World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
44
Citations
7852
World Ranking
7589
National Ranking
241

Lars Kulik publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lars Kulik sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 193 publications — 44th percentile

44% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Lars Kulik D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lars Kulik sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 48th percentile

48% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Lars Kulik is affiliated with the University of Melbourne in Australia. Their research predominantly spans the fields of Social Sciences and Psychology, with a focus on several subfields including Sociology and Political Science, Clinical Psychology, Demography, Social Psychology, and Health.

The main topics covered in their research include:

  • Work-Family Balance Challenges
  • Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering
  • Tourism, Volunteerism, and Development
  • Health disparities and outcomes
  • Resilience and Mental Health
  • Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
  • Health, psychology, and well-being

Lars Kulik's publications reflect a focus on volunteering, family dynamics, and wellbeing, especially in the context of social issues intensified by the COVID-19 pandemic. Recent papers include:

  • "Multifaceted volunteering: The volunteering experience in the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in light of volunteering styles," 2021, Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy
  • "A multi-variable model for explaining long-term commitment to volunteering among COVID-19 volunteers," 2022, Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy
  • "The relationship between family-work conflict and spousal aggression during the COVID-19 pandemic," 2021, Community Work & Family
  • "The centrality of resourcefulness in explaining wellbeing among financially challenged single mothers," 2020, Journal of Family Social Work
  • "Perceived stress among single Palestinian women in Israel: a mixed method research," 2022, Current Psychology

They have published extensively in venues such as social-issues in israel, Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, Journal of Emergency Management, Journal of Family Social Work, and Community Work & Family.

Frequent collaborators in their research include:

  • Dan Ramon
  • Camelia Ibrahim-Dwairy
  • Muriel Balkanyi-Nehora
  • Ronit Bar
  • Liora Arnon

Best Publications

  • A formal model of obfuscation and negotiation for location privacy

    Matt Duckham;Lars Kulik

  • Spatial Information Theory

    Stephan Winter;Matt Duckham;Lars Kulik;Ben Kuipers

  • On trip planning queries in spatial databases

    Feifei Li;Dihan Cheng;Marios Hadjieleftheriou;George Kollios

  • Location privacy and location-aware computing

    Matt Duckham;Lars Kulik

  • Efficient generation of simple polygons for characterizing the shape of a set of points in the plane

    Matt Duckham;Lars Kulik;Mike Worboys;Antony Galton

  • "Simplest" Paths: Automated Route Selection for Navigation

    Matt Duckham;Lars Kulik

  • Older adults as digital content producers

    Jenny Waycott;Frank Vetere;Sonja Pedell;Lars Kulik

  • The V*-Diagram: a query-dependent approach to moving KNN queries

    Sarana Nutanong;Rui Zhang;Egemen Tanin;Lars Kulik

  • Wayfinding choremes-a language for modeling conceptual route knowledge

    Alexander Klippel;Heike Tappe;Lars Kulik;Paul U. Lee

  • A conceptualization of vehicle platoons and platoon operations

    Santa Maiti;Stephan Winter;Lars Kulik

  • Not For Me: Older Adults Choosing Not to Participate in a Social Isolation Intervention

    Jenny Waycott;Frank Vetere;Sonja Pedell;Amee Morgans

  • Privacy preserving group nearest neighbor queries

    Tanzima Hashem;Lars Kulik;Rui Zhang

  • Safeguarding location privacy in wireless ad-hoc networks

    Tanzima Hashem;Lars Kulik

  • SleepExplorer: a visualization tool to make sense of correlations between personal sleep data and contextual factors

    Zilu Liang;Bernd Ploderer;Wanyu Liu;Yukiko Nagata

  • Gesture recognition using RFID technology

    Parvin Asadzadeh;Lars Kulik;Egemen Tanin

  • Simulation of obfuscation and negotiation for location privacy

    Matt Duckham;Lars Kulik

  • Effectively learning spatial indices

    Jianzhong Qi;Guanli Liu;Christian S. Jensen;Lars Kulik

  • Group trip planning queries in spatial databases

    Tanzima Hashem;Tahrima Hashem;Mohammed Eunus Ali;Lars Kulik

  • Ontology-driven map generalization

    Lars Kulik;Matt Duckham;Max Egenhofer

  • Preserving Privacy in the Internet of Connected Vehicles

    Soheila Ghane;Alireza Jolfaei;Lars Kulik;Kotagiri Ramamohanarao

  • Optimal traffic merging strategy for communication- and sensor-enabled vehicles

    Tanveer Awal;Lars Kulik;Kotagiri Ramamohanrao

Frequent Co-Authors

Kotagiri Ramamohanarao
Kotagiri Ramamohanarao University of Melbourne
James Bailey
James Bailey University of Melbourne
Rui Zhang
Rui Zhang National University of Singapore
Frank Vetere
Frank Vetere University of Melbourne
Jenny Waycott
Jenny Waycott University of Melbourne
Stephan Winter
Stephan Winter University of Melbourne
Shanika Karunasekera
Shanika Karunasekera University of Melbourne
Ralf Hartmut Güting
Ralf Hartmut Güting University of Hagen
Max J. Egenhofer
Max J. Egenhofer University of Maine
Michael F. Worboys
Michael F. Worboys University of Greenwich

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online education for Computer Science opens up many flexible pathways. For those looking to enter the workforce quickly, the fastest associates degree options can be attractive, offering foundational skills within a short timeframe.

If you’re considering an advanced academic route, an online edd program (Doctor of Education) can help you move into leadership or teaching positions in technology and related fields.

It’s important to select the best online schools that are nationally accredited to ensure quality education and recognized qualifications, especially for career advancement.

For students with a creative and technical mindset, game design schools online offer a direct path into the gaming industry, combining coding, design, and storytelling.

With these varied online degree options, you can tailor your studies to fit your schedule, budget, and career goals.

Best Scientists Citing Lars Kulik

Trending Scientists