World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Robert R. Friedlander

Robert R. Friedlander

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Computer Science 50 5726 5563 2598 2507 209 5184

Robert R. Friedlander publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Robert R. Friedlander between 2001 and 2017, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Robert R. Friedlander published across 17 years, from 2001 to 2017, averaging 14.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 45 publications in 2013. 6 of the 240 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2001 to 2017. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 45. Peak 45 publications in 2013. 2001: 1 publication 2002: 0 publications 2003: 0 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 6 publications 2006: 9 publications 2007: 18 publications 2008: 43 publications 2009: 7 publications 2010: 15 publications 2011: 13 publications 2012: 38 publications 2013: 45 publications 2014: 14 publications 2015: 21 publications 2016: 2 publications 2017: 4 publications
2001 2017

240 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Robert R. Friedlander: publications per year, 2001 to 2017
Year Publications
2001 1
2002 0
2003 0
2004 4
2005 6
2006 9
2007 18
2008 43
2009 7
2010 15
2011 13
2012 38
2013 45
2014 14
2015 21
2016 2
2017 4
Total 240
Download as CSV

Robert R. Friedlander publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert R. Friedlander sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 32–41 to 991+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 609. Most scientists, 609, have 142–151 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 202–211 publications, is where this scientist sits. 32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32–41 publications 991+

This scientist: 209 publications — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
32–41 7
42–51 22
52–61 82
62–71 134
72–81 249
82–91 324
92–101 421
102–111 420
112–121 497
122–131 544
132–141 555
142–151 609
152–161 559
162–171 534
172–181 556
182–191 583
192–201 519
202–211 508 209
212–221 490
222–231 437
232–241 423
242–251 408
252–261 377
262–271 301
272–281 335
282–291 320
292–301 293
302–311 250
312–321 238
322–331 206
332–341 209
342–351 208
352–361 162
362–371 176
372–381 127
382–391 158
392–401 128
402–411 104
412–421 94
422–431 99
432–441 83
442–451 108
452–461 73
462–471 77
472–481 69
482–491 84
492–501 62
502–511 54
512–521 57
522–531 51
532–541 51
542–551 32
552–561 38
562–571 28
572–581 43
582–591 33
592–601 41
602–611 32
612–621 28
622–631 25
632–641 27
642–651 17
652–661 20
662–671 17
672–681 15
682–691 14
692–701 21
702–711 13
712–721 12
722–731 19
732–741 14
742–751 12
752–761 10
762–771 10
772–781 11
782–791 10
792–801 11
802–811 8
812–821 8
822–831 7
832–841 11
842–851 10
852–861 5
862–871 9
872–881 4
882–891 6
892–901 3
902–911 6
912–921 3
922–931 2
932–941 2
942–951 2
952–961 3
962–971 3
972–981 3
982–990 5
991+ 100
Download as CSV

Robert R. Friedlander D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert R. Friedlander sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 52 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 131+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 990. Most scientists, 990, have 36–37 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 50–51 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 50 D-Index — 62nd percentile

62% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 879
32–33 983
34–35 918
36–37 990
38–39 968
40–41 907
42–43 821
44–45 763
46–47 689
48–49 543
50–51 543 50
52–53 518
54–55 500
56–57 458
58–59 400
60–61 337
62–63 308
64–65 292
66–67 249
68–69 213
70–71 192
72–73 189
74–75 165
76–77 139
78–79 119
80–81 121
82–83 113
84–85 88
86–87 87
88–89 75
90–91 69
92–93 57
94–95 46
96–97 38
98–99 34
100–101 36
102–103 27
104–105 37
106–107 18
108–109 31
110–111 19
112–113 16
114–115 12
116–117 20
118–119 15
120–121 5
122–123 20
124–125 8
126–127 5
128–129 7
130 3
131+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Operating system
  • Database
  • Programming language

His main research concerns Data mining, Metadata, Inference, Correctness and Database. His Data mining study combines topics in areas such as Event, Chaotic, Set and Cohort. His Cohort research incorporates elements of Computer program, Framingham Risk Score and Optimal control.

His work on Metadata repository is typically connected to Data source as part of general Metadata study, connecting several disciplines of science. His studies examine the connections between Correctness and genetics, as well as such issues in Reliability, with regards to Information retrieval, Key and Identification. As part of one scientific family, Robert R. Friedlander deals mainly with the area of Database, narrowing it down to issues related to the Value, and often Event based.

His most cited work include:

  • Context-based search for a data store related to a graph node (113 citations)
  • Methods for Associating Records in Healthcare Databases with Individuals (107 citations)
  • System and method for optimizing federated and ETL'd databases having multidimensionally constrained data (88 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

Robert R. Friedlander spends much of his time researching Computer program, Data mining, Set, Database and Information retrieval. Robert R. Friedlander has researched Computer program in several fields, including Object, Event, Context based and Product. His Data mining research includes themes of Event, Metadata, Inference and Cohort.

His Metadata research focuses on Key and how it relates to View. His work in Inference covers topics such as Correctness which are related to areas like Reliability. His Set study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Real-time computing and Information technology.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Computer program (40.08%)
  • Data mining (35.02%)
  • Set (30.38%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2013-2017)?

  • Computer program (40.08%)
  • Object (11.39%)
  • Set (30.38%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

Robert R. Friedlander mainly focuses on Computer program, Object, Set, Information retrieval and Database. His Computer program study combines topics in areas such as Context based, Context object and Product. His work carried out in the field of Set brings together such families of science as Event, Event and Computation.

His Information retrieval research incorporates elements of Digital sensors, Descriptive statistics and Data structure. His Database research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Virtual memory, Statistics, Memory map and Confidence score. His biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Object model and Data mining, Database design.

Between 2013 and 2017, his most popular works were:

  • Electronic Messaging Display Optimization (49 citations)
  • Secure management of a smart card (40 citations)
  • Generating deportment and comportment cohorts (40 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Operating system
  • Programming language
  • Database

Robert R. Friedlander spends much of his time researching Computer program, Object, Database, Object model and Method. His research integrates issues of Installation, Distributed computing, Resource and Set in his study of Computer program. He combines Set and Product in his studies.

Database and Weighted score are two areas of study in which he engages in interdisciplinary research. His study explores the link between Object model and topics such as Object-oriented design that cross with problems in Product, Context model, Data mining and Dimension. His Method research incorporates themes from Disparate system and Information retrieval.

Best Publications

  • Context-based search for a data store related to a graph node

    Samuel S. Adams;Robert R. Friedlander;John K. Gerken;James R. Kraemer

  • Methods for Associating Records in Healthcare Databases with Individuals

    Robert R. Friedlander;Anwer M. Khan

  • System and method for a multiple disciplinary normalization of source for metadata integration with ETL processing layer of complex data across multiple claim engine sources in support of the creation of universal/enterprise healthcare claims record

    Robert R. Friedlander;Richard A. Hennessy;James R. Kraemer

  • System and method for optimizing federated and ETL'd databases having multidimensionally constrained data

    Robert R. Friedlander;Richard Hennessy;James R. Kraemer

  • Inference of anomalous behavior of members of cohorts and associate actors related to the anomalous behavior

    Robert R. Friedlander;James R. Kraemer

  • System and method to optimize control cohorts using clustering algorithms

    Robert R. Friedlander;Richard A. Hennessy;James R. Kraemer;John Baxter Rollins

  • System and method for deriving a hierarchical event based database having action triggers based on inferred probabilities

    Robert R. Friedlander;Richard A. Hennessy;James R. Kraemer

  • System and method for deriving a hierarchical event based database optimized for analysis of biological systems

    Robert R. Friedlander;Richard A. Hennessy;James R. Kraemer

  • Generating Generalized Risk Cohorts

    Robert Lee Angell;Robert R. Friedlander;James R. Kraemer

  • Automatic generation of new rules for processing synthetic events using computer-based learning processes

    Robert Lee Angell;Robert R. Friedlander;James R. Kraemer

  • System and method for deriving a hierarchical event based database optimized for pharmaceutical analysis

    Robert R. Friedlander;Richard A. Hennessy;James R. Kraemer

  • System and method for deriving a hierarchical event based database optimized for clinical applications

    Robert R. Friedlander;Richard A. Hennessy;James R. Kraemer

  • System and method for deriving a hierarchical event based database optimized for analysis of criminal and security information

    Robert R. Friedlander;Richard A. Hennessy;James R. Kraemer

  • Synthetic Events For Real Time Patient Analysis

    Robert Lee Angell;Robert R. Friedlander;James R. Kraemer

  • Directing a user to a medical resource

    Robert R. Friedlander;Richard Hennessy;James R. Kraemer

  • System and method of accident investigation for complex situations involving numerous known and unknown factors along with their probabilistic weightings

    Robert R. Friedlander;Richard A. Hennessy;James R. Kraemer

  • System and method for deriving a hierarchical event based database optimized for privacy and security filtering

    Robert R. Friedlander;Richard A. Hennessy;James R. Kraemer

  • System and method for quality control in healthcare settings to continuously monitor outcomes and undesirable outcomes such as infections, re-operations, excess mortality, and readmissions

    Robert R. Friedlander;Richard A. Hennessy;James R. Kraemer

  • System and method for deriving a hierarchical event based database optimized for analysis of complex accidents

    Robert R. Friedlander;Richard A. Hennessy;James R. Kraemer

  • System and method for the longitudinal analysis of education outcomes using cohort life cycles, cluster analytics-based cohort analysis, and probablistic data schemas

    Robert R. Friedlander;Jay A. Goodwyn;James R. Kraemer;Anthony W. Young

  • Generating Cohorts Based on Attributes of Objects Identified Using Video Input

    Robert Lee Angell;Sergio Borger;Robert R. Friedlander;James R. Kraemer

Frequent Co-Authors

James R. Kraemer
James R. Kraemer IBM (United States)
Robert Lee Angell
Robert Lee Angell IBM (United States)
David Ungar
David Ungar Apple (United States)

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Computer Science in the USA opens doors to a wide range of related online degree programs and flexible career choices. If you’re eager to speed up your studies, consider options such as a fast track computer science degree. These programs are ideal for motivated learners aiming to transition quickly into the job market.

For students interested in applying computing to tackle environmental problems, there are several well-recognized environmental engineering schools online. Combining engineering and computer science can unlock roles in sustainability, green tech, and resource management.

Engineering-focused learners might also explore a mechanical engineering degree online cost guide to find affordable pathways in this high-demand field, where computer science skills are increasingly valuable in areas like automation and simulation.

Alternatively, if your interests are more theoretical, earning a bachelor of science in physics online can lead to careers in research, data science, or advanced technology development. Online study makes these pathways more accessible than ever, offering flexibility and diverse specialization options.

Best Scientists Citing Robert R. Friedlander

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles