World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
31
Citations
5138
World Ranking
9569
National Ranking
4045

Henry A. Buchtel publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Henry A. Buchtel sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 85 publications — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Henry A. Buchtel D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Henry A. Buchtel sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 31 D-Index — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2016 - Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA)

Overview

Henry A. Buchtel is affiliated with the University of Michigan-Ann Arbor in the United States. Their research spans multiple fields within medicine and neuroscience, focusing primarily on areas such as fibromyalgia, pain management, and neurophysiology.

The scientist's recent publications cover topics related to pain mechanisms and treatment, as well as functional brain connectivity and neuropharmacology. Notable papers include:

  • Greater Somatosensory Afference With Acupuncture Increases Primary Somatosensory Connectivity and Alleviates Fibromyalgia Pain via Insular γ-Aminobutyric Acid: A Randomized Neuroimaging Trial (2020, Arthritis & Rheumatology)
  • Temporal Summation but Not Expectations of Pain Relief Predict Response to Acupuncture Treatment in Fibromyalgia (2024, Journal of Pain)
  • The future of science publishing (2024, Cortex)
  • Methohexital - Induced lateralized periodic discharges during Wada test (2021, Clinical Neurophysiology Practice)

The core topics of their work include:

  • Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research
  • Pain Management and Placebo Effect
  • Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Acupuncture Treatment Research Studies
  • Epilepsy research and treatment
  • Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies

Henry A. Buchtel has collaborated frequently with a number of researchers, including:

  • Ishtiaq Mawla
  • Eric Ichesco
  • Steven E. Harte
  • Vitaly Napadow
  • Richard E. Harris

Their publications have appeared in these venues:

  • Arthritis & Rheumatology
  • Journal of Pain
  • Cortex
  • Clinical Neurophysiology Practice

Their work is situated within the main fields of Medicine and Neuroscience, with subfields including Psychiatry and Mental Health, Cognitive Neuroscience, Physiology, Complementary and Alternative Medicine, and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience.

Henry A. Buchtel was recognized as a Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA) in 2016.

Best Publications

  • Frontal lobe lesions in man cause difficulties in suppressing reflexive glances and in generating goal-directed saccades

    D. Guitton;Henry A. Buchtel;R. M. Douglas

  • Spatial compatibility and anatomical factors in simple and choice reaction time.

    G.P. Anzola;G. Bertoloni;H.A. Buchtel;G. Rizzolatti

  • Neuronal plasticity: historical roots and evolution of meaning

    G. Berlucchi;H. A. Buchtel

  • Positron emission tomographic scan investigations of Huntington's disease: Cerebral metabolic correlates of cognitive function

    Stanley Berent;Bruno Giordani;Shirley Lehtinen;Dorene S. Markel

  • Spatial attentional shifts: Implications for the role of polysensory mechanisms

    Henry A. Buchtel;Charles M. Butter

  • Hemispheric Superiority in Reaction Time to Faces: A Sex Difference

    G. Rizzolatti;H.A. Buchtel

  • Verbal fluency and positron emission tomographic mapping of regional cerebral glucose metabolism.

    Michael J. Boivin;Bruno Giordani;Stanley Berent;David A. Amato

  • Diffusion tensor imaging of normal-appearing white matter as biomarker for radiation-induced late delayed cognitive decline.

    Christopher H. Chapman;Vijaya Nagesh;Pia C. Sundgren;Henry Buchtel;Henry Buchtel

  • Serial Cognitive Testing in Temporal Lobe Epilepsy: Longitudinal Changes with Medical and Surgical Therapies

    Linda M. Selwa;Stanley Berent;Bruno Giordani;Thomas R. Henry

  • Spatial attentional shifts: further evidence for the role of polysensory mechanisms using visual and tactile stimuli.

    Charles M. Butter;Henry A. Buchtel;Richard Santucci

  • A preliminary report of short-term cognitive-behavioral group therapy for inpatients with personality disorders.

    Tamar Springer;Naomi E. Lohr;Henry A. Buchtel;Kenneth R. Silk

  • Diffusion tensor imaging predicts cognitive function change following partial brain radiotherapy for low-grade and benign tumors

    Christopher H. Chapman;Christopher H. Chapman;Tong Zhu;Mohamad Nazem-Zadeh;Yebin Tao

  • Presurgery expectations, postsurgery satisfaction, and psychosocial adjustment after epilepsy surgery.

    Ingrid Wheelock;Christopher Peterson;Henry A. Buchtel;Henry A. Buchtel

  • Cerebral hemispheric lateralization of cognitive deficits due to alcoholism

    M. Miglioli;H. A. Buchtel;T. Campanini;C. De Risio

  • Hemispheric differences in discriminative reaction time to facial expressions.

    Henry Buchtel;Francesca Campari;Carlo de Risio;Romanella Rota

  • Sodium methohexital (brevital) as an anesthetic in the Wada test.

    Henry A. Buchtel;Erasmo A. Passaro;Linda M. Selwa;John Deveikis

  • Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging as a biomarker for prediction of radiation-induced neurocognitive dysfunction.

    Yue Cao;Christina I. Tsien;Pia C. Sundgren;Vijaya Nagesh

  • Visual-learning deficits following cerebellar damage in rats.

    Henry A. Buchtel

  • Impairments in orienting to visual stimuli in monkeys following unilateral lesions of the superior sulcal polysensory cortex

    Karen E. Luh;Charles M. Butter;Henry A. Buchtel

  • Analysis of the Activity Evoked in the Cerebellar Cortex by Stimulation of the Visual Pathways

    H. A. Buchtel;G. Iosif;G. F. Marchesi;L. Provini

  • The conceptual nervous system

    D. O. Hebb;Henry A. Buchtel

Frequent Co-Authors

Giacomo Rizzolatti
Giacomo Rizzolatti University of Parma
Theodore S. Lawrence
Theodore S. Lawrence University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Giovanni Berlucchi
Giovanni Berlucchi University of Verona
Larry Junck
Larry Junck University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Ronald N. Kostoff
Ronald N. Kostoff Georgia Institute of Technology
Bruno Giordani
Bruno Giordani University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Thomas R. Henry
Thomas R. Henry University of Minnesota
Thomas L. Chenevert
Thomas L. Chenevert University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Stanley Berent
Stanley Berent University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Kenneth M. Adams
Kenneth M. Adams University of Michigan–Ann Arbor

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in neuroscience, a variety of online degree programs can support diverse career goals in mental health, research, and clinical practice. Many students start by exploring psychology degrees online, which provide a strong foundation in understanding human behavior and the brain. These programs are flexible and can often be completed at an affordable cost.

Some career pathways, like social work, offer accelerated routes. For example, 1 year msw programs online no bsw make it possible to enter the field quickly, even for those without a prior Bachelor of Social Work. This allows for faster entry into professional roles that impact community and mental health.

For advanced clinical careers, students may consider psyd programs usa that focus on psychology practice and assessment. Likewise, those interested in relationship and family dynamics may pursue accelerated online mft programs, enabling rapid qualification as a marriage and family therapist.

These flexible, online pathways can complement neuroscience study, giving graduates more career options and enabling a broader impact in health and human services.

Best Scientists Citing Henry A. Buchtel

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles