D-Index & Metrics Best Publications
Research.com 2022 Rising Star of Science Award Badge

D-Index & Metrics D-index (Discipline H-index) only includes papers and citation values for an examined discipline in contrast to General H-index which accounts for publications across all disciplines.

Discipline name D-index D-index (Discipline H-index) only includes papers and citation values for an examined discipline in contrast to General H-index which accounts for publications across all disciplines. Citations Publications World Ranking National Ranking
Psychology D-index 34 Citations 9,002 96 World Ranking 6203 National Ranking 621
Rising Stars D-index 36 Citations 9,875 157 World Ranking 739 National Ranking 23

Research.com Recognitions

Awards & Achievements

2022 - Research.com Rising Star of Science Award

2020 - Frank Prize, University of Florida

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Social psychology
  • Statistics
  • Epistemology

Sander van der Linden mainly focuses on Perception, Social psychology, Public relations, Misinformation and Scientific consensus. His work on Risk perception as part of general Perception study is frequently connected to Metaphor and Global warming, therefore bridging the gap between diverse disciplines of science and establishing a new relationship between them. His work in Risk perception covers topics such as Affect which are related to areas like Conceptual model, Information processing and Structural equation modeling.

His work in the fields of Social psychology, such as Prosocial behavior, overlaps with other areas such as Variance. Other disciplines of study, such as Behavioural sciences, Political economy of climate change and Public opinion, are mixed together with his Public relations studies. Sander van der Linden combines subjects such as Fake news, Internet privacy and Blame with his study of Misinformation.

His most cited work include:

  • Using social and behavioural science to support COVID-19 pandemic response. (915 citations)
  • The social-psychological determinants of climate change risk perceptions: Towards a comprehensive model (273 citations)
  • The Scientific Consensus on Climate Change as a Gateway Belief: Experimental Evidence (250 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

His primary areas of investigation include Social psychology, Misinformation, Scientific consensus, Public relations and Perception. His Social psychology study which covers Risk perception that intersects with Environmental health. His Misinformation study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Fake news and Internet privacy.

His Scientific consensus study is associated with Global warming. His multidisciplinary approach integrates Public relations and Behavioural sciences in his work. His study in Affect is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Structural equation modeling and Information processing.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Social psychology (37.50%)
  • Misinformation (22.79%)
  • Scientific consensus (16.18%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2019-2021)?

  • Social psychology (37.50%)
  • Misinformation (22.79%)
  • Fake news (8.82%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

His primary areas of study are Social psychology, Misinformation, Fake news, Inoculation theory and Behavioural sciences. His research in the fields of Grandiosity overlaps with other disciplines such as Clinical trial. His research investigates the connection with Misinformation and areas like Clinical psychology which intersect with concerns in Psychological Theory and Memorization.

Behavioural sciences combines with fields such as Public relations, Environmental psychology, Climate change mitigation, Consumption and Officer in his work. His research integrates issues of Coping and Global health in his study of Public relations. His work investigates the relationship between Internet privacy and topics such as Source credibility that intersect with problems in Psychological science and Affect.

Between 2019 and 2021, his most popular works were:

  • Using social and behavioural science to support COVID-19 pandemic response. (915 citations)
  • Risk perceptions of COVID-19 around the world (236 citations)
  • Susceptibility to misinformation about COVID-19 around the world (70 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Social psychology
  • Statistics
  • Epistemology

His primary scientific interests are in Misinformation, Fake news, Inoculation theory, Social psychology and Ideology. Misinformation and Certainty are frequently intertwined in his study. The Political spectrum research Sander van der Linden does as part of his general Ideology study is frequently linked to other disciplines of science, such as Political economy, therefore creating a link between diverse domains of science.

His research is interdisciplinary, bridging the disciplines of Perception and Advertising. A large part of his Perception studies is devoted to Risk perception. The concepts of his Internet privacy study are interwoven with issues in Global health and Sample.

This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s body of work. If you have any feedback, you can contact us here.

Best Publications

Using social and behavioural science to support COVID-19 pandemic response.

Jay J. Van Bavel;Katherine Baicker;Paulo S. Boggio;Valerio Capraro.
Nature Human Behaviour (2020)

1545 Citations

Risk perceptions of COVID-19 around the world

Sarah Dryhurst;Claudia R. Schneider;John Kerr;Alexandra L. J. Freeman.
Journal of Risk Research (2020)

739 Citations

The social-psychological determinants of climate change risk perceptions: Towards a comprehensive model

Sander van der Linden.
Journal of Environmental Psychology (2015)

559 Citations

The Scientific Consensus on Climate Change as a Gateway Belief: Experimental Evidence

Sander L. van der Linden;Anthony A. Leiserowitz;Geoffrey D. Feinberg;Edward W. Maibach.
PLOS ONE (2015)

432 Citations

Inoculating the Public against Misinformation about Climate Change

Sander van der Linden;Anthony Leiserowitz;Seth Rosenthal;Edward Maibach.
Global challenges (Hoboken, NJ) (2017)

400 Citations

Susceptibility to misinformation about COVID-19 around the world

Jon Roozenbeek;Claudia R. Schneider;Sarah Dryhurst;John Kerr.
Royal Society Open Science (2020)

311 Citations

Improving Public Engagement With Climate Change Five “Best Practice” Insights From Psychological Science

Sander van der Linden;Edward Maibach;Anthony Leiserowitz.
Perspectives on Psychological Science (2015)

302 Citations

The conspiracy-effect: Exposure to conspiracy theories (about global warming) decreases pro-social behavior and science acceptance

Sander van der Linden.
Personality and Individual Differences (2015)

224 Citations

Fake news game confers psychological resistance against online misinformation

Jon Roozenbeek;Sander van der Linden.
Palgrave Communications (2019)

218 Citations

The fake news game: actively inoculating against the risk of misinformation

Jon Roozenbeek;Sander van der Linden.
Journal of Risk Research (2019)

212 Citations

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Contact us

Best Scientists Citing Sander van der Linden

Stephan Lewandowsky

Stephan Lewandowsky

University of Bristol

Publications: 40

Edward Maibach

Edward Maibach

George Mason University

Publications: 27

Anthony Leiserowitz

Anthony Leiserowitz

Yale University

Publications: 23

Ullrich K. H. Ecker

Ullrich K. H. Ecker

University of Western Australia

Publications: 15

Heidi J Larson

Heidi J Larson

University of London

Publications: 14

Jay J. Van Bavel

Jay J. Van Bavel

New York University

Publications: 14

Michael Siegrist

Michael Siegrist

ETH Zurich

Publications: 13

James N. Druckman

James N. Druckman

Northwestern University

Publications: 12

Karen M. Douglas

Karen M. Douglas

University of Kent

Publications: 12

W. J. Wouter Botzen

W. J. Wouter Botzen

Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam

Publications: 10

Linda Steg

Linda Steg

University of Groningen

Publications: 10

K. A. I. Nekaris

K. A. I. Nekaris

Oxford Brookes University

Publications: 10

Jennifer R. Marlon

Jennifer R. Marlon

Yale University

Publications: 9

David G. Rand

David G. Rand

MIT

Publications: 9

Lawrence C. Hamilton

Lawrence C. Hamilton

University of New Hampshire

Publications: 9

Nicholas Frank Pidgeon

Nicholas Frank Pidgeon

Cardiff University

Publications: 9

Trending Scientists

Mikael Johansson

Mikael Johansson

Royal Institute of Technology

Christopher J. Diorio

Christopher J. Diorio

University of Washington

Yinping Zhang

Yinping Zhang

Tsinghua University

Dirk Volkmer

Dirk Volkmer

University of Augsburg

Catherine J. Murphy

Catherine J. Murphy

University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

Shigeki Masunaga

Shigeki Masunaga

Yokohama National University

Huaqiang Cao

Huaqiang Cao

Tsinghua University

Yit-Tsong Chen

Yit-Tsong Chen

Academia Sinica

P.J. Maziasz

P.J. Maziasz

Oak Ridge National Laboratory

Scott A. Beatson

Scott A. Beatson

University of Queensland

Thilo Köhler

Thilo Köhler

University of Geneva

Chris H. Bridts

Chris H. Bridts

University of Antwerp

Mark S. Goldberg

Mark S. Goldberg

McGill University

Jürgen Finke

Jürgen Finke

University of Freiburg

Gary S. Rubin

Gary S. Rubin

University College London

Randall A. Kramer

Randall A. Kramer

Duke University

Something went wrong. Please try again later.