World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 43 4295 3968 303 291 403 12100

Ted Brown publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Ted Brown between 1969 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Ted Brown published across 57 years, from 1969 to 2025, averaging 8 papers a year. Output peaked at 39 publications in 2021. 25 of the 456 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1969 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 39. Peak 39 publications in 2021. 1969: 1 publication 1970: 0 publications 1971: 0 publications 1972: 0 publications 1973: 0 publications 1974: 0 publications 1975: 0 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 0 publications 2001: 0 publications 2002: 1 publication 2003: 0 publications 2004: 0 publications 2005: 6 publications 2006: 0 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 16 publications 2009: 29 publications 2010: 37 publications 2011: 32 publications 2012: 20 publications 2013: 21 publications 2014: 23 publications 2015: 22 publications 2016: 19 publications 2017: 28 publications 2018: 30 publications 2019: 34 publications 2020: 27 publications 2021: 39 publications 2022: 20 publications 2023: 22 publications 2024: 12 publications 2025: 13 publications
1969 2025

456 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Ted Brown: publications per year, 1969 to 2025
Year Publications
1969 1
1970 0
1971 0
1972 0
1973 0
1974 0
1975 0
1976 0
1977 0
1978 0
1979 0
1980 0
1981 0
1982 0
1983 0
1984 0
1985 0
1986 0
1987 0
1988 0
1989 0
1990 0
1991 0
1992 0
1993 0
1994 0
1995 0
1996 0
1997 0
1998 0
1999 0
2000 0
2001 0
2002 1
2003 0
2004 0
2005 6
2006 0
2007 4
2008 16
2009 29
2010 37
2011 32
2012 20
2013 21
2014 23
2015 22
2016 19
2017 28
2018 30
2019 34
2020 27
2021 39
2022 20
2023 22
2024 12
2025 13
Total 456
Download as CSV

Ted Brown publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ted Brown sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 394–403 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 403 publications — 95th percentile

95% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27 403
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Ted Brown D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ted Brown sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 43 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300 43
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Ted Brown is affiliated with Monash University in Australia and has an extensive publication record predominantly within medicine, psychology, and health professions. Their research contributions span several interconnected fields, with notable focus areas in clinical psychology, education, psychiatry and mental health, occupational therapy, and developmental and educational psychology.

The scientist has published prominently in journals related to occupational therapy and health care, including the Journal of Occupational Therapy Schools & Early Intervention, the Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, the British Journal of Occupational Therapy, the Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, and Occupational Therapy In Health Care.

Key research topics explored by Ted Brown include:

  • Occupational Therapy Practice and Research
  • Family and Disability Support Research
  • Children's Physical and Motor Development
  • Innovations in Medical Education
  • Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders
  • Child Therapy and Development
  • Early Childhood Education and Development

Their recent scholarly papers cover diverse aspects of health, psychology, and education. These include:

  • 'Learning in and out of lockdown': A comparison of two groups of undergraduate occupational therapy students' engagement in online-only and blended education approaches during the COVID-19 pandemic (2022) - Australian Occupational Therapy Journal
  • Transcranial direct current stimulation as an adjunct to cognitive training for older adults with mild cognitive impairment: A randomized controlled trial (2021) - Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine
  • The Relationship between Psychological Well-Being and Psychosocial Factors in University Students (2020) - International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
  • An Investigation Into the Relationship Between Playfulness and Well-being in Australian Adults: An Exploratory Study (2020) - OTJR Occupational Therapy Journal of Research
  • Measuring what matters in healthcare: a practical guide to psychometric principles and instrument development (2023) - Frontiers in Psychology

Ted Brown has collaborated regularly with several researchers, including Mong-Lin Yu, Luke Robinson, Jamie Etherington, Stephen Isbel, and Louise Gustafsson, reflecting a network of frequent co-authors contributing to their body of work.

Best Publications

  • Exploratory factor analysis: A five-step guide for novices

    Brett Williams;Andrys Onsman;Ted Brown

  • The Movement Assessment Battery for Children--Second Edition (MABC-2): a review and critique.

    Ted Brown;Aislinn Lalor

  • What are the factors of organisational culture in health care settings that act as barriers to the implementation of evidence-based practice? A scoping review.

    Brett Williams;Samuel Perillo;Ted Brown

  • The Australian DREEM: evaluating student perceptions of academic learning environments within eight health science courses

    Ted Brown;Brett Williams;Marty Lynch

  • Practice education learning environments: The mismatch between perceived and preferred expectations of undergraduate health science students

    Ted Brown;Brett Williams;Lisa McKenna;Claire Palermo

  • The Relationship between Psychological Well-Being and Psychosocial Factors in University Students.

    Francisco Manuel Morales-Rodríguez;Isabel Espigares-López;Ted Brown;José Manuel Pérez-Mármol

  • Levels of empathy in undergraduate nursing students.

    Lisa McKenna;Malcolm Boyle;Ted Brown;Brett Williams

  • Empathy levels among health professional students: a cross-sectional study at two universities in Australia

    Williams B;Brown T;McKenna L;Boyle Mj

  • Levels of empathy in undergraduate emergency health, nursing, and midwifery students: a longitudinal study

    Brett Williams;Ted Brown;Malcolm Boyle;Lisa McKenna

  • Evaluating the Psychometric Quality of Social Skills Measures: A Systematic Review

    Reinie Cordier;Renée Speyer;Yu Wei Chen;Sarah Wilkes-Gillan

  • Learning style preferences of Australian health science students.

    Maryam Zoghi;Ted Brown;Brett Williams;Louis Roller

  • Scoping reviews in occupational therapy: The what, why, and how to

    Carol McKinstry;Ted Brown;Louise Gustafsson

  • Evidence-based practice and research utilisation: Perceived research knowledge, attitudes, practices and barriers among Australian paediatric occupational therapists

    Carissa Lyons;Ted Brown;Mei Hui Tseng;Jacqueline Casey

  • Patient navigators facilitating access to primary care: a scoping review

    Annette Peart;Virginia Lewis;Ted Brown;Grant Russell

  • Direct, indirect and intangible costs of acute hand and wrist injuries: A systematic review

    Luke Steven Robinson;Mitchell Sarkies;Ted Brown;Lisa O’Brien

  • Attitudes of undergraduate health science students towards patients with intellectual disability, substance abuse, and acute mental illness: a cross-sectional study

    Malcolm J Boyle;Brett Williams;Ted Brown;Andrew Molloy

  • Are learning style preferences of health science students predictive of their attitudes towards e-learning?

    Ted Brown;Maryam Zoghi;Brett Williams;Shapour Jaberzadeh

  • From stretcher-bearer to paramedic: the Australian paramedics’ move towards professionalisation

    Brett Williams;Andrys Onsman;Ted Brown

  • Learning style preferences of occupational therapy, physiotherapy and speech pathology students: A comparative study

    Ted Brown;Tessa Cosgriff;Glenys French

  • Psychometric Properties of Visuoperceptual Measures of Videofluoroscopic and Fibre-Endoscopic Evaluations of Swallowing: A Systematic Review

    Katina Swan;Reinie Cordier;Ted Brown;Renée Speyer;Renée Speyer;Renée Speyer

  • Levels of empathy in undergraduate occupational therapy students

    Ted Brown;Brett Williams;Malcolm Boyle;Andrew Molloy

  • Movement Assessment Battery for Children: 2nd Edition (MABC-2)

    Ted Brown

Frequent Co-Authors

Brett Williams
Brett Williams Monash University
Lisa McKenna
Lisa McKenna La Trobe University
Sylvia Rodger
Sylvia Rodger University of Queensland
Yuh-Shan Ho
Yuh-Shan Ho Asian University
Shapour Jaberzadeh
Shapour Jaberzadeh Monash University
Stephen N. Elliott
Stephen N. Elliott Arizona State University
Elizabeth Molloy
Elizabeth Molloy University of Melbourne
Debra Nestel
Debra Nestel Monash University
Charlotte E. Rees
Charlotte E. Rees University of Newcastle Australia
Lindy Clemson
Lindy Clemson University of Sydney

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you're considering a future in Social Sciences and Humanities, there are a range of online degrees tailored to diverse interests and career goals. Popular options include counseling, marriage and family therapy, psychology, and social work. These fields not only offer personal fulfillment but also growing job markets and flexible online study formats.

Cost and accreditation are crucial factors. For those seeking quality, accredited training, many students choose cacrep schools that meet rigorous professional standards in counseling. Prospective marriage and family therapists can explore the cheapest online mft programs, which make specialized training accessible and affordable.

Online degrees in mental health remain popular, as seen with online degrees in psychology. Those interested in impactful careers in advocacy or human services may consider the easiest msw programs to get into, making a Master of Social Work achievable even for non-traditional learners. As you chart your educational path, these online programs provide entry into rewarding fields that value empathy, analytical skills, and human connection.

Best Scientists Citing Ted Brown

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles