World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
66
Citations
19148
World Ranking
2975
National Ranking
285

John-Paul Taylor publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John-Paul Taylor sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 319 publications — 85th percentile

85% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

John-Paul Taylor D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John-Paul Taylor sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 66 D-Index — 69th percentile

69% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

John-Paul Taylor is affiliated with Newcastle University in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily spans the fields of Medicine and Neuroscience, with a notable focus on subfields such as Cognitive Neuroscience, Neurology, Psychiatry and Mental Health, Physiology, and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging.

The scientist's work encompasses a variety of topics, including:

  • Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Hallucinations in medical conditions
  • Neurological disorders and treatments

John-Paul Taylor's recent publications include:

  • Research criteria for the diagnosis of prodromal dementia with Lewy bodies, 2020, Neurology
  • Diagnosis and management of dementia with Lewy bodies: Fourth consensus report of the DLB Consortium, 2020, Newcastle University ePrints (Newcastle University)
  • Measures of resting state EEG rhythms for clinical trials in Alzheimer's disease: Recommendations of an expert panel, 2021, Alzheimer's & Dementia
  • The reliability of a deep learning model in clinical out-of-distribution MRI data: A multicohort study, 2020, Medical Image Analysis
  • Diagnostic contribution and therapeutic perspectives of transcranial magnetic stimulation in dementia, 2021, Clinical Neurophysiology

The venues where John-Paul Taylor frequently publishes include:

  • Alzheimer's & Dementia
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Movement Disorders
  • Neurology
  • International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry

Collaborations are a significant part of their work, with frequent coauthors comprising:

  • John T. O'Brien
  • Alan Thomas
  • Michael Firbank
  • Paul C. Donaghy
  • Calum A. Hamilton

Best Publications

  • Diagnosis and management of dementia with Lewy bodies Fourth consensus report of the DLB Consortium

    Ian G. McKeith;Bradley F. Boeve;Dennis W. DIckson;Glenda Halliday

  • Research criteria for the diagnosis of prodromal dementia with Lewy bodies

    Ian G. McKeith;Tanis J. Ferman;Alan J. Thomas;Frédéric Blanc

  • Dementia: timely diagnosis and early intervention

    Louise Robinson;Eugene Tang;John-Paul Taylor

  • Evidence of activity-dependent withdrawal of corticospinal projections during human development

    J. A. Eyre;J. P. Taylor;F. Villagra;M. Smith

  • Dementia with Lewy bodies: an update and outlook

    Tiago Fleming Outeiro;Tiago Fleming Outeiro;Tiago Fleming Outeiro;David J. Koss;Daniel Erskine;Lauren Walker

  • Clinical practice with anti-dementia drugs: A revised (third) consensus statement from the British Association for Psychopharmacology

    John T. O'Brien;Clive Holmes;Matthew Jones;Roy Jones

  • Pharmacological Management of Lewy Body Dementia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

    Chris Stinton;Ian G. McKeith;John-Paul Taylor;Louise Lafortune

  • Impaired dopaminergic neurotransmission and microtubule-associated protein tau alterations in human LRRK2 transgenic mice.

    H. L. Melrose;J. C. Dächsel;B. Behrouz;S. J. Lincoln

  • New evidence on the management of Lewy body dementia.

    John Paul Taylor;Ian G. McKeith;David J. Burn;Brad F. Boeve

  • Parietal white matter lesions in Alzheimer’s disease are associated with cortical neurodegenerative pathology, but not with small vessel disease

    Kirsty E. McAleese;Lauren Walker;Sophie Graham;Elisa L. J. Moya

  • What electrophysiology tells us about Alzheimer's disease: a window into the synchronization and connectivity of brain neurons.

    Claudio Babiloni;Katarzyna Blinowska;Laura Bonanni;Andrej Cichocki

  • Cognitive decline and quality of life in incident Parkinson's disease: The role of attention

    Rachael A Lawson;Alison J Yarnall;Gordon W Duncan;David P Breen

  • Peripheral inflammation in prodromal Alzheimer’s and Lewy body dementias

    Eleanor King;John Tiernan O’Brien;Paul Donaghy;Christopher Morris

  • Measures of resting state EEG rhythms for clinical trials in Alzheimer's disease: Recommendations of an expert panel

    Claudio Babiloni;Xianghong Arakaki;Hamed Azami;Karim Bennys

  • Severity of mild cognitive impairment in early Parkinson's disease contributes to poorer quality of life

    Rachael A. Lawson;Alison J. Yarnall;Gordon W. Duncan;Tien Kheng Khoo

  • Transcranial magnetic stimulation and transcranial direct current stimulation: treatments for cognitive and neuropsychiatric symptoms in the neurodegenerative dementias?

    Greg J Elder;John-Paul Taylor

  • Cortical tau load is associated with white matter hyperintensities

    Kirsty E. McAleese;Michael Firbank;Madhurima Dey;Sean J. Colloby

  • The reliability of a deep learning model in clinical out-of-distribution MRI data: A multicohort study

    Gustav Mårtensson;Daniel Ferreira;Tobias Granberg;Lena Cavallin

  • Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for negative symptoms of schizophrenia: a randomized controlled pilot study.

    Andrew Mogg;Rick Purvis;Savitha Eranti;Faith Contell

  • Cortical Thickness in Dementia with Lewy Bodies and Alzheimer's Disease: A Comparison of Prodromal and Dementia Stages

    Frederic Blanc;Sean J. Colloby;Nathalie Philippi;Xavier de Pétigny

  • Quantitative electroencephalogram utility in predicting conversion of mild cognitive impairment to dementia with Lewy bodies

    Laura Bonanni;Bernardo Perfetti;Stefania Bifolchetti;John Paul Taylor

  • A comparative analysis of leucine-rich repeat kinase 2 (Lrrk2) expression in mouse brain and Lewy body disease.

    H.L. Melrose;C.B. Kent;J.P. Taylor;J.C. Dachsel

  • fMRI resting state networks and their association with cognitive fluctuations in dementia with Lewy bodies.

    Luis R. Peraza;Marcus Kaiser;Michael Firbank;Sara Graziadio

  • Revisiting DLB Diagnosis: A Consideration of Prodromal DLB and of the Diagnostic Overlap With Alzheimer Disease

    Ian McKeith;John-Paul Taylor;Alan Thomas;Paul Donaghy

Frequent Co-Authors

John T. O'Brien
John T. O'Brien University of Cambridge
Alan J. Thomas
Alan J. Thomas Newcastle University
Ian G. McKeith
Ian G. McKeith Newcastle University
Michael J. Firbank
Michael J. Firbank Newcastle University
David J. Burn
David J. Burn Newcastle University
Sean J. Colloby
Sean J. Colloby Newcastle University
Laura Bonanni
Laura Bonanni University of Chieti-Pescara
Marco Onofrj
Marco Onofrj University of Chieti-Pescara
Marcus Kaiser
Marcus Kaiser University of Nottingham
Raffaella Franciotti
Raffaella Franciotti University of Chieti-Pescara

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing John-Paul Taylor

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles