World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
53
Citations
10648
World Ranking
4852
National Ranking
96

Catuscia Palamidessi publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Catuscia Palamidessi sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 330 publications — 79th percentile

79% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Catuscia Palamidessi D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Catuscia Palamidessi sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 53 D-Index — 67th percentile

67% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Catuscia Palamidessi is affiliated with the French Institute for Research in Computer Science and Automation (INRIA) in France. Their research primarily falls within the field of Computer Science, with a focus on Artificial Intelligence, Sociology and Political Science, Safety Research, Computer Networks and Communications, and Statistics and Probability.

The scientist's work covers several main topics including Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data, Cryptography and Data Security, Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning, Ethics and Social Impacts of AI, Privacy, Security, and Data Protection, Internet Traffic Analysis and Secure E-voting, and Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI).

Palamidessi has contributed to numerous publications and has authored papers featured in journals and conference venues such as arXiv (Cornell University), ACM SIGLOG News, HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe), Proceedings on Privacy Enhancing Technologies, and Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence.

Some recent papers include:

  • On the Applicability of Machine Learning Fairness Notions (2021), ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter
  • Machine learning fairness notions: Bridging the gap with real-world applications (2021), Information Processing & Management
  • Survey on Causal-based Machine Learning Fairness Notions (2020), arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Survey on fairness notions and related tensions (2023), EURO Journal on Decision Processes
  • On the Risks of Collecting Multidimensional Data Under Local Differential Privacy (2023), Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment

Frequent collaborators include Konstantinos Chatzikokolakis, Annabelle McIver, Mário S. Alvim, Karima Makhlouf, and Carroll Morgan.

In addition to journal articles and conference papers, Palamidessi has published at least one book with Springer Nature titled The Science of Quantitative Information Flow (2020).

Best Publications

  • Geo-indistinguishability: differential privacy for location-based systems

    Miguel E. Andrés;Nicolás E. Bordenabe;Konstantinos Chatzikokolakis;Catuscia Palamidessi

  • Comparing the expressive power of the synchronous and asynchronous $pi$-calculi

    Catuscia Palamidessi

  • Broadening the Scope of Differential Privacy Using Metrics

    Konstantinos Chatzikokolakis;Konstantinos Chatzikokolakis;Miguel E. Andrés;Nicolás Emilio Bordenabe;Catuscia Palamidessi

  • Declarative modeling of the operational behavior of logic languages

    M. Falaschi;G. Levi;C. Palamidessi;M. Martelli

  • Optimal Geo-Indistinguishable Mechanisms for Location Privacy

    Nicolás E. Bordenabe;Konstantinos Chatzikokolakis;Catuscia Palamidessi

  • Anonymity protocols as noisy channels

    Konstantinos Chatzikokolakis;Catuscia Palamidessi;Prakash Panangaden

  • Measuring Information Leakage Using Generalized Gain Functions

    M. S. Alvim;K. Chatzikokolakis;C. Palamidessi;G. Smith

  • Computational Logic — CL 2000

    John Lloyd;Veronica Dahl;Ulrich Furbach;Manfred Kerber

  • Comparing the expressive power of the synchronous and the asynchronous π-calculus

    Catuscia Palamidessi

  • Comparing the expressive power of the Synchronous and the Asynchronous pi-calculus

    Catuscia Palamidessi

  • Kernel-LEAF: a logic plus functional language

    Elio Giovannetti;Giorgio Levi;Corrado Moiso;Catuscia Palamidessi

  • Quantitative Notions of Leakage for One-try Attacks

    Christelle Braun;Konstantinos Chatzikokolakis;Catuscia Palamidessi

  • Differential privacy: on the trade-off between utility and information leakage

    Mário S. Alvim;Miguel E. Andrés;Konstantinos Chatzikokolakis;Pierpaolo Degano

  • Temporal concurrent constraint programming: denotation, logic and applications

    Mogens Nielsen;Catuscia Palamidessi;Frank D. Valencia

  • A model-theoretic reconstruction of the operational semantics of logic programs

    Moreno Falaschi;Giorgio Levi;Maurizio Martelli;Catuscia Palamidessi

  • Probabilistic Asynchronous pi-Calculus

    Oltea Mihaela Herescu;Catuscia Palamidessi

  • A fully abstract model for concurrent constraint programming

    Frank S. de Boer;Catuscia Palamidessi

  • Algebraic properties of idempotent substitutions

    Catuscia Palamidessi

  • A Predictive Differentially-Private Mechanism for Mobility Traces

    Konstantinos Chatzikokolakis;Catuscia Palamidessi;Marco Stronati

  • The Failure of Failures in a Paradigm for Asynchronous Communication

    Frank S. de Boer;Joost N. Kok;Catuscia Palamidessi;Jan J. M. M. Rutten

  • Probabilistic anonymity

    Mohit Bhargava;Catuscia Palamidessi

  • Differential Privacy: on the trade-o between Utility and Information Leakage

    M S Alvim;M E Andres;K Chatzikokolakis;P Degano

Frequent Co-Authors

Carroll Morgan
Carroll Morgan University of New South Wales
Annabelle McIver
Annabelle McIver Macquarie University
Joost N. Kok
Joost N. Kok University of Twente
Dale Miller
Dale Miller French Institute for Research in Computer Science and Automation - INRIA
Prakash Panangaden
Prakash Panangaden McGill University
Jan Rutten
Jan Rutten Radboud University
Mogens Nielsen
Mogens Nielsen Aarhus University
Giuseppe F. Italiano
Giuseppe F. Italiano Guido Carli Free International University for Social Studies
Vladimiro Sassone
Vladimiro Sassone University of Southampton
Elena Marchiori
Elena Marchiori Radboud University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Computer Science in the USA opens the door to a wide range of related online degrees and career opportunities. With the rise of digital learning, students now have access to flexible, affordable programs that cater to different interests and career goals.

For those interested in big data, machine learning, or analytics, consider the top data science programs available online. These programs provide advanced skills highly sought after in today’s data-driven industries.

Not limited to tech, the field of construction is also embracing technology. An online 2 year construction management degree online prepares graduates for dynamic leadership roles at the intersection of construction and computing.

If you’re considering a broader business perspective, enrolling in one of the cheapest mba online programs can give you the strategic and managerial skills needed to rise in tech organizations.

Finally, the flexibility of online master's programs means you can upskill rapidly—sometimes in as little as one year—without putting your career on hold.

Best Scientists Citing Catuscia Palamidessi

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles