World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
38
Citations
5005
World Ranking
10373
National Ranking
4338

Guang Lin publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Guang Lin sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 188 publications — 42nd percentile

42% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Guang Lin D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Guang Lin sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Guang Lin is affiliated with Purdue University West Lafayette in the United States. Their research spans multiple domains primarily concentrated in Engineering and Computer Science, with a significant focus on Artificial Intelligence and related subfields.

Their work covers several specialized areas, including:

  • Model Reduction and Neural Networks
  • Probabilistic and Robust Engineering Design
  • Markov Chains and Monte Carlo Methods
  • Gaussian Processes and Bayesian Inference
  • Machine Learning in Materials Science
  • Advanced Mathematical Modeling in Engineering
  • Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows

Guang Lin has published extensively in prominent venues such as:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Journal of Computational Physics
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics

Their research outputs include numerous papers co-authored with collaborators like Christian Moya, Zecheng Zhang, Ziyang Huang, Haoyang Zheng, and Yixuan Sun.

Some of the recent papers include:

  • EEG-based emotion recognition using 4D convolutional recurrent neural network (2020), published in Cognitive Neurodynamics
  • A transfer Learning-Based LSTM strategy for imputing Large-Scale consecutive missing data and its application in a water quality prediction system (2021), published in Journal of Hydrology
  • Comparison of physical-based, data-driven and hybrid modeling approaches for evapotranspiration estimation (2021), published in Journal of Hydrology
  • Identifiability and predictability of integer- and fractional-order epidemiological models using physics-informed neural networks (2021), published in Nature Computational Science
  • Improving Simulation Efficiency of MCMC for Inverse Modeling of Hydrologic Systems With a Kalman-Inspired Proposal Distribution (2020), published in Water Resources Research

Guang Lin's contributions integrate computational techniques and advanced mathematical modeling approaches across various scientific disciplines, reflecting a multidisciplinary engagement between engineering and computer science. Their collaboration network and publication record emphasize consistent active participation in fields where Artificial Intelligence and scientific computing intersect.

Best Publications

  • Multi-output separable Gaussian process: Towards an efficient, fully Bayesian paradigm for uncertainty quantification

    Ilias Bilionis;Nicholas Zabaras;Bledar A. Konomi;Guang Lin

  • Compressive Sensing Based Machine Learning Strategy For Characterizing The Flow Around A Cylinder With Limited Pressure Measurements

    Ido Bright;Guang Lin;J. Nathan Kutz

  • Robust data-driven discovery of governing physical laws with error bars.

    Sheng Zhang;Guang Lin

  • Adaptive ANOVA decomposition of stochastic incompressible and compressible flows

    Xiu Yang;Minseok Choi;Guang Lin;George Em Karniadakis

  • Sensitivity of surface flux simulations to hydrologic parameters based on an uncertainty quantification framework applied to the Community Land Model

    Zhangshuan Hou;Maoyi Huang;L. Ruby Leung;Guang Lin

  • An efficient, high-order probabilistic collocation method on sparse grids for three-dimensional flow and solute transport in randomly heterogeneous porous media

    Guang Lin;Alexandre M. Tartakovsky

  • Comparison of physical-based, data-driven and hybrid modeling approaches for evapotranspiration estimation

    Xiaolong Hu;Liangsheng Shi;Guang Lin;Lin Lin

  • Infrared Thermal Imaging-Based Crack Detection Using Deep Learning

    Jun Yang;Wei Wang;Guang Lin;Qing Li

  • Multi-Resolution Climate Ensemble Parameter Analysis with Nested Parallel Coordinates Plots

    Junpeng Wang;Xiaotong Liu;Han-Wei Shen;Guang Lin

  • An Iterative Local Updating Ensemble Smoother for Estimation and Uncertainty Assessment of Hydrologic Model Parameters With Multimodal Distributions

    Jiangjiang Zhang;Guang Lin;Weixuan Li;Laosheng Wu

  • Identifiability and predictability of integer- and fractional-order epidemiological models using physics-informed neural networks

    Ehsan Kharazmi;Min Cai;Min Cai;Xiaoning Zheng;Xiaoning Zheng;Zhen Zhang

  • ConvPDE-UQ: Convolutional neural networks with quantified uncertainty for heterogeneous elliptic partial differential equations on varied domains

    Nick Winovich;Karthik Ramani;Guang Lin

  • A sensitivity analysis of cloud properties to CLUBB parameters in the single-column Community Atmosphere Model (SCAM5)

    Zhun Guo;Zhun Guo;Minghuai Wang;Yun Qian;Vincent E. Larson

  • Improving Simulation Efficiency of MCMC for Inverse Modeling of Hydrologic Systems With a Kalman-Inspired Proposal Distribution

    Jiangjiang Zhang;Jasper A. Vrugt;Jasper A. Vrugt;Xiaoqing Shi;Guang Lin

  • Generating Random Earthquake Events for Probabilistic Tsunami Hazard Assessment

    Randall J. LeVeque;Knut Waagan;Frank I. González;Donsub Rim

  • Predicting shock dynamics in the presence of uncertainties

    G. Lin;C.-H. Su;G. E. Karniadakis

  • Weak Galerkin finite element methods for Darcy flow: Anisotropy and heterogeneity

    Guang Lin;Guang Lin;Jiangguo Liu;Lin Mu;Xiu Ye

  • A Sensitivity Study of Radiative Fluxes at the Top of Atmosphere to Cloud-Microphysics and Aerosol Parameters in the Community Atmosphere Model CAM5

    Chun Zhao;Xiaohong Liu;Xiaohong Liu;Yun Qian;Jin-Ho Yoon

  • Dynamic-Feature Extraction, Attribution, and Reconstruction (DEAR) Method for Power System Model Reduction

    Shaobu Wang;Shuai Lu;Ning Zhou;Guang Lin

  • Uncertainty quantification via random domain decomposition and probabilistic collocation on sparse grids

    G. Lin;A. M. Tartakovsky;D. M. Tartakovsky

  • DeepLight: Deep Lightweight Feature Interactions for Accelerating CTR Predictions in Ad Serving

    Wei Deng;Junwei Pan;Tian Zhou;Deguang Kong

Frequent Co-Authors

George Em Karniadakis
George Em Karniadakis Brown University
Laosheng Wu
Laosheng Wu University of California, Riverside
Faming Liang
Faming Liang Purdue University West Lafayette
Yun Qian
Yun Qian Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
Jasper A. Vrugt
Jasper A. Vrugt University of California, Irvine
Jie Bao
Jie Bao University of New South Wales
Xiaohong Liu
Xiaohong Liu Texas A&M University
Alexandre M. Tartakovsky
Alexandre M. Tartakovsky University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Chun Zhao
Chun Zhao University of Science and Technology of China
Karthik Ramani
Karthik Ramani Purdue University West Lafayette

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Computer Science in the USA opens doors to a variety of in-demand and flexible career paths. Many learners are exploring online degree options to balance work, family, and education, while also managing costs. For those interested in engineering, consider researching the mechanical engineering degree cost to find programs that fit your budget.

If you’re curious about the physical world, an online physics degree offers a solid foundation in theory and application, with flexible study options.

Data-driven fields are also in high demand. If you’re looking to specialize, you might ask, what is the cheapest data science course in the us? This can lead to lucrative roles in analytics, AI, and business intelligence.

Engineering enthusiasts can also review accredited online electrical engineering programs. Graduates from these programs are equipped with the technical skills needed for various technology sectors.

Best Scientists Citing Guang Lin

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles