World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 95 10089 9467 5195 4798 1061 32291

Mouen A. Khashab publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Mouen A. Khashab between 2004 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Mouen A. Khashab published across 23 years, from 2004 to 2026, averaging 42.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 107 publications in 2017. 14 of the 975 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
25 50 75 100
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2004 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 107. Peak 107 publications in 2017. 2004: 1 publication 2005: 5 publications 2006: 0 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 9 publications 2009: 12 publications 2010: 17 publications 2011: 25 publications 2012: 42 publications 2013: 64 publications 2014: 73 publications 2015: 85 publications 2016: 80 publications 2017: 107 publications 2018: 77 publications 2019: 101 publications 2020: 104 publications 2021: 105 publications 2022: 16 publications 2023: 25 publications 2024: 9 publications 2025: 12 publications 2026: 2 publications
2004 2026

975 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Mouen A. Khashab: publications per year, 2004 to 2026
Year Publications
2004 1
2005 5
2006 0
2007 4
2008 9
2009 12
2010 17
2011 25
2012 42
2013 64
2014 73
2015 85
2016 80
2017 107
2018 77
2019 101
2020 104
2021 105
2022 16
2023 25
2024 9
2025 12
2026 2
Total 975
Download as CSV

Mouen A. Khashab publications per year - data summary

  • Mouen A. Khashab, a Medicine scholar from Johns Hopkins University, has 975 publications recorded across 23 years, from 2004 to 2026.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 2004 and the most recent to 2026.
  • The most productive year is 2017, with 107 publications.
  • The least productive year with any output is 2004, with 1 publication.
  • 1 of the 23 years in the span carries no publications at all (2006).
  • The rate of publication averages 42.4 papers per year over the whole span, or 44.3 per year counting only the 22 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2022-2026) hold 64 publications, 7% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 2004-2011: 73 publications (9.1 per year); 2012-2019: 629 publications (78.6 per year); 2020-2026: 273 publications (39.0 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Mouen A. Khashab publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mouen A. Khashab sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 1,061–1,080 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 1,061 publications — 95th percentile

95% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77 1,061
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Mouen A. Khashab publication distribution in Medicine in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 20,134 Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 86 ranges running from 101–120 to 1,796+ publications.
  • Mouen A. Khashab, a Medicine scholar from Johns Hopkins University, records 1,061 publications - the 95th percentile of the discipline.
  • 95% of ranked Medicine scientists score the same or lower than Mouen A. Khashab, and about 5% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 441–460 publications range, and Mouen A. Khashab ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 341–360 publications, holding 922 scientists (5% of the field).
  • 64% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 521–540 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Mouen A. Khashab D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mouen A. Khashab sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 94–95 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 95 D-Index — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808 95
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Mouen A. Khashab D-index placement in Medicine in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 20,134 Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 75 ranges running from 70–71 to 217+ D-Index.
  • Mouen A. Khashab, a Medicine scholar from Johns Hopkins University, records 95 D-Index - the 51st percentile of the discipline.
  • 51% of ranked Medicine scientists score the same or lower than Mouen A. Khashab, and about 49% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 94–95 D-Index range, and Mouen A. Khashab falls inside that same range.
  • The most crowded range is 82–83 D-Index, holding 1,027 scientists (5% of the field).
  • 70% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 106–107 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more, 98 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Overview

Mouen A. Khashab is affiliated with Johns Hopkins University in the United States and has a significant body of research in medicine, focusing primarily on surgery and gastroenterology.

Their work spans several subfields, including:

  • Surgery
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
  • Gastroenterology
  • Speech and Hearing
  • Oncology

Main research topics covered by Mouen A. Khashab include:

  • Esophageal and GI Pathology
  • Gastrointestinal disorders and treatments
  • Dysphagia Assessment and Management
  • Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders
  • Gastroesophageal reflux and treatments
  • Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
  • Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research

Their recent publications illustrate a focus on advanced endoscopic techniques and outcomes in gastrointestinal procedures. Notable papers include:

  • "Gastric per-oral endoscopic myotomy (G-POEM) for refractory gastroparesis: results from an international prospective trial," 2021, Gut
  • "Assessment of the learning curve for EUS-guided gastroenterostomy for a single operator," 2020, Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
  • "Role of endoscopic functional luminal imaging probe in predicting the outcome of gastric peroral endoscopic pyloromyotomy (with video)," 2020, Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
  • "Zenker's peroral endoscopic myotomy, or flexible or rigid septotomy for Zenker's diverticulum: a multicenter retrospective comparison," 2021, Endoscopy
  • "Endoscopic ultrasound-directed transgastric ERCP (EDGE): a retrospective multicenter study," 2020, Endoscopy

Mouen A. Khashab frequently collaborates with researchers such as Tobias Zuchelli, Vivek Kumbhari, and Cyrus Piraka, reflecting ongoing partnerships within their research community.

Their publications are predominantly featured in high-impact medical journals, with frequent venues including:

  • Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
  • Endoscopy
  • Endoscopy International Open
  • The American Journal of Gastroenterology
  • Gastroenterology

Best Publications

  • Adverse events associated with ERCP

    Vinay Chandrasekhara;Mouen A. Khashab;V. Raman Muthusamy;Ruben D. Acosta

  • The management of antithrombotic agents for patients undergoing GI endoscopy

    Ruben D. Acosta;Neena S. Abraham;Vinay Chandrasekhara;Krishnavel V. Chathadi

  • Incidence, severity, and mortality of post-ERCP pancreatitis: a systematic review by using randomized, controlled trials

    Bharati Kochar;Venkata S. Akshintala;Elham Afghani;B. Joseph Elmunzer

  • ASGE guideline on the role of endoscopy in the evaluation and management of choledocholithiasis

    James L. Buxbaum;Syed M. Abbas Fehmi;Shahnaz Sultan;Shahnaz Sultan;Shahnaz Sultan;Douglas S. Fishman

  • Bowel preparation before colonoscopy.

    John R. Saltzman;Brooks D. Cash;Shabana F. Pasha;Dayna S. Early

  • Guidelines for sedation and anesthesia in GI endoscopy

    Dayna S. Early;Jenifer R. Lightdale;John J. Vargo;Ruben D. Acosta

  • A Systematic Review of Solid-Pseudopapillary Neoplasms: Are these rare lesions?

    Joanna K. Law;Aadil Ahmed;Vikesh K. Singh;Venkata S. Akshintala

  • The role of endoscopy in inflammatory bowel disease.

    Amandeep K. Shergill;Jenifer R. Lightdale;David H. Bruining;Ruben D. Acosta

  • Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) vs laparoscopic Heller myotomy (LHM) for the treatment of Type III achalasia in 75 patients: a multicenter comparative study

    Vivek Kumbhari;Alan H Tieu;Manabu Onimaru;Mohammad H. El Zein

  • ASGE guideline on screening and surveillance of Barrett's esophagus

    Bashar Qumseya;Shahnaz Sultan;Paul Bain

  • International multicenter experience with an over-the-scope clipping device for endoscopic management of GI defects (with video).

    Yamile Haito-Chavez;Joanna K. Law;Thomas Kratt;Alberto Arezzo

  • The role of endoscopy in the management of variceal hemorrhage

    Joo Ha Hwang;Amandeep K. Shergill;Ruben D. Acosta;Vinay Chandrasekhara

  • Gastric peroral endoscopic myotomy for refractory gastroparesis: first human endoscopic pyloromyotomy (with video)

    Mouen A. Khashab;Ellen Stein;John O. Clarke;Payal Saxena

  • GERD after per-oral endoscopic myotomy as compared with Heller's myotomy with fundoplication: a systematic review with meta-analysis.

    Alessandro Repici;Lorenzo Fuccio;Roberta Maselli;Fabrizio Mazza

  • Long non-coding RNA HNF1A-AS1 regulates proliferation and migration in oesophageal adenocarcinoma cells

    Xue Yang;Xue Yang;Jee Hoon Song;Yulan Cheng;Wenjing Wu

  • Guidelines for privileging, credentialing, and proctoring to perform GI endoscopy

    Ashley L. Faulx;Jenifer R. Lightdale;Ruben D. Acosta;Deepak Agrawal

  • A comparative evaluation of EUS-guided biliary drainage and percutaneous drainage in patients with distal malignant biliary obstruction and failed ERCP.

    Mouen A. Khashab;Ali K ord Valeshabad;Elham Afghani;Vikesh K. Singh

  • International multicenter experience with peroral endoscopic myotomy for the treatment of spastic esophageal disorders refractory to medical therapy (with video)

    Mouen A. Khashab;Ahmed A. Messallam;Manabu Onimaru;Ezra Nathaniel Teitelbaum

  • Endoscopic Therapy With Lumen-apposing Metal Stents Is Safe and Effective for Patients With Pancreatic Walled-off Necrosis

    Reem Z. Sharaiha;Amy Tyberg;Mouen A. Khashab;Nikhil A. Kumta

  • Human bile contains MicroRNA‐laden extracellular vesicles that can be used for cholangiocarcinoma diagnosis

    Ling Li;David Masica;Masaharu Ishida;Ciprian Tomuleasa

Frequent Co-Authors

Marcia I. Canto
Marcia I. Canto Johns Hopkins University
Alessandro Repici
Alessandro Repici Humanitas University
Todd H. Baron
Todd H. Baron University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Martin A. Makary
Martin A. Makary Johns Hopkins University
David L. Carr-Locke
David L. Carr-Locke NewYork–Presbyterian Hospital
Brooks D. Cash
Brooks D. Cash The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
Sachin Wani
Sachin Wani University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus
Pankaj J. Pasricha
Pankaj J. Pasricha Johns Hopkins University
Ralph H. Hruban
Ralph H. Hruban Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Robert D. Fanelli
Robert D. Fanelli Berkshire Medical Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a career in medicine doesn’t always require a traditional pathway. Many students opt for flexible, online degree programs to fast-track their entry into healthcare fields or to advance their current careers. There are several key online options to consider, each tailored to unique goals, schedules, and budget constraints.

For those interested in becoming a licensed practical nurse, online LPN programs offer a convenient alternative to on-campus study, often allowing students to study at their own pace. Students seeking deeper specialization, especially in the field of psychiatry, will find many PMHNP online programs designed for flexibility and rapid completion.

Cost is often a critical concern. Those looking to minimize expenses can explore the cheapest online DNP programs for advanced nursing practice, or compare the healthcare administration degree cost at different institutions.

Whether you are just starting your medical career or looking to specialize, online degrees can provide a more accessible and affordable pathway into the healthcare sector.

Best Scientists Citing Mouen A. Khashab

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles