World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Chris Baeken

Chris Baeken

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
58
Citations
14815
World Ranking
3846
National Ranking
51

Neuroscience

D-Index
60
Citations
15518
World Ranking
3794
National Ranking
40

Chris Baeken publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Chris Baeken sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 406 publications — 91st percentile

91% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Chris Baeken D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Chris Baeken sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 60 D-Index — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Chris Baeken is a researcher affiliated with Eindhoven University of Technology in the Netherlands, with a focus on Neuroscience, Medicine, and Psychology. Their work spans several key areas, including Cognitive Neuroscience, Neurology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Clinical Psychology, and Psychiatry and Mental Health.

The scientist has published extensively on topics such as Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) studies, Functional Brain Connectivity, and the intersection of Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, and Cognitive Processes. Other notable research topics include Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies, Vestibular and auditory disorders, Action Observation and Synchronization, and broader Mental Health Research.

Chris Baeken has contributed to a range of well-regarded academic venues. Frequent publication outlets include Brain Stimulation, Clinical Neurophysiology, Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience, and the International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology.

Among the more recent papers associated with their research interests are:

  • Evidence-based guidelines on the therapeutic use of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS): An update (2014-2018), 2020, Clinical Neurophysiology
  • Corrigendum to "Evidence-based guidelines on the therapeutic use of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS): An update (2014-2018)", 2020, Clinical Neurophysiology
  • Guidelines for TMS/tES clinical services and research through the COVID-19 pandemic, 2020, Brain Stimulation
  • The neural correlates of psychosocial stress: A systematic review and meta-analysis of spectral analysis EEG studies, 2022, Neurobiology of Stress
  • Depressive Symptoms in the Elderly-An Early Symptom of Dementia? A Systematic Review, 2020, Frontiers in Pharmacology

Collaboration plays a significant role in Chris Baeken's research activities. Frequent co-authors include:

  • Marie-Anne Vanderhasselt
  • Frank Van Overwalle
  • Natacha Deroost
  • Kris Baetens
  • Rudi De Raedt

Best Publications

  • Evidence-based guidelines on the therapeutic use of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS)

    Jean Pascal Lefaucheur;Nathalie André-Obadia;Andrea Antal;Samar S. Ayache

  • Evidence-based guidelines on the therapeutic use of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS): An update (2014–2018)

    Jean Pascal Lefaucheur;André Aleman;Chris Baeken;David H. Benninger

  • A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) Over the Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex in Healthy and Neuropsychiatric Samples: Influence of Stimulation Parameters

    Josefien Dedoncker;Andre R. Brunoni;Chris Baeken;Chris Baeken;Marie-Anne Vanderhasselt

  • Transcranial electrical and magnetic stimulation (tES and TMS) for addiction medicine: A consensus paper on the present state of the science and the road ahead

    Hamed Ekhtiari;Hosna Tavakoli;Giovanni Addolorato;Chris Baeken

  • Development of the signal in sensory rhodopsin and its transfer to the cognate transducer.

    Rouslan Moukhametzianov;Johann P. Klare;Rouslan Efremov;Christian Baeken

  • Dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and Stroop performance: Tackling the lateralization

    Marie-Anne Vanderhasselt;Rudi De Raedt;Chris Baeken

  • Accelerated intermittent theta burst stimulation treatment in medication-resistant major depression: A fast road to remission?

    Romain Duprat;Stefanie Desmyter;De Raedt Rudi;Kees van Heeringen

  • Sham tDCS: A hidden source of variability? Reflections for further blinded, controlled trials

    Clara Fonteneau;Marine Mondino;Martijn Arns;Chris Baeken

  • Accelerated HF-rTMS in treatment-resistant unipolar depression: Insights from subgenual anterior cingulate functional connectivity

    Chris Baeken;Daniele Marinazzo;Guo-Rong Wu;Peter Van Schuerbeek

  • The influence of rTMS over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex on Stroop task performance

    Marie-Anne Vanderhasselt;Rudi De Raedt;Chris Baeken;Lemke Leyman

  • Intensive HF-rTMS treatment in refractory medication-resistant unipolar depressed patients.

    Chris Baeken;Marie-Anne Vanderhasselt;Jonathan Remue;Sarah Herremans

  • Neurocognitive effects of HF-rTMS over the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex on the attentional processing of emotional information in healthy women: An event-related fMRI study

    Rudi De Raedt;Lemke Leyman;Chris Baeken;Peter Van Schuerbeek

  • Is there a neuroanatomical basis of the vulnerability to suicidal behavior? A coordinate-based meta-analysis of structural and functional MRI studies.

    Kees van Heeringen;Stijn Bijttebier;Stefanie Desmyter;Myriam Vervaet

  • Corrigendum to "Evidence-based guidelines on the therapeutic use of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS): An update (2014-2018)" [Clin. Neurophysiol. 131 (2020) 474-528].

    Jean-Pascal Lefaucheur;André Aleman;Chris Baeken;David H Benninger

  • The Impact of Accelerated HF-rTMS on the Subgenual Anterior Cingulate Cortex in Refractory Unipolar Major Depression: Insights From 18FDG PET Brain Imaging.

    Chris Baeken;Chris Baeken;Daniele Marinazzo;Hendrik Everaert;Guo-Rong Wu;Guo-Rong Wu

  • Neurostimulation as an intervention for treatment resistant depression: From research on mechanisms towards targeted neurocognitive strategies.

    Rudi De Raedt;Marie-Anne Vanderhasselt;Chris Baeken

  • Neurobiological mechanisms of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on the underlying neurocircuitry in unipolar depression.

    Chris Baeken;Rudi De Raedt

  • Guidelines for TMS/tES clinical services and research through the COVID-19 pandemic.

    Marom Bikson;Colleen A Hanlon;Adam J Woods;Bernadette T Gillick

  • Cortisol response to stress: The role of expectancy and anticipatory stress regulation.

    Matias M Pulopulos;Chris Baeken;Rudi De Raedt

  • tDCS over the left prefrontal cortex enhances cognitive control for positive affective stimuli.

    Marie-Anne Vanderhasselt;Rudi De Raedt;Andre R Brunoni;Camilia Campanha

  • Inter-individual differences in the habitual use of cognitive reappraisal and expressive suppression are associated with variations in prefrontal cognitive control for emotional information: an event related fMRI study

    Marie-Anne Vanderhasselt;Chris Baeken;Peter Van Schuerbeek;Rob Luypaert

  • Parsing the components of the psychomotor syndrome in schizophrenia

    L. Docx;M. Morrens;C. Bervoets;W. Hulstijn

  • Right prefrontal HF-rTMS attenuates right amygdala processing of negatively valenced emotional stimuli in healthy females

    C. Baeken;R. De Raedt;P. Van Schuerbeek;M.A. Vanderhasselt

Frequent Co-Authors

Rudi De Raedt
Rudi De Raedt Ghent University
Andre R. Brunoni
Andre R. Brunoni Universidade de São Paulo
Martijn Arns
Martijn Arns Brainclinics
Frank Van Overwalle
Frank Van Overwalle Vrije Universiteit Brussel
Daniele Marinazzo
Daniele Marinazzo Ghent University
Alexander T. Sack
Alexander T. Sack Maastricht University
Paul Boon
Paul Boon Ghent University
André Aleman
André Aleman University Medical Center Groningen
Ernst H. W. Koster
Ernst H. W. Koster Ghent University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Psychology opens doors to a variety of online degree programs and rewarding career pathways, especially in the field of social work. Many states in the USA have specific educational requirements for those who wish to become licensed social workers.

For instance, if you’re interested in working in Texas, review the social worker degree requirements in Texas to understand which psychology or social work degrees are accepted for licensure. Similarly, aspiring professionals in Utah should look at the degree needed to be a social worker in Utah to ensure they enroll in a program that matches state guidelines.

Career requirements can also differ in other regions. In Vermont, you’ll want to review the degree needed to be a social worker in Vermont. For those planning to build their careers in Virginia, find out the Virginia minimum degree requirement for social workers. Exploring these pathways ensures you choose the right online degree program and take the necessary steps toward a successful and fulfilling career.

Best Scientists Citing Chris Baeken

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles