World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Political Science

D-Index
34
Citations
6015
World Ranking
838
National Ranking
448

Sarah E. Kreps publication distribution in Political Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Political Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sarah E. Kreps sits on this spectrum.

36–40 publications: 10 scientists 41–45 publications: 11 scientists 46–50 publications: 25 scientists 51–55 publications: 27 scientists 56–60 publications: 44 scientists 61–65 publications: 52 scientists 66–70 publications: 62 scientists 71–75 publications: 62 scientists 76–80 publications: 79 scientists 81–85 publications: 71 scientists 86–90 publications: 82 scientists 91–95 publications: 65 scientists 96–100 publications: 85 scientists 101–105 publications: 76 scientists 106–110 publications: 66 scientists 111–115 publications: 78 scientists 116–120 publications: 67 scientists 121–125 publications: 73 scientists 126–130 publications: 73 scientists 131–135 publications: 64 scientists 136–140 publications: 45 scientists 141–145 publications: 53 scientists 146–150 publications: 44 scientists 151–155 publications: 45 scientists 156–160 publications: 33 scientists 161–165 publications: 32 scientists 166–170 publications: 28 scientists 171–175 publications: 31 scientists 176–180 publications: 29 scientists 181–185 publications: 27 scientists 186–190 publications: 36 scientists 191–195 publications: 27 scientists 196–200 publications: 24 scientists 201–205 publications: 16 scientists 206–210 publications: 16 scientists 211–215 publications: 19 scientists 216–220 publications: 16 scientists 221–225 publications: 17 scientists 226–230 publications: 18 scientists 231–235 publications: 23 scientists 236–240 publications: 17 scientists 241–245 publications: 13 scientists 246–250 publications: 17 scientists 251–255 publications: 9 scientists 256–260 publications: 13 scientists 261–265 publications: 8 scientists 266–270 publications: 12 scientists 271–275 publications: 8 scientists 276–280 publications: 10 scientists 281–285 publications: 13 scientists 286–290 publications: 13 scientists 291–295 publications: 5 scientists 296–300 publications: 6 scientists 301–305 publications: 11 scientists 306–310 publications: 9 scientists 311–315 publications: 6 scientists 316–320 publications: 4 scientists 321–325 publications: 4 scientists 326–330 publications: 2 scientists 331–332 publications: 5 scientists 333+ publications: 97 scientists
36 publications 333+

This scientist: 122 publications — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 333 publications or more.

Sarah E. Kreps D-index placement in Political Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Political Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sarah E. Kreps sits on this spectrum.

20 D-Index: 76 scientists 21 D-Index: 79 scientists 22 D-Index: 84 scientists 23 D-Index: 68 scientists 24 D-Index: 88 scientists 25 D-Index: 82 scientists 26 D-Index: 76 scientists 27 D-Index: 75 scientists 28 D-Index: 99 scientists 29 D-Index: 96 scientists 30 D-Index: 96 scientists 31 D-Index: 81 scientists 32 D-Index: 86 scientists 33 D-Index: 81 scientists 34 D-Index: 84 scientists 35 D-Index: 72 scientists 36 D-Index: 58 scientists 37 D-Index: 53 scientists 38 D-Index: 48 scientists 39 D-Index: 40 scientists 40 D-Index: 40 scientists 41 D-Index: 32 scientists 42 D-Index: 26 scientists 43 D-Index: 25 scientists 44 D-Index: 33 scientists 45 D-Index: 33 scientists 46 D-Index: 17 scientists 47 D-Index: 21 scientists 48 D-Index: 22 scientists 49 D-Index: 18 scientists 50 D-Index: 19 scientists 51 D-Index: 19 scientists 52 D-Index: 15 scientists 53 D-Index: 14 scientists 54 D-Index: 10 scientists 55 D-Index: 13 scientists 56 D-Index: 9 scientists 57 D-Index: 11 scientists 58 D-Index: 12 scientists 59 D-Index: 10 scientists 60 D-Index: 5 scientists 61 D-Index: 7 scientists 62+ D-Index: 100 scientists
20 D-Index 62+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 62nd percentile

62% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 62 D-Index or more.

Overview

Sarah E. Kreps is affiliated with Cornell University in the United States and works primarily within the social sciences. Their research spans multiple subfields, including sociology and political science, health, political science and international relations, economics and econometrics, and communication.

The main topics covered in Sarah Kreps's work include:

  • Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
  • Misinformation and Its Impacts
  • SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
  • Social Media and Politics
  • COVID-19 Epidemiological Studies
  • Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
  • Media Influence and Politics

Recent notable publications by Sarah Kreps feature research on public health and political communication, including:

  • "Factors Associated With US Adults' Likelihood of Accepting COVID-19 Vaccination" (2020, JAMA Network Open)
  • "Model Uncertainty, Political Contestation, and Public Trust in Science: Evidence from the COVID-19 Pandemic" (2020, Science Advances)
  • "All the News That's Fit to Fabricate: AI-Generated Text as a Tool of Media Misinformation" (2020, Journal of Experimental Political Science)

Although not a direct publication of Sarah Kreps, the paper "COVID-19 vaccine acceptance and hesitancy in low- and middle-income countries" (2021, Nature Medicine), authored by Julio S. Solís Arce, is closely related to the dominant themes in Kreps's research domain.

Sarah Kreps has collaborated frequently with several scholars, including:

  • Douglas L. Kriner
  • John S. Brownstein
  • Paul Lushenko
  • Baobao Zhang
  • Nina McMurry

Regarding publication venues, Sarah Kreps has a significant presence in:

  • Harvard Dataverse
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • PLoS ONE
  • npj Vaccines
  • Vaccine

In addition to articles, Sarah Kreps has contributed to book publications. One identified work is titled "Social Media and International Relations," published in 2020 by Cambridge University Press.

Best Publications

  • COVID-19 vaccine acceptance and hesitancy in low- and middle-income countries.

    Julio S. Solís Arce;Shana S. Warren;Niccolò F. Meriggi;Alexandra Scacco

  • Factors Associated With US Adults' Likelihood of Accepting COVID-19 Vaccination.

    Sarah Kreps;Sandip Prasad;John S. Brownstein;John S. Brownstein;Yulin Hswen

  • Model uncertainty, political contestation, and public trust in science: Evidence from the COVID-19 pandemic

    S. E. Kreps;D. L. Kriner

  • Cadmium in the Environment: Sources, Mechanisms of Biotoxicity, and Biomarkers

    Françoise Pinot;Sarah E. Kreps;Maria Bachelet;Pierre Hainaut

  • Elite Consensus as a Determinant of Alliance Cohesion: Why Public Opinion Hardly Matters for NATO-led Operations in Afghanistan

    Sarah Kreps

  • The Foreign Policy Consequences of Trade: China’s Commercial Relations with Africa and Latin America, 1992–2006

    Gustavo A. Flores-Macías;Sarah E. Kreps

  • Agents of Destruction? Applying Principal-Agent Analysis to State-Sponsored Terrorism

    Daniel Byman;Sarah E. Kreps

  • Coalitions of Convenience: United States Military Interventions after the Cold War

    Sarah E. Kreps

  • All the News That’s Fit to Fabricate: AI-Generated Text as a Tool of Media Misinformation

    Sarah Kreps;R. Miles McCain;Miles Brundage

  • International law, military effectiveness, and public support for drone strikes

    Sarah E. Kreps;Geoffrey P. R. Wallace

  • Escalation firebreaks in the cyber, conventional, and nuclear domains: moving beyond effects-based logics

    Sarah Kreps;Jacquelyn Schneider

  • Separating Fact from Fiction in the Debate over Drone Proliferation

    Michael C. Horowitz;Sarah E. Kreps;Matthew Fuhrmann

  • Public attitudes toward COVID-19 vaccination: The role of vaccine attributes, incentives, and misinformation.

    Sarah Kreps;Nabarun Dasgupta;John S. Brownstein;Yulin Hswen

  • COVID-19 Vaccine Acceptance and Hesitancy in Low and Middle Income Countries, and Implications for Messaging

    Julio S Solis Arce;Shana S Warren;Niccolo F Meriggi;Alexandra Scacco

  • Americans' perceptions of privacy and surveillance in the COVID-19 pandemic.

    Baobao Zhang;Sarah E Kreps;Nina McMurry;R. Miles McCain

  • The Use of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles in Contemporary Conflict: A Legal and Ethical Analysis

    Sarah Kreps;John Kaag

  • Flying under the radar: A study of public attitudes towards unmanned aerial vehicles

    Sarah Kreps;Sarah Kreps

  • Borrowing Support for War: The Effect of War Finance on Public Attitudes toward Conflict

    Gustavo A. Flores-Macías;Sarah E. Kreps

  • Coalitions of Convenience

    Sarah E. Kreps

  • Drones: What Everyone Needs to Know®

    Sarah Kreps

  • The 2006 Lebanon War: Lessons Learned

    Sarah E. Kreps

  • When Does the Mission Determine the Coalition? The Logic of Multilateral Intervention and the Case of Afghanistan

    Sarah Kreps

  • Mechanisms of Morality: Sources of Support for Humanitarian Intervention

    Sarah Kreps;Sarah Maxey

  • The Relationship between US Adults' Misconceptions about COVID-19 Vaccines and Vaccination Preferences.

    Sarah E. Kreps;Jillian L. Goldfarb;John S. Brownstein;Douglas L. Kriner

  • The Ratification Premium: Hawks, Doves, and Arms Control

    Sarah E. Kreps;Elizabeth N. Saunders;Kenneth A. Schultz

  • Political Parties at War: A Study of American War Finance,

    Sarah E. Kreps

Frequent Co-Authors

Douglas L. Kriner
Douglas L. Kriner Cornell University
Dean Karlan
Dean Karlan Northwestern University
John S. Brownstein
John S. Brownstein Boston Children's Hospital
Michael Horowitz
Michael Horowitz University of Adelaide
Macartan Humphreys
Macartan Humphreys Social Science Research Center Berlin
Jacob N. Shapiro
Jacob N. Shapiro Princeton University
Kenneth A. Schultz
Kenneth A. Schultz Stanford University
Saad B. Omer
Saad B. Omer The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Jakob Svensson
Jakob Svensson Stockholm University
Basit Zafar
Basit Zafar University of Michigan–Ann Arbor

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Political Science opens doors to diverse academic and professional options. Many students pair their studies with degrees for history to build a robust understanding of society, politics, and cultural change. Interdisciplinary knowledge helps you adapt to evolving job markets and broad career demands.

For those seeking flexibility, the best online interdisciplinary studies degree options can provide broad skills across multiple fields, enhancing your qualifications in both public and private sectors. Advancing your expertise further through online MA in history programs can lead to specialized roles in research, education, or public policy.

In addition to traditional degrees, many Political Science students benefit from targeted certifications that can boost salary potential and job prospects. Consider exploring certificate programs that pay well for a fast, cost-effective way to add marketable skills to your resume. These pathways can help kickstart or advance your career in government, law, education, or business.

Best Scientists Citing Sarah E. Kreps

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles