World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
74
Citations
25629
World Ranking
1472
National Ranking
767

Max J. Egenhofer publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Max J. Egenhofer sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 206 publications — 48th percentile

48% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Max J. Egenhofer D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Max J. Egenhofer sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 74 D-Index — 90th percentile

90% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Max J. Egenhofer is affiliated with the University of Maine in the United States. Their academic work spans various aspects within their field, contributing to research and knowledge at this institution.

Although specific details about recent papers, co-authors, publication venues, book publications, and fields or subfields of study are not available, Max J. Egenhofer's association with a reputed university suggests involvement in scholarly activities and research.

There are no listed awards, which indicates that publicly available recognitions for this scientist have not been documented. Likewise, information on particular research topics or thematic areas is not provided.

Due to the limited data on publications, collaborations, and research themes, an outline of Max J. Egenhofer's scientific contributions cannot be delineated in detail. However, their role within an academic institution implies engagement in teaching, research, or both.

Best Publications

  • Point-set topological spatial relations

    Max J. Egenhofer;Robert D. Franzosa

  • Determining semantic similarity among entity classes from different ontologies

    M.A. Rodriguez;M.J. Egenhofer

  • Point-Set Topological Spatial Relations

    Unknown

  • Categorizing Binary Topological Relations Between Regions, Lines, and Points in Geographic Databases

    Max J. Egenhofer

  • Reasoning about Binary Topological Relations

    Max J. Egenhofer

  • Using Ontologies for Integrated Geographic Information Systems

    Frederico T. Fonseca;Max J. Egenhofer;Peggy Agouris;Gilberto Câmara

  • Spatial SQL: a query and presentation language

    M.J. Egenhofer

  • Toward the semantic geospatial web

    Max J. Egenhofer

  • A Formal Definition of Binary Topological Relationships

    Max J. Egenhofer

  • Reasoning about Gradual Changes of Topological Relationships

    Max J. Egenhofer;Khaled K. Al-Taha

  • Identity-based change: a foundation for spatio-temporal knowledge representation

    Kathleen Hornsby;Max J. Egenhofer

  • Topological relations in the world of minimum bounding rectangles: a study with R-trees

    Dimitris Papadias;Timos Sellis;Yannis Theodoridis;Max J. Egenhofer

  • Topological relations between regions with holes

    Max J. Egenhofer;Eliseo Clementini;Paolino Di Felice

  • Modelling topological spatial relations: Strategies for query processing

    Eliseo Clementini;Jayant Sharma;Max J. Egenhofer

  • On the Equivalence of Topological Relations

    Max J. Egenhofer;Robert D. Franzosa

  • Query processing in spatial-query-by-sketch

    Max J. Egenhofer

  • Modeling Moving Objects over Multiple Granularities

    Kathleen Hornsby;Max J. Egenhofer

  • Advances in Spatial Databases

    Max J. Egenhofer;John R. Herring

  • Ontology-driven geographic information systems

    Frederico T. Fonseca;Max J. Egenhofer

  • Spatial and temporal reasoning in geographic information systems

    Max J. Egenhofer;Reginald G. Golledge

  • The design and analysis of spatial data structures

    Max J. Egenhofer

  • Using Ontologies for Integrated Geo-graphic Info

    Frederico Torres Fonseca;Max J. Egenhofer;Peggy Agouris;Gilberto Camara

Frequent Co-Authors

Werner Kuhn
Werner Kuhn University of California, Santa Barbara
Michael F. Goodchild
Michael F. Goodchild University of California, Santa Barbara
Martin Raubal
Martin Raubal ETH Zurich
Dimitris Papadias
Dimitris Papadias Hong Kong University of Science and Technology
Isabel F. Cruz
Isabel F. Cruz University of Illinois at Chicago
Lars Kulik
Lars Kulik University of Melbourne
Michael F. Worboys
Michael F. Worboys University of Greenwich
Eric Sheppard
Eric Sheppard University of California, Los Angeles
Elisa Bertino
Elisa Bertino Purdue University West Lafayette

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

As you explore the possibilities of studying Computer Science in the USA, it’s worth considering the wide range of related online degrees and career pathways available. Many students now opt for flexible online programs that help jumpstart their technical or business careers without the limitations of traditional classrooms.

For those seeking advanced expertise, a cheap doctorate degree online allows you to earn a highly respected qualification at a lower cost. If you’re aiming for a leadership role in academia or education, online edd programs provide fast-track pathways to doctorate-level knowledge in as few as 18 months.

Alternatively, kickstarting your career can be faster than you think. The best associate degree in 6 months online options offer practical skills and credentials within a short timeframe. If your goal is to blend technology and management, pursuing an online college business degree can open doors to various industries—including tech startups, finance, and beyond.

With so many flexible and affordable online degrees available, your learning path is more accessible than ever.

Best Scientists Citing Max J. Egenhofer

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles