World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Rudi De Raedt

Rudi De Raedt

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 76 1730 1557 23 23 383 18764

Rudi De Raedt publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Rudi De Raedt between 1997 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Rudi De Raedt published across 29 years, from 1997 to 2025, averaging 14.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 30 publications in 2021. 37 of the 431 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1997 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 30. Peak 30 publications in 2021. 1997: 1 publication 1998: 3 publications 1999: 3 publications 2000: 3 publications 2001: 4 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 4 publications 2004: 7 publications 2005: 7 publications 2006: 16 publications 2007: 13 publications 2008: 12 publications 2009: 16 publications 2010: 21 publications 2011: 28 publications 2012: 28 publications 2013: 20 publications 2014: 24 publications 2015: 23 publications 2016: 21 publications 2017: 19 publications 2018: 16 publications 2019: 24 publications 2020: 18 publications 2021: 30 publications 2022: 10 publications 2023: 21 publications 2024: 11 publications 2025: 26 publications
1997 2025

431 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Rudi De Raedt: publications per year, 1997 to 2025
Year Publications
1997 1
1998 3
1999 3
2000 3
2001 4
2002 2
2003 4
2004 7
2005 7
2006 16
2007 13
2008 12
2009 16
2010 21
2011 28
2012 28
2013 20
2014 24
2015 23
2016 21
2017 19
2018 16
2019 24
2020 18
2021 30
2022 10
2023 21
2024 11
2025 26
Total 431
Download as CSV

Rudi De Raedt publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rudi De Raedt sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 381–390 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 383 publications — 93rd percentile

93% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58 383
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Rudi De Raedt D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rudi De Raedt sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 76–77 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 76 D-Index — 85th percentile

85% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132 76
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Rudi De Raedt is affiliated with Ghent University in Belgium and has an extensive research portfolio primarily within the fields of psychology and neuroscience. Their work spans over 130 publications in psychology and 68 in neuroscience, reflecting a focus on experimental and cognitive psychology, clinical psychology, cognitive neuroscience, neurology, and social psychology.

Their research addresses several main topics, including anxiety, depression, psychometrics, treatment, cognitive processes, mental health research topics, transcranial magnetic stimulation studies, child and adolescent psychosocial and emotional development, neural and behavioral psychology studies, heart rate variability and autonomic control, and functional brain connectivity studies.

Notable recent papers by Rudi De Raedt include:

  • The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on wellbeing and cognitive functioning of older adults, 2021, Scientific Reports
  • The relationship between Instagram use and indicators of mental health: A systematic review, 2021, Computers in Human Behavior Reports
  • Social media use and well-being: A prospective experience-sampling study, 2020, Computers in Human Behavior
  • The neural correlates of psychosocial stress: A systematic review and meta-analysis of spectral analysis EEG studies, 2022, Neurobiology of Stress
  • Combined transcranial direct current stimulation and psychological interventions: State of the art and promising perspectives for clinical psychology, 2020, Biological Psychology

Frequent publication venues for their work include:

  • Cognitive Therapy and Research
  • Clinical Neurophysiology
  • Behaviour Research and Therapy
  • Scientific Reports
  • Brain Stimulation

Rudi De Raedt collaborates regularly with a number of researchers. The most frequent co-authors include Marie-Anne Vanderhasselt, Chris Baeken, Matías M. Pulopulos, Jens Allaert, and Álvaro Sánchez-López.

Best Publications

  • Understanding depressive rumination from a cognitive science perspective: the impaired disengagement hypothesis.

    Ernst H.W. Koster;Evi De Lissnyder;Nazanin Derakshan;Rudi De Raedt

  • The Karolinska Directed Emotional Faces: A validation study

    Ellen Goeleven;Rudi De Raedt;Lemke Leyman;Bruno Verschuere

  • Understanding vulnerability for depression from a cognitive neuroscience perspective: A reappraisal of attentional factors and a new conceptual framework

    Rudi De Raedt;Ernst H. W. Koster

  • Mood-congruent attentional bias in dysphoria: maintained attention to and impaired disengagement from negative information.

    Ernst H. W. Koster;Rudi De Raedt;Ellen Goeleven;Erik Franck

  • Deficient inhibition of emotional information in depression.

    Ellen Goeleven;Rudi De Raedt;Saskia Baert;Ernst H.W. Koster

  • The Default Mode Network and Recurrent Depression: A Neurobiological Model of Cognitive Risk Factors

    Igor Marchetti;Ernst H. W. Koster;Edmund J. Sonuga-Barke;Rudi De Raedt

  • Psychometric Properties of the Dutch Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale

    Erik Franck;Rudi De Raedt;Catherine Barbez;Yves Rosseel

  • Being Moved Valence Activates Approach-Avoidance Behavior Independently of Evaluation and Approach-Avoidance Intentions

    Regina Krieglmeyer;Roland Deutsch;Jan De Houwer;Rudi De Raedt

  • Attentional bias training in depression: Therapeutic effects depend on depression severity

    Saskia Baert;Rudi De Raedt;Rik Schacht;Ernst H.W. Koster

  • Attentional biases for angry faces in unipolar depression

    Lemke Leyman;Rudi De Raedt;Rik Schacht;Ernst H. W. Koster

  • The association between depressive symptoms and executive control impairments in response to emotional and non-emotional information

    Evi De Lissnyder;Ernst H. W. Koster;Nazanin Derakshan;Rudi De Raedt

  • Rumination mediates the relationship between impaired cognitive control for emotional information and depressive symptoms: A prospective study in remitted depressed adults

    Ineke Demeyer;Evi De Lissnyder;Ernst H.W. Koster;Rudi De Raedt

  • The relationship between cognitive/neuropsychological factors and car driving performance in older adults.

    Rudi De Raedt;Ingrid Ponjaert-Kristoffersen

  • Self-esteem reconsidered: Unstable self-esteem outperforms level of self-esteem as vulnerability marker for depression

    Erik Franck;Rudi De Raedt

  • Dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and Stroop performance: Tackling the lateralization

    Marie-Anne Vanderhasselt;Rudi De Raedt;Chris Baeken

  • The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on wellbeing and cognitive functioning of older adults.

    Sarah De Pue;Céline Gillebert;Eva Dierckx;Marie Anne Vanderhasselt

  • Cognitive control moderates the association between stress and rumination

    Evi De Lissnyder;Ernst H.W. Koster;Liesbet Goubert;Thomas Onraedt

  • Mood-congruent attention and memory bias in dysphoria: Exploring the coherence among information-processing biases.

    Ernst H.W. Koster;Rudi De Raedt;Lemke Leyman;Evi De Lissnyder

  • Reaction times and performance variability in normal aging, mild cognitive impairment, and Alzheimer's disease

    Ellen Gorus;Rudi De Raedt;Margaretha Lambert;Jean-Claude Lemper

  • Self-esteem and depression revisited: Implicit positive self-esteem in depressed patients?

    Rudi De Raedt;Rik Schacht;Erik Franck;Jan De Houwer

Frequent Co-Authors

Chris Baeken
Chris Baeken Ghent University
Ernst H. W. Koster
Ernst H. W. Koster Ghent University
Caroline Braet
Caroline Braet Ghent University
Gilles Pourtois
Gilles Pourtois Ghent University
Jan De Houwer
Jan De Houwer Ghent University
Andre R. Brunoni
Andre R. Brunoni Universidade de São Paulo
Simone Kühn
Simone Kühn Max Planck Institute for Human Development
Alexandre Heeren
Alexandre Heeren Université Catholique de Louvain
Daniele Marinazzo
Daniele Marinazzo Ghent University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing an online degree in psychology or counseling opens doors to a variety of fulfilling career pathways, especially for those interested in becoming a licensed therapist. The journey to licensure can differ depending on your location, education background, and professional goals.

For example, if you’re considering becoming a licensed therapist in Cleveland, you’ll need to complete a master’s degree in counseling, accumulate supervised clinical experience, and pass required exams. Aspiring therapists looking at opportunities in Colorado will want to understand the unique Colorado Springs licensed therapist education requirements.

Similar pathways exist in other cities, each with specific educational and licensing needs. If you intend to practice in Ohio, understanding the licensed therapist requirements in Columbus is essential for proper planning. Likewise, becoming a licensed therapist in Corpus Christi comes with its own set of procedures.

No matter your state, researching program accreditations and local licensure requirements is crucial. An online degree can provide the flexibility needed to meet these goals and successfully launch your psychology career.

Best Scientists Citing Rudi De Raedt

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles