World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Martin Raubal

Martin Raubal

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
50
Citations
8739
World Ranking
5674
National Ranking
118

Martin Raubal publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martin Raubal sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 249 publications — 62nd percentile

62% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Martin Raubal D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martin Raubal sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 50 D-Index — 62nd percentile

62% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Martin Raubal is affiliated with ETH Zurich in Switzerland and has a significant research presence in the fields of social sciences, engineering, and computer science. Their scholarly contributions cover a variety of interdisciplinary topics, primarily focused on transportation and mobility.

The main fields of study encompassed in their work include:

  • Social Sciences
  • Engineering
  • Computer Science

The scientist's research delves into several subfields, with a concentration on:

  • Transportation
  • Building and Construction
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Automotive Engineering
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

Key topics addressed across their publications include:

  • Human Mobility and Location-Based Analysis
  • Traffic Prediction and Management Techniques
  • Urban Transport and Accessibility
  • Transportation Planning and Optimization
  • Geographic Information Systems Studies
  • Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
  • Spatial Cognition and Navigation

Martin Raubal has published a number of articles between 2021 and 2023, including:

  • "Applications of deep learning in congestion detection, prediction and alleviation: A survey" (2021) in Transportation Research Part C Emerging Technologies
  • "Using rooftop photovoltaic generation to cover individual electric vehicle demand-A detailed case study" (2022) in Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
  • "Trackintel: An open-source Python library for human mobility analysis" (2023) in Computers Environment and Urban Systems
  • "Incorporating multimodal context information into traffic speed forecasting through graph deep learning" (2023) in International Journal of Geographical Information Systems
  • "Context-aware multi-head self-attentional neural network model for next location prediction" (2023) in Transportation Research Part C Emerging Technologies

The scholar regularly collaborates with peers such as:

  • Peter Kiefer
  • Henry Martin
  • Nina Wiedemann
  • Dominik Bucher
  • Ye Hong

Frequent publication venues for their work include:

  • Repository for Publications and Research Data (ETH Zurich)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • International Journal of Geographical Information Systems
  • AGILE GIScience Series

Best Publications

  • Enriching Wayfinding Instructions with Local Landmarks

    Martin Raubal;Stephan Winter

  • Location based services: ongoing evolution and research agenda

    Haosheng Huang;Georg Gartner;Jukka Matthias Krisp;Martin Raubal

  • Correlating mobile phone usage and travel behavior – A case study of Harbin, China

    Yihong Yuan;Martin Raubal;Martin Raubal;Yu Liu

  • Cognitive and linguistic aspects of geographic space

    Martin Raubal;David M. Mark;Andrew U. Frank

  • Eye tracking for spatial research: Cognition, computation, challenges

    Peter Kiefer;Ioannis Giannopoulos;Martin Raubal;Andrew T. Duchowski

  • The Index of Pupillary Activity: Measuring Cognitive Load vis-à-vis Task Difficulty with Pupil Oscillation

    Andrew T. Duchowski;Krzysztof Krejtz;Izabela Krejtz;Cezary Biele

  • Selection of Salient Features for Route Directions

    Clemens Nothegger;Stephan Winter;Martin Raubal

  • Comparing the Complexity of Wayfinding Tasks in Built Environments

    M Raubal;M J Egenhofer

  • A Formal Model of the Process of Wayfinding in Built Environments

    Martin Raubal;Michael F. Worboys

  • User‐centred time geography for location‐based services

    Martin Raubal;Harvey J. Miller;Scott Bridwell

  • Everyday space–time geographies: using mobile phone-based sensor data to monitor urban activity in Harbin, Paris, and Tallinn

    R. Ahas;A. Aasa;Y. Yuan;M. Raubal

  • An Affordance-Based Model of Place in GIS

    Troy Jordan;Martin Raubal;Bryce Gartrell;Max J. Egenhofer

  • The semantics of similarity in geographic information retrieval

    Krzysztof Janowicz;Martin Raubal;Werner Kuhn

  • Where Am I? Investigating Map Matching During Self‐Localization With Mobile Eye Tracking in an Urban Environment

    Peter Kiefer;Ioannis Giannopoulos;Martin Raubal

  • Ontology and epistemology for agent-based wayfinding simulation

    Martin Raubal

  • Extracting Dynamic Urban Mobility Patterns from Mobile Phone Data

    Yihong Yuan;Yihong Yuan;Martin Raubal

  • Map navigation with mobile devices: virtual versus physical movement with and without visual context

    Michael Rohs;Johannes Schöning;Martin Raubal;Georg Essl

  • Structuring Space with Image Schemata: Wayfinding in Airports as a Case Study

    Martin Raubal;Martin Raubal;Max J. Egenhofer;Max J. Egenhofer;Dieter Pfoser;Dieter Pfoser;Nectaria Tryfona;Nectaria Tryfona

  • Measuring similarity of mobile phone user trajectories– a Spatio-temporal Edit Distance method

    Yihong Yuan;Martin Raubal

  • Applications of deep learning in congestion detection, prediction and alleviation: A survey

    Nishant Kumar;Martin Raubal

  • Semantic rules for context-aware geographical information retrieval

    Carsten Keßler;Martin Raubal;Christoph Wosniok

Frequent Co-Authors

Werner Kuhn
Werner Kuhn University of California, Santa Barbara
Stephan Winter
Stephan Winter University of Melbourne
Krzysztof Janowicz
Krzysztof Janowicz University of California, Santa Barbara
Antonio Krüger
Antonio Krüger German Research Centre for Artificial Intelligence
Johannes Schöning
Johannes Schöning University of St. Gallen
Max J. Egenhofer
Max J. Egenhofer University of Maine
Andrew T. Duchowski
Andrew T. Duchowski Clemson University
Harvey J. Miller
Harvey J. Miller The Ohio State University
Michael F. Goodchild
Michael F. Goodchild University of California, Santa Barbara

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring computer science doesn’t just mean traditional on-campus degrees—many students are now considering online and hybrid pathways. For those looking for an affordable next step in analytics and AI, consider a cheapest data science masters in usa to advance your expertise without the heavy financial burden.

If you’re interested in combining computing with hardware, the top online electrical engineering schools offer flexible programs that open doors in automation, robotics, and embedded systems.

Looking for faster ways to boost your employability? Check out the certifications for jobs that can be completed quickly and often lead to well-paying, in-demand tech roles.

Time is valuable—many prospective professionals are choosing a shortest online masters degree to fast-track their careers or pivot into new specialization areas.

Whether you’re interested in a new field, an advanced degree, or a practical certification, these options make computer science more flexible and accessible than ever.

Best Scientists Citing Martin Raubal

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles