World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Chris Baeken

Chris Baeken

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 58 3846 3544 51 48 370 14815
Neuroscience 60 3794 3471 40 37 406 15518

Chris Baeken publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Chris Baeken between 1998 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Chris Baeken published across 28 years, from 1998 to 2025, averaging 17.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 56 publications in 2023. 69 of the 499 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40 50
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1998 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 56. Peak 56 publications in 2023. 1998: 3 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 0 publications 2001: 0 publications 2002: 1 publication 2003: 1 publication 2004: 1 publication 2005: 4 publications 2006: 6 publications 2007: 1 publication 2008: 7 publications 2009: 13 publications 2010: 18 publications 2011: 18 publications 2012: 17 publications 2013: 14 publications 2014: 18 publications 2015: 22 publications 2016: 23 publications 2017: 30 publications 2018: 21 publications 2019: 40 publications 2020: 35 publications 2021: 52 publications 2022: 29 publications 2023: 56 publications 2024: 29 publications 2025: 40 publications
1998 2025

499 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Chris Baeken: publications per year, 1998 to 2025
Year Publications
1998 3
1999 0
2000 0
2001 0
2002 1
2003 1
2004 1
2005 4
2006 6
2007 1
2008 7
2009 13
2010 18
2011 18
2012 17
2013 14
2014 18
2015 22
2016 23
2017 30
2018 21
2019 40
2020 35
2021 52
2022 29
2023 56
2024 29
2025 40
Total 499
Download as CSV

Chris Baeken publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Chris Baeken sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 887+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 539. Most scientists, 539, have 98–107 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 398–407 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientist 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 887+

This scientist: 406 publications — 91st percentile

91% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 18
48–57 79
58–67 193
68–77 323
78–87 406
88–97 452
98–107 539
108–117 505
118–127 522
128–137 469
138–147 456
148–157 459
158–167 397
168–177 383
178–187 350
188–197 302
198–207 306
208–217 262
218–227 242
228–237 220
238–247 203
248–257 174
258–267 176
268–277 175
278–287 125
288–297 116
298–307 127
308–317 128
318–327 99
328–337 89
338–347 78
348–357 96
358–367 66
368–377 59
378–387 65
388–397 54
398–407 48 406
408–417 49
418–427 34
428–437 31
438–447 30
448–457 31
458–467 36
468–477 40
478–487 35
488–497 30
498–507 23
508–517 26
518–527 20
528–537 23
538–547 20
548–557 20
558–567 17
568–577 14
578–587 20
588–597 20
598–607 19
608–617 18
618–627 17
628–637 11
638–647 11
648–657 11
658–667 8
668–677 7
678–687 11
688–697 10
698–707 4
708–717 6
718–727 5
728–737 5
738–747 9
748–757 9
758–767 3
768–777 7
778–787 7
788–797 6
798–807 2
808–817 2
818–827 7
828–837 0
838–847 9
848–857 3
858–867 1
868–877 3
878–886 6
887+ 100
Download as CSV

Chris Baeken D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Chris Baeken sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 68 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 163+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 512. Most scientists, 512, have 46–47 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 60–61 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30–31 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 60 D-Index — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 42
32–33 172
34–35 296
36–37 435
38–39 459
40–41 456
42–43 467
44–45 478
46–47 512
48–49 435
50–51 425
52–53 418
54–55 392
56–57 357
58–59 334
60–61 328 60
62–63 260
64–65 278
66–67 239
68–69 250
70–71 210
72–73 200
74–75 189
76–77 170
78–79 146
80–81 113
82–83 126
84–85 100
86–87 84
88–89 99
90–91 84
92–93 85
94–95 72
96–97 76
98–99 45
100–101 49
102–103 43
104–105 32
106–107 45
108–109 50
110–111 32
112–113 39
114–115 32
116–117 29
118–119 27
120–121 19
122–123 23
124–125 27
126–127 16
128–129 24
130–131 13
132–133 21
134–135 17
136–137 14
138–139 15
140–141 10
142–143 10
144–145 13
146–147 9
148–149 8
150–151 6
152–153 6
154–155 7
156–157 7
158–159 10
160–161 4
162 8
163+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Chris Baeken is a researcher affiliated with Eindhoven University of Technology in the Netherlands, with a focus on Neuroscience, Medicine, and Psychology. Their work spans several key areas, including Cognitive Neuroscience, Neurology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Clinical Psychology, and Psychiatry and Mental Health.

The scientist has published extensively on topics such as Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) studies, Functional Brain Connectivity, and the intersection of Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, and Cognitive Processes. Other notable research topics include Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies, Vestibular and auditory disorders, Action Observation and Synchronization, and broader Mental Health Research.

Chris Baeken has contributed to a range of well-regarded academic venues. Frequent publication outlets include Brain Stimulation, Clinical Neurophysiology, Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience, and the International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology.

Among the more recent papers associated with their research interests are:

  • Evidence-based guidelines on the therapeutic use of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS): An update (2014-2018), 2020, Clinical Neurophysiology
  • Corrigendum to "Evidence-based guidelines on the therapeutic use of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS): An update (2014-2018)", 2020, Clinical Neurophysiology
  • Guidelines for TMS/tES clinical services and research through the COVID-19 pandemic, 2020, Brain Stimulation
  • The neural correlates of psychosocial stress: A systematic review and meta-analysis of spectral analysis EEG studies, 2022, Neurobiology of Stress
  • Depressive Symptoms in the Elderly-An Early Symptom of Dementia? A Systematic Review, 2020, Frontiers in Pharmacology

Collaboration plays a significant role in Chris Baeken's research activities. Frequent co-authors include:

  • Marie-Anne Vanderhasselt
  • Frank Van Overwalle
  • Natacha Deroost
  • Kris Baetens
  • Rudi De Raedt

Best Publications

  • Evidence-based guidelines on the therapeutic use of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS)

    Jean Pascal Lefaucheur;Nathalie André-Obadia;Andrea Antal;Samar S. Ayache

  • A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) Over the Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex in Healthy and Neuropsychiatric Samples: Influence of Stimulation Parameters

    Josefien Dedoncker;Andre R. Brunoni;Chris Baeken;Chris Baeken;Marie-Anne Vanderhasselt

  • Transcranial electrical and magnetic stimulation (tES and TMS) for addiction medicine: A consensus paper on the present state of the science and the road ahead

    Hamed Ekhtiari;Hosna Tavakoli;Giovanni Addolorato;Chris Baeken

  • Development of the signal in sensory rhodopsin and its transfer to the cognate transducer.

    Rouslan Moukhametzianov;Johann P. Klare;Rouslan Efremov;Christian Baeken

  • Dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and Stroop performance: Tackling the lateralization

    Marie-Anne Vanderhasselt;Rudi De Raedt;Chris Baeken

  • Accelerated intermittent theta burst stimulation treatment in medication-resistant major depression: A fast road to remission?

    Romain Duprat;Stefanie Desmyter;De Raedt Rudi;Kees van Heeringen

  • Sham tDCS: A hidden source of variability? Reflections for further blinded, controlled trials

    Clara Fonteneau;Marine Mondino;Martijn Arns;Chris Baeken

  • Accelerated HF-rTMS in treatment-resistant unipolar depression: Insights from subgenual anterior cingulate functional connectivity

    Chris Baeken;Daniele Marinazzo;Guo-Rong Wu;Peter Van Schuerbeek

  • The influence of rTMS over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex on Stroop task performance

    Marie-Anne Vanderhasselt;Rudi De Raedt;Chris Baeken;Lemke Leyman

  • Intensive HF-rTMS treatment in refractory medication-resistant unipolar depressed patients.

    Chris Baeken;Marie-Anne Vanderhasselt;Jonathan Remue;Sarah Herremans

  • Neurocognitive effects of HF-rTMS over the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex on the attentional processing of emotional information in healthy women: An event-related fMRI study

    Rudi De Raedt;Lemke Leyman;Chris Baeken;Peter Van Schuerbeek

  • Is there a neuroanatomical basis of the vulnerability to suicidal behavior? A coordinate-based meta-analysis of structural and functional MRI studies.

    Kees van Heeringen;Stijn Bijttebier;Stefanie Desmyter;Myriam Vervaet

  • Corrigendum to "Evidence-based guidelines on the therapeutic use of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS): An update (2014-2018)" [Clin. Neurophysiol. 131 (2020) 474-528].

    Jean-Pascal Lefaucheur;André Aleman;Chris Baeken;David H Benninger

  • The Impact of Accelerated HF-rTMS on the Subgenual Anterior Cingulate Cortex in Refractory Unipolar Major Depression: Insights From 18FDG PET Brain Imaging.

    Chris Baeken;Chris Baeken;Daniele Marinazzo;Hendrik Everaert;Guo-Rong Wu;Guo-Rong Wu

  • Neurostimulation as an intervention for treatment resistant depression: From research on mechanisms towards targeted neurocognitive strategies.

    Rudi De Raedt;Marie-Anne Vanderhasselt;Chris Baeken

  • Neurobiological mechanisms of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on the underlying neurocircuitry in unipolar depression.

    Chris Baeken;Rudi De Raedt

  • Guidelines for TMS/tES clinical services and research through the COVID-19 pandemic.

    Marom Bikson;Colleen A Hanlon;Adam J Woods;Bernadette T Gillick

  • Cortisol response to stress: The role of expectancy and anticipatory stress regulation.

    Matias M Pulopulos;Chris Baeken;Rudi De Raedt

  • tDCS over the left prefrontal cortex enhances cognitive control for positive affective stimuli.

    Marie-Anne Vanderhasselt;Rudi De Raedt;Andre R Brunoni;Camilia Campanha

  • Inter-individual differences in the habitual use of cognitive reappraisal and expressive suppression are associated with variations in prefrontal cognitive control for emotional information: an event related fMRI study

    Marie-Anne Vanderhasselt;Chris Baeken;Peter Van Schuerbeek;Rob Luypaert

  • Parsing the components of the psychomotor syndrome in schizophrenia

    L. Docx;M. Morrens;C. Bervoets;W. Hulstijn

  • Right prefrontal HF-rTMS attenuates right amygdala processing of negatively valenced emotional stimuli in healthy females

    C. Baeken;R. De Raedt;P. Van Schuerbeek;M.A. Vanderhasselt

Frequent Co-Authors

Rudi De Raedt
Rudi De Raedt Ghent University
Andre R. Brunoni
Andre R. Brunoni Universidade de São Paulo
Martijn Arns
Martijn Arns Brainclinics
Frank Van Overwalle
Frank Van Overwalle Vrije Universiteit Brussel
Daniele Marinazzo
Daniele Marinazzo Ghent University
Alexander T. Sack
Alexander T. Sack Maastricht University
Paul Boon
Paul Boon Ghent University
André Aleman
André Aleman University Medical Center Groningen
Ernst H. W. Koster
Ernst H. W. Koster Ghent University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Psychology opens doors to a variety of online degree programs and rewarding career pathways, especially in the field of social work. Many states in the USA have specific educational requirements for those who wish to become licensed social workers.

For instance, if you’re interested in working in Texas, review the social worker degree requirements in Texas to understand which psychology or social work degrees are accepted for licensure. Similarly, aspiring professionals in Utah should look at the degree needed to be a social worker in Utah to ensure they enroll in a program that matches state guidelines.

Career requirements can also differ in other regions. In Vermont, you’ll want to review the degree needed to be a social worker in Vermont. For those planning to build their careers in Virginia, find out the Virginia minimum degree requirement for social workers. Exploring these pathways ensures you choose the right online degree program and take the necessary steps toward a successful and fulfilling career.

Best Scientists Citing Chris Baeken

Trending Scientists