H-Index & Metrics Best Publications

H-Index & Metrics

Discipline name H-index Citations Publications World Ranking National Ranking
Medicine D-index 115 Citations 142,087 288 World Ranking 1912 National Ranking 7

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Law
  • Health care
  • Internal medicine

His primary scientific interests are in MEDLINE, Evidence-based medicine, Health care, Randomized controlled trial and Family medicine. His research in MEDLINE intersects with topics in Psychological intervention, Quality, Research design, Medical education and Alternative medicine. His study in Psychological intervention is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Meta-Analysis as Topic and Systematic review.

He has researched Evidence-based medicine in several fields, including Quality of evidence, Grade system, Public relations, Health policy and Grading. His work carried out in the field of Randomized controlled trial brings together such families of science as Observational study, Statistics, Clinical trial, Relative risk and Publication bias. His work deals with themes such as Health services research, Interquartile range and CINAHL, which intersect with Family medicine.

His most cited work include:

  • The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (13036 citations)
  • GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations (8386 citations)
  • Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. (5176 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

His scientific interests lie mostly in Health care, MEDLINE, Nursing, Health policy and Systematic review. His work in Health care covers topics such as Psychological intervention which are related to areas like Family medicine and Randomized controlled trial. His study looks at the intersection of MEDLINE and topics like Alternative medicine with Peer review.

His Nursing research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Program evaluation and Process management. His Health policy study deals with Health services research intersecting with Health administration and Social policy. His study explores the link between Evidence-based medicine and topics such as Grading that cross with problems in Quality assurance.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Health care (27.44%)
  • MEDLINE (22.56%)
  • Nursing (18.29%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2013-2021)?

  • Health care (27.44%)
  • Evidence-based medicine (15.55%)
  • Medical education (13.11%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

The scientist’s investigation covers issues in Health care, Evidence-based medicine, Medical education, Psychological intervention and Public health. His biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Knowledge management, Critical thinking, Actuarial science and MEDLINE. Andrew D Oxman combines subjects such as Cost–benefit analysis and Cost sharing with his study of MEDLINE.

The various areas that Andrew D Oxman examines in his Evidence-based medicine study include Systematic review, Certainty, Resource, Health literacy and Process management. His Medical education research integrates issues from Developing country, Information and Communications Technology, Focus group and Critical appraisal. His research in Psychological intervention tackles topics such as Intervention which are related to areas like Peer review, Clinical trial, Randomized controlled trial and Family medicine.

Between 2013 and 2021, his most popular works were:

  • Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (4456 citations)
  • Interpreting results and drawing conclusions (403 citations)
  • GRADE Evidence to Decision (EtD) frameworks: a systematic and transparent approach to making well informed healthcare choices. 1: Introduction (389 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Law
  • Health care
  • Internal medicine

His main research concerns Health care, Evidence-based medicine, Systematic review, Psychological intervention and MEDLINE. His Health care study incorporates themes from Actuarial science and Resource. The subject of his Evidence-based medicine research is within the realm of Alternative medicine.

His research integrates issues of Intervention, Needs assessment, Organizational culture and Operations research in his study of Systematic review. His Psychological intervention study which covers Randomized controlled trial that intersects with Physical medicine and rehabilitation and Impact evaluation. His research in MEDLINE is mostly focused on Cochrane Library.

This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s body of work. If you have any feedback, you can contact us here.

Best Publications

The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials

Julian P T Higgins;Douglas G Altman;Peter C Gøtzsche;Peter Jüni.
BMJ (2011)

16260 Citations

GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations

Gordon H Guyatt;Andrew David Oxman;Gunn Elisabeth Vist;Regina Kunz.
BMJ (2008)

11463 Citations

Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement

D Moher;A Liberati;J Tetzlaff;D G Altman.
Revista Española de Nutrición Humana y Dietética (2014)

9753 Citations

Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations.

David Atkins;Dana Best;Peter A Briss;Martin Eccles.
BMJ (2004)

5176 Citations

GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence

Howard Balshem;Mark Helfand;Mark Helfand;Holger J. Schünemann;Andrew D. Oxman.
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology (2011)

4573 Citations

Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes

Noah Ivers;Gro Jamtvedt;Signe Flottorp;Jane M Young.
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (2012)

4487 Citations

GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction-GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables

Gordon Guyatt;Andrew D Oxman;Elie A Akl;Regina Kunz.
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology (2011)

4048 Citations

Changing Physician Performance: A Systematic Review of the Effect of Continuing Medical Education Strategies

DA Davis;MA Thomson;AD Oxman;RB Haynes.
JAMA (1995)

3772 Citations

Evidence-Based Medicine: A New Approach to Teaching the Practice of Medicine

Gordon Guyatt;John Cairns;David Churchill;Deborah Cook.
JAMA (1992)

3122 Citations

Closing the gap between research and practice: an overview of systematic reviews of interventions to promote the implementation of research findings

Lisa A Bero;Roberto Grilli;Jeremy M Grimshaw;Emma Harvey.
BMJ (1998)

2613 Citations

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Contact us

Best Scientists Citing Andrew D Oxman

Gordon H. Guyatt

Gordon H. Guyatt

McMaster University

Publications: 516

Holger J. Schünemann

Holger J. Schünemann

McMaster University

Publications: 389

Jeremy M. Grimshaw

Jeremy M. Grimshaw

Ottawa Hospital

Publications: 315

Elie A. Akl

Elie A. Akl

American University of Beirut

Publications: 311

Lehana Thabane

Lehana Thabane

McMaster University

Publications: 211

Peter Tugwell

Peter Tugwell

University of Ottawa

Publications: 203

Pablo Alonso-Coello

Pablo Alonso-Coello

Cochrane

Publications: 179

Sharon E. Straus

Sharon E. Straus

University of Toronto

Publications: 170

Michel Wensing

Michel Wensing

University Hospital Heidelberg

Publications: 160

John N. Lavis

John N. Lavis

McMaster University

Publications: 149

Christian Gluud

Christian Gluud

Copenhagen Trial Unit

Publications: 144

Deborah J. Cook

Deborah J. Cook

McMaster University

Publications: 140

Victor M. Montori

Victor M. Montori

Mayo Clinic

Publications: 139

Jonathan C. Craig

Jonathan C. Craig

Flinders University

Publications: 137

John P. A. Ioannidis

John P. A. Ioannidis

Stanford University

Publications: 134

Douglas G. Altman

Douglas G. Altman

University of Oxford

Publications: 134

Something went wrong. Please try again later.