World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Bret T. Petersen

Bret T. Petersen

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 86 14051 13230 7127 6597 474 29549

Bret T. Petersen publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Bret T. Petersen between 1989 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Bret T. Petersen published across 37 years, from 1989 to 2025, averaging 12.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 37 publications in 2006. 17 of the 479 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1989 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 37. Peak 37 publications in 2006. 1989: 3 publications 1990: 1 publication 1991: 0 publications 1992: 1 publication 1993: 0 publications 1994: 3 publications 1995: 3 publications 1996: 8 publications 1997: 4 publications 1998: 14 publications 1999: 6 publications 2000: 17 publications 2001: 13 publications 2002: 12 publications 2003: 12 publications 2004: 22 publications 2005: 21 publications 2006: 37 publications 2007: 29 publications 2008: 32 publications 2009: 21 publications 2010: 8 publications 2011: 13 publications 2012: 11 publications 2013: 11 publications 2014: 5 publications 2015: 14 publications 2016: 18 publications 2017: 16 publications 2018: 14 publications 2019: 20 publications 2020: 16 publications 2021: 25 publications 2022: 19 publications 2023: 13 publications 2024: 13 publications 2025: 4 publications
1989 2025

479 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Bret T. Petersen: publications per year, 1989 to 2025
Year Publications
1989 3
1990 1
1991 0
1992 1
1993 0
1994 3
1995 3
1996 8
1997 4
1998 14
1999 6
2000 17
2001 13
2002 12
2003 12
2004 22
2005 21
2006 37
2007 29
2008 32
2009 21
2010 8
2011 13
2012 11
2013 11
2014 5
2015 14
2016 18
2017 16
2018 14
2019 20
2020 16
2021 25
2022 19
2023 13
2024 13
2025 4
Total 479
Download as CSV

Bret T. Petersen publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bret T. Petersen sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 461–480 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 474 publications — 53rd percentile

53% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751 474
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Bret T. Petersen D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bret T. Petersen sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 86–87 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 86 D-Index — 31st percentile

31% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960 86
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Bret T. Petersen is affiliated with the Mayo Clinic in the United States. Their research spans a broad area within medicine, focusing primarily on surgery, pulmonary and respiratory medicine, oncology, gastroenterology, and hepatology. This expertise translates into a diverse range of publications, emphasizing gastrointestinal and hepatobiliary diseases.

Their recent published papers include the following:

  • Indomethacin with or without prophylactic pancreatic stent placement to prevent pancreatitis after ERCP: a randomised non-inferiority trial (2024, The Lancet)
  • Defining Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis: Results From an International Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis Study Group Consensus Process (2021, Gastroenterology)
  • Identification of patients with malignant biliary strictures using a cholangioscopy-based deep learning artificial intelligence (with video) (2022, Gastrointestinal Endoscopy)
  • Transpapillary gallbladder stent placement for long-term therapy of acute cholecystitis (2021, Gastrointestinal Endoscopy)
  • Impact of trimodality sampling on detection of malignant biliary strictures compared with patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis (2021, Gastrointestinal Endoscopy)

Bret T. Petersen frequently collaborates with several other researchers in their field. Notable frequent co-authors include:

  • Andrew C. Storm
  • John A. Martin
  • Vinay Chandrasekhara
  • Ryan Law
  • Barham K. Abu Dayyeh

Much of their work is published in leading medical journals, with frequent publication venues including:

  • Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
  • The American Journal of Gastroenterology
  • Endoscopy
  • Gastroenterology
  • Hepatology Communications

Petersen's research interests are detailed through the main and subfields of study, prominently featuring:

  • Medicine as the primary field with numerous works
  • Surgery
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
  • Oncology
  • Gastroenterology
  • Hepatology

The scientist also focuses on specific clinical and pathological topics, which have guided much of their research output. These main topics include:

  • Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders
  • Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
  • Pediatric Hepatobiliary Diseases and Treatments
  • Cholangiocarcinoma and Gallbladder Cancer Studies
  • Pancreatitis Pathology and Treatment
  • Esophageal and GI Pathology
  • Gastrointestinal Bleeding Diagnosis and Treatment

Best Publications

  • A lexicon for endoscopic adverse events: report of an ASGE workshop.

    Peter B. Cotton;Glenn M. Eisen;Lars Aabakken;Todd Huntley Baron

  • Quality indicators for colonoscopy

    Douglas K. Rex;John L. Petrini;Todd Huntley Baron;Amitabh Chak

  • Diagnosis of autoimmune pancreatitis: the Mayo Clinic experience.

    Suresh T. Chari;Thomas C. Smyrk;Michael J. Levy;Mark D. Topazian

  • Immunoglobulin G4–Associated Cholangitis: Clinical Profile and Response to Therapy

    Amaar Ghazale;Suresh T. Chari;Lizhi Zhang;Thomas C. Smyrk

  • Value of serum IgG4 in the diagnosis of autoimmune pancreatitis and in distinguishing it from pancreatic cancer.

    Amaar Ghazale;Suresh T Chari;Thomas C Smyrk;Michael J Levy

  • Study of recurrence after surgical resection of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the pancreas.

    Suresh T. Chari;Dhiraj Yadav;Thomas C. Smyrk;Eugene P. DiMagno

  • Differences in Clinical Profile and Relapse Rate of Type 1 Versus Type 2 Autoimmune Pancreatitis

    Raghuwansh P. Sah;Suresh T. Chari;Rahul Pannala;Aravind Sugumar

  • Endoscopic balloon dilation compared with sphincterotomy for extraction of bile duct stones.

    James A. Disario;Martin L. Freeman;David J. Bjorkman;Padraic MacMathuna

  • Treatment of relapsing autoimmune pancreatitis with immunomodulators and rituximab: the Mayo Clinic experience

    Phil A Hart;Mark D Topazian;Thomas E Witzig;Jonathan E Clain

  • Small-bowel imaging in Crohn's disease: a prospective, blinded, 4-way comparison trial

    Craig A. Solem;Edward V. Loftus;Joel G. Fletcher;Todd H. Baron

  • A diagnostic strategy to distinguish autoimmune pancreatitis from pancreatic cancer.

    Suresh T. Chari;Naoki Takahashi;Michael J. Levy;Thomas C. Smyrk

  • Quality indicators for gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures: an introduction.

    Douglas O. Faigel;Irving M. Pike;Todd H. Baron;Amitabh Chak

  • Single-operator cholangioscopy in patients requiring evaluation of bile duct disease or therapy of biliary stones (with videos).

    Yang K.Yang Chen;Mansour Parsi;Kenneth Frank Binmoeller;Robert Hawes

  • Transdermal nicotine for mildly to moderately active ulcerative colitis : A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

    William J. Sandborn;William J. Tremaine;Kenneth P. Offord;George M. Lawson

  • Quality indicators for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography

    Todd Huntley Baron;Bret T. Petersen;Klaus Mergener;Amitabh Chak

  • ASGE Technology Status Evaluation Report: wireless capsule endoscopy.

    Daniel S. Mishkin;Ram Chuttani;Joseph Croffie;James DiSario

  • Safety and Outcome of Endoscopic Snare Excision of the Major Duodenal Papilla

    Ian D. Norton;Christopher J. Gostout;Todd H. Baron;Alex Geller

  • Dissolution of Cholesterol Gallbladder Stones by Methyl Tert-Butyl Ether Administered by Percutaneous Transhepatic Catheter

    Thistle Jl;May Gr;Bender Ce;Williams Hj

  • Impact of Endoscopist Withdrawal Speed On Polyp Yield: Implications for Optimal Colonoscopy Withdrawal Time

    D. T. Simmons;G. C. Harewood;T. H. Baron;B. T. Petersen

  • Grading the complexity of endoscopic procedures: results of an ASGE working party

    Peter B. Cotton;Glenn Eisen;Joseph Romagnuolo;John Vargo

Frequent Co-Authors

Michael J. Levy
Michael J. Levy Harvard Medical School
Suresh T. Chari
Suresh T. Chari The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Todd H. Baron
Todd H. Baron University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Kenneth K. Wang
Kenneth K. Wang Mayo Clinic
Thomas C. Smyrk
Thomas C. Smyrk Mayo Clinic
Alan N. Barkun
Alan N. Barkun McGill University Health Centre
John J. Vargo
John J. Vargo Cleveland Clinic
Michael G. Sarr
Michael G. Sarr Mayo Clinic

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

As you consider a future in medicine, it’s worth exploring related online degrees and career pathways. The healthcare field offers diverse roles that go beyond becoming a physician, many of which can be pursued through flexible, accredited online programs.

For example, mental health professionals are in high demand, and the msn to pmhnp online pathway allows registered nurses to become Psychiatric Mental Health Nurse Practitioners. Those interested in leadership might consider healthcare administration degrees, which prepare graduates for management roles in clinics, hospitals, and beyond.

Cost is often a concern, but there are affordable online mha programs that offer a Master of Healthcare Administration—ideal for those ready to advance without excessive debt. Similarly, advanced nursing professionals seeking the highest credentials can enroll in the cheapest dnp programs online to earn their Doctor of Nursing Practice.

These online options make it easier than ever to find your place in healthcare, aligning your interests, schedule, and budget with your future goals.

Best Scientists Citing Bret T. Petersen

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles