World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 46 6405 5961 86 82 196 9016

Alexandre Heeren publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Alexandre Heeren between 2007 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Alexandre Heeren published across 20 years, from 2007 to 2026, averaging 12 papers a year. Output peaked at 20 publications in 2019. 17 of the 240 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2007 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 20. Peak 20 publications in 2019. 2007: 1 publication 2008: 1 publication 2009: 8 publications 2010: 6 publications 2011: 17 publications 2012: 11 publications 2013: 16 publications 2014: 18 publications 2015: 16 publications 2016: 12 publications 2017: 15 publications 2018: 13 publications 2019: 20 publications 2020: 19 publications 2021: 16 publications 2022: 14 publications 2023: 13 publications 2024: 7 publications 2025: 16 publications 2026: 1 publication
2007 2026

240 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Alexandre Heeren: publications per year, 2007 to 2026
Year Publications
2007 1
2008 1
2009 8
2010 6
2011 17
2012 11
2013 16
2014 18
2015 16
2016 12
2017 15
2018 13
2019 20
2020 19
2021 16
2022 14
2023 13
2024 7
2025 16
2026 1
Total 240
Download as CSV

Alexandre Heeren publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alexandre Heeren sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 191–200 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 196 publications — 68th percentile

68% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343 196
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Alexandre Heeren D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alexandre Heeren sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 46–47 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 46 D-Index — 45th percentile

45% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495 46
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Alexandre Heeren is affiliated with the Université Catholique de Louvain in Belgium. Their academic work spans multiple fields, primarily within psychology and neuroscience, focusing on experimental and cognitive psychology, cognitive neuroscience, clinical psychology, sociology, political science, and social psychology.

Their research covers several main topics including mental health research, functional brain connectivity studies, anxiety, depression, psychometrics, treatment, cognitive processes, child and adolescent psychosocial and emotional development, climate change communication and perception, behavioral health and interventions, and psychological well-being and life satisfaction.

Heeren has published extensively, with notable papers including:

  • On climate anxiety and the threat it may pose to daily life functioning and adaptation: a study among European and African French-speaking participants, 2022, Climatic Change
  • What do measures of self-report interoception measure? Insights from a systematic review, latent factor analysis, and network approach, 2022, Biological Psychology
  • On the Measurement of Climate Change Anxiety: French Validation of the Climate Anxiety Scale, 2022, Psychologica Belgica
  • A Network Approach to Parental Burnout, 2021, Digital Access to Libraries
  • Positive and negative urgency as a single coherent construct: Evidence from a large-scale network analysis in clinical and non-clinical samples, 2021, Journal of Personality

Frequent coauthors of Alexandre Heeren include:

  • M. Annelise Blanchard
  • Yorgo Hoebeke
  • Camille Mouguiama-Daouda
  • Alba Contreras
  • Isabelle Roskam

Their research has been published in several recurring venues such as:

  • Journal of Anxiety Disorders
  • PubMed
  • Arabixiv (OSF Preprints)
  • Comprehensive Psychiatry
  • Psychologica Belgica

Best Publications

  • Are we overpathologizing everyday life? A tenable blueprint for behavioral addiction research

    Joël Billieux;Adriano Schimmenti;Yasser Khazaal;Pierre Maurage

  • How can we conceptualize behavioural addiction without pathologizing common behaviours

    Daniel Kardefelt-Winther;Alexandre Heeren;Adriano Schimmenti;Antonius J. van Rooij

  • The effects of mindfulness on executive processes and autobiographical memory specificity

    Alexandre Heeren;Nady Van Broeck;Pierre Philippot

  • Social media and depression symptoms: A network perspective.

    George Aalbers;Richard J. McNally;Alexandre Heeren;Sanne de Wit

  • Improving Emotional Intelligence: A Systematic Review of Existing Work and Future Challenges:

    Ilios Kotsou;Ilios Kotsou;Moïra Mikolajczak;Alexandre Heeren;Jacques Grégoire

  • Attention bias modification for social anxiety: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

    Alexandre Heeren;Cristina Mogoașe;Pierre Philippot;Richard J. McNally

  • A Bayesian network analysis of posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms in adults reporting childhood sexual abuse.

    Richard J. McNally;Alexandre Heeren;Alexandre Heeren;Donald John Robinaugh

  • Attention training toward and away from threat in social phobia: effects on subjective, behavioral, and physiological measures of anxiety.

    Alexandre Heeren;Hannah Elizabeth Reese;Richard J. McNally;Pierre Philippot

  • Cross-cultural validity of the Five Facets Mindfulness Questionnaire : adaptation and validation in a French-speaking sample

    Alexandre Heeren;Céline Douilliez;Virginie Peschard;Laetitia Debrauwere

  • Commentary: A network theory of mental disorders.

    Payton J. Jones;Alexandre Heeren;Alexandre Heeren;Richard J. McNally

  • Changes in ruminative thinking mediate the clinical benefits of mindfulness : preliminary findings

    Alexandre Heeren;Pierre Philippot

  • An integrative network approach to social anxiety disorder: The complex dynamic interplay among attentional bias for threat, attentional control, and symptoms

    Alexandre Heeren;Alexandre Heeren;Richard J. McNally

  • Mapping network connectivity among symptoms of social anxiety and comorbid depression in people with social anxiety disorder

    Alexandre Heeren;Payton J. Jones;Richard J. McNally

  • Does attention bias modification improve attentional control? A double-blind randomized experiment with individuals with social anxiety disorder.

    Alexandre Heeren;Cristina Mogoase;Richard J. McNally;Anne Schmitz

  • The (neuro)cognitive mechanisms behind attention bias modification in anxiety : proposals based on theoretical accounts of attentional bias

    Alexandre Heeren;Rudi De Raedt;Ernst H. W. Koster;Pierre Philippot

  • How does attention training work in social phobia: disengagement from threat or re-engagement to non-threat?

    Alexandre Heeren;Laurent Lievens;Pierre Philippot

  • Unpacking Rumination and Executive Control: A Network Perspective:

    Emily E. Bernstein;Alexandre Heeren;Richard J. McNally

  • Tinnitus specifically alters the top-down executive control sub-component of attention: Evidence from the Attention Network Task.

    Alexandre Heeren;Pierre Maurage;Hélène Perrot;Anne De Volder

  • Disrupted regulation of social exclusion in alcohol-dependence : an fMRI Study

    P. Maurage;F. Joassin;M. Pesenti;P. Philippot

  • Impact of Anodal and Cathodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation over the Left Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex during Attention Bias Modification: An Eye-Tracking Study

    Alexandre Heeren;Chris Baeken;Marie-Anne Vanderhasselt;Pierre Philippot

  • How does attention training work in social phobia: Disengagement from threat or reengagement to non-threat? : In M. Rossignol (Chair), Cognitive processing of affective information in anxiety.

    Alexandre Heeren;Laurent Lievens;Pierre Philippot

  • Mapping network connectivity among symptoms of social anxiety and comorbid depression in people with social anxiety disorder

    Alexandre Heeren;Richard J. McNally

Frequent Co-Authors

Pierre Philippot
Pierre Philippot Université Catholique de Louvain
Pierre Maurage
Pierre Maurage Université Catholique de Louvain
Joël Billieux
Joël Billieux University of Lausanne
Richard J. McNally
Richard J. McNally Harvard University
Philippe de Timary
Philippe de Timary Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc
Adriano Schimmenti
Adriano Schimmenti Università degli Studi di Enna Kore
Yasser Khazaal
Yasser Khazaal University of Lausanne
Rudi De Raedt
Rudi De Raedt Ghent University
Moïra Mikolajczak
Moïra Mikolajczak Université Catholique de Louvain
Martial Van der Linden
Martial Van der Linden University of Geneva

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a degree in psychology opens doors to a wide variety of career paths, including the rewarding field of social work. Many prospective professionals wonder what type of education is required to become a social worker, as requirements vary from state to state.

For example, the degree needed to be a social worker in South Dakota typically starts with a bachelor’s degree in social work or a related field. In contrast, specific licensure or advanced study may be necessary for regions such as Tennessee and Texas.

If you’re considering this path, it's important to know the degree needed to be a social worker in Tennessee or the degree needed to be a social worker in Texas, as requirements can vary in coursework, supervised experience, and licensure exams.

Additionally, understanding social worker degree requirements in Utah highlights the value of obtaining specialized credentials. Many universities in the USA offer flexible online degrees in psychology and social work, making it easier than ever to advance your education and pursue a fulfilling career.

Best Scientists Citing Alexandre Heeren

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles