World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
52
Citations
11607
World Ranking
5272
National Ranking
26

Wolnei Caumo publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Wolnei Caumo sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 260 publications — 76th percentile

76% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Wolnei Caumo D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Wolnei Caumo sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 52 D-Index — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Wolnei Caumo is affiliated with the Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul in Brazil and has a significant body of work centered primarily in the fields of Medicine and Neuroscience. Their research contributions span multiple subfields including Neurology, Physiology, Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Psychiatry and Mental Health, and Pharmacology. The scientist's work focuses prominently on topics related to Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies, Pain Management and Treatment, and Pain Mechanisms and Treatments.

Their recent publications address various aspects of neurological and psychiatric disorders, pain treatment methodologies, and cognitive effects within medical contexts. Key papers include:

  • Evidence-Based Guidelines and Secondary Meta-Analysis for the Use of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Neurological and Psychiatric Disorders (2020) published in The International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology
  • Methods and strategies of tDCS for the treatment of pain: current status and future directions (2020) in Expert Review of Medical Devices
  • Clinical impact of melatonin on breast cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy; effects on cognition, sleep and depressive symptoms: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial (2020) in PLoS ONE
  • Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Patients with Anxiety: Current Perspectives (2020) in Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment
  • Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation vs Sham for the Treatment of Inattention in Adults With Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (2022) in JAMA Psychiatry

Wolnei Caumo frequently collaborates with several coauthors, reflecting extensive research partnerships. These include Iraci Lucena da Silva Torres, Felipe Fregni (who appears twice with two different counts of collaborations), Liciane Fernandes Medeiros, and Andressa de Souza.

The scientist's research is also published repeatedly in leading journals. The most frequent publication venues are:

  • PLoS ONE
  • Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology (English Edition)
  • Neuroscience Letters
  • Scientific Reports
  • Pain Medicine

In terms of research topics, the main areas covered by Wolnei Caumo include:

  • Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
  • Pain Management and Treatment
  • Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research
  • Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
  • Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

This profile reflects rigorous academic work over the past several years with significant emphasis on clinical and experimental neurology, pain research, and modulation techniques such as transcranial stimulation. Wolnei Caumo's scholarly output contributes to these complex fields by addressing both clinical applications and underlying physiological mechanisms.

Best Publications

  • Obesity and shift work: chronobiological aspects.

    L. C. Antunes;R. Levandovski;G. Dantas;W. Caumo

  • Depression Scores Associate With Chronotype and Social Jetlag in a Rural Population

    Rosa Maria Levandovski;Giovana Dantas;Luciana Carvalho Fernandes;Wolnei Caumo

  • Risk factors for preoperative anxiety in adults.

    W. Caumo;A. P. Schmidt;C. N. Schneider;J. Bergmann

  • Evidence-based guidelines and secondary meta-analysis for the use of transcranial direct current stimulation in neurological and psychiatric disorders

    Felipe Fregni;Mirret M El-Hagrassy;Kevin Pacheco-Barrios;Kevin Pacheco-Barrios;Sandra Carvalho

  • Preoperative predictors of moderate to intense acute postoperative pain in patients undergoing abdominal surgery

    W. Caumo;A. P. Schmidt;C. N. Schneider;J. Bergmann

  • Regulatory considerations for the clinical and research use of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS): Review and recommendations from an expert panel

    F. Fregni;M. A. Nitsche;C. K. Loo;A. R. Brunoni

  • Neurobiological Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation: A Review

    Liciane Fernandes Medeiros;Izabel Cristina Custodio de Souza;Liliane Pinto Vidor;Andressa de Souza

  • Relationship between depressive mood and chronotype in healthy subjects.

    Maria Paz Hidalgo;Wolnei Caumo;Michele Posser;Sônia Beatriz Coccaro

  • Cross‐Cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Brazilian Portuguese Version of the Pain Catastrophizing Scale

    Francisléa Sehn;Eduardo Chachamovich;Liliane Pinto Vidor;Letizzia Dall-Agnol

  • Risk factors for postoperative anxiety in adults

    W. Caumo;A. P. Schmidt;C. N. Schneider;J. Bergmann

  • Efficacy of melatonin in the treatment of endometriosis: a phase II, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

    André Schwertner;Claudia C. Conceição dos Santos;Gislene Dalferth Costa;Alícia Deitos

  • Preoperative anxiolytic effect of melatonin and clonidine on postoperative pain and morphine consumption in patients undergoing abdominal hysterectomy: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study.

    Wolnei Caumo;Rosa Levandovski;Maria Paz L. Hidalgo

  • The Central Sensitization Inventory validated and adapted for a Brazilian population: psychometric properties and its relationship with brain-derived neurotrophic factor.

    Wolnei Caumo;Luciana da Conceição Antunes;Jéssica Lorenzzi Elkfury;Evelyn Grabin Herbstrith

  • The clinical impact of preoperative melatonin on postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing abdominal hysterectomy.

    Wolnei Caumo;Fernanda Torres;Nivio L. Moreira;Jorge A. S. Auzani

  • Risk factors for postoperative anxiety in children.

    W. Caumo;J. C. Broenstrub;L. Fialho;S. M. G. Petry

  • Clinical efficacy of dexmedetomidine alone is less than propofol for conscious sedation during ERCP.

    Suzana Muller;Silvia M. Borowics;Elaine A.F. Fortis;Luciana C. Stefani

  • Melatonin analgesia is associated with improvement of the descending endogenous pain-modulating system in fibromyalgia: a phase II, randomized, double-dummy, controlled trial

    Simone de Azevedo Zanette;Rafael Vercelino;Gabriela Laste;Joanna Ripoll Rozisky

  • Sleep disturbances associated with minor psychiatric disorders in medical students

    M. P. Hidalgo;W. Caumo

  • Cafeteria diet-induced obesity plus chronic stress alter serum leptin levels

    I.C. Macedo;L.F. Medeiros;C. Oliveira;C.M. Oliveira

  • Methods and strategies of tDCS for the treatment of pain: current status and future directions.

    Kevin Pacheco-Barrios;Alejandra Cardenas-Rojas;Aurore Thibaut;Aurore Thibaut;Beatriz Costa

  • Evaluation of the structure of Brazilian State-Trait Anxiety Inventory using a Rasch psychometric approach ☆ ☆☆

    Márcia Balle Kaipper;Eduardo Chachamovich;Maria Paz Loayza Hidalgo;Iraci Lucena da Silva Torres

  • Dimensionality and Reliability of the Central Sensitization Inventory in a Pooled Multicountry Sample.

    Antonio I. Cuesta-Vargas;Antonio I. Cuesta-Vargas;Randy Neblett;Alessandro Chiarotto;Jeroen Kregel

Frequent Co-Authors

Iraci Lucena da Silva Torres
Iraci Lucena da Silva Torres Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul
Felipe Fregni
Felipe Fregni Harvard University
Andre R. Brunoni
Andre R. Brunoni Universidade de São Paulo
Luis Augusto Rohde
Luis Augusto Rohde Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul
Adriano B. L. Tort
Adriano B. L. Tort Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte
Aurore Thibaut
Aurore Thibaut University of Liège
Daniel Weintraub
Daniel Weintraub University of Pennsylvania
Marom Bikson
Marom Bikson City College of New York
Robert J. Gatchel
Robert J. Gatchel The University of Texas at Arlington
Regina P. Markus
Regina P. Markus Universidade de São Paulo

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering a career in neuroscience? Exploring related online degree programs can open doors in both clinical and research settings. Many students interested in the human brain also look at psychology, therapy, or social work as alternative or complementary paths.

Psychology degrees are a popular choice, offering flexibility with both undergraduate and graduate options. If affordability is a concern, consider pursuing an online psychology degree cheap to minimize costs while advancing your education. For those seeking advanced study, a masters in psychology online provides specialized knowledge and can boost your career prospects.

Careers in mental health are also in high demand. Specialized programs such as mft masters programs prepare graduates for roles in marriage and family therapy, a field closely linked to neuropsychological principles. Additionally, fast-track options exist for social work—explore 1 year msw programs online no bsw as an accelerated route to licensure and practical experience.

Each of these related pathways can complement a neuroscience background, offering diverse opportunities in research, healthcare, and therapy.

Best Scientists Citing Wolnei Caumo

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles