World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Shapour Jaberzadeh

Shapour Jaberzadeh

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
44
Citations
6281
World Ranking
7239
National Ranking
209

Shapour Jaberzadeh publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Shapour Jaberzadeh sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 210 publications — 65th percentile

65% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Shapour Jaberzadeh D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Shapour Jaberzadeh sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Shapour Jaberzadeh is affiliated with Monash University in Australia and has an extensive body of research primarily in neuroscience and medicine. Their work encompasses diverse subfields including neurology, cognitive neuroscience, biomedical engineering, rehabilitation, and psychiatry and mental health.

The scientist's research topics focus notably on transcranial magnetic stimulation studies, vestibular and auditory disorders, muscle activation and electromyography studies, stroke rehabilitation and recovery, balance, gait, and falls prevention, musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation, and motor control and adaptation.

Several notable papers authored or co-authored by Shapour Jaberzadeh include:

  • Determination of anodal tDCS duration threshold for reversal of corticospinal excitability: An investigation for induction of counter-regulatory mechanisms, 2020, Brain Stimulation
  • The comparative effects of unilateral and bilateral transcranial direct current stimulation on motor learning and motor performance: A systematic review of literature and meta-analysis, 2020, Journal of Clinical Neuroscience
  • Comparing the effects of multi-session anodal trans-cranial direct current stimulation of primary motor and dorsolateral prefrontal cortices on fatigue and quality of life in patients with multiple sclerosis: a double-blind, randomized, sham-controlled trial, 2020, Clinical Rehabilitation
  • Determination of anodal tDCS intensity threshold for reversal of corticospinal excitability: an investigation for induction of counter-regulatory mechanisms, 2020, Scientific Reports
  • The effect of transcranial direct current stimulation on balance in healthy young and older adults: A systematic review of the literature, 2020, Neurophysiologie Clinique

Frequently collaborating co-authors include Maryam Zoghi, Fatemeh Ehsani, Keith Hill, Paul B. Fitzgerald, and Dawson J. Kidgell.

Publications by Shapour Jaberzadeh commonly appear in venues such as bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Brain Connectivity, Experimental Brain Research, Psychophysiology, and Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies.

Best Publications

  • Plasticity induced by non-invasive transcranial brain stimulation: A position paper.

    Ying Zu Huang;Ying Zu Huang;Ying Zu Huang;Ming Kue Lu;Andrea Antal;Joseph Classen

  • The Pain of Tendinopathy: Physiological or Pathophysiological?

    Ebonie Rio;G Lorimer Moseley;Craig Purdam;Tom Samiric

  • Does anodal transcranial direct current stimulation enhance excitability of the motor cortex and motor function in healthy individuals and subjects with stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

    A Bastani;Shapour Jaberzadeh

  • The effect of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation on motor sequence learning in healthy individuals: A systematic review and meta-analysis

    Fahimeh Hashemirad;Maryam Zoghi;Paul B. Fitzgerald;Shapour Jaberzadeh

  • Does anodal transcranial direct current stimulation modulate sensory perception and pain? A meta-analysis study

    Bita Vaseghi;Maryam Zoghi;Shapour Jaberzadeh

  • Differential modulation of corticospinal excitability by different current densities of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation.

    Andisheh Bastani;Shapour Jaberzadeh

  • a-tDCS differential modulation of corticospinal excitability: the effects of electrode size.

    A Bastani;Shapour Jaberzadeh

  • Relative contributions of infraspinatus and deltoid during external rotation in healthy shoulders.

    Natalie L. Bitter;Elizabeth F. Clisby;Mark A. Jones;Mary E. Magarey

  • Different current intensities of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation do not differentially modulate motor cortex plasticity.

    Dawson Kidgell;Robin M Daly;Kayleigh Young;Jarrad Anthony Lum

  • Does transcranial electrical stimulation enhance corticospinal excitability of the motor cortex in healthy individuals? A systematic review and meta-analysis

    Thusharika Dissanayaka;Maryam Zoghi;Michael Farrell;Gary F. Egan

  • Ultrasound measurement of deep abdominal muscle activity in sitting positions with different stability levels in subjects with and without chronic low back pain

    Omid Rasouli;Amir Massoud Arab;Mohsen Amiri;Shapour Jaberzadeh

  • How does anodal transcranial direct current stimulation of the pain neuromatrix affect brain excitability and pain perception? A randomised, double-blind, sham-control study.

    Bita Vaseghi;Maryam Zoghi;Shapour Jaberzadeh

  • Differential effects of primary motor cortex and cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation on motor learning in healthy individuals: A randomized double-blind sham-controlled study

    F. Ehsani;A.H. Bakhtiary;S. Jaberzadeh;A. Talimkhani

  • A Higher Number of TMS-Elicited MEP from a Combined Hotspot Improves Intra- and Inter-Session Reliability of the Upper Limb Muscles in Healthy Individuals

    Andisheh Bastani;Shapour Jaberzadeh

  • The minimal number of TMS trials required for the reliable assessment of corticospinal excitability, short interval intracortical inhibition, and intracortical facilitation.

    Mana Biabani;Michael Farrell;Maryam Zoghi;Gary Egan

  • Multi-session anodal tDCS enhances the effects of postural training on balance and postural stability in older adults with high fall risk: Primary motor cortex versus cerebellar stimulation

    Mohaddeseh Hafez Yosephi;Fatemeh Ehsani;Maryam Zoghi;Shapour Jaberzadeh

  • Determination of anodal tDCS duration threshold for reversal of corticospinal excitability: An investigation for induction of counter-regulatory mechanisms

    Maryam Hassanzahraee;Michael A. Nitsche;Maryam Zoghi;Shapour Jaberzadeh

  • Relative contributions of the infraspinatus and deltoid during external rotation in patients with symptomatic subacromial impingement.

    Elizabeth F. Clisby;Natalie L. Bitter;Michael J. Sandow;Mark A. Jones

  • Within-session repeated a-tDCS: the effects of repetition rate and inter-stimulus interval on corticospinal excitability and motor performance

    Andisheh Bastani;Shapour Jaberzadeh

  • Anodal transcranial pulsed current stimulation: A novel technique to enhance corticospinal excitability

    Shapour Jaberzadeh;Andisheh Bastani;Maryam Zoghi

  • Standardization of H-reflex analyses

    Russell Brinkworth;M Tuncer;M Tuncer;Kylie J Tucker;Shapour Jaberzadeh;Shapour Jaberzadeh

Frequent Co-Authors

Michael Farrell
Michael Farrell University of New South Wales
Gary F. Egan
Gary F. Egan Monash University
Paul B. Fitzgerald
Paul B. Fitzgerald Australian National University
Michael A. Nordstrom
Michael A. Nordstrom University of Adelaide
Timothy S. Miles
Timothy S. Miles University of Adelaide
Michael A. Nitsche
Michael A. Nitsche TU Dortmund University
Lisa McKenna
Lisa McKenna La Trobe University
Brett Williams
Brett Williams Monash University
Ted Brown
Ted Brown Monash University
Mary P. Galea
Mary P. Galea University of Melbourne

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in neuroscience, several related online degrees and certifications offer career flexibility and advancement. Many choose to start with the easiest degree to get to quickly enter the field, then specialize as their interests develop. Online programs can be an ideal way to balance study with professional or personal commitments.

Exploring best online certificate programs can add valuable credentials in areas like data analysis, clinical research, or behavioral health—skills highly relevant to neuroscience careers. Budget-conscious students can take advantage of most affordable online msw programs for roles intersecting neuroscience and social work.

If you're considering a specialization in applied behavior analysis, look into bcba certification programs online. These credentials are in high demand in clinical and educational settings, often overlapping with neuroscience research and practice.

Best Scientists Citing Shapour Jaberzadeh

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles