World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Michael Hanus

Michael Hanus

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
39
Citations
6110
World Ranking
9793
National Ranking
489

Michael Hanus publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael Hanus sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 196 publications — 45th percentile

45% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Michael Hanus D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael Hanus sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Michael Hanus is affiliated with Kiel University in Germany. Their work primarily focuses on computer science with a significant number of publications in the subfields of artificial intelligence, computational theory and mathematics, and software. Other areas of interest include computer networks and communications as well as hardware and architecture.

The researcher's main topics of study encompass logic, programming, and type systems, logic, reasoning, and knowledge, formal methods in verification, software testing and debugging techniques, semantic web and ontologies, parallel computing and optimization techniques, and constraint satisfaction and optimization.

Among the recent papers authored by Michael Hanus are the following:

  • Combining Static and Dynamic Contract Checking for Curry, 2020, published in Fundamenta Informaticae
  • From Logic to Functional Logic Programs, 2022, published in Theory and Practice of Logic Programming
  • Adding Data to Curry, 2020, published in Lecture Notes in Computer Science
  • Memoized Pull-Tabbing for Functional Logic Programming, 2021, published in Lecture Notes in Computer Science
  • A Logic Programming Approach to Reaction Systems, 2020, published in arXiv (Cornell University)

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Michael Hanus include:

  • Claudio Sacerdoti Coen
  • Atsushi Igarashi
  • Finn Teegen
  • Sergio Antoy
  • Andy Jost

Publication venues where Michael Hanus has frequently contributed are:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Lecture Notes in Computer Science
  • Theory and Practice of Logic Programming
  • Fundamenta Informaticae
  • Science of Computer Programming

Michael Hanus has also contributed to academic books published by Springer Science+Business Media. Titles include:

  • Functional and Constraint Logic Programming, 2021
  • Functional and Logic Programming, 2022
  • Practical Aspects of Declarative Languages, 2023

Best Publications

  • The Integration of Functions into Logic Programming: From Theory to Practice

    Michael Hanus

  • A needed narrowing strategy

    Sergio Antoy;Rachid Echahed;Michael Hanus

  • Curry: an integrated functional logic language (version 0

    Michael Hanus

  • A unified computation model for functional and logic programming

    Michael Hanus

  • Curry: An Integrated Functional Logic Language

    Michael Hanus;Sergio Antoy;Herbert Kuchen;Francisco J. López-Fraguas

  • Functional logic programming

    Sergio Antoy;Michael Hanus

  • Multi-paradigm declarative languages

    Michael Hanus

  • A needed narrowing strategy

    Sergio Antoy;Rachid Echahed;Michael Hanus

  • Operational semantics for declarative multi-paradigm languages

    Elvira Albert;Michael Hanus;Frank Huch;Javier Oliver

  • Curry: A Truly Functional Logic Language

    M Hanus;H Kuchen;JJ Moreno-Navarro

  • Xbase: implementing domain-specific languages for Java

    Sven Efftinge;Moritz Eysholdt;Jan Köhnlein;Sebastian Zarnekow

  • Overlapping rules and logic variables in functional logic programs

    Sergio Antoy;Michael Hanus

  • Functional Logic Programming: From Theory to Curry

    Michael Hanus

  • Compiling Logic Programs with Equality

    Michael Hanus

  • KiCS2: a new compiler from Curry to Haskell

    Bernd Braßel;Michael Hanus;Björn Peemöller;Fabian Reck

  • Higher-order narrowing with definitional trees

    Michael Hanus;Christian Prehofer

  • High-Level Server Side Web Scripting in Curry

    Michael Hanus

  • Compiling Multi-Paradigm Declarative Programs into Prolog

    Sergio Antoy;Michael Hanus

  • Pakcs: The portland aachen kiel curry system

    Michael Hanus;Sergio Antoy;B. Bra el;Martin Engelke

  • Functional Logic Design Patterns

    Sergio Antoy;Michael Hanus

Frequent Co-Authors

Javier Oliver
Javier Oliver Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya
Paul Klint
Paul Klint Centrum Wiskunde & Informatica
Wilhelm Hasselbring
Wilhelm Hasselbring Kiel University
Claude Kirchner
Claude Kirchner French Institute for Research in Computer Science and Automation - INRIA
Aart Middeldorp
Aart Middeldorp University of Innsbruck

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring computer science in the USA opens doors to many related fields and flexible learning opportunities. Many students consider online programs to gain expertise while balancing work or other commitments.

For those interested in the foundations of technology, an online bachelor's degree in physics provides a strong analytical background and can complement computer science skills. Another trending area is data analysis, where earning a data science degree can lead to high-demand roles in tech, finance, and business.

Professionals seeking to level up their technical expertise may benefit from an online master’s in electrical engineering degree. This path enables you to delve deeper into fields such as robotics, embedded systems, or communications.

For a quicker route to career advancement, some opt for easy certifications that pay well. These can boost your resume and unlock entry-level tech jobs with less time invested than a full degree.

With a wide range of flexible and affordable online options, there’s a pathway suited for every goal in the tech industry.

Best Scientists Citing Michael Hanus

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles