World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
108
Citations
40416
World Ranking
6035
National Ranking
3226

Stuart Sherman publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stuart Sherman sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 1,011 publications — 94th percentile

94% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Stuart Sherman D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stuart Sherman sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 108 D-Index — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Stuart Sherman is affiliated with Indiana University in the United States and has contributed extensively to the field of medicine, with a particular focus on surgery. Their research spans several subfields including surgery, oncology, pulmonary and respiratory medicine, gastroenterology, and microbiology.

The scientist's work covers a variety of topics centered around pancreatic and biliary diseases, reflecting a deep engagement with clinical and pathological aspects. Main research themes include:

  • Pancreatitis Pathology and Treatment
  • Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
  • Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders
  • Gastrointestinal disorders and treatments
  • Pediatric Hepatobiliary Diseases and Treatments
  • Esophageal and GI Pathology
  • Medical Device Sterilization and Disinfection

Stuart Sherman has published in numerous scientific journals, both as a primary and co-author. Frequent publication venues include:

  • Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
  • The American Journal of Gastroenterology
  • Gastroenterology
  • Endoscopy
  • Pancreatology

Collaboration is a significant aspect of their scientific output, with regular coauthors including:

  • Mark A. Gromski
  • Jeffrey J. Easler
  • Evan L. Fogel
  • Benjamin L. Bick
  • James L. Watkins

Their recent papers reveal a focus on the complications and microbiology associated with pancreatitis and related conditions. Notable examples of their latest publications are:

  • The continuum of complications in survivors of necrotizing pancreatitis, 2020, Surgery
  • Microbiology of bile aspirates obtained at ERCP in patients with suspected acute cholangitis, 2022, Endoscopy
  • Constant-severe pain in chronic pancreatitis is associated with genetic loci for major depression in the NAPS2 cohort, 2020, Journal of Gastroenterology
  • Double high-level disinfection versus liquid chemical sterilization for reprocessing of duodenoscopes used for ERCP: a prospective randomized study, 2020, Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
  • Pain Experience in Pancreatitis: Strong Association of Genetic Risk Loci for Anxiety and PTSD in Patients With Severe, Constant, and Constant-Severe Pain, 2021, The American Journal of Gastroenterology

Overall, Stuart Sherman's research contributions are anchored in clinical medicine and surgery, emphasizing gastrointestinal and pancreatic disorders, medical device sterilization, and the genetic and microbiological factors influencing disease progression and treatment outcomes.

Best Publications

  • Complications of Endoscopic Biliary Sphincterotomy

    Freeman Ml;Nelson Db;Sherman S;Haber Gb

  • Risk factors for post-ERCP pancreatitis: a prospective multicenter study.

    Chi Liang Cheng;Stuart Sherman;James L. Watkins;Jeffrey Barnett

  • A randomized trial of rectal indomethacin to prevent post-ERCP pancreatitis

    B. Joseph Elmunzer;James M. Scheiman;Glen A. Lehman;Amitabh Chak

  • Comparison of endoscopic ultrasonography and multidetector computed tomography for detecting and staging pancreatic cancer.

    John DeWitt;Benedict Devereaux;Melissa Chriswell;Kathleen McGreevy

  • Complications of endoscopic sphincterotomy : a prospective series with emphasis on the increased risk associated with sphincter of Oddi dysfunction and nondilated bile ducts

    Stuart Sherman;Thomas A. Ruffolo;Robert H. Hawes;Glen A. Lehman

  • Alcohol Consumption, Cigarette Smoking, and the Risk of Recurrent Acute and Chronic Pancreatitis

    Dhiraj Yadav;Robert H. Hawes;Randall E. Brand;Michelle A. Anderson

  • Endoscopic balloon dilation compared with sphincterotomy for extraction of bile duct stones.

    James A. Disario;Martin L. Freeman;David J. Bjorkman;Padraic MacMathuna

  • Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms: predictors of malignant and invasive pathology.

    C Max Schmidt;Patrick B. White;Joshua A. Waters;Constantin T. Yiannoutsos

  • A prospective randomized comparison of endoscopic ultrasound- and computed tomography-guided celiac plexus block for managing chronic pancreatitis pain.

    Frank Gress;Colleen Schmitt;Stuart Sherman;Steven Ikenberry

  • Prospective evaluation of endoscopic ultrasonography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in patients with chronic abdominal pain of suspected pancreatic origin

    M. J. Wiersema;R. H. Hawes;G. A. Lehman;M. L. Kochman

  • Quality indicators for ERCP.

    Douglas G. Adler;John G. Lieb;Jonathan Cohen;Irving M. Pike

  • Endoscopic ultrasound-guided celiac plexus block for managing abdominal pain associated with chronic pancreatitis: a prospective single center experience

    Frank Gress;Colleen Schmitt;Stuart Sherman;Donato Ciaccia

  • Role of EUS in the preoperative staging of pancreatic cancer: a large single-center experience.

    Frank G. Gress;Robert H. Hawes;Thomas J. Savides;Steven O. Ikenberry

  • Common genetic variants in the CLDN2 and PRSS1-PRSS2 loci alter risk for alcohol-related and sporadic pancreatitis

    David C. Whitcomb;Jessica LaRusch;Alyssa M. Krasinskas;Lambertus Klei

  • Biliary tract complications after orthotopic liver transplantation with choledochocholedochostomy anastomosis: endoscopic findings and results of therapy.

    Rungsun Rerknimitr;Stuart Sherman;Evan L. Fogel;Cem Kalayci

  • Functional gallbladder and sphincter of Oddi disorders

    Jose Behar;Enrico Corazziari;Moises Guelrud;Walter Hogan

  • ERCP- and endoscopic sphincterotomy-induced pancreatitis.

    Stuart Sherman;Glen A. Lehman

  • Triple-tissue sampling at ERCP in malignant biliary obstruction.

    Jeegar Jailwala;Evan L. Fogel;Stuart Sherman;Klaus Gottlieb

  • Type of pain, pain-associated complications, quality of life, disability and resource utilisation in chronic pancreatitis: a prospective cohort study

    Daniel K. Mullady;Dhiraj Yadav;Stephen T. Amann;Michael R. O'Connell

  • Alcohol and Smoking as Risk Factors in an Epidemiology Study of Patients With Chronic Pancreatitis

    Gregory A. Coté;Dhiraj Yadav;Adam Slivka;Robert H. Hawes

Frequent Co-Authors

Glen A. Lehman
Glen A. Lehman Indiana University
Randall E. Brand
Randall E. Brand University of Pittsburgh
Peter A. Banks
Peter A. Banks Brigham and Women's Hospital
David C. Whitcomb
David C. Whitcomb University of Pittsburgh
Robert H. Hawes
Robert H. Hawes Orlando Health
Henry A. Pitt
Henry A. Pitt Temple University
Keith D. Lillemoe
Keith D. Lillemoe Harvard University
Mouen A. Khashab
Mouen A. Khashab Johns Hopkins University
Bret T. Petersen
Bret T. Petersen Mayo Clinic
Guido Costamagna
Guido Costamagna Catholic University of the Sacred Heart

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring alternative career pathways in medicine and healthcare is a smart move for students considering flexibility or specialization. Many respected universities now offer an accelerated healthcare administration degree online, allowing learners to quickly build valuable management skills and pursue leadership roles within hospitals and clinics.

For registered nurses looking to advance, there are specialized bridge programs like the asn to np route. These programs enable nurses with associate degrees to achieve a master's degree and become nurse practitioners in less time.

Nutrition and wellness is another growing field. Students interested in dietetics or health education may benefit from an online bachelor's degree in nutrition, which provides foundational knowledge for careers in public health, sports nutrition, or healthcare settings.

Finally, those seeking executive positions in healthcare can pursue an online mha programs cahme accredited. These master’s programs, accredited by CAHME, ensure high-quality preparation for complex healthcare leadership roles.

Best Scientists Citing Stuart Sherman

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles