World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Earth Science 56 2428 2207 1019 904 173 10949

Maoyi Huang publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Maoyi Huang between 2003 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Maoyi Huang published across 23 years, from 2003 to 2025, averaging 9.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 30 publications in 2019. 6 of the 225 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2003 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 30. Peak 30 publications in 2019. 2003: 3 publications 2004: 0 publications 2005: 1 publication 2006: 3 publications 2007: 0 publications 2008: 2 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 1 publication 2011: 2 publications 2012: 5 publications 2013: 19 publications 2014: 25 publications 2015: 25 publications 2016: 18 publications 2017: 24 publications 2018: 16 publications 2019: 30 publications 2020: 17 publications 2021: 12 publications 2022: 10 publications 2023: 3 publications 2024: 2 publications 2025: 4 publications
2003 2025

225 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Maoyi Huang: publications per year, 2003 to 2025
Year Publications
2003 3
2004 0
2005 1
2006 3
2007 0
2008 2
2009 3
2010 1
2011 2
2012 5
2013 19
2014 25
2015 25
2016 18
2017 24
2018 16
2019 30
2020 17
2021 12
2022 10
2023 3
2024 2
2025 4
Total 225
Download as CSV

Maoyi Huang publication distribution in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Earth Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Maoyi Huang sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 603+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 557. Most scientists, 557, have 128–137 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 603 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 168–177 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 5 scientists 48–57 publications: 33 scientists 58–67 publications: 94 scientists 68–77 publications: 161 scientists 78–87 publications: 278 scientists 88–97 publications: 376 scientists 98–107 publications: 404 scientists 108–117 publications: 484 scientists 118–127 publications: 540 scientists 128–137 publications: 557 scientists 138–147 publications: 491 scientists 148–157 publications: 495 scientists 158–167 publications: 458 scientists 168–177 publications: 490 scientists 178–187 publications: 414 scientists 188–197 publications: 401 scientists 198–207 publications: 333 scientists 208–217 publications: 292 scientists 218–227 publications: 290 scientists 228–237 publications: 262 scientists 238–247 publications: 243 scientists 248–257 publications: 208 scientists 258–267 publications: 185 scientists 268–277 publications: 147 scientists 278–287 publications: 128 scientists 288–297 publications: 119 scientists 298–307 publications: 120 scientists 308–317 publications: 107 scientists 318–327 publications: 93 scientists 328–337 publications: 87 scientists 338–347 publications: 64 scientists 348–357 publications: 87 scientists 358–367 publications: 60 scientists 368–377 publications: 60 scientists 378–387 publications: 34 scientists 388–397 publications: 50 scientists 398–407 publications: 44 scientists 408–417 publications: 31 scientists 418–427 publications: 39 scientists 428–437 publications: 27 scientists 438–447 publications: 36 scientists 448–457 publications: 27 scientists 458–467 publications: 29 scientists 468–477 publications: 30 scientists 478–487 publications: 19 scientists 488–497 publications: 15 scientists 498–507 publications: 18 scientists 508–517 publications: 19 scientists 518–527 publications: 16 scientists 528–537 publications: 10 scientists 538–547 publications: 11 scientists 548–557 publications: 14 scientists 558–567 publications: 11 scientists 568–577 publications: 7 scientists 578–587 publications: 14 scientists 588–597 publications: 5 scientists 598–602 publications: 4 scientists 603+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 603+

This scientist: 173 publications — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 603 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Earth Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,176 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 5
48–57 33
58–67 94
68–77 161
78–87 278
88–97 376
98–107 404
108–117 484
118–127 540
128–137 557
138–147 491
148–157 495
158–167 458
168–177 490 173
178–187 414
188–197 401
198–207 333
208–217 292
218–227 290
228–237 262
238–247 243
248–257 208
258–267 185
268–277 147
278–287 128
288–297 119
298–307 120
308–317 107
318–327 93
328–337 87
338–347 64
348–357 87
358–367 60
368–377 60
378–387 34
388–397 50
398–407 44
408–417 31
418–427 39
428–437 27
438–447 36
448–457 27
458–467 29
468–477 30
478–487 19
488–497 15
498–507 18
508–517 19
518–527 16
528–537 10
538–547 11
548–557 14
558–567 11
568–577 7
578–587 14
588–597 5
598–602 4
603+ 100
Download as CSV

Maoyi Huang D-index placement in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Earth Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Maoyi Huang sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 77 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 106+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 389. Most scientists, 389, have 36 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 106 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 56 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 144 scientists 31 D-Index: 215 scientists 32 D-Index: 278 scientists 33 D-Index: 379 scientists 34 D-Index: 366 scientists 35 D-Index: 372 scientists 36 D-Index: 389 scientists 37 D-Index: 366 scientists 38 D-Index: 344 scientists 39 D-Index: 349 scientists 40 D-Index: 296 scientists 41 D-Index: 289 scientists 42 D-Index: 277 scientists 43 D-Index: 279 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 257 scientists 46 D-Index: 212 scientists 47 D-Index: 202 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 204 scientists 50 D-Index: 183 scientists 51 D-Index: 178 scientists 52 D-Index: 182 scientists 53 D-Index: 178 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 117 scientists 56 D-Index: 163 scientists 57 D-Index: 120 scientists 58 D-Index: 113 scientists 59 D-Index: 136 scientists 60 D-Index: 135 scientists 61 D-Index: 96 scientists 62 D-Index: 103 scientists 63 D-Index: 83 scientists 64 D-Index: 103 scientists 65 D-Index: 83 scientists 66 D-Index: 89 scientists 67 D-Index: 92 scientists 68 D-Index: 89 scientists 69 D-Index: 78 scientists 70 D-Index: 75 scientists 71 D-Index: 53 scientists 72 D-Index: 62 scientists 73 D-Index: 54 scientists 74 D-Index: 35 scientists 75 D-Index: 52 scientists 76 D-Index: 50 scientists 77 D-Index: 32 scientists 78 D-Index: 37 scientists 79 D-Index: 20 scientists 80 D-Index: 33 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 34 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 24 scientists 85 D-Index: 19 scientists 86 D-Index: 18 scientists 87 D-Index: 26 scientists 88 D-Index: 30 scientists 89 D-Index: 17 scientists 90 D-Index: 21 scientists 91 D-Index: 19 scientists 92 D-Index: 15 scientists 93 D-Index: 14 scientists 94 D-Index: 20 scientists 95 D-Index: 9 scientists 96 D-Index: 10 scientists 97 D-Index: 15 scientists 98 D-Index: 13 scientists 99 D-Index: 3 scientists 100 D-Index: 13 scientists 101 D-Index: 3 scientists 102 D-Index: 9 scientists 103 D-Index: 4 scientists 104 D-Index: 6 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 106+

This scientist: 56 D-Index — 75th percentile

75% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 106 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Earth Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,176 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 144
31 215
32 278
33 379
34 366
35 372
36 389
37 366
38 344
39 349
40 296
41 289
42 277
43 279
44 248
45 257
46 212
47 202
48 207
49 204
50 183
51 178
52 182
53 178
54 163
55 117
56 163 56
57 120
58 113
59 136
60 135
61 96
62 103
63 83
64 103
65 83
66 89
67 92
68 89
69 78
70 75
71 53
72 62
73 54
74 35
75 52
76 50
77 32
78 37
79 20
80 33
81 36
82 34
83 34
84 24
85 19
86 18
87 26
88 30
89 17
90 21
91 19
92 15
93 14
94 20
95 9
96 10
97 15
98 13
99 3
100 13
101 3
102 9
103 4
104 6
105 6
106+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Maoyi Huang is affiliated with the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory in the United States. Their research primarily spans Environmental Science, with significant contributions in the subfields of Global and Planetary Change, Atmospheric Science, Water Science and Technology, Environmental Engineering, and Nature and Landscape Conservation.

Their work covers a variety of main topics including Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics, Climate variability and models, Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies, Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations, Water-Energy-Food Nexus Studies, Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics, and Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies.

Maoyi Huang's publication record includes contributions to multiple scientific journals and venues. They have published extensively in:

  • OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information)
  • Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres
  • Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems
  • Environmental Research Letters
  • Biogeosciences

Notable recent papers by Maoyi Huang include:

  • Global land use for 2015-2100 at 0.05° resolution under diverse socioeconomic and climate scenarios, 2020, Scientific Data
  • Benchmarking and parameter sensitivity of physiological and vegetation dynamics using the Functionally Assembled Terrestrial Ecosystem Simulator (FATES) at Barro Colorado Island, Panama, 2020, Biogeosciences
  • Biophysical impacts of Earth greening largely controlled by aerodynamic resistance, 2020, Science Advances
  • A substantial role of soil erosion in the land carbon sink and its future changes, 2020, Global Change Biology
  • Neglecting irrigation contributes to the simulated summertime warm-and-dry bias in the central United States, 2020, npj Climate and Atmospheric Science

Frequent collaborators in Maoyi Huang's research include:

  • Xingyuan Chen
  • Zhao Yang
  • Xuehang Song
  • Zhangshuan Hou
  • Yanyan Cheng

Best Publications

  • Technical description of version 4.5 of the Community Land Model (CLM)

    Keith Oleson;M. Lawrence;B. Bonan;Beth Drewniak

  • Global patterns of drought recovery

    Christopher R. Schwalm;Christopher R. Schwalm;William R. L. Anderegg;Anna M. Michalak;Joshua B. Fisher

  • Model Parameter Estimation Experiment (MOPEX): An overview of science strategy and major results from the second and third workshops

    Q. Duan;J. Schaake;V. Andréassian;S. Franks

  • Hillslope Hydrology in Global Change Research and Earth System Modeling

    Ying Fan;M. Clark;D. M. Lawrence;S. Swenson

  • A new parameterization for surface and groundwater interactions and its impact on water budgets with the variable infiltration capacity (VIC) land surface model

    Xu Liang;Zhenghui Xie;Zhenghui Xie;Maoyi Huang

  • A Physically Based Runoff Routing Model for Land Surface and Earth System Models

    Hongyi Li;Mark S. Wigmosta;Huan Wu;Maoyi Huang

  • Global patterns and controls of soil organic carbon dynamics as simulated by multiple terrestrial biosphere models: Current status and future directions.

    Hanqin Tian;Chaoqun Lu;Jia Yang;Kamaljit Banger

  • Impact of large‐scale climate extremes on biospheric carbon fluxes: An intercomparison based on MsTMIP data

    Jakob Zscheischler;Jakob Zscheischler;Anna M. Michalak;Christopher Schwalm;Miguel D. Mahecha

  • The North American Carbon Program Multi-Scale Synthesis and Terrestrial Model Intercomparison Project – Part 1: Overview and experimental design

    D. N. Huntzinger;C. Schwalm;A. M. Michalak;K. Schaefer

  • Impacts of Climate Change on Energy Consumption and Peak Demand in Buildings: A Detailed Regional Approach

    James A. Dirks;Willy J. Gorrissen;John H. Hathaway;Daniel C. Skorski

  • Uncertainty in the response of terrestrial carbon sink to environmental drivers undermines carbon-climate feedback predictions.

    D. N. Huntzinger;A. M. Michalak;C. Schwalm;C. Schwalm;P. Ciais

  • A new global river network database for macroscale hydrologic modeling

    Huan Wu;Huan Wu;John S. Kimball;Hongyi Li;Maoyi Huang

  • A Modeling Study of Irrigation Effects on Surface Fluxes and Land–Air–Cloud Interactions in the Southern Great Plains

    Yun Qian;Maoyi Huang;Ben Yang;Larry K. Berg

  • Global land use for 2015–2100 at 0.05° resolution under diverse socioeconomic and climate scenarios

    Min Chen;Chris R. Vernon;Neal T. Graham;Mohamad Hejazi

  • 21st century United States emissions mitigation could increase water stress more than the climate change it is mitigating

    Mohamad I. Hejazi;Nathalie Voisin;Lu Liu;Lisa M. Bramer

  • Assessment of simulated water balance from Noah, Noah‐MP, CLM, and VIC over CONUS using the NLDAS test bed

    Xitian Cai;Zong-Liang Yang;Youlong Xia;Maoyi Huang

  • Investigating the Nexus of Climate, Energy, Water, and Land at Decision-Relevant Scales: The Platform for Regional Integrated Modeling and Analysis (PRIMA)

    Ian Kraucunas;Leon Clarke;James Dirks;John Hathaway

  • The critical role of the routing scheme in simulating peak river discharge in global hydrological models

    Fang Zhao;Ted I. E. Veldkamp;Katja Frieler;Jacob Schewe

  • On an improved sub-regional water resources management representation for integration into earth system models

    Nathalie Voisin;Hongyi Li;Duane L. Ward;Maoyi Huang

  • Benchmarking and parameter sensitivity of physiological and vegetation dynamics using the Functionally Assembled Terrestrial Ecosystem Simulator (FATES) at Barro Colorado Island, Panama

    Charles D. Koven;Ryan G. Knox;Rosie A. Fisher;Jeffrey Q. Chambers;Jeffrey Q. Chambers

  • Crop yield response to climate change varies with crop spatial distribution pattern.

    Guoyong Leng;Maoyi Huang

  • Disentangling climatic and anthropogenic controls on global terrestrial evapotranspiration trends

    Jiafu Mao;Wenting Fu;Xiaoying Shi;Daniel M. Ricciuto

  • Modeling the Effects of Groundwater-Fed Irrigation on Terrestrial Hydrology over the Conterminous United States

    Guoyong Leng;Maoyi Huang;Qiuhong Tang;Huilin Gao

  • Sensitivity of surface flux simulations to hydrologic parameters based on an uncertainty quantification framework applied to the Community Land Model

    Zhangshuan Hou;Maoyi Huang;L. Ruby Leung;Guang Lin

  • Disentangling climatic and anthropogenic controls on global terrestrial evapotranspiration trends

    J. Mao;W. Fu;X. Shi;D. M. Ricciuto

Frequent Co-Authors

Lai-yung Ruby Leung
Lai-yung Ruby Leung Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
Guoyong Leng
Guoyong Leng Chinese Academy of Sciences
Christopher R. Schwalm
Christopher R. Schwalm Woodwell Climate Research Center
Yun Qian
Yun Qian Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
Atul K. Jain
Atul K. Jain University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Hongyi Li
Hongyi Li University of Houston
Anna M. Michalak
Anna M. Michalak Stanford University
Xiaoying Shi
Xiaoying Shi Oak Ridge National Laboratory
Deborah N. Huntzinger
Deborah N. Huntzinger Northern Arizona University
Daniel J. Hayes
Daniel J. Hayes University of Maine

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Earth Science often opens doors to diverse career pathways that intersect with fields like information management, digital media, and education. For those interested in managing geological data or environmental archives, pursuing ala accredited mlis programs can provide specialized training in library and information science relevant to Earth Science resources.

When considering if this route fits your goals, understanding whether is library science a good degree offers insights into career prospects, demand, and salary potential. This knowledge helps align your educational choices with long-term objectives.

Moreover, creative fields like photography also connect with Earth Science through environmental documentation and remote sensing imagery. For those seeking affordable options, the list of cheapest online photography degree programs offers accessible pathways to develop these valuable skills.

Veterans looking to transition into related fields can benefit from tailored support found in online photography bachelor degree for veterans programs, which combine flexibility with targeted resources to facilitate successful career changes.

Best Scientists Citing Maoyi Huang

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles