World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Wilhelm Hasselbring

Wilhelm Hasselbring

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
45
Citations
8253
World Ranking
7202
National Ranking
349

Wilhelm Hasselbring publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Wilhelm Hasselbring sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 477 publications — 92nd percentile

92% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Wilhelm Hasselbring D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Wilhelm Hasselbring sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 45 D-Index — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Wilhelm Hasselbring is affiliated with Kiel University in Germany and has a research profile centered on computer science, with specific focus on information systems and computer networks. Their work encompasses multiple subfields including information systems and management, artificial intelligence, and industrial and manufacturing engineering.

The scientist's research topics cover a range of areas related to software and computing systems, including:

  • Software System Performance and Reliability
  • Cloud Computing and Resource Management
  • Scientific Computing and Data Management
  • Service-Oriented Architecture and Web Services
  • Distributed and Parallel Computing Systems
  • Software Engineering Research
  • Digital Transformation in Industry

Wilhelm Hasselbring has collaborated frequently with several coauthors, notably:

  • Sören Henning
  • Henning Schnoor
  • Reiner Jung
  • Sven Gundlach
  • Alexander Barbie

Key recent publications by Wilhelm Hasselbring include:

  • From FAIR research data toward FAIR and open research software, 2020, it - Information Technology
  • Open Source Research Software, 2020, Computer
  • Kieker: A monitoring framework for software engineering research, 2020, Software Impacts

Other significant papers associated with their network but primarily authored by coauthors include:

  • Theodolite: Scalability Benchmarking of Distributed Stream Processing Engines in Microservice Architectures, 2021, Big Data Research
  • A configurable method for benchmarking scalability of cloud-native applications, 2022, Empirical Software Engineering

Wilhelm Hasselbring's publishing activity can be found in a variety of venues, with the most frequent being:

  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Software Impacts
  • Informatik-Spektrum
  • it - Information Technology

Overall, their contributions predominantly target performance and scalability in cloud and distributed systems, as well as open research software. Their research outputs address various aspects of software engineering, scientific data management, and digital transformation within industry settings.

Best Publications

  • Information system integration

    Wilhelm Hasselbring

  • The SI challenge in health care

    Jane Grimson;William Grimson;Wilhelm Hasselbring

  • Kieker: a framework for application performance monitoring and dynamic software analysis

    André van Hoorn;Jan Waller;Wilhelm Hasselbring

  • Microservice Architectures for Scalability, Agility and Reliability in E-Commerce

    Wilhelm Hasselbring;Guido Steinacker

  • Toward trustworthy software systems

    W. Hasselbring;R. Reussner

  • Search-based genetic optimization for deployment and reconfiguration of software in the cloud

    Soren Frey;Florian Fittkau;Wilhelm Hasselbring

  • Strategic information management plans: the basis for systematic information management in hospitals

    A.F Winter;E Ammenwerth;O.J Bott;B Brigl

  • Continuous Monitoring of Software Services: Design and Application of the Kieker Framework

    André van Hoorn;Matthias Rohr;Wilhelm Hasselbring;Jan Waller

  • Xbase: implementing domain-specific languages for Java

    Sven Efftinge;Moritz Eysholdt;Jan Köhnlein;Sebastian Zarnekow

  • Exploring software cities in virtual reality

    Florian Fittkau;Alexander Krause;Wilhelm Hasselbring

  • Using Microservices for Legacy Software Modernization

    Holger Knoche;Wilhelm Hasselbring

  • Live trace visualization for comprehending large software landscapes: The ExplorViz approach

    Florian Fittkau;Jan Waller;Christian Wulf;Wilhelm Hasselbring

  • The CloudMIG Approach: Model-Based Migration of Software Systems to Cloud-Optimized Applications

    Sören Frey;Wilhelm Hasselbring

  • Software landscape and application visualization for system comprehension with ExplorViz

    Florian Fittkau;Alexander Krause;Wilhelm Hasselbring

  • Performance-oriented DevOps: A Research Agenda

    Andreas Brunnert;André van Hoorn;Felix Willnecker;Alexandru Danciu

  • Including Performance Benchmarks into Continuous Integration to Enable DevOps

    Jan Waller;Nils C. Ehmke;Wilhelm Hasselbring

  • Microservices for Scalability: Keynote Talk Abstract

    Wilhelm Hasselbring

  • Self-adaptive software system monitoring for performance anomaly localization

    Jens Ehlers;Andre van Hoorn;Jan Waller;Wilhelm Hasselbring

  • Simulating Cloud Deployment Options for Software Migration Support

    Florian Fittkau;Soren Frey;Wilhelm Hasselbring

  • Handbuch der Software-Architektur

    Ralf H. Reussner;Wilhelm Hasselbring

  • Information System Integration: Introduction.

    Wilhelm Hasselbring

  • Kieker: A Framework for Application Performance Monitoring and Dynamic Software Analysis — Invited Demo Paper —

    André van Hoorn;Jan Waller;Wilhelm Hasselbring

Frequent Co-Authors

Ralf Reussner
Ralf Reussner Karlsruhe Institute of Technology
Claus Pahl
Claus Pahl Free University of Bozen-Bolzano
Klaus Pohl
Klaus Pohl University of Duisburg-Essen
Helmut Krcmar
Helmut Krcmar Technical University of Munich
Frank Wenzhöfer
Frank Wenzhöfer Max Planck Institute for Marine Microbiology
Manfred Reichert
Manfred Reichert University of Ulm
Odej Kao
Odej Kao Technical University of Berlin
Florian Matthes
Florian Matthes Technical University of Munich
Hans-Ulrich Prokosch
Hans-Ulrich Prokosch University of Erlangen-Nuremberg
Pooyan Jamshidi
Pooyan Jamshidi University of South Carolina

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing Computer Science in the USA opens doors to various dynamic online degree programs and evolving career paths. For those prioritizing speed and a strong earning potential, consider exploring some of the best online degrees that offer flexible study options and quick entry into high-demand tech roles.

The field of Artificial Intelligence is rapidly expanding, and there are several online degrees in AI available, making it easier and more affordable to specialize in this cutting-edge area from anywhere in the world.

If you’re still considering your major, research the best majors for the future to ensure your degree remains relevant and valued by employers as technology continues to reshape industries.

Graduate-level studies are also accessible online. If you’re interested in programs that balance academic rigor with a manageable workload, you may want to investigate the easiest online masters degree options that align with your career ambitions and personal schedule.

Best Scientists Citing Wilhelm Hasselbring

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles