World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 57 4033 3718 55 52 316 12605

Pierre Maurage publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Pierre Maurage between 2003 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Pierre Maurage published across 23 years, from 2003 to 2025, averaging 15.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 37 publications in 2021. 33 of the 356 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2003 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 37. Peak 37 publications in 2021. 2003: 1 publication 2004: 3 publications 2005: 0 publications 2006: 1 publication 2007: 3 publications 2008: 10 publications 2009: 7 publications 2010: 2 publications 2011: 9 publications 2012: 13 publications 2013: 19 publications 2014: 23 publications 2015: 26 publications 2016: 15 publications 2017: 33 publications 2018: 21 publications 2019: 32 publications 2020: 25 publications 2021: 37 publications 2022: 19 publications 2023: 24 publications 2024: 16 publications 2025: 17 publications
2003 2025

356 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Pierre Maurage: publications per year, 2003 to 2025
Year Publications
2003 1
2004 3
2005 0
2006 1
2007 3
2008 10
2009 7
2010 2
2011 9
2012 13
2013 19
2014 23
2015 26
2016 15
2017 33
2018 21
2019 32
2020 25
2021 37
2022 19
2023 24
2024 16
2025 17
Total 356
Download as CSV

Pierre Maurage publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Pierre Maurage sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 311–320 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 316 publications — 89th percentile

89% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100 316
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Pierre Maurage D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Pierre Maurage sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 56–57 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 57 D-Index — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345 57
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Pierre Maurage is affiliated with the Université Catholique de Louvain in Belgium. Their research spans several key fields including psychology, neuroscience, and medicine, with a particular concentration on cognitive neuroscience, experimental and cognitive psychology, and clinical psychology.

The main topics addressed in Maurage's work include:

  • Anxiety, depression, psychometrics, treatment, and cognitive processes
  • Neural and behavioral psychology studies
  • Substance abuse treatment and outcomes
  • Mental health research topics
  • Behavioral health and interventions
  • Psychosomatic disorders and their treatments
  • Functional brain connectivity studies

The scientist has contributed to numerous publications, with frequent outputs in venues such as:

  • Addictive Behaviors
  • Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry
  • Psychopharmacology
  • Biological Psychology
  • Journal of Psychiatric Research

Some of the recent papers coauthored or related to their research interests include:

  • "COVID-19 pandemic lockdown and problematic eating behaviors in a student population," 2020, Journal of Behavioral Addictions
  • "Contribution of Time Estimation and Knowledge to Heartbeat Counting Task Performance under Original and Adapted Instructions," 2020, Biological Psychology
  • "Binge-Watching: What Do we Know So Far? A First Systematic Review of the Evidence," 2020, Current Addiction Reports
  • "A taxonomy of technology design features that promote potentially addictive online behaviours," 2023, Nature Reviews Psychology
  • "A heartfelt response to Zimprich et al. (2020), and Ainley et al. (2020)'s commentaries: Acknowledging issues with the HCT would benefit interoception research," 2020, Biological Psychology

Frequent collaborators include Arthur Pabst, Joël Billieux, Philippe de Timary, Zoé Bollen, and Fabien D'Hondt.

Maurage has also contributed to book publications, notably with Mardaga eBooks, where the work titled Le binge drinking chez les jeunes was published in 2021.

Best Publications

  • Can Disordered Mobile Phone Use Be Considered a Behavioral Addiction? An Update on Current Evidence and a Comprehensive Model for Future Research

    Joël Billieux;Joël Billieux;Pierre Maurage;Pierre Maurage;Olatz Lopez-Fernandez;Olatz Lopez-Fernandez;Daria J. Kuss

  • Are we overpathologizing everyday life? A tenable blueprint for behavioral addiction research

    Joël Billieux;Adriano Schimmenti;Yasser Khazaal;Pierre Maurage

  • How can we conceptualize behavioural addiction without pathologizing common behaviours

    Daniel Kardefelt-Winther;Alexandre Heeren;Adriano Schimmenti;Antonius J. van Rooij

  • Alexithymia and the Processing of Emotional Facial Expressions (EFEs): Systematic Review, Unanswered Questions and Further Perspectives

    Delphine Grynberg;Betty Chang;Olivier Corneille;Pierre Maurage

  • Interoceptive accuracy scores from the heartbeat counting task are problematic: Evidence from simple bivariate correlations.

    Giorgia Zamariola;Pierre Maurage;Olivier Luminet;Olivier Corneille

  • Is Dysfunctional Use of the Mobile Phone a Behavioural Addiction? Confronting Symptom-Based Versus Process-Based Approaches.

    Joël Billieux;Pierre Philippot;Cécile Schmid;Pierre Maurage

  • COVID-19 pandemic lockdown and problematic eating behaviors in a student population

    Valentin Flaudias;Sylvain Iceta;Sylvain Iceta;Oulmann Zerhouni;Rachel F. Rodgers;Rachel F. Rodgers

  • Dissociation between affective and cognitive empathy in alcoholism: a specific deficit for the emotional dimension.

    Pierre Maurage;Delphine Grynberg;Xavier Noël;Frédéric Joassin

  • The development of emotion recognition from facial expressions and non-linguistic vocalizations during childhood

    Georgia Chronaki;Georgia Chronaki;Julie A. Hadwin;Matthew Garner;Pierre Maurage

  • Cerebral effects of binge drinking: Respective influences of global alcohol intake and consumption pattern

    Pierre Maurage;Frédéric Joassin;Auriane Speth;Jessica Modave

  • Assessing binge-watching behaviors: Development and validation of the “Watching TV Series Motives” and “Binge-Watching Engagement and Symptoms” questionnaires

    Maèva Flayelle;Natale Canale;Claus Vögele;Laurent Karila

  • Latent deleterious effects of binge drinking over a short period of time revealed only by electrophysiological measures.

    Pierre Maurage;Mauro Pesenti;Pierre Philippot;Frédéric Joassin

  • Human gender differences in an emotional visual oddball task: an event-related potentials study.

    Salvatore Campanella;Mandy Rossignol;Sandrine Mejias;Frédéric Joassin

  • Binge drinking in adolescents: A review of neurophysiological and neuroimaging research

    Géraldine Petit;Pierre Maurage;Charles Kornreich;Paul Verbanck

  • Binge-Watching: What Do we Know So Far? A First Systematic Review of the Evidence

    Maèva Flayelle;Pierre Maurage;Kim Ridell Di Lorenzo;Claus Vögele

  • Impaired emotional facial expression decoding in alcoholism is also present for emotional prosody and body postures.

    Pierre Maurage;Salvatore Campanella;Pierre Philippot;Ian Charest

  • Toward a qualitative understanding of binge-watching behaviors: A focus group approach.

    Maèva Flayelle;Pierre Maurage;Joël Billieux

  • A taxonomy of technology design features that promote potentially addictive online behaviours

    Unknown

  • Cross-modal interactions between human faces and voices involved in person recognition

    Frederic Joassin;Mauro Pesenti;Pierre Maurage;Emilie E. Verreckt

  • Is the P300 deficit in alcoholism associated with early visual impairments (P100, N170)? An oddball paradigm.

    P Maurage;P Philippot;Paul Verbanck;Xavier Noël

  • Tinnitus specifically alters the top-down executive control sub-component of attention: Evidence from the Attention Network Task.

    Alexandre Heeren;Pierre Maurage;Hélène Perrot;Anne De Volder

Frequent Co-Authors

Joël Billieux
Joël Billieux University of Lausanne
Philippe de Timary
Philippe de Timary Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc
Pierre Philippot
Pierre Philippot Université Catholique de Louvain
Alexandre Heeren
Alexandre Heeren Université Catholique de Louvain
Salvatore Campanella
Salvatore Campanella Université Libre de Bruxelles
Olivier Luminet
Olivier Luminet Université Catholique de Louvain
Paul Verbanck
Paul Verbanck Université Libre de Bruxelles
Claus Vögele
Claus Vögele University of Luxembourg
Xavier Noël
Xavier Noël Université Libre de Bruxelles
Charles Kornreich
Charles Kornreich Université Libre de Bruxelles

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a degree in psychology opens doors to a wide range of online programs and career possibilities across the United States. Whether you’re interested in counseling, clinical work, human resources, or research, finding the right online program is crucial for your professional growth.

If you’re considering a program in the Southwest, check out the top psychology degrees in Colorado Springs for a blend of reputable schools and flexible learning options. For those seeking standout programs in the South, the top psychology degrees in Conway highlight strong academic support and diverse specializations.

The Mid-Atlantic region is home to many renowned programs, with the best psychology degree rankings in Fairfax offering insight into excellent faculty and robust online platforms. Florida is also a leader, with the top psychology degrees in Florida providing a range of fully online options tailored to varying career interests.

Researching these regional programs can help you find a flexible and accredited online degree that matches your career goals—whether you’re aiming for licensure, research roles, or private practice.

Best Scientists Citing Pierre Maurage

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles