaluate phytotoxicity of sulphadimethoxine on terrestrial plants

    L. Migliore;C. Civitareale;S. Cozzolino;P. Casoria

  • Pollination efficiency and the evolution of specialized deceptive pollination systems.

    Giovanni Scopece;Salvatore Cozzolino;Steven D. Johnson;Florian P. Schiestl

  • Evolution of sexual mimicry in the orchid subtribe orchidinae: the role of preadaptations in the attraction of male bees as pollinators

    Florian P Schiestl;Salvatore Cozzolino

Frequent Co-Authors

Alex Widmer
Alex Widmer ETH Zurich
Florian P. Schiestl
Florian P. Schiestl University of Zurich
Christian Lexer
Christian Lexer University of Vienna
Nicolas Vereecken
Nicolas Vereecken Université Libre de Bruxelles
Michael F. Fay
Michael F. Fay Royal Botanic Gardens
Simon J. Hiscock
Simon J. Hiscock University of Oxford
Ryan D. Phillips
Ryan D. Phillips La Trobe University
Manfred Ayasse
Manfred Ayasse University of Ulm
Kingsley W. Dixon
Kingsley W. Dixon Curtin University
Marc-André Selosse
Marc-André Selosse University of Gdańsk

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Ecology and Evolution opens doors to a variety of related careers in science, healthcare, and education. Many students consider online degree programs for greater flexibility and cost savings. For example, those interested in information management and research often look into the cost of mlis degree us as a potential pathway into library science and data curation.

Other popular options include health-related fields. There are several accredited speech pathology programs designed for students with science backgrounds, providing swift routes to licensure. For those changing careers, slp bridge program online options help non-SLP majors transition into communication sciences and disorders.

Additionally, science graduates curious about healthcare can explore accelerated nursing programs for non nurses to quickly enter nursing. With so many online pathways, students of Ecology and Evolution will find a diverse range of career options outside traditional research roles.

Best Scientists Citing Salvatore Cozzolino

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles