World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 83 15380 14465 7755 7172 507 38445

Peter A. Banks publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Peter A. Banks between 1966 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Peter A. Banks published across 60 years, from 1966 to 2025, averaging 8.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 36 publications in 2013. 6 of the 515 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1966 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 36. Peak 36 publications in 2013. 1966: 2 publications 1967: 2 publications 1968: 1 publication 1969: 3 publications 1970: 1 publication 1971: 3 publications 1972: 0 publications 1973: 1 publication 1974: 0 publications 1975: 4 publications 1976: 2 publications 1977: 1 publication 1978: 1 publication 1979: 18 publications 1980: 1 publication 1981: 1 publication 1982: 3 publications 1983: 3 publications 1984: 3 publications 1985: 2 publications 1986: 7 publications 1987: 7 publications 1988: 6 publications 1989: 2 publications 1990: 4 publications 1991: 5 publications 1992: 5 publications 1993: 7 publications 1994: 9 publications 1995: 13 publications 1996: 11 publications 1997: 15 publications 1998: 31 publications 1999: 5 publications 2000: 5 publications 2001: 4 publications 2002: 11 publications 2003: 6 publications 2004: 10 publications 2005: 10 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 19 publications 2008: 27 publications 2009: 21 publications 2010: 24 publications 2011: 24 publications 2012: 17 publications 2013: 36 publications 2014: 14 publications 2015: 17 publications 2016: 12 publications 2017: 15 publications 2018: 11 publications 2019: 11 publications 2020: 5 publications 2021: 12 publications 2022: 11 publications 2023: 4 publications 2024: 2 publications 2025: 4 publications
1966 2025

515 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Peter A. Banks: publications per year, 1966 to 2025
Year Publications
1966 2
1967 2
1968 1
1969 3
1970 1
1971 3
1972 0
1973 1
1974 0
1975 4
1976 2
1977 1
1978 1
1979 18
1980 1
1981 1
1982 3
1983 3
1984 3
1985 2
1986 7
1987 7
1988 6
1989 2
1990 4
1991 5
1992 5
1993 7
1994 9
1995 13
1996 11
1997 15
1998 31
1999 5
2000 5
2001 4
2002 11
2003 6
2004 10
2005 10
2006 4
2007 19
2008 27
2009 21
2010 24
2011 24
2012 17
2013 36
2014 14
2015 17
2016 12
2017 15
2018 11
2019 11
2020 5
2021 12
2022 11
2023 4
2024 2
2025 4
Total 515
Download as CSV

Peter A. Banks publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter A. Banks sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 501–520 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 507 publications — 59th percentile

59% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617 507
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Peter A. Banks D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter A. Banks sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 82–83 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 83 D-Index — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027 83
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Peter A. Banks is affiliated with Brigham and Women's Hospital in the United States and has contributed extensively to the field of medicine, particularly within the study of pancreatitis and related gastrointestinal disorders. Their research spans several subfields, including surgery, oncology, epidemiology, pulmonary and respiratory medicine, and genetics.

The main focus of Banks' work includes pancreatitis pathology and treatment, pancreatic and hepatic oncology research, gastrointestinal disorders and treatments, diabetes and associated disorders, liver disease diagnosis and treatment, abdominal surgery and complications, and frailty in older adults.

Banks has published research in several frequent venues, such as:

  • Gastroenterology
  • Pancreatology
  • The American Journal of Gastroenterology
  • Digestive Diseases and Sciences
  • Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology

Notable recent papers include:

  • "Lactated Ringers vs Normal Saline Resuscitation for Mild Acute Pancreatitis: A Randomized Trial," 2020, Gastroenterology
  • "Multiple zeta values in deformation quantization," 2020, Inventiones mathematicae
  • "Pain Experience in Pancreatitis: Strong Association of Genetic Risk Loci for Anxiety and PTSD in Patients With Severe, Constant, and Constant-Severe Pain," 2021, The American Journal of Gastroenterology
  • "Autoimmunity May Explain Diabetes in a Subset of Patients With Recurrent Acute and Chronic Pancreatitis: A Pilot Study," 2021, Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology
  • "Acute pancreatitis precedes chronic pancreatitis in the majority of patients: Results from the NAPS2 consortium," 2022, Pancreatology

Frequent collaborators in Banks' research include:

  • David X. Jin
  • Julia McNabb-Baltar
  • David C. Whitcomb
  • Timothy B. Gardner
  • Dhiraj Yadav

The research portfolio by Peter A. Banks encompasses significant contributions to both clinical and theoretical aspects of medicine, focusing heavily on pancreatitis and related disorders. Their interdisciplinary work connects surgery and oncology with broader medical research themes such as respiratory medicine and genetics, reflecting a comprehensive approach to complex medical conditions.

Best Publications

  • Classification of acute pancreatitis—2012: revision of the Atlanta classification and definitions by international consensus

    Peter A Banks;Thomas L Bollen;Christos Dervenis;Hein G Gooszen

  • Practice guidelines in acute pancreatitis.

    Peter A. Banks;Martin L. Freeman;Ronnie Fass;Darren S. Baroni

  • IAP Guidelines for the Surgical Management of Acute Pancreatitis

    Waldemar Uhl;Andrew Warshaw;Clement Imrie;Claudio Bassi

  • The early prediction of mortality in acute pancreatitis: a large population-based study

    Bechien U Wu;Richard S. Johannes;Xiaowu Sun;Ying Tabak

  • Tumours of histiocytes and accessory dendritic cells: an immunohistochemical approach to classification from the International Lymphoma Study Group based on 61 cases

    S. A. Pileri;T. M. Grogan;N. L. Harris;P Banks

  • Acute Pancreatitis: Bench to the Bedside

    Stephen J. Pandol;Ashok K. Saluja;Clement W. Imrie;Peter A. Banks

  • Lactated Ringer's solution reduces systemic inflammation compared with saline in patients with acute pancreatitis.

    Bechien U. Wu;James Q. Hwang;Timothy H. Gardner;Kathryn Repas

  • Alcohol Consumption, Cigarette Smoking, and the Risk of Recurrent Acute and Chronic Pancreatitis

    Dhiraj Yadav;Robert H. Hawes;Randall E. Brand;Michelle A. Anderson

  • A modified CT severity index for evaluating acute pancreatitis: Improved correlation with patient outcome

    Koenraad J. Mortele;Walter Wiesner;Lisa Intriere;Shridhar Shankar

  • Early diagnosis of pancreatic infection by computed tomography-guided aspiration

    Stephen G. Gerzof;Peter A. Banks;Alan H. Robbins;Willard C. Johnson

  • Comparison of existing clinical scoring systems to predict persistent organ failure in patients with acute pancreatitis.

    Rawad Mounzer;Christopher J. Langmead;Bechien U. Wu;Anna C. Evans

  • Relationship of necrosis to organ failure in severe acute pancreatitis

    S Tenner;G Sica;M Hughes;E Noordhoek

  • A comparative evaluation of radiologic and clinical scoring systems in the early prediction of severity in acute pancreatitis.

    Thomas L Bollen;Vikesh K Singh;Rie Maurer;Kathryn Repas

  • A double-blind comparison of oral versus rectal mesalamine versus combination therapy in the treatment of distal ulcerative colitis.

    M Safdi;M DeMicco;C Sninsky;P Banks

  • A prospective evaluation of the bedside index for severity in acute pancreatitis score in assessing mortality and intermediate markers of severity in acute pancreatitis.

    Vikesh K Singh;Bechien U Wu;Thomas L Bollen;Kathryn Repas

  • Common genetic variants in the CLDN2 and PRSS1-PRSS2 loci alter risk for alcohol-related and sporadic pancreatitis

    David C. Whitcomb;Jessica LaRusch;Alyssa M. Krasinskas;Lambertus Klei

  • AGA technical review: Treatment of pain in chronic pancreatitis

    Andrew L. Warshaw;Andrew L. Warshaw;Peter A. Banks;Peter A. Banks;Carlos Fernàndez–del Castillo;Carlos Fernàndez–del Castillo

  • Hemoconcentration Is an Early Marker for Organ Failure and Necrotizing Pancreatitis

    Alphonso Brown;John Orav;Peter A. Banks

  • Type of pain, pain-associated complications, quality of life, disability and resource utilisation in chronic pancreatitis: a prospective cohort study

    Daniel K. Mullady;Dhiraj Yadav;Stephen T. Amann;Michael R. O'Connell

  • A MODIFIED CT SEVERITY INDEX FOR EVALUATING ACUTE PANCREATITIS: IMPROVED CORRELATION WITH PATIENT OUTCOME.

    K.J. Mortele;K.H. Zou;P.A. Banks;S.G. Silverman

Frequent Co-Authors

David C. Whitcomb
David C. Whitcomb University of Pittsburgh
Randall E. Brand
Randall E. Brand University of Pittsburgh
Stuart Sherman
Stuart Sherman Indiana University
Joao A. Paulo
Joao A. Paulo Harvard University
Hanno Steen
Hanno Steen Boston Children's Hospital
Robert H. Hawes
Robert H. Hawes Orlando Health
David L. Carr-Locke
David L. Carr-Locke NewYork–Presbyterian Hospital
Stuart G. Silverman
Stuart G. Silverman Brigham and Women's Hospital
Hein G. Gooszen
Hein G. Gooszen Radboud University
Hjalmar C. van Santvoort
Hjalmar C. van Santvoort Utrecht University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring medicine in the USA opens up numerous related online degree options and career pathways. If you are interested in healthcare leadership, consider the top online mha programs that are cahme accredited for a thorough foundation in healthcare administration. These accredited programs ensure you meet current industry standards and are prepared for advanced roles.

For practicing nurses, advancing your credentials can be more accessible than ever. Some schools now offer online rn to bsn programs without clinicals, making it easier for busy professionals to earn a bachelor’s degree while balancing work and other responsibilities.

Those with a master’s in nursing looking to move forward might explore the shortest post master's dnp program to quickly gain a terminal nursing degree. Additionally, several easiest dnp programs are available, helping you find flexible and less-intensive pathways to achieve your goals.

These online options can help streamline your journey into new medical and healthcare roles, providing more ways to advance your education and career from anywhere in the world.

Best Scientists Citing Peter A. Banks

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles