World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 108 6034 5671 3225 2990 1011 40416

Stuart Sherman publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Stuart Sherman between 1981 and 2024, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Stuart Sherman published across 44 years, from 1981 to 2024, averaging 23.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 62 publications in 2000. 23 of the 1,043 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
20 40 60
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1981 to 2024. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 62. Peak 62 publications in 2000. 1981: 1 publication 1982: 1 publication 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 1 publication 1989: 0 publications 1990: 3 publications 1991: 6 publications 1992: 5 publications 1993: 8 publications 1994: 13 publications 1995: 41 publications 1996: 35 publications 1997: 32 publications 1998: 27 publications 1999: 16 publications 2000: 62 publications 2001: 43 publications 2002: 35 publications 2003: 41 publications 2004: 51 publications 2005: 38 publications 2006: 44 publications 2007: 50 publications 2008: 57 publications 2009: 43 publications 2010: 42 publications 2011: 43 publications 2012: 35 publications 2013: 33 publications 2014: 29 publications 2015: 31 publications 2016: 19 publications 2017: 37 publications 2018: 19 publications 2019: 23 publications 2020: 21 publications 2021: 18 publications 2022: 17 publications 2023: 19 publications 2024: 4 publications
1981 2024

1,043 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Stuart Sherman: publications per year, 1981 to 2024
Year Publications
1981 1
1982 1
1983 0
1984 0
1985 0
1986 0
1987 0
1988 1
1989 0
1990 3
1991 6
1992 5
1993 8
1994 13
1995 41
1996 35
1997 32
1998 27
1999 16
2000 62
2001 43
2002 35
2003 41
2004 51
2005 38
2006 44
2007 50
2008 57
2009 43
2010 42
2011 43
2012 35
2013 33
2014 29
2015 31
2016 19
2017 37
2018 19
2019 23
2020 21
2021 18
2022 17
2023 19
2024 4
Total 1,043
Download as CSV

Stuart Sherman publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stuart Sherman sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 1,001–1,020 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 1,011 publications — 94th percentile

94% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77 1,011
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Stuart Sherman D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stuart Sherman sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 108–109 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 108 D-Index — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445 108
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Stuart Sherman is affiliated with Indiana University in the United States and has contributed extensively to the field of medicine, with a particular focus on surgery. Their research spans several subfields including surgery, oncology, pulmonary and respiratory medicine, gastroenterology, and microbiology.

The scientist's work covers a variety of topics centered around pancreatic and biliary diseases, reflecting a deep engagement with clinical and pathological aspects. Main research themes include:

  • Pancreatitis Pathology and Treatment
  • Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
  • Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders
  • Gastrointestinal disorders and treatments
  • Pediatric Hepatobiliary Diseases and Treatments
  • Esophageal and GI Pathology
  • Medical Device Sterilization and Disinfection

Stuart Sherman has published in numerous scientific journals, both as a primary and co-author. Frequent publication venues include:

  • Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
  • The American Journal of Gastroenterology
  • Gastroenterology
  • Endoscopy
  • Pancreatology

Collaboration is a significant aspect of their scientific output, with regular coauthors including:

  • Mark A. Gromski
  • Jeffrey J. Easler
  • Evan L. Fogel
  • Benjamin L. Bick
  • James L. Watkins

Their recent papers reveal a focus on the complications and microbiology associated with pancreatitis and related conditions. Notable examples of their latest publications are:

  • The continuum of complications in survivors of necrotizing pancreatitis, 2020, Surgery
  • Microbiology of bile aspirates obtained at ERCP in patients with suspected acute cholangitis, 2022, Endoscopy
  • Constant-severe pain in chronic pancreatitis is associated with genetic loci for major depression in the NAPS2 cohort, 2020, Journal of Gastroenterology
  • Double high-level disinfection versus liquid chemical sterilization for reprocessing of duodenoscopes used for ERCP: a prospective randomized study, 2020, Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
  • Pain Experience in Pancreatitis: Strong Association of Genetic Risk Loci for Anxiety and PTSD in Patients With Severe, Constant, and Constant-Severe Pain, 2021, The American Journal of Gastroenterology

Overall, Stuart Sherman's research contributions are anchored in clinical medicine and surgery, emphasizing gastrointestinal and pancreatic disorders, medical device sterilization, and the genetic and microbiological factors influencing disease progression and treatment outcomes.

Best Publications

  • Complications of Endoscopic Biliary Sphincterotomy

    Freeman Ml;Nelson Db;Sherman S;Haber Gb

  • Risk factors for post-ERCP pancreatitis: a prospective multicenter study.

    Chi Liang Cheng;Stuart Sherman;James L. Watkins;Jeffrey Barnett

  • A randomized trial of rectal indomethacin to prevent post-ERCP pancreatitis

    B. Joseph Elmunzer;James M. Scheiman;Glen A. Lehman;Amitabh Chak

  • Comparison of endoscopic ultrasonography and multidetector computed tomography for detecting and staging pancreatic cancer.

    John DeWitt;Benedict Devereaux;Melissa Chriswell;Kathleen McGreevy

  • Complications of endoscopic sphincterotomy : a prospective series with emphasis on the increased risk associated with sphincter of Oddi dysfunction and nondilated bile ducts

    Stuart Sherman;Thomas A. Ruffolo;Robert H. Hawes;Glen A. Lehman

  • Alcohol Consumption, Cigarette Smoking, and the Risk of Recurrent Acute and Chronic Pancreatitis

    Dhiraj Yadav;Robert H. Hawes;Randall E. Brand;Michelle A. Anderson

  • Endoscopic balloon dilation compared with sphincterotomy for extraction of bile duct stones.

    James A. Disario;Martin L. Freeman;David J. Bjorkman;Padraic MacMathuna

  • Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms: predictors of malignant and invasive pathology.

    C Max Schmidt;Patrick B. White;Joshua A. Waters;Constantin T. Yiannoutsos

  • A prospective randomized comparison of endoscopic ultrasound- and computed tomography-guided celiac plexus block for managing chronic pancreatitis pain.

    Frank Gress;Colleen Schmitt;Stuart Sherman;Steven Ikenberry

  • Prospective evaluation of endoscopic ultrasonography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in patients with chronic abdominal pain of suspected pancreatic origin

    M. J. Wiersema;R. H. Hawes;G. A. Lehman;M. L. Kochman

  • Quality indicators for ERCP.

    Douglas G. Adler;John G. Lieb;Jonathan Cohen;Irving M. Pike

  • Endoscopic ultrasound-guided celiac plexus block for managing abdominal pain associated with chronic pancreatitis: a prospective single center experience

    Frank Gress;Colleen Schmitt;Stuart Sherman;Donato Ciaccia

  • Role of EUS in the preoperative staging of pancreatic cancer: a large single-center experience.

    Frank G. Gress;Robert H. Hawes;Thomas J. Savides;Steven O. Ikenberry

  • Common genetic variants in the CLDN2 and PRSS1-PRSS2 loci alter risk for alcohol-related and sporadic pancreatitis

    David C. Whitcomb;Jessica LaRusch;Alyssa M. Krasinskas;Lambertus Klei

  • Biliary tract complications after orthotopic liver transplantation with choledochocholedochostomy anastomosis: endoscopic findings and results of therapy.

    Rungsun Rerknimitr;Stuart Sherman;Evan L. Fogel;Cem Kalayci

  • Functional gallbladder and sphincter of Oddi disorders

    Jose Behar;Enrico Corazziari;Moises Guelrud;Walter Hogan

  • ERCP- and endoscopic sphincterotomy-induced pancreatitis.

    Stuart Sherman;Glen A. Lehman

  • Triple-tissue sampling at ERCP in malignant biliary obstruction.

    Jeegar Jailwala;Evan L. Fogel;Stuart Sherman;Klaus Gottlieb

  • Type of pain, pain-associated complications, quality of life, disability and resource utilisation in chronic pancreatitis: a prospective cohort study

    Daniel K. Mullady;Dhiraj Yadav;Stephen T. Amann;Michael R. O'Connell

  • Alcohol and Smoking as Risk Factors in an Epidemiology Study of Patients With Chronic Pancreatitis

    Gregory A. Coté;Dhiraj Yadav;Adam Slivka;Robert H. Hawes

Frequent Co-Authors

Glen A. Lehman
Glen A. Lehman Indiana University
Randall E. Brand
Randall E. Brand University of Pittsburgh
Peter A. Banks
Peter A. Banks Brigham and Women's Hospital
David C. Whitcomb
David C. Whitcomb University of Pittsburgh
Robert H. Hawes
Robert H. Hawes Orlando Health
Henry A. Pitt
Henry A. Pitt Temple University
Keith D. Lillemoe
Keith D. Lillemoe Harvard University
Mouen A. Khashab
Mouen A. Khashab Johns Hopkins University
Bret T. Petersen
Bret T. Petersen Mayo Clinic
Guido Costamagna
Guido Costamagna Catholic University of the Sacred Heart

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring alternative career pathways in medicine and healthcare is a smart move for students considering flexibility or specialization. Many respected universities now offer an accelerated healthcare administration degree online, allowing learners to quickly build valuable management skills and pursue leadership roles within hospitals and clinics.

For registered nurses looking to advance, there are specialized bridge programs like the asn to np route. These programs enable nurses with associate degrees to achieve a master's degree and become nurse practitioners in less time.

Nutrition and wellness is another growing field. Students interested in dietetics or health education may benefit from an online bachelor's degree in nutrition, which provides foundational knowledge for careers in public health, sports nutrition, or healthcare settings.

Finally, those seeking executive positions in healthcare can pursue an online mha programs cahme accredited. These master’s programs, accredited by CAHME, ensure high-quality preparation for complex healthcare leadership roles.

Best Scientists Citing Stuart Sherman

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles